Estenosis anastomóticas benignas en la cirugía radical del cáncer de recto. Resultados del tratamiento con dilatación hidrostática

Role of endoscopic interventions and electroincision in benign anastomotic strictures following colorectal surgery

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The anastomotic strictures are one of the most common colorectal surgery complications, and various endoscopic techniques have been defined. Balloon dilation is the most well-known and the simplest procedure. In this article, we aimed to present our series of endoscopic interventions and electroincision management for anastomotic strictures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The files of 59 patients, who underwent colorectal surgery between January 2010 and September 2017 in our hospital and were diagnosed during the follow-up with anastomotic stricture, were analyzed. The outcomes of endoscopic interventions such as balloon dilation and electroincision were compared and reported.

RESULTS

The mean age of the 59 patients included in the study was 59.5±16.26 years. The primary operative indications were colorectal cancer in 46, inflammatory bowel disease in 7, diverticulum in 5, and penetrating trauma in one patient. Single- or multiple-balloon dilations were successful in 48 patients. Electroincision was performed in 11 patients because of the balloon dilation failure. None of the patients needed a secondary surgery. During the mean 33.75 months of the follow-up, the stricture recurred in seven patients who had undergone balloon dilation. Repeated balloon dilation was successful in these patients without any need for an additional surgical intervention.

CONCLUSION

Balloon dilation can be performed safely as the primary treatment option, because of its easy access and noninvasive application. Electroincision is also a safe and effective endoscopic technique that can be preferred especially when the balloon dilation fails.

Preventing complications in colorectal anastomosis: results of a randomized controlled trial using bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement for circular stapler

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic complications, including leaks, stenoses, and bleeding, cause considerable mortality and morbidity after colorectal surgery.

OBJETIVE

The purpose of this work was to evaluate the effectiveness of bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement in reducing colorectal anastomotic complications.

DESIGN

This was a prospective randomized clinical study.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted at a university hospital within a specialized colorectal unit.

PATIENTS

Patients undergoing left colon resection for a benign or malignant condition were eligible. A total of 302 patients participated, including 154 control subjects and 148 with reinforcement.

INTERVENTION

Patients were prospectively randomly assigned to reinforcement of circular stapled anastomosis with a bioabsorbable device versus stapled circular anastomosis without reinforcement.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary end point was the rate of pooled incidences of anastomotic complications (leakage, bleeding, or stenosis). Secondary outcomes were the rate of reoperations and the length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar between both groups. Intention-to-treat analysis revealed that there were no significant differences in the pooled incidences of anastomotic complications (p = 0.821). Regarding individual complications, we did not observe statistical differences between groups, including leakage (6.6% vs 4.8%; p = 0.518), hemorrhage (1.4% vs 1.3%; p = 0.431), or stenosis (2.9% vs 6.8%; p = 0.128). Again, no significant differences were observed in length of stay (7 days; p = 0.242) or rate of reoperation (7.3% vs 9.6%; p = 0.490). A patient (0.3%) in the control group died.

LIMITATIONS

Sample size calculation was performed including all 3 of the complications, which may render it underpowered to detect differences regarding a specific complication. Anastomoses located within 5 cm from the anal verge were excluded from the study.

CONCLUSIONS

The results obtained show that bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement in a colorectal anastomosis >5 cm from the anal verge does not reduce the rate of pooled anastomotic complications (ie, leaks, bleeding, or stenosis).

Balloon dilatation of benign rectal anastomotic strictures -- a review

BACKGROUND

The occurrence of anastomotic stricture at the level of the rectum gives rise to three broad therapeutic options, namely major pelvic and abdominal revisional surgery, faecal diversion (stoma), or local revision by transanal approaches (including endoscopic and fluoroscopic). This article updates the current evidence and focuses on the results of the balloon dilatation technique.

METHODS

A Medline search was carried out using the search terms (dilatation OR dilatation) AND (stricture OR strictures OR stenosis OR stenotic) AND (rectum OR rectal). In an effort to lessen publication bias, articles included at least 10 patients who were consecutively referred for treatment.

RESULTS/CONCLUSION

This review would suggest that probably relatively short strictures have been chosen for balloon dilatation and that the results have had a very low major morbidity (0.45%) and mortality (0%) rate.