System maps for retention of small neutral compounds on a superficially porous particle column in reversed-phase liquid chromatography

Guidelines for descriptor assignments for the solvation parameter model by separation techniques

The solvation parameter model uses six compound descriptors to model equilibrium properties in biphasic systems formally defined as excess molar refraction, E, dipolarity/polarizability, S, overall hydrogen-bond acidity, A, overall hydrogen-bond basicity, B, McGowan's characteristic volume, V, and the gas-liquid partition constant on hexadecane at 25 °C, L. The V descriptor can be assigned from structure and the E descriptor for compounds liquid at 20 °C can be calculated from its refractive index and characteristic volume. The E descriptor for compounds solid at 20 °C and the S, A, B, and L descriptors are assigned from experimental properties traditionally obtained by chromatographic, liquid-liquid partition, and solubility measurements. Here I report an efficient experimental design using the Solver method for the accurate assignment of descriptors for neutral compounds that simultaneously minimizes laboratory resources. This multi-technique approach requires 3 retention factor measurements in a 60 °C temperature range per compound on four columns by gas chromatography, 3 retention factor measurements in a 30 % (v/v) acetonitrile composition range per compound on two columns by reversed-phase liquid chromatography, and eight partition constant measurements by liquid-liquid partition in totally organic and aqueous biphasic systems for a total of 26 experimental measurements. The accuracy of the descriptor assignments was validated by comparison with the values in the Wayne State University (WSU) descriptor database taken as the best estimate of the true descriptor values. The E, S, A, B and L descriptors were assigned simultaneously by the Solver method using the above approach without significant bias and with an average absolute deviation (AAD) of 0.054, 0.018, 0.015, 0.013, and 0.040, respectively, compared with the WSU database values, corresponding to a relative absolute average deviation in percent (RAAD) of 7.2, 1.9, 3.6, 5.1, and 0.84 %, respectively, for 32 varied compounds. This streamlined approach represents a significant improvement on earlier single-technique approaches used as the starting point for the development of the multi-technique approach. For compounds of variable hydrogen-bond basicity modifications to the multi-technique approach were implemented while maintaining the same number of experimental measurements. Acceptable descriptor assignments for B/B° were obtained for compounds liquid at 20 °C for which the E descriptor was available by calculation. For solid compounds at 20 °C the E and B/B° descriptors are restricted to qualitative application where approximate values may be acceptable.

Selectivity comparison of acetonitrile-methanol-water ternary mobile phases on an octadecylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase

The solvation parameter model was used in this study to investigate various intermolecular interactions that influence retention on the standard C18 stationary phase for the solvent system acetonitrile:methanol (ACN:MeOH, 1:1). In comparison to the organic mobile phase modifiers acetonitrile, acetone, methanol, 2-propanol, and tetrahydrofuran, the solvent strength for the ACN:MeOH (1:1) solvent system was evaluated. To facilitate the interpretation of various intermolecular interactions that contribute to retention on a standard C18 stationary phase for the solvent system ACN:MeOH (1:1), system maps were constructed and compared with those of acetone, tetrahydrofuran, acetonitrile, 2-propanol, and methanol. The solvation parameter models were constructed for the ternary solvent system ACN:MeOH (1:1)-water, and in the models constructed, the coefficient of determination values were from 0.998 to 0.999, the Fisher statistic values for the models were from 1687 to 4015, and the standard error of the estimate values ranged from 0.022 to 0.029. The solvent system ACN:MeOH (1:1) has retention properties more similar to methanol than acetonitrile, indicating methanol's influence is more dominant.

Unique selectivity of tetrahydrofuran-2-propanol-water ternary mobile phases on a superficially porous particle column in reversed-phase liquid chromatography

Three mixed mobile phase organic modifiers, tetrahydrofuran: 2-propanol 1:1 (v/v), tetrahydrofuran: 2-propanol: 1:3 (v/v), and tetrahydrofuran: 2-propanol: 3:1 (v/v) were studied at 20-70% (v/v) total organic solvent compositions. The solvent strength parameters for the three mixed organic modifiers and system properties were compared to those of more established binary solvent systems, acetonitrile-water and methanol-water. To interpret intermolecular interactions responsible for retention for the three mixed mobile phase organic modifiers, system maps were constructed and compared with acetonitrile and methanol. Three mixed organic mobile phase modifiers on one stationary phase chemistry (Kinetex C18) provide different selectivity than the more established acetonitrile and methanol mobile phase modifiers on the same stationary phase (Kinetex C18) as well as different stationary phase chemistries (Kinetex Biphenyl, Kinetex Phenyl-Hexyl, Kinetex F5, Kinetex XB-C18, and Kinetex EVO C18). The solvation parameter models for all three mixed mobile phase systems the coefficient of determination ranged from 0.991 to 0.999, the Fisher statistic from 338 to 1850, and the standard error of the estimate ranged from 0.024 to 0.097.

Retention properties of acetone-water mobile phases on a biphenylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase in reversed-phase liquid chromatography

The solvation parameter model system constants and retention factors were used to interpret retention properties of 39 calibration compounds on a biphenylsiloxane-bonded stationary phase (Kinetex Biphenyl) for acetone-water binary mobile phase systems containing 30-70% (v/v). Variation in system constants, phase ratios, and retention factors of acetone-water binary mobile phases systems were compared with more commonly used acetonitrile and methanol mobile phase systems. Retention properties of acetone mobile phases on a Kinetex Biphenyl column were more similar to that of acetonitrile than methanol mobile phases except with respect to selectivity equivalency. Importantly, selectivity differences arising between acetone and acetonitrile systems (the lower hydrogen-bond basicity of acetone-water mobile phases and differences in hydrogen-bond acidity, cavity formation and dispersion interactions) could be exploited in reversed-phase liquid chromatography method development on a Kinetex Biphenyl stationary phase. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Solvation properties of acetone-water mobile phases in reversed-phase liquid chromatography

The solvation parameter model is used for the selectivity evaluation of siloxane-bonded reversed-phase columns with mobile phases containing from 20-70 % (v/v) acetone-water. System constants determined at 10 % (v/v) increments of acetone solvent were utilized for the construction of system maps and correlation diagrams on five columns with different stationary phase chemistry; superficially porous octadecylsiloxane-bonded silica (Kinetex C18), electrostatic-shielded octadecylsiloxane-bonded silica (Luna Omega PS C18, diisobutyloctadecyl-bonded silica(Kinetex XB-C18), phenylhexyl-bonded silica (Kinetex Phenyl-Hexyl) and octylsiloxane-bonded silica (Kinetex C8). For all columns and acetone-water compositions the calibration n = 34 to 39 had a range for the coefficient of determination from 0.988 to 0.998, Fisher statistic from 277 to 1551 and a standard error of the estimate from 0.024 to 0.097. A comparison of the system constants for acetonitrile and methanol compositions for the same separation conditions confirms that the general solvation properties of acetone mobiles phases are more similar to that of acetonitrile than methanol and that method transfer should not be difficult.

Solvation parameter model: Tutorial on its application to separation systems for neutral compounds

The solvation parameter model affords a useful tool to model distribution properties of neutral compounds in biphasic separation systems. Common applications include column characterization and method development in gas chromatography; reversed-phase, micellar and hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography; supercritical fluid chromatography; and micellar electrokinetic chromatography. The characterization of the distribution properties of liquid-liquid partition systems is another major application of this model. This tutorial is aimed at establishing good practices for the application of the model to separation systems. Suitable experimental protocols to determine system constants by multiple linear regression analysis and descriptors by the Solver method are presented; statistical tools to evaluate model quality are discussed; and model-specific data analysis tools based on system maps and correlation diagrams are described.