Complicaciones después de una pancreaticoduodenectomía

Cross-sectional imaging after pancreatic surgery: The dialogue between the radiologist and the surgeon

Pancreatic surgery is nowadays considered one of the most complex surgical approaches and not unscathed from complications. After the surgical procedure, cross-sectional imaging is considered the non-invasive reference standard to detect early and late compilations, and consequently to address patients to the best management possible. Contras-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) should be considered the most important and useful imaging technique to evaluate the surgical site. Thanks to its speed, contrast, and spatial resolution, it can help reach the final diagnosis with high accuracy. On the other hand, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) should be considered as a second-line imaging approach, especially for the evaluation of biliary findings and late complications. In both cases, the radiologist should be aware of protocols and what to look at, to create a robust dialogue with the surgeon and outline a fitted treatment for each patient.

Clinical outcomes and costs of the use of fibrin sealant in pancreaticojejunal anastomosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective analysis study

Objectives

The benefits of using a fibrin sealant to reinforce the pancreaticojejunal anastomosis are still contentious, a fact that justifies the study of its effects on clinical outcomes and costs of pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Methods

Study of 62 consecutive patients submitted to pancreaticoduodenectomy, divided into two groups of 31 patients each: GWS = group with sealant and GWOS = group without sealant that were compared according to demographic, clinical, laboratory aspects, the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), according to the definition of the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula, updated in 2016, and its postoperative complications categorized according to the Clavien classification, as well as hospital costs evaluated by the absorption costing method (with the exception of those related to medications).

Results

The groups were homogeneous and there were no significant differences in the postoperative clinical course or in the indicators of hospital care between them. Hard texture of pancreatic tissue was the only protective factor against the development of POPF (RR = 0.29 (95%CI:0,12–0,68); p = 0.005). Moreover, hospital costs were higher in GWS than in GWOS (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

The use of fibrin sealant to reinforce pancreaticojejunal anastomosis did not improve the clinical and healthcare outcomes and, in addition, increased hospital costs.

•

Pancreaticoduodenectomy is the treatment of choice for resectable tumors of the pancreato-duodenal confluence.

•

Morbidity rates remain high ranging between 30% and 50%.

•

Pancreatic fistula is the most feared post pancreatic surgery complication.

•

Studies on the effects of using fibrin sealant in pancreatic surgery are scarce and controversial.

Role of drain amylase levels assay and routinary postoperative day 3 abdominal CT scan in prevention of complications and management of surgical drains after pancreaticoduodenectomy

To asses drains amylase (DA) cut-offs for the risk of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) and define the optimal timing of drains removal based on daily DA assay and abdominal CT scan finding after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). Different algorithms able to identify patients at higher risk of POPF and to assess the optimal time for drains removal after PD have been proposed. The most accurate DA cut-offs in the assessment of the risk of clinically relevant POPF were retrospectively identified. Data from a prospective trial for optimal timing of drains removal were analyzed. Then, to validate the cut-offs identified in the first phase, they were applied to the patients enrolled in the prospective trial. Patients with POD1 DA ≥ 666 U/L were at higher risk of clinically relevant POPF (p 0.0001). POD3 DA value ≥ 252 U/L predicted 88% of clinical relevant fistulas. POD3 DA level ≥ 207 U/L was able to predict 68% of biliary fistulas. Patients with abdominal collection ≥ 5 cm, showed a significantly higher rate (60% vs. 23%, p < 0.001) of biliary fistula. Timing of drains removal did not influence complications. Drains amylase levels predict clinically relevant POPF. Drains should be maintained up to POD3; in case of POD1 DA levels < 666 U/L and POD3 DA levels < 252 U/L drains could be removed. In case of POD3 DA levels, ≥ 207 the routine use of abdominal CT scan in the same day could be justified to detect collections ≥ 5 cm and maintain drains beyond the POD3.

Outcomes of an enhanced recovery after surgery programme for pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has demonstrated in colorectal surgery a reduction in morbidity and length of stay without compromising security. Experience with ERAS programs in pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is still limited. The aims of this study were first to evaluate the applicability of an ERAS program for PD patients in our hospital, and second to analyze the postoperative results.

METHODS

A retrospective study using a prospectively maintained database identified 41 consecutive PD included in an ERAS program. Key elements studied were early removal of tubes and drainages, early oral feeding and early mobilization. Variables studied were mortality, morbidity, perioperative data, length of stay, re-interventions and inpatient readmission. This group of patients was compared with an historic control group of 44 PD patients with a standard postoperative management.

RESULTS

A total of 85 pancreatoduodenectomies were analyzed (41 patients in the ERAS group, and 44 patients in the control group. General mortality was 2.4% (2 patients) belonging to the control group. There were no statistical differences in mortality, length of stay in intensive care, reoperationss, and readmissions. ERAS group had a lower morbidity rate than the control group (32 vs. 48%; P=.072), as well as a lower length of stay (14.2 vs. 18.7 days). All the key ERAS proposed elements were achieved.

CONCLUSIONS

ERAS programs may be implemented safely in pancreaticoduodenectomy. They may reduce the length of stay, unifying perioperative care and diminishing clinical variability and hospital costs.

Enteric reconstruction of pancreatic stump following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a review of the literature

Techniques for reconstruction of pancreatic stump with gastrointestinal tract following pancreaticoduodenectomy are closely related to postoperative complications, mortality and quality of life. In order to reduce postoperative complications, particularly pancreatic fistula, many modifications and new surgical techniques have been proposed to replace the traditional pancreaticojejunostomy and pancreaticogastrostomy. The objective of this review, based on large prospective randomized trials and meta-analyses, is to evaluate the different techniques of enteric reconstruction of pancreatic stump following pancreaticoduodenectomy, including: invagination pancreaticojejunostomy, binding pancreaticojejunostomy, duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy, Roux-en-Y pancreaticojejunostomy, and pancreaticogastrostomy, so as to provide a comprehensive comparison of these techniques and to assess of their roles and effectiveness.