Percutaneous Coronary Interventions for Chronic Total Occlusions: More Benefit for the Patient or for the Interventionist's Ego?

Validation of the newly introduced CASTLE Score for predicting successful CTO recanalization

Background

The new EuroCTO CASTLE Score was validated against the widely adopted Japanese Multicenter CTO Registry (J-CTO) score in predicting technical success in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary chronic total occlusions (CTO).

Methods

A total of 463 patients treated by CTO PCI were included in a retrospective analysis. Result: The mean CASTLE score was 2.23 ± 1.1 and J-CTO score was 2.84 ± 1.0. The overall technical success rate was 83.2%. At 30 days follow up, a primary composite safety endpoint showed a low proportion of stent thrombosis (0.2%) and re-hospitalization (0.4%). Moreover, an improvement of clinical symptoms was found in 83% of patients. Receiver operating characteristic analysis (ROC) demonstrated a comparable overall discriminatory performance in predicting technical outcome: CASTLE score, area under the ROC curve (AUC) 0.668, 95% CI: 0.606–0.730; J-CTO score AUC 0.692, 95% CI: 0.631–0.752; Comparison of AUCs: p = 0.324. Those findings were even consistent in more complex procedures CASTLE Score ≥ 4 and J-CTO score ≥ 3: CASTLE Score AUC 0.514, 95% CI: 0.409–0.619; J-CTO score, AUC 0.617, 95% CI: 0.493–0.741; Comparison of AUCs: p = 0.211. Furthermore, increasing score values are accompanied by a longer examination and fluoroscopy time, more contrast medium and a higher dose area product.

Conclusion

Compared to the widely accepted J-CTO score, the new introduced EuroCTO CASTLE score demonstrated a comparable overall discriminatory performance in predicting technical outcomes in CTO PCI.

Impact of chronic kidney disease in chronic total occlusion management and clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND

Data on the impact of chronic kidney disease (CKD) on clinical outcomes in chronic total occlusion (CTO) patients is scarce, and the optimal treatment strategy for this population is not well established. This study aims to compare differences in CTO management and long-term clinical outcomes, including all-cause and cardiac mortalities, according to baseline glomerular filtration rate (GFR).

METHODS

All patients with at least one CTO diagnosed in our center between 2010 and 2014 were included. Demographic and clinical data were registered. All-cause and cardiac mortalities were assessed during a median follow-up of 4.03 years (IQR 2.6-4.8). Clinical outcomes were compared between patients with CKD (GFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m²) and without CKD (GFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m²).

RESULTS

A total of 1248 patients (67.3 ± 10.9 years; 32% CKD) were identified. CKD patients were older and had a higher prevalence of hypertension, type 2 diabetes, peripheral arterial disease, and severe left ventricular dysfunction compared to patients with normal renal function (p < 0.05). Subjects with renal dysfunction were more often treated with MT alone, compared to patients without CKD (63% vs 45%; p < 0.001), who were more likely to undergo PCI or surgery. During follow-up, 386 patients [31%] died. CKD patients had a higher rate of all-cause and cardiac mortalities compared to patients without CKD (p < 0.001). The independent predictors for all-cause mortality were age, GFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m², Syntax Score I, and successful revascularization of the CTO (CABG or PCI-CTO). Among patients with CKD, advanced age, eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m², and CTO successful revascularization were predictors of all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with CKD were more often treated with MT alone. At long-term follow-up, revascularization of the CTO is associated with lower all-cause and cardiac mortalities in this population.

Current approaches for treatment of coronary chronic occlusions

Introduction: Coronary chronic total occlusions (CTO) represent a challenging subset in interventional cardiology.Areas covered: During the last decade, improvements in materials, techniques, and meticulous pre-procedural lesion assessment have increased the success rate in CTO lesions. Several scores have been developed to address overall lesion evaluation and help select the most appropriate treatment strategy. In addition, specific algorithms such as the hybrid algorithm have been introduced to provide a framework for CTO operators and a rapid management of the various challenging aspects of the procedure. The hybrid approach requires operator's ability to switch from one treatment strategy to another when the first one appears to be unsuccessful. Adequate training and operators' experience remain crucial to improve the likelihood of success.Expert opinion: The aim of this review is to provide insights and guidance for operators on current approaches for treatment of CTO and complication management.

Utility of Intravascular Ultrasound in Percutaneous Revascularization of Chronic Total Occlusions: An Overview

Intravascular ultrasound has been used for >20 years to guide percutaneous coronary intervention in different subsets of coronary lesions. During the last decade, the interest in percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion (CTO) has increased dramatically, leading to high success rates. Failure of guidewire crossing is the most common reason for failed CTO attempts. Certain angiographic features, such as blunt proximal CTO cap, tortuosity, heavy calcification, and lack of visibility of path in the distal vessel, increase procedural difficulty. A better understanding of the behavior of the guidewire within the CTO segment may represent a key issue to achieve successful outcome. In this respect, intravascular ultrasound imaging might have potential roles in the recanalization of CTOs. In this paper, we focused on the usefulness and the applications of intravascular ultrasound imaging in percutaneous CTO recanalization, underlying its impact on clinical outcome.

Coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion: current indications and future directions

Chronic total occlusions (CTOs) are routinely encountered during coronary angiography, but subsequent revascularization rates are low. This has likely been driven by a historical belief that there is minimal clinical benefit and poor success rates with a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, in the current era, with the development of new techniques and tools, experienced operators can perform CTO-PCI successfully in the majority of patients. The current indications and benefit of CTO-PCI remain a topic of controversy and debate. There is a growing body of predominantly nonrandomized studies reporting both short-term and long-term outcomes of CTO-PCI. Recent and upcoming randomized-controlled trials in this area will also potentially expand indications in both stable and patients with acute coronary syndrome. In this review, we will discuss the current evidence for CTO-PCI and also future directions in this field.