Collectively Operated Fellow-Initiated Research as a Novel Teaching Model to Bolster Interest and Increase Proficiency in Academic Research

The effect of bromocriptine on left ventricular functional recovery in peripartum cardiomyopathy: insights from the BRO-HF retrospective cohort study

Aims

Bromocriptine is thought to facilitate left ventricular (LV) recovery in peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) through inhibition of prolactin secretion. However, this potential therapeutic effect remains controversial and was incompletely studied in diverse populations.

Methods and results

Consecutive women with new‐onset PPCM (n = 76) between 1994 and 2015 in Quebec, Canada, were classified according to treatment (n = 8, 11%) vs. no treatment (n = 68, 89%) with bromocriptine. We assessed LV functional recovery at mid‐term (6 months) and long‐term (last follow‐up) and compared outcomes among groups. Women treated with bromocriptine experienced better mid‐term left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) recovery from 23 ± 10% at baseline to 55 ± 12% at 6 months, compared with a change from 30 ± 12% at baseline to 45 ± 13% at 6 months in women treated with standard medical therapy (P interaction < 0.01). At long‐term, a similar positive association was found with bromocriptine (9% greater LVEF variation, P interaction < 0.01). In linear regressions adjusted for obstetrical, clinical, echocardiographic, and pharmacological variables, treatment with bromocriptine was associated with a greater improvement in LVEF [β coefficient (standard error), 14.1 (4.4); P = 0.03]. However, there was no significant association between bromocriptine use and the combined occurrence of all‐cause death and heart failure events (hazard ratio, 1.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.15 to 9.31), using univariable Cox regressions based over a cumulative follow‐up period of 285 patient‐years.

Conclusions

In women newly diagnosed with PPCM, treatment with bromocriptine was independently associated with greater LV functional recovery.

Understanding the patient perspective on research access to national health records databases for conduct of randomized registry trials

BACKGROUND

Use of health administrative databases is proposed for screening and monitoring of participants in randomized registry trials. However, access to these databases raises privacy concerns. We assessed patient's preferences regarding use of personal information to link their research records with national health databases, as part of a hypothetical randomized registry trial.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Cardiology patients were invited to complete an anonymous self-reported survey that ascertained preferences related to the concept of accessing government health databases for research, the type of personal identifiers to be shared and the type of follow-up preferred as participants in a hypothetical trial. A total of 590 responders completed the survey (90% response rate), the majority of which were Caucasians (90.4%), male (70.0%) with a median age of 65years (interquartile range, 8). The majority responders (80.3%) would grant researchers access to health administrative databases for screening and follow-up. To this end, responders endorsed the recording of their personal identifiers by researchers for future record linkage, including their name (90%), and health insurance number (83.9%), but fewer responders agreed with the recording of their social security number (61.4%, p<0.05 with date of birth as reference). Prior participation in a trial predicted agreement for granting researchers access to the administrative databases (OR: 1.69, 95% confidence interval: 1.03-2.90; p=0.04).

CONCLUSION

The majority of Cardiology patients surveyed were supportive of use of their personal identifiers to access administrative health databases and conduct long-term monitoring in the context of a randomized registry trial.