[Evaluation of three-dimensional endoanal endosonography of perianal fistulas and correlation with surgical findings]

Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound to assess the validity of Goodsall's Rule and the Midline Rule in predicting the path of perianal fistula-in-ano and the location of the internal opening

BACKGROUND

Correct identification of the internal opening is essential in the management of perianal fistulae. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of Goodsall's Law and the Midline Rule in predicting the path of perianal fistula-in-ano and the location of the internal opening using 3-dimensional endoanal ultrasound.

METHODS

An observational study including patients diagnosed with fistula-in-ano, at our institution from January 2006 to December 2020 was performed. Location and distance from the anal verge of the external opening, internal opening, and the path of the fistulous tract were recorded during physical examination and endoanal ultrasound. Goodsall's and Midline rules were applied to all fistulae according to the location of the external opening. The location of the internal opening as predicted by either rule was then compared to the real location of the internal opening identified during endoanal ultrasound examination.

RESULTS

Nine hundred and nine patients [657 (72.3%) males, mean age 50.78 (49.84-51.72) years] were included. 665 (73.2%) of fistulae were transsphinteric. Concordance between predicted internal opening site and the true internal opening location was 0.601 (good match) for Goodsall's rule, and 0.416 (moderate match) for the Midline rule. Goodsall's rule proved to be more predictive in the anterior plane (p < 0.001). Both rules were more likely to make a correct diagnosis in posterior fistulae located 4.5-7.5 mm from the anal verge.

CONCLUSIONS

Both Midline and Goodsall's rules are highly predictive of the course of fistula tracts located in the posterior plane, and are lower for anterior located fistulae, female patients and when the external opening is located further from the anal verge.

Sphincter damage during fistulotomy for perianal fistulae and its relationship with faecal incontinence

Background

The length of sphincter which can be divided during fistulotomy for perianal fistula is unclear. The aim was to quantify sphincter damage during fistulotomy and determine the relationship between such damage with symptoms and severity of faecal incontinence and long-term quality of life (QOL).

Methods

A prospective cohort study was performed over a 2-year period. Patients with intersphincteric and mid to low transsphincteric perianal fistulas without risk factors for faecal incontinence were scheduled for fistulotomy. All patients underwent 3D endoanal ultrasound (3D-EAUS) pre-operatively and 8 weeks postoperatively. Measurements were taken of pre- and postoperative anal sphincter involvement and division. Anal continence was assessed using the Jorge-Wexner scale and QOL scores pre, 6 and 12 months postoperatively.

Results

Forty-nine patients were selected. A strong correlation between pre- and postoperative measurements was found p < 0.001. A median length of 41% of the external anal sphincter and 32% of the internal anal sphincter was divided during fistulotomy. Significant differences in mild symptoms of anal continence were found with increasing length of external anal sphincter division. But there was no significant deterioration in continence, soiling, or quality of life scores at the 1-year follow-up. Division of over two-thirds of the external anal sphincter was associated with the highest incontinence rates.

Conclusions

3D-EAUS is a valuable tool for quantifying the extent of sphincter involvement pre- and postoperatively. Post-fistulotomy faecal incontinence is mild and increases with increasing length of sphincter division but does not affect long-term quality of life.

Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound is accurate and reproducible in determining type and height of anal fistulas

AIM

Surgical treatment of high anal fistulas is associated with the potential risk of faecal incontinence and recurrence. The primary aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound (3D-EAUS) in the assessment of height and type of anal fistulas, compared to the intra-operative findings (gold standard). The secondary aim was to evaluate the inter-observer reproducibility of 3D-EAUS.

METHOD

The study design was a prospective analysis of retrospective data. 299 patients (202 men), mean age 45.3 years, who underwent surgery for anal fistulas, were included. All patients were preoperatively assessed by 3D-EAUS. Two readers independently reviewed the volumes to determine the type and height of fistulas. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, proportion of agreements and Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ) were calculated for both examiners. Ultrasound findings were compared with intra-operative data (reference standard), evaluated blindly by the surgeons.

RESULTS

At surgery, 201 (67%) were transsphincteric, 49 (16%) suprasphincteric, 47 (16%) intersphincteric and two (1%) extrasphincteric fistulas. Intra-operatively, 177 (59%) were low and 122 (41%) high fistulas. The overall accuracy of 3D-EAUS was 91% for fistula type (271/299 fistulas: 97% transsphincteric, 100% intersphincteric, 57% suprasphincteric, 0% extrasphincteric) and 92% for fistula height (275/299 fistulas: 80% high and 100% low). Both readers reported very good agreement with surgery in the assessment of fistula type (proportion of agreement 0.88, κ = 0.89) and height (proportion of agreement 0.90, κ = 0.91).

CONCLUSIONS

3D-EAUS is an accurate and reproducible modality for the assessment of type and height of anal fistulas.

Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound for diagnosis of perianal fistulas: Reliable and objective technique

AIM: To evaluate accuracy of three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound (3D-EAUS) as compared to 2D-EAUS and physical examination (PE) in diagnosis of perianal fistulas and correlate with intraoperative findings.

METHODS: A prospective observational consecutive study was performed with patients included over a two years period. All patients were studied and operated on by the Colorectal Unit surgeons. The inclusion criteria were patients over 18, diagnosed with a criptoglandular perianal fistula. The PE, 2D-EAUS and 3D-EAUS was performed preoperatively by the same colorectal surgeon at the outpatient clinic prior to surgery and the fistula anatomy was defined and they were classified in intersphincteric, high or low transsphincteric, suprasphincteric and extrasphincteric. Special attention was paid to the presence of a secondary tract, the location of the internal opening (IO) and the site of external opening. The results of these different examinations were compared to the intraoperative findings. Data regarding location of the IO, primary tract, secondary tract, and the presence of abscesses or cavities was analysed.

RESULTS: Seventy patients with a mean age of 47 years (range 21-77), 51 male were included. Low transsphincteric fistulas were the most frequent type found (33, 47.1%) followed by high transsphincteric (24, 34.3%) and intersphincteric fistulas (13, 18.6%). There are no significant differences between the number of IO diagnosed by the different techniques employed and surgery (P > 0.05) and, there is a good concordance between intraoperative findings and the 2D-EAUS (k = 0.67) and 3D-EAUS (k = 0.75) for the diagnosis of the primary tract. The ROC curves for the diagnosis of transsphincteric fistulas show that both ultrasound techniques are adequate for the diagnosis of low transsphincteric fistulas, 3D-EAUS is superior for the diagnosis of high transsphincteric fistulas and PE is weak for the diagnosis of both types.

CONCLUSION: 3D-EAUS shows a higher accuracy than 2D-EAUS for assessing height of primary tract in transsphincteric fistulas. Both techniques show a good concordance with intraoperative finding for diagnosis of primary tracts.

Methods for preoperative assessment of anal fistula

Anal fistula is one of the most common perianal diseases, and methods for its preoperative assessment are diverse. Traditional methods include physical examination, probing, Goodsall's law, methylene blue test, and so on. Although traditional methods play a role, their accuracy for complex anal fistulas is low. Therefore, their application must be combined with other methods. Fistulography fails to depict the relationship of the fistula to the sphincter complex, and computed tomography lacks specificity to distinguish between fistula and surrounding muscle tissue. Both methods are rarely used now. Magnetic resonance imaging and three-dimensional anorectal endosonography have become routine preoperative examinations and play an important role for guiding precise surgery. However, they also have their own shortcomings. In this paper, we will summarize a variety of methods for preoperative assessment of anal fistula.

Quantifying the extent of fistulotomy. How much sphincter can we safely divide? A three-dimensional endosonographic study

PURPOSE

To quantify the longitudinal division of the internal anal sphincter (IAS) and external anal sphincter (EAS) after fistulotomy using three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound (3D-EAUS) and correlate the results with postoperative faecal incontinence.

METHODS

A prospective, consecutive study was performed from December 2008 to October 2010. All patients underwent 3D-EAUS before and 8 weeks after surgery. Thirty-six patients with simple perianal fistula were included. Patients with an intersphincteric or low transphincteric fistula (<66% sphincter involved) without risk factors for incontinence underwent fistulotomy. The outcome measures were the longitudinal extent of division of the IAS and EAS in relation to total sphincter length and continence (Jorge and Wexner scores).

RESULTS

One-year follow-up revealed a 0% recurrence rate. There was a strong correlation between preoperative 3D-EAUS measurement of fistula height with intraoperative and postoperative 3D-EAUS measurement of IAS and EAS division (p < 0.001). The relationship between the level of EAS division and faecal incontinence showed a significant difference in incontinence rates between fistulotomies limited to the lower two thirds of the EAS and those above this level. Five patients (13.9%) had worse anal continence after surgery, although this was mild in all patients (<3/20 Jorge and Wexner scale). There was no significant difference in continence scores before and after surgery (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients without risk factors, division of the EAS during fistulotomy limited to the lower two thirds of the EAS is associated with excellent continence and cure rates.