[Ocular Trauma Score comparison with open globe receiving early or late care attention]

Epidemiology and prognosis factors in open globe injuries in the Federal District of Brazil

OBJECTIVE

To identify the epidemiological profile and prognostic factors of open globe injuries that require emergency surgical treatment.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SUBJECTS

Patients with OGI who underwent publicly funded emergency surgical treatment in the Federal District from 2014 to 2018.

METHODS

Data were collected by reviewing electronic medical records through a questionnaire and tabulated. The statistical analysis was performed in SPSS Statistics 26.0.0.0 (p ≤ 0.05).

RESULTS

A total of 359 records were included, corresponding to 336 eyes of 334 patients (294 males and 40 females). The average age was 32.7 years. The affected eye was the right eye in 165 cases, the left eye in 166 cases, and both eyes in 3 cases. The average time between injury and hospitalization was 75.7 h, and the time between injury and surgery averaged 173.7 h. The injury types were as follows: 197 penetrating; 109 rupture; 19 IOFB; 11 perforating. The injuries were in the following zones: 181 zone I; 82 zone II; 70 zone III. The OTS grades were as follows: 57 were classified as grade 1; 101 were grade 2; 142 were grade 3; 28 were grade 4; and 8 were 5. The most commonly performed surgeries were corneal suture, corneoscleral suture, and evisceration. The most common clinical features were traumatic cataract, herniated iris and hyphema. The following were risk factors for poor prognosis: zone III, time between trauma and surgery > 72 h, rupture injury, retinal detachment, disorganization of the eyeball, endophthalmitis, uveal prolapse, OTS classification 1 or 2, and low initial visual acuity. The following factors predicted a good prognosis: initial VA > 1/200, penetrating injury, OTS 4 and zone II.

CONCLUSIONS

The high frequency of many of these factors may explain the high rate of severe visual loss found. Injury localization in zone II was identified as a previously unrecognized protective factor against severe visual loss.

Factors affecting final functional outcomes in open-globe injuries and use of ocular trauma score as a predictive tool in Nepalese population

BACKGROUND

Open globe injury (OGI) is one of the most devastating form of ocular trauma. The aim of the study is to identify the epidemiology and predict visual outcomes in traumatic open globe injuries using ocular trauma score (OTS) and correlate with final visual acuity (VA) at 3 months.

METHODS

Patients older than 5 years, presenting to B.P. Koirala Lions Centre for Ophthalmic Studies (BPKLCOS) from March 2016- March 2017 with OGI that met inclusion criteria were evaluated. Patient profile, nature and cause of injury, and time to presentation were recorded. Patients were managed accordingly and followed up to 3 months. An OTS score for each patient was calculated and raw scores were categorized accordingly. The VA after 3 months were compared to the predicted OTS values.

RESULTS

Seventy-three eyes of 72 patients were examined. 76 % were male, and the mean age was 26.17 years (median, 23.5 years). The mean time from injury to presentation was < 6 hours (30 patients, 41 %). Thirty-seven eyes (51 %) had zone I trauma, followed by twenty eyes (27 %) with zone II, and sixteen eyes (22 %) with zone III trauma. Sixty-five patients (90 %) were managed surgically, and fifty (68 %) received intravitreal antibiotics with steroid. When compared, the projected VA as per OTS were able to predict actual final visual outcomes in 60 % of the eyes with OGI of various zones.

CONCLUSIONS

OTS can be an accurate predictive tool for final visual acuity even with a short follow up period of 3 months; with poor presenting visual acuity, delayed presentation, posterior zones of injury, need for intravitreal injections, endophthalmitis, and globe rupture associated with poorer prognosis.

Application of pediatric ocular trauma score in pediatric open globe injuries

AIM

To evaluate the predictive value of pediatric penetrating ocular trauma score (POTS) on the visual outcome in children with open globe injury.

METHODS

A retrospective study in 90 children (60 males and 30 females) aged 1-15y (average, 7.48±2.86y) with penetrating ocular trauma was performed. Each patient's POTS was calculated. The effects of POTS on final visual acuity (FVA) were examined. Correlation between factors affecting POTS and the FVA was established.

RESULTS

All patients presented with single-eye trauma. The follow-up time was 3-21mo (average, 10.23±3.54mo). Among the 90 cases of penetrating wounds, 71 eyes (78.89%) were injured in Zone I (wound involvement limited to the cornea, including the corneoscleral limbus), 17 eyes (18.89%) were injured in Zone II (wound involving the sclera and no more posterior than 5 mm from the corneoscleral limbus), and 2 eyes (2.22%) were injured in Zone III (wound involvement posterior to the anterior 5 mm of the sclera). Analysis of POTS and FVA showed important correlation between them (r=0.414, P=0.000). Initial visual acuity (P=0.00), age (P=0.02), injury location (P=0.002), traumatic cataract (P=0.00), vitreous hemorrhage (P=0.027), retinal detachment (P=0.003), and endophthalmitis (P=0.03) were found to be statistically significant factors for the FVA outcome.

CONCLUSION

Ocular trauma presents serious consequences and poor prognosis in children. The POTS may be a reliable prognostic tool in children with open globe injury.

Posterior Segment Intraocular Foreign Body: Extraction Surgical Techniques, Timing, and Indications for Vitrectomy

Ocular penetrating injury with Intraocular Foreign Body (IOFB) is a common form of ocular injury. Several techniques to remove IOFB have been reported by different authors. The aim of this publication is to review different timing and surgical techniques related to the extraction of IOFB. Material and Methods. A PubMed search on “Extraction of Intraocular Foreign Body,” “Timing for Surgery Intraocular Foreign Body,” and “Surgical Technique Intraocular Foreign Body” was made. Results. Potential advantages of immediate and delayed IOFB removal have been reported with different results. Several techniques to remove IOFB have been reported by different authors with good results. Conclusion. The most important factor at the time to perform IOFB extraction is the experience of the surgeon.