Application of single-drop microextraction coupled with gas chromatography for the determination of multiclass pesticides in vegetables with nitrogen phosphorus and electron capture detection

Facile and highly efficient three-phase single drop microextraction in-line coupled with capillary electrophoresis

A high-performance version of in-line, three-phase direct immersion-single drop microextraction (DI-SDME) coupled with capillary electrophoresis (CE) was demonstrated using a commercial CE instrument, and all the major and minor details were described to provide an easy-to-follow and user-friendly protocol. The excellent sample cleanup and enrichment power of this method was demonstrated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in human urine. The only preparation of urine samples was the addition of HCl to acidify the urine sample to pH 2. The acidic NSAIDs in the acidified urine sample were extracted into a basic acceptor drop covered with a thin organic layer attached to the inlet tip of a capillary immersed in the sample. A simple but powerful DI-SDME-CE method could be carried out automatically without any modification of the existing CE instrument. For improved performance, sample agitation and heating were employed by installing a microstirrer and a thermostating jacket in the sample tray. With 10 min of DI-SDME at 35°C with stirring, NSAIDs such as ketoprofen, ibuprofen, and naproxen in urine were enriched 340-970-fold with intraday and interday RSDs of 0.8-2.4% and 1.1-3.6%, respectively. The LODs obtained with in-line coupled CE/UV were 10-50 nM (2-10 µg/L). The performance of DI-SDME-CE/UV was also demonstrated by determining the naproxen level in human urine collected 24 h after taking a single oral dose of the drug. The spike recovery of naproxen from a single-point standard addition to the urine sample was 80%. Our high-performance three-phase DI-SDME-CE method is quite promising for the analysis of ionizable trace analytes in a complex sample matrix.

Influence of relevant parameters on the extraction efficiency and the stability of the microdrop in the single drop microextraction

Single drop microextraction technique uses microamounts of organic solvents. Simplicity, low cost, low environmental impact, compatibility with chromatographic systems as well as its applicability to different matrices are main advantages of single drop microextraction. This technique has become frequently used for the extraction of a broad scope of compounds for numerous analytical applications. This review provides an overview of the existing single drop microextraction modes of realisation and the main scope is devoted to the optimization of parameters influencing the efficiency. The state of the art is discussed on the basis of examples selected from representative application areas. Extraction parameters for toxic organic compounds extraction and microdrop stability were evaluated.

Direct immersion single drop micro-extraction method for multi-class pesticides analysis in mango using GC-MS

Due the negative effects of pesticides on environment and human health, more efficient and environmentally friendly methods are needed. In this sense, a simple, fast, free from memory effects and economical direct-immersion single drop micro-extraction (SDME) method and GC-MS for multi-class pesticides determination in mango samples was developed. Sample pre-treatment using ultrasound-assisted solvent extraction and factors affecting the SDME procedure (extractant solvent, drop volume, stirring rate, ionic strength, time, pH and temperature) were optimized using factorial experimental design. This method presented high sensitive (LOD: 0.14-169.20μgkg-1), acceptable precision (RSD: 0.7-19.1%), satisfactory recovery (69-119%) and high enrichment factors (20-722). Several obtained LOQs are below the MRLs established by the European Commission; therefore, the method could be applied for pesticides determination in routing analysis and custom laboratories. Moreover, this method has shown to be suitable for determination of some of the studied pesticides in lime, melon, papaya, banana, tomato, and lettuce.

Microextraction techniques for the determination of volatile and semivolatile organic compounds from plants: a review

Vegetables and fruits are necessary for human health, and traditional Chinese medicine that uses plant materials can cure diseases. Thus, understanding the composition of plant matrix has gained increased attention in recent years. Since plant matrix is very complex, the extraction, separation and quantitation of these chemicals are challenging. In this review we focus on the microextraction techniques used in the determination of volatile and semivolatile organic compounds (such as esters, alcohols, aldehydes, hydrocarbons, ketones, terpenes, sesquiterpene, phenols, acids, plant secondary metabolites and pesticides) from plants (e.g., fruits, vegetables, medicinal plants, tree leaves, etc.). These microextraction techniques include: solid phase microextraction (SPME), stir-bar sorptive extraction (SBSE), single drop microextraction (SDME), hollow fiber liquid phase microextraction (HF-LPME), dispersive liquid liquid microextraction (DLLME), and gas purge microsyringe extraction (GP-MSE). We have taken into consideration papers published from 2008 to the end of January 2013, and provided critical and interpretative review on these techniques, and formulated future trends in microextraction for the determination of volatile and semivolatile compounds from plants.

Mass spectrometry parameters optimization for the 46 multiclass pesticides determination in strawberries with gas chromatography ion-trap tandem mass spectrometry

Multiclass analysis method was optimized in order to analyze pesticides traces by gas chromatography with ion-trap and tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS). The influence of some analytical parameters on pesticide signal response was explored. Five ion trap mass spectrometry (IT-MS) operating parameters, including isolation time (IT), excitation voltage (EV), excitation time (ET), maximum excitation energy or "q" value (q), and isolation mass window (IMW) were numerically tested in order to maximize the instrument analytical signal response. For this, multiple linear regression was used in data analysis to evaluate the influence of the five parameters on the analytical response in the ion trap mass spectrometer and to predict its response. The assessment of the five parameters based on the regression equations substantially increased the sensitivity of IT-MS/MS in the MS/MS mode. The results obtained show that for most of the pesticides, these parameters have a strong influence on both signal response and detection limit. Using the optimized method, a multiclass pesticide analysis was performed for 46 pesticides in a strawberry matrix. Levels higher than the limit established for strawberries by the European Union were found in some samples.

Rapid and simple low density miniaturized homogeneous liquid-liquid extraction and gas chromatography/mass spectrometric determination of pesticide residues in sediment

A simple, rapid and environmentally friendly analytical methodology is developed for extraction of pesticides (diazinon, chlorpyrifos and trifluralin) from sediment samples based on a technique called low density miniaturized homogenous liquid-liquid extraction (LDMHLLE) prior gas chromatography mass spectrometry determination. The method based on homogeneous liquid-liquid extraction with methanol containing n-hexane as a solvent of lower density than water (n-hexane). After addition of water, n-hexane solvent immediately forms a distinct water immiscible phase at the top of the vial, which can be easily separated and injected to the GC/MS instrument for quantification. Acquisition was performed in the selected ion monitoring mode. The limits of detection were estimated for the individual pesticides as 3S(b) (three times of the standard deviation of baseline) of the measured chromatogram for pesticides. The proposed method is very fast, simple, and sensitive without any need for stirring and centrifugation and applied to real sediment samples, successfully.

Optimization of microwave-assisted extraction followed by RP-HPLC for the simultaneous determination of oleanolic acid and ursolic acid in the fruits of Chaenomeles sinensis

An optimized microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) method and an efficient HPLC analysis method were developed for fast extraction and simultaneous determination of oleanolic acid and ursolic acid in the fruit of Chaenomeles sinensis. The open vessel MAE process was optimized by using a central composite experimental design. The optimal conditions identified were microwave power 600 W, temperature 52 degrees C, solvent to material ratio 32 mL/g and extraction time 7 min. The results showed that MAE is a more rapid extraction method with higher yield and lower solvent consumption. The HPLC-photodiode array detection analysis method was validated to have good linearity, precision, reproduction and accuracy. Compared with conventional extraction and analysis methods, MAE-HPLC-photodiode array detection is a faster, convenient and appropriate method for determination of oleanolic acid and ursolic acid in the fruits of C. sinensis.

Determination of sulfonamides in swine muscle after salting-out assisted liquid extraction with acetonitrile coupled with back-extraction by a water/acetonitrile/dichloromethane ternary component system prior to high-performance liquid chromatography

A salting-out assisted liquid extraction coupled with back-extraction by a water/acetonitrile/dichloromethane ternary component system combined with high-performance liquid chromatography with diode-array detection (HPLC-DAD) was developed for the extraction and determination of sulfonamides in solid tissue samples. After the homogenization of the swine muscle with acetonitrile and salt-promoted partitioning, an aliquot of 1 mL of the acetonitrile extract containing a small amount of dichloromethane (250-400 microL) was alkalinized with diethylamine. The clear organic extract obtained by centrifugation was used as a donor phase and then a small amount of water (40-55 microL) could be used as an acceptor phase to back-extract the analytes in the water/acetonitrile/dichloromethane ternary component system. In the back-extraction procedure, after mixing and centrifuging, the sedimented phase would be water and could be withdrawn easily into a microsyringe and directly injected into the HPLC system. Under the optimal conditions, recoveries were determined for swine muscle fortified at 10 ng/g and quantification was achieved by matrix-matched calibration. The calibration curves of five sulfonamides showed linearity with the coefficient of estimation above 0.998. Relative recoveries for the analytes were all from 96.5 to 109.2% with relative standard deviation of 2.7-4.0%. Preconcentration factors ranged from 16.8 to 30.6 for 1 mL of the acetonitrile extract. Limits of detection ranged from 0.2 to 1.0 ng/g.

Method validation and comparison of acetonitrile and acetone extraction for the analysis of 169 pesticides in soya grain by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

An acetonitrile-based extraction method for the analysis of 169 pesticides in soya grain, using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) in the positive and negative electrospray ionization (ESI) mode, has been optimized and validated. This method has been compared with our earlier published acetone-based extraction method, as part of a comprehensive study of both extraction methods, in combination with various gas chromatography-(tandem) mass spectrometry [GC-MS(/MS)] and LC-MS/MS techniques, using different detection modes. Linearity of calibration curves, instrument limits of detection (LODs) and matrix effects were evaluated by preparing standards in solvent and in the two soya matrix extracts from acetone and acetonitrile extractions, at seven levels, with six replicate injections per level. Limits of detection were calculated based on practically realized repeatability relative standard deviations (RSDs), rather than based on (extrapolated) signal/noise ratios. Accuracies (as % recoveries), precision (as repeatability of recovery experiments) and method limits of quantification (LOQs) were compared. The acetonitrile method consists of the extraction of a 2-g sample with 20 mL of acetonitrile (containing 1% acetic acid), followed by a partitioning step with magnesium sulphate and a subsequent buffering step with sodium acetate. After mixing an aliquot with methanol, the extract can be injected directly into the LC-MS/MS system, without any cleanup. Cleanup hardly improved selectivity and appeared to have minor changes of the matrix effect, as was earlier noticed for the acetone method. Good linearity of the calibration curves was obtained over the range from 0.1 or 0.25 to 10 ng mL(-1), with r(2)>or=0.99. Instrument LOD values generally varied from 0.1 to 0.25 ng mL(-1), for both methods. Matrix effects were not significant or negligible for nearly all pesticides. Recoveries were in the range 70-120%, with RSD Collapse

Key Words Collapse

MESH Headings

• Acetone/chemistry
• Acetonitriles/chemistry
• Calibration
• Chromatography, Liquid/methods
• Pesticide Residues/analysis
• Pesticides/analysis
• Plant Extracts/chemistry
• Reproducibility of Results
• Seeds/chemistry
• Glycine max/chemistry
• Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Ionara R Pizzutti Chemistry Department, Federal University of Santa Maria, Center of Research and Analysis of Residues and Contaminants, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
André de Kok
Maurice Hiemstra
Cristine Wickert
Osmar D Prestes

Collapse