Chronic idiopathic anal pain. Results of a diagnostic-therapeutic protocol in a colorectal referral unit

Optimal management of functional anorectal pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Functional anorectal is idiopathic and characterised by severe and potentially intractable anorectal pain. The current review aims to appraise available evidence for the management of functional anorectal pain and synthesise reported outcomes using network meta-analysis. PubMed, CENTRAL and Web of Science databases were searched for studies investigating treatments for functional anorectal pain. The primary outcome was clinical improvement of symptoms and the secondary outcome was pain scores reported during follow-up. A Bayesian network meta-analysis of interventions was performed. A total of 1538 patients were included from 27 studies. Intramuscular injection of triamcinolone, sacral neuromodulation (SNM) and biofeedback were most likely to be associated with improvement in symptoms [SUCRA (triamcinolone) = 0.79; SUCRA (SNM) = 0.74; SUCRA (Biofeedback) = 0.61]. Electrogalvanic stimulation (EGS), injection of botulinum toxin A and topical glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) were less likely to produce clinical improvement [SUCRA (EGS) = 0.53; SUCRA (Botox) = 0.30; SUCRA (GTN) = 0.27]. SNM and biofeedback were associated with the largest reductions in pain scores [mean difference, range (SNM) = 4.6-8.2; (Biofeedback) = 4.6-6]. As biofeedback is noninvasive and may address underlying pathophysiology, it is a reasonable first-line choice in patients with high resting pressures or defecation symptoms. In patients with normal resting pressures, SNM or EGS are additional options. Although SNM is more likely to produce a meaningful response compared to EGS, EGS is noninvasive and has less morbidity. Whilst triamcinolone injection is associated with symptomatic clinical improvement, the magnitude of pain reduction is less.

Proctalgia Syndromes: Update in Diagnosis and Management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Functional anorectal pain syndromes are a neglected yet often disabling clinical entity resulting in significant economic and psychological burden to the patient. The aim of this review is to update the practicing gastroenterologist/coloproctologist on the diagnosis and management of these complicated disorders.

RECENT FINDINGS

The updated Rome foundation diagnostic criteria (Rome IV) for functional anorectal pain subgroups chronic proctalgia (levator ani syndrome and unspecified functional anorectal pain) and acute proctalgia (proctalgia fugax) on the basis of symptom duration and digital rectal examination findings. Chronic proctalgia is thought to be secondary to paradoxical pelvic floor contraction in many patients and biofeedback to improve the defecation effort has proven effective for over 90% in the short term. Unfortunately, management of proctalgia fugax remains challenging and treatment outcomes modest at best. A number of therapies to relax the pelvic floor may be employed to improve symptoms in functional anorectal pain syndromes; however, only biofeedback to improve defaecatory dynamics in patients with levator ani syndrome has proven effectiveness in a randomized setting. Further investigation of treatment approaches in proctalgia fugax is required.

Descending perineum syndrome: a review of the presentation, diagnosis, and management

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Defecatory dysfunction is a relatively common and challenging problem among women and one that practicing pelvic reconstructive surgeons and gynecologists deal with frequently. A subset of defecatory dysfunction includes obstructed defecation, which can have multiple causes, one of which is descending perineum syndrome (DPS).

METHODS

A literature search was performed to identify the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of DPS.

RESULTS

Although DPS has been described in the literature for many decades, it is still uncommonly diagnosed and difficult to manage. A high index of suspicion combined with physical examination consistent with excess perineal descent, patient symptom assessment, and imaging in the form of defecography are required for the diagnosis to be accurately made. Primary management options of DPS include conservative measures consisting of bowel regimens and biofeedback. Although various surgical approaches have been described in limited case series, no compelling evidence can be demonstrated at this point to support surgical intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Knowledge of DPS is essential for the practicing pelvic reconstructive surgeon to make a timely diagnosis, avoid harmful treatments, and initiate therapy early on.