Prognostic Utility of Skeletal Muscle Mass Metrics in Patients With Heart Failure

Prognostic Value of Sarcopenia Definitions and Outcomes Consortium Criteria in Older Patients with Heart Failure

OBJECTIVES

The Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia in 2019 (AWGS 2019) emphasized muscle mass measurements. In contrast, the Sarcopenia Definitions and Outcomes Consortium (SDOC) prioritizes functional strength and mobility. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the prognostic utility of the SDOC and AWGS 2019 criteria for all-cause mortality in older patients with heart failure.

DESIGN

A post hoc analysis of the Prevalence and Prognostic Value of Physical and Social Frailty in Geriatric Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure (FRAGILE-HF) study, a prospective, multicenter, observational study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Patients aged ≥65 years hospitalized for heart failure across 15 hospitals in Japan.

METHODS

Sarcopenia was diagnosed according to the AWGS 2019 and SDOC definitions. According to the SDOC criteria and by integrating insights from previous research, patients were categorized into nonsarcopenia, possible sarcopenia, and sarcopenia groups. The primary outcome was 2-year mortality.

RESULTS

Of the 1282 study patients, possible sarcopenia and sarcopenia were diagnosed in 357 and 786 individuals, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significant difference between the groups. Adjusted Cox proportional hazards analysis indicated a significant stepwise association between sarcopenic status and mortality risk (possible sarcopenia: hazard ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.66-2.28; P = .525; sarcopenia: hazard ratio, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.08-3.34; P = .027). When sarcopenia defined by the SDOC and AWGS 2019 criteria was added to the model incorporating conventional risk factors, no significant difference was observed in the prognostic capabilities between the 2 models (net reclassification improvement, -0.009; 95% CI, -0.193 to 0.174; P = .920, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.697 for SDOC and 0.703 for AWGS 2019; P = .675).

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Among older patients with heart failure, the SDOC criteria for sarcopenia diagnosis are useful for risk stratification and provide prognostic capabilities equivalent to those of the AWGS 2019 criteria.

Association of sarcopenia defined by different skeletal muscle mass measurements with prognosis and quality of life in older patients with heart failure

BACKGROUND

Diagnosing sarcopenia in heart failure (HF) patients is important, but how to assess skeletal muscle mass in HF patients with fluid retention is controversial. We aimed to examine the association between sarcopenia, defined by different skeletal muscle mass measurements, and clinical outcomes in older HF patients.

METHODS

We included 546 older HF patients (≥ 65 years) who were assessed for sarcopenia at discharge (median age 77 years, 309 males). Sarcopenia was diagnosed using grip strength, usual gait speed, and skeletal muscle mass according to international criteria. We used mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC), mid-upper arm muscle circumference (MAMC), calf circumference (CC), and skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis to assess skeletal muscle mass and defined sarcopenia in each of these measurements. Prognostic outcomes were composite events (all-cause death and HF rehospitalization) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) events (CVD death and CVD rehospitalization). Quality of life (QOL) was assessed using the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey physical functioning (SF-36PF) score.

RESULTS

The sarcopenia defined by MUAC [hazard ratio (HR): 2.50; 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI): 1.64-3.81; p < 0.001] or MAMC (HR: 1.98; 95 % CI: 1.35-2.92; p = 0.001) were associated with higher composite event rates than the non-sarcopenia. The sarcopenia defined by MUAC (HR: 1.88; 95 % CI: 1.25-2.83; p = 0.002) or MAMC (HR: 1.70; 95 % CI: 1.16-2.49; p = 0.007) were associated with higher CVD event rates than the non-sarcopenia. The sarcopenia defined by CC or SMI were not associated with prognoses. The sarcopenia defined by MUAC, MAMC, or CC were associated with low SF-36PF scores (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that a diagnosis of sarcopenia based on MUAC or MAMC rather than CC or SMI reflects prognosis and QOL in older HF patients.