[Laparoscopic fundoplication results in the treatment of the non-gastrointestinal symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux]

Surgical Treatment for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review

Importance

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is a prevalent disease that is usually treated with diet, lifestyle modifications, and proton pump inhibitor therapy. However, nearly 10% to 30% of patients do not achieve adequate acid suppression even with high doses of proton pump inhibitors. For these patients with resistant disease, fundoplication may be recommended but the success rate of fundoplication surgery on laryngopharyngeal symptoms and findings remains uncertain.

Objective

To determine whether fundoplication is associated with control of signs and symptoms in patients with LPR.

Evidence Review

A literature search was conducted on PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline to identify studies published between 1990 and 2018 about the efficacy of fundoplication on clinical outcomes of LPR. Three investigators screened publications for eligibility and exclusion based on predetermined criteria. Study design, patient characteristics, diagnostic method, exclusion criteria, treatment characteristics, follow-up, and quality of the outcome assessment were evaluated.

Findings

Of the 266 studies identified, 34 met the inclusion criteria, accounting for 2190 patients with LPR (1270 women and 920 men; mean [SD] age at the time of surgery, 49.3 [6.3] years). A weighted mean of 83.0% of patients (95% CI, 79.7%-86.3%) experienced improvement and a weighted mean of 67.0% of patients (95% CI, 64.1%-69.9%) experienced a disappearance of symptoms, but there is a high level of methodological heterogeneity among studies according to diagnostic method, exclusion criteria, and outcomes used to assess the efficacy of fundoplication. A pH study without impedance study was used in most studies but with various inclusion criteria. According to results of an a priori assessment, the clinical outcomes used were overall poor, excluding many symptoms and findings associated with LPR.

Conclusion and Relevance

The reported studies of fundoplication in LPR disease have important heterogeneity in method of diagnosis, exclusion criteria, symptoms, and signs assessed as therapeutic outcomes; therefore, this systematic review was nonconclusive regarding whether surgery for LPR disease is associated with effective control of sight and symptoms. Otolaryngologists, gastroenterologists, and surgeons must establish a diagnostic criterion standard, clear indications for surgery, and future clinical outcomes to precisely assess the effectiveness of treatment.

Anti-reflux surgery for controlling respiratory symptoms of gastro-esophageal reflux disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients have a higher prevalence of airway symptoms, such as chronic cough, wheezing, and hoarseness. The therapeutic management of patients with these symptoms is controversial. Therefore, this study aims to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the efficacy of anti-reflux surgery for controlling respiratory symptoms related to GERD. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. Extraction of the data concerning proportions of participants who were not free of respiratory symptoms related to GERD (cough, wheezing, hoarseness) or not substantially improved at follow-ups (failure to cure) was performed. Of the 3,424 initially screened articles, 68 studies were included for systematic review and 61 were included for meta-analysis, with a cumulative sample size of 3,869 patients. Of all the included patients, after anti-reflux surgery, the general symptoms improvement was 80% (95% CI 75.2-84%). The numbers needed to harm (NNH) and the numbers needed to treat (NNT) were 15.21 and 1.23, respectively. Of the included patients, 83.4% (95% CI 78.3-87.5%) patients reported improvement in cough symptoms after surgery. For the wheezing symptom, 71.5% (95% CI 62.9-78.8%) reported improvement after surgery. Moreover, surgery presented better results in improving respiratory symptoms than medical therapy (risk difference: -0.46; 95% CI -0.77, -0.16). Physicians should strongly consider surgical anti-reflux procedures for controlling respiratory symptoms in GERD patients after proper patient selection. Anti-reflux surgery has shown high efficacy in improving respiratory symptoms related to GERD, even when compared to medical therapy.

The impact of laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery on quality of life: do patients with atypical symptoms benefit?

INTRODUCTION

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) may manifest atypically as cough, hoarseness or difficulty breathing. However, it is difficult to diagnostically establish a cause-and-effect between atypical symptoms and GERD. In addition, the benefit of laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery (LARS) in patients with laryngopharyngeal manifestations of GERD are not well characterized. We report the largest series reported to date assessing operative and quality of life (QOL) outcomes after LARS in patients experiencing extraesophageal manifestations of GERD and discuss recommendations for this patient population.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients with extraesophageal symptoms and pathologic reflux that underwent LARS between February 2012 and July 2019 was conducted. Inclusion criteria consisted of patients with atypical manifestations of GERD as defined by preoperative survey in addition to physiological diagnosis of pathological reflux. Patient QOL outcomes was analyzed using four validated instruments: the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), Laryngopharyngeal Reflux QOL, Swallowing QOL (SWAL), and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQOL) surveys.

RESULTS

420 patients (24% male, 76% female) with a mean age of 61.7 ± 13.0 years and BMI of 28.6 ± 5.0 kg/m² were included in this study. Thirty-day wound (0.2%) and non-wound (6.74%) related complication rates were recorded in addition to thirty-day readmission rate (2.6%). Patients reported significant improvements in laryngopharyngeal symptoms at mean follow-up of 18.9 ± 16.6 months post LARS reflected by results of four QOL instruments (RSI - 64%, LPR - 75%, GERD-HRQOL - 80%, SWAL + 18%). The majority of patients demonstrated complete resolution of symptoms upon subsequent encounters with 68% of patients reporting no atypical extraesophageal manifestations during follow-up survey (difficulty breathing - 86%, chronic cough - 81%, hoarseness - 66%, globus sensation - 68%) and 68% of patients no longer taking anti-reflux medication. Seventy-two percent of patients reported being satisfied with their symptom control at latest follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

In appropriately selected candidates with atypical GERD symptomatology and objective diagnosis of GERD LARS may afford significant QOL improvements with minimal operative or long-term morbidity.