Hierro intravenoso

Two case reports of desensitization in patients with hypersensitivity to iron

BACKGROUND

Iron deficiency anemia is a disease that can significantly compromise a patient's quality of life. Desensitization is a safe and effective treatment option for iron-deficient anemic patients who require intravenous iron despite their hypersensitivity to iron. This report describes a safe desensitization protocol for patients with iron hypersensitivity who require iron treatment for their clinical improvement.

CASE PRESENTATION

Two patients of 20 and 46-year-old diagnosed with secondary iron deficiency anemia hipermenorreas and a clinical history of fail treatment with oral iron, who presented a reaction of the anaphylactic type while they receive iron parenteral sucrose. Therefore, the patients were treated with the desensitization protocol applied for patients with hypersensitivity to iron.

CONCLUSION

Iron deficiency anemia is a disease that can significantly compromise the quality of life of patients. The desensitization protocol for patients with hypersensitivity to iron is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with a history of allergy to intravenous iron. This case report shows the usefulness to use the desensitization protocol for patients with hypersensitivity to iron.

[The multidisciplinary approach is useful for optimising preoperative haemoglobin in colorectal cancer surgery]

INTRODUCTION

Optimising haemoglobin (Hb) levels less than 13 g/dl in the preoperative period can reduce the transfusion rate. With this aim, we developed a multidisciplinary protocol in our hospital for the treatment of patients proposed for colorectal cancer surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

A study was conducted on 437 patients who had surgery performed for colorectal cancer in the period 2005-2009. The data recorded were: demographic data, Hb and iron metabolism (Fe) at the time of diagnosis, Hb on the day of the surgery and on discharge, tumour location, preoperative adjuvant treatment (chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy), tumour stage (TNM), iron treatment, transfusion rate, and complications at 30 days. Patients were classified into Group A; Hb < 13 g/dl and/or abnormal Fe metabolism, and Group B; Hb > 13 g/dl and/or normal Fe metabolism.

RESULTS

Of the total, 53.3% were in Group B and were treated with Fe; 73.6% intravenous (IV), and the rest oral. The mean dose of IV Fe was 867 mg. The mean intraindividual difference between the Hb on the day of surgery and at the initial value, increased by 0.6g/dl in Group A, while it decreased by 0.8 g/dl in Group B. The mean intraindividual difference between the Hb at discharge and the diagnosis decreased by 0.4 g/dl in Group A compared to 2.5 g/dl in Group B. The overall transfusion rate was 8.6%. No statistically significant differences were observed in complications.

CONCLUSIONS

A multidisciplinary and early treatment of colorectal cancer enables patients with a low haemoglobin (Group A) to be optimised, as well as achieving a lower transfusion rate.