Reconstruction of post-traumatic upper extremity soft tissue defects with pedicled flaps: An algorithmic approach to clinical decision making

Simultaneous internal fixation and latissimus dorsi pedicle flap coverage: A reliable regimen for open fractures with accompanying sizable soft tissue loss of the upper extremities

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment protocol for open fractures with accompanying sizable soft tissue defect of the upper extremities has not been specifically delineated. The authors described the concurrent use of internal fixation and latissimus dorsi (LD) pedicle flap coverage in managing such complex fractures.

METHODS

Twenty patients with open fractures accompanied by large soft tissue defect of the upper extremities (8 clavicle fractures and 12 humeral fractures) were treated by fix & LD pedicle flap. The dimension of the defect, time to fix & flap, post-operative complications, time to union and clinical measurements were recorded.

RESULTS

The mean size of the defect was 132.45 cm2 (range 6-12 x 2-20 cm2). The average time to fix & flap was 9.9 days (range 7-14). Fractures union was achieved in all patients with an average duration of 18.5 weeks (range 14-28). Regarding post-operative complications, distal flap necrosis occurred in 3 patients, retained seroma in 3 and heterotopic ossification in 1. By the Mayo Elbow Performance (MEP) score, 3 cases were considered to be excellent, 6 were good, 7 were fair and 4 were poor. By the University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score, 2 cases were considered to be excellent, 7 were good, 7 were fair and 4 were poor. The average Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score was 31.29 (range 12.5-58.3).

CONCLUSION

Fix & LD pedicle flap is a reliable regimen for open fractures with sizable soft tissue defect of the clavicle and humerus.

Local or regional flaps in developing country: Experience from Eastern Bhutan

Soft tissue reconstruction plays an integral part in orthopaedic surgery. For developing country like Bhutan, where no micro-surgical or plastic surgeons are available, orthopaedic surgeons perform the local or regional flaps for the soft tissue defects. In this paper, we describe the use of different kinds of local and regional flaps and its outcome at Eastern Regional Referral Hospital, Bhutan.

Evolution and Diversity of Medial Sural Artery Perforator Flap for Hand Reconstruction

The free medial sural artery perforator (MSAP) flap is a recently popularized flap. It has evolved from a composite myocutaneous flap to a pedicled perforator flap for lower limb reconstruction. It is also a versatile free perforator flap for extremity and head and neck reconstruction. The diversity of the flap designs with options for harvest of non-vascularized grafts enhances the versatility for hand and upper limb reconstruction. The adjunctive use of endoscopy and indocyanine green fluorescence imaging studies can assist and demystify the flap anatomy. The authors present their experience using free MSAP flaps for complex mutilated hand and upper extremity reconstruction.

Delayed Abdominal Flap for Upper Extremity Soft Tissue Coverage

Unlike other body parts, the upper extremity has critical structures close to the skin, making soft tissue injuries more complex. These injuries can result from various causes, including trauma and necrotizing soft tissue infections, necessitating reconstruction. Historically, pedicled flaps from the groin and abdomen were commonly used for upper extremity reconstruction, but they had limitations, such as the need for flap division and debulking, patient discomfort, and stiffness. Free flap reconstruction has become the preferred method, but it still faces challenges like patient and facility issues, the absence of recipient vessels after injury, and multi-surface wounds. This case report describes a 67-year-old patient with a severe necrotizing soft tissue infection in the right upper extremity. After multiple debridement procedures, the patient underwent hand amputation and soft tissue coverage using an abdominal wall-based flap. The objectives of achieving stable soft tissue coverage while preserving maximal length of the upper extremity were successfully achieved, and the patient expressed satisfaction with the outcomes. Inadequate management of upper extremity wounds can lead to amputation and psychological distress. The reconstructive ladder is used to approach upper extremity soft tissue defects, with free tissue transfer being the standard for larger defects. However, abdominal flaps still have indications when free tissue transfer is not feasible or contraindicated. It is imperative that plastic surgeons have these techniques in their armamentarium to provide a service to the ever more complex patient with an upper extremity wound.

A treatment algorithm for reconstruction of soft tissue defects in the hand: a narrative review

Background and Objective

The hand is the highly specialized distal construct of the upper limb with complex and intricate anatomy. Soft tissue defects can compromise this and result in significant functional impairment. Choosing the optimal reconstructive modality is essential for the best functional recovery. The objective of this narrative review was to provide a treatment algorithm for soft tissue defects in the hand.

Methods

Relevant literature for the topic was searched from PubMed and Cochrane Database from year 1953 up till end of November 2022. Specified searches for randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and reviews were performed.

Key Content and Findings

There are no randomized controlled trials published on this topic. There are six systematic reviews or meta-analyses published. Most of the literature still comprises on expert opinion and case reports with few previously proposed algorithms. Defect features, size, location and depth, patient related factors and available resources are the main determinants of the treatment strategy. In the hand, there are reasonable locoregional coverage options, but microsurgical options should be a routine alternative of the treatment repertoire. In the thumb and fingers, the reconstruction depends remarkably on injury extent.

Conclusions

Patient factors, surgical expertise, etiology, severity and goal of reconstruction will invariably have influence on the ultimate reconstruction performed, and algorithms may significantly help the surgical planning.

Multistage Reconstruction of Large Arm Defect Using Keystone Type I Flap and Temporary Synthetic Skin Substitute

Large arm defects remain a challenge to the reconstructive surgeon, as local and regional flaps are limited regarding size and free flaps have disadvantages such as poor color match, technical complexity, prolonged operative time, and the risk of total flap loss. Keystone flaps are fascia-based flaps and combine perforator-based vascularity with relative simplicity of nonmicrosurgical techniques and do not distort local anatomy in cases of malignant excision with wide defects. This article highlights the approach of a multistaged procedure to reconstruct a large arm defect using a keystone type I flap and a temporary synthetic skin substitute for closure in a patient referred to our department for wide resection of a large melanoma in situ on the posterior aspect of the left arm. The defect, measuring 14 cm × 8 cm, was initially reconstructed with a keystone type I flap. Part of the wound was temporarily covered with EpiGARD (Biovision GmbH, Ilmenau, Germany) to avoid excessive wound tension. One week later, the wound was partially narrowed, and a smaller EpiGARD was placed in office under local anesthesia. The multistaged approach was completed with direct closure 1 week later after removal of the smaller EpiGARD. No complications occurred and the result was satisfactory with a pleasing cosmetic result after an 8-month follow-up. In conclusion, the keystone flap allows reconstruction of large arm defects. Temporary synthetic skin substitute coverage can serve as a good addition for those cases where tension on the margins is observed at the price of a small in-office procedure.

Division of Fasciocutaneous Pedicled Flaps-Is It Time to Change Practice?: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION

The study was carried out to evaluate the safety of early division of the pedicled flaps and to identify the optimum day of division.

METHODS

This prospective, parallel arm, open-label, noninferiority, randomized controlled trial was carried out from January 2019 to July 2020. All patients (age, ≥5 years) undergoing reconstructive procedures using pedicled flaps were randomized in 1:1 ratio to receive either early division or conventional division protocol. In the early-division group, the flap perfusion, if satisfactory on day 8 by clinical and thermographic methods, a clamp was applied on the pedicle. The clamp was gradually tightened to produce controlled delay, and perfusion assessment was repeated after complete tightening. If satisfactory, the flaps were divided. Primary endpoints were flap at 24 hours after division, day of division, and day of complete inset of the flap. Secondary end points included perfusion of the flap on day 8, morbidity parameters (wound infection/suture dehiscence, need for secondary surgery and donor site morbidity), quality of life, and function scores.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were included in each group. The 2 groups were similar in terms of various demographic, clinicopathological variables, defect and flap characteristics. The flap survival rate was similar (P = 0.31) between the early (34/35) and standard (35/35) division groups. The early-division group had a significantly early mean day of flap division (mean difference of 12.74 days; P < 0.00001) and complete flap inset (mean difference of 12.09 days; P < 0.00001). All flaps had satisfactory perfusion on day 8. The wound infection rate was 1.33 times significantly higher in the conventional group (P = 0.033). There was a higher incidence of donor site morbidity (9% vs 0%) in the conventional group when compared with the early division group. The quality of life and function scores at 3 weeks (mean difference 2.37; P < 0.001) and 6 weeks (mean difference 3.76; P < 0.001) and adjacent joint stiffness were significantly higher in the early division group when compared with conventional group.

CONCLUSIONS

The pedicled flaps can be divided significantly early at an average duration of 10 to 11 days after flap inset with increased patient satisfaction rate and with a reduced postoperative morbidity. The authors have included a diversity of pedicled flaps used in different anatomic locations. By using stratified block randomization, we could ensure that the distribution was similar between the 2 groups, thus minimizing the heterogeneity in the analysis. This could also potentially indicate the usefulness of the controlled delay technique, irrespective of the anatomic location and type of the flap.

Surgical treatment results in patients with defects of the integumentary tissues of the trunk and limbs of mechanical origin

This study aimed to develop and implement a universal method for the quantitative assessment of treatment effectiveness in patients with skin and underlying soft tissue defects of the trunk and extremities. The study involved 242 patients, including 46 patients with upper extremity injuries, 179 with lesions of lower extremity tissues, and 17 patients with defects of the integumentary tissues of the trunk. The greatest treatment effectiveness was observed in patients with upper limb injury: excellent result - 60.0%, good - 33.3%, unsatisfactory - 6.7% of patients. In the group of patients with lower extremity injuries, an excellent result was recorded in 19.6% of cases, good (58.1%), satisfactory (15.1%), and unsatisfactory in 7.2% of patients. In patients with trunk injuries, an excellent treatment result was obtained in 23.5%, good - 35.5%, satisfactory - 23.5%, and unsatisfactory - 17.6%. The universal quantitative method for evaluating treatment effectiveness in patients with various types of damage to the trunk and extremities tissues was proposed. This method makes it possible to objectively determine the level of medical service provided to each patient, which is of great importance in the context of medical service reorganization in the state.

Management of Complex Upper Extremity Trauma with Associated Vascular Injury

Introduction Combined soft tissue and vascular injuries of the upper extremity pose several challenges at once to the plastic surgeon. Many decisions have to be taken urgently that will influence the salvage or amputation of the affected extremity. The aim of this article was to provide an evidence-based outline for the management of such injuries. Learning objectives of this article are as follows: (1) approach to a patient with upper extremity composite tissue and vascular injury presenting to the emergency, (2) decision-making as to when to salvage and when to go for amputation of the traumatized upper extremity, (3) role of imaging in emergency situation, (4) role of fasciotomy, (5) intraoperative sequencing of steps, and (6) options for vascular reconstruction and the flaps used for coverage. After reading this article, the reader should have a clear understanding of the management of vascular injury in a patient with composite defects of upper extremity.

Resurfacing of a Degloved Finger With a Reverse Radial Adipofascial Forearm Flap

Complex upper-limb trauma, in particular crush and avulsion injuries, present an ongoing challenge for the reconstructive hand surgeon given the extensive zone of injury, particularly involving the neurovascular structures. When replantation is deemed unsuitable, the reconstruction must be both robust and flexible enough to meet the functional needs of the patient. The authors present a case of a ring avulsion amputation of the middle digit of a young patient’s dominant hand. Due to the distal extent of avulsion, the amputated digit was determined to be nonreplantable, and the patient’s medical comorbidities precluded traditional delayed pedicle flap options. Therefore, a reverse radial adipofascial flap was used as a single-stage reconstruction to resurface the entirety of the circumferential digital defect. At 8 months of follow up, the patient demonstrated exceptional passive and active range of motion with excellent contour and cosmesis, illustrating the utility of this reconstructive option.

Upper limb traumatic injuries: A concise overview of reconstructive options

Different options for upper limb reconstruction are described in literature: advancement or rotation flaps, regional flaps and free flaps are the most common. Local and regional flaps can represent the reconstructive options for small defects while large wounds require the use of free flaps or distant pedicled flaps. In case of large wound, the use of free flaps rather than distant pedicle flaps is usually preferred. To choose the best reconstructive option, it is essential for the surgeon to have a general overview about the different methods.

In this review the Authors will refer to the most commonly used methods to cover soft tissues injuries affecting the dorsum and the palm of the hand and the forearm (excluding fingers). The aim is to show all flap reconstructive options so as to support the inexperienced surgeon during the management of traumatic injuries of the upper limb.

•

Reconstruction of traumatic injuries of the upper limbs can be challenging.

•

Small defects can be covered by local and regional flaps while large wounds need the use of free or distant pedicled flaps.

•

The literature shows different opinions whether to use pedicled flaps (regional or distant) or free flaps.

•

Dermal substitutes can be considered in patients who are not suitable for flaps reconstruction.

•

Patient related factors and surgical background can significantly interfere with the surgical reconstructive solution.

Radial Flap in Reconstructions of the Hand - Case Series Study

Radial forearm flap is an axial flap that has become an important technique in reconstructive surgery as a free flap or as a pedicled flap. Defects of the skin and other tissues on the hand are very common and most often they are work-related injuries. In deep defects, flap must be used, as well as in reconstruction of the amputated thumb. There are many flaps that provide adequate soft tissue coverage for the hand. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to present the results of the use of radial forearm flap in various reconstructions on the hand. The retrospective study included 35 patients who underwent reconstruction with radial forearm flaps due to defects of the skin and other tissues on the hand, in the period 1997-2019. Results and complications of the surgery were analyzed. The functional and aesthetic outcome was assessed using Michigan Hand Outcome Qusteionnarire. All patients were followed for a minimum of 1 year. Fasciocutaneous flap was the most commonly used (65.71%), followed by adiposofascial (20%) and osteocutaneous (14.29%). The size of the fasciocutaneous flap ranged from 2.2x3.1cm to 9x13.5cm. The majority of donor sites were closed with split-thickness skin grafts (56.52%), and less frequently with direct suture, local skin flap, and full-thickness skin graft. There were no complete flap losses in the study. Marginal necrosis was noted in 8.57%, and graft failure at the donor site in 14.29%. Secondary surgical procedures were performed in 13 patients. The functional-aesthetic result of the operation, based on the MHQ score, ranged from 31 (1/35) to 130 points (3/35). The ultimate aim of hand reconstruction is to restore sufficient function and form, also, closing the wound within three days following the injury is desirable. Meticulous intraoperative dissection of radial flap and early physical therapy after surgery are mandatory. The radial flap is a suitable method, especially for large and more distal skin defects on the hand, and a very good method for thumb reconstruction.

Soft tissue coverage of the upper limb: A flap reconstruction overview

Different opinions about the reconstructive choice for upper limb are described in literature: advancement or rotation flaps, regional flaps and free flaps are the most common reconstructive options. Local and regional flaps can be used to cover small defects while large wounds require the use of free flaps or distant pedicled flaps. The coverage of large wounds opens a discussion about when to use free flaps and when distant pedicled flaps. This review will describe the different methods used for the coverage of soft tissues injuries affecting hand and/or forearm (excluding fingers). The aim is to show all flap reconstructive options in order to support the inexperienced surgeon during the management of traumatic injuries of the upper limb.

Two Perforators Improve the Extent and Reliability of Paraumbilical Flaps for Upper Limb Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Complex defects of the forearm and arm are best reconstructed with free flaps. Free flaps are however not universally available. They require long operative time and may be contraindicated in patients with extensive injuries due to a lack of good recipient vessels. The alternatives to free flaps are distant flaps such as groin flaps, random abdominal flaps, thoracoepigastric flaps and paraumbilical perforator flaps. These are axial flaps that are limited by the angiosomes supplied by a given perforator or blood vessel. To improve the extent and reliabilities of the paraumbilical flaps, we incorporated two perforators in the flap.

METHODS

A total of 17 patients with extensive forearm defects were managed by two vessel paraumbilical perforator flaps between January 2013 and December 2018. The perforators were identified by a hand-held Doppler and the flap was fashioned with the perforators at the base.

RESULTS

The mean length of the flap raised was 19.5 cm and width was 8.3 cm. The median age was 39 years. All the flaps were successful with no incidence of flap necrosis and no dehiscence.

CONCLUSION

Two vessel perforator flaps improved the reliability of the paraumbilical perforator flap, allowing for a bigger flap to be harvested and thus ensuring a cover of larger defects. The flaps were easy to raise and were easily tolerated by the patients.

Treating Hand Trauma in Low-Resource Setting: A Challenge for Low- and Middle-Income Countries

Hand trauma surgical treatment and perioperative therapy are often lacking in low- and middle-income countries resulting in high rates of patient morbidity following injury. Providing education through a multifaceted approach including in-person teaching, written resources, videos, and Internet and social media platforms and facilitating skill acquisition through simulation permits local providers to gain expertise in hand trauma care and thus benefits patients. This article outlines challenges faced by low- and middle-income countries in caring for hand trauma patients and possible implementable solutions.