Implantless patellar fixation in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction

Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction using patella bone tunnel techniques with or without implants. A systematic review of outcomes and complications

PURPOSE

Τhe main goal of this study was to compare the clinical results, including the complication rates and patient-reported outcomes, in patients who underwent surgery for recurrent patellar dislocation using different patellar tunnel fixation techniques. This study compared Medial Patellofemoral Ligament (MPFL) reconstruction implant free techniques against ones that used implants.

METHODS

The present systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The literature search was conducted in January 2023. We included patients who underwent isolated MPFL reconstruction for recurrent patellar instability. Patients with confirmed concomitant or prior ipsilateral knee procedures, multiligament injury, severe patellar dysplasia or less than 6 months of follow-up were excluded. MINORS and MCMS scores were used for the assessment of methodological quality.

RESULTS

Data from 750 procedures were collected, of which 284 used implants to perform the procedure while in 455 an implant-free technique was used. Patient age at the time of surgery ranged from 11 to 60 years while the follow-up time of the studies ranged between 3 and 108 months. Postoperative Kujala (0.3, p = 0.89) and Lysholm (1.2, p = 0.26) scores were better in the implant-free techniques compared to implant-based. A higher rate of recurrent dislocation (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.10-2.54, p = 0.4), subluxation (OR 0.20; 95% CI 0.40-0.88, p = 0.019) and stiffness (OR 0.76; 95% CI 0.33-1.72, p = 0.55) was noted in the implant-free techniques, while the implant-based techniques displayed increased incidence of patella fractures (OR 3.12; 95% CI 0.77-12.6, p = 0.09), reoperation (OR 1.69; 95% CI 0.78-3.65, p = 0.17) and infection (OR 2.07; 95% CI 0.46-9.32, p = 0.33).

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference between the 2 techniques in terms of patient reported outcomes. Regarding complications, MPFL reconstruction using implants demonstrated significant higher rate of patella fractures while the implant free technique showed a greater risk of subluxation.

Isolated medial patellofemoral reconstruction outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Treatment of patellar instability remains up for debate, and a combination of tibial tubercle osteotomy and medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLr) of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) has become the mainstay treatment for recurrent lateral patellar dislocation. Due to limited small studies, there remains a variety of surgical techniques still being practiced. The use of MPFL reconstruction, in isolation, has demonstrated promise.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to investigate if isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (iMPFLr) can safely and efficaciously restore knee stability and to present the patient demographics, surgical techniques, graft choices, clinical outcomes, and complications after iMPFLr for recurrent patellar dislocation (RPD).

METHODS

A review of the current literature according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, yielded 299 abstracts. Twenty-seven articles met the inclusion/exclusion criteria accounting for 1200 patients. Data was pooled and analyzed focusing on patient demographics, graft type used, Kujala, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm, Tegner, and complications.

RESULTS

Across all studies the weighted mean age was found to be an average of 24.5 years, BMI was 24.9 kg/m2, follow-up was 47.3 months, as 67% were female, TT-TG distance was 15.3 mm, and Caton Deschamps index 1.11. The pooled effect size difference of pre versus post assessment of Kujala was -2.8, IKDC was -4.5, Lysholm was -6.4, and Tegner was -0.74. The pooled complication rate was found to be 8% across all included studies. A subgroup analysis was also performed, specifically looking at how single bundle, double bundle, gracilis, semitendinosus and knee angle during fixation effect outcome data.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates that isolated MPFL reconstruction is a safe and effective treatment for recurrent patellar dislocations. Given the efficacy of isolated MPFL reconstruction, future investigations should aim to uncover the exact TT-TG distance, trochlear dysplasia, and patella alta grade for selecting patients to undergo this procedure. Furthermore, more primary research needs to be conducted on this topic due to the overall lack of published data from randomized controlled studies and no broad standardization of outcome measurements.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

(4) Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Transpatellar bone tunnels perforating the lateral or anterior cortex increase the risk of patellar fracture in MPFL reconstruction: a finite element analysis and survey of the International Patellofemoral Study Group

PURPOSE

(1) To determine applied patellar drilling techniques for medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction among members of the International Patellofemoral Study Group (IPSG) and (2) to evaluate the risk of patellar fracture for various patellar bone tunnel locations based on a finite element analysis (FEA) model.

METHODS

In the first part of the study, an online survey on current MPFL reconstruction techniques was conducted among members of the IPSG. In the second part of the study, a three-dimensional FEA model of a healthy knee joint was created using a computed tomography scan. Patient-specific bone density was integrated into the patella, and cartilage of 3 mm thickness was modeled for the patellofemoral joint. According to the survey's results, two different types of patellar bone tunnels (bone socket and transpatellar bone tunnel) were simulated. The risk of patellar fracture was evaluated based on the fracture risk volume (FRV) obtained from the FEA.

RESULTS

Finite element analysis revealed that subchondral bone socket tunnel placement is associated with the lowest FRV but increased with an anterior offset (1-5 mm). Transpatellar bone tunnels violating the lateral or anterior cortex showed a higher FRV compared to bone socket, with the highest values observed when the anterior cortex was penetrated.

CONCLUSION

Violation of the anterior or lateral patellar cortex using transpatellar bone tunnels increased FRV compared to a subchondral patellar bone socket tunnel. In MPFL reconstruction, subchondral patellar bone socket tunnels should be considered for patellar graft fixation to avoid the risk of postoperative patellar fracture.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Survey; Descriptive laboratory study/Level V.

Hardware-free MPFL reconstruction in patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability is safe and effective

PURPOSE

This systematic review evaluated the clinical outcomes of hardware-free MPFL reconstruction techniques in patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability, focusing on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), redislocation rate, and complications. The hypothesis was that hardware-free MPFL reconstruction in patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability is safe and effective.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and Virtual Health Library databases were accessed in October 2021. All the clinical studies investigating the efficacy and feasibility of hardware-free MPFL reconstruction were screened for inclusion. Only studies with a minimum 24-month follow-up were considered eligible. Kujala Anterior Knee Pain Scale improvement and redislocation rate after surgical treatment were evaluated as primary outcomes. The rate of postoperative complications was evaluated as a secondary outcome. The quality of the methodological assessment was assessed using the Modified Coleman Methodology Score.

RESULTS

Eight studies were included in the present systematic review. The quality of the methodological assessment was moderate. Short- to long-term improvement of Kujala score was observed in all included studies. Mean score improvement ranged from + 13.2/100 to + 54/100, with mean postoperative scores ranging from 82/100 to 94/100. Patellar redislocation was observed in 8.33% (8 of 96) patients.

CONCLUSION

Hardware-free MPFL reconstruction with or without associated soft-tissue or bony realignment procedures provided reliable clinical improvements and was associated with a low rate of redislocation in patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability. Advantages such as safety, femoral physis preservation, and comparable complication profiles with implant-based techniques endorse its implementation. Orthopedic surgeons in cost-sensitive environments may also benefit their patients with lower costs, no need for implants, lack of implant-related complications, or surgery for implant removal.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.