Analysis of the efficacy of a modified posteromedial approach for Klammer III posterior Pilon fractures

A systematic review of posterior pilon variant fractures

Posterior pilon variant ankle fractures (PPVF) are a unique subtype of posterior malleolar fractures which have been a source of controversy and confusion in recent years. There has not been a thorough literature review previously written on the topic. Database searches of PubMed and Embase were conducted from inception until June 2023. The key words included "pilon variant," "posterior pilon variant," and "posterior pilon" fractures. Outcomes were evaluated by union time, rates of delayed union, nonunion, malunion, and complication. A total of 15 articles relevant to surgical repair of pilon variant fractures were included in the literature review. The unique mechanism of injury has been reported to involve both rotational and axial forces, leading to involvement of the posterior and medial aspects of the distal tibia. Pilon variant fractures can be suspected by several characteristics on radiographs and have a high confirmation rate via CT images. Multiple systems have been proposed to classify this fracture pattern, but there is no consensus on the ideal classification system. Surgically, direct fixation has shown better short-term clinical outcomes versus indirect fixation or no fixation. PPVF have a distinct fracture pattern involving the posterior and medial columns of the distal tibial plafond, and results from a mechanism intermediate to rotational and axial forces. These fractures are more severe than tri-malleolar fractures due to increased rates of articular impaction and incongruity. Future classification systems should focus on joint surface area and the tibial pilon column involved to avoid confusion with less severe posterior malleolar fractures.

Safety of the modified posteromedial approach in complex ankle fractures: Comparative analysis versus posterolateral access

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety of the modified posteromedial approach (MfPM) in the surgical management of complex ankle fractures in terms of local complications.

METHODS

Retrospective multicenter review of a series of malleolar fractures surgically treated by posterior ankle approaches between 2016 and 2022. Two approaches were used. In the MfPM group patients were placed in a prone position and the incision was made 1 cm medially to the Achilles tendon. In the posterolateral access (PL) group patients were placed in a prone or lateral decubitus position and the incision was made between the lateral malleolus and the Achilles tendon. Complications evaluated were divided into wound complications, infections, neuritis, vascular alterations and others.

RESULTS

81 ankle fractures with a posterior malleolar fragment treated by open reduction and internal fixation were identified. 20 cases were approached through the MfPM approach and 61 through the PL access. The mean follow up was 18.60 months (range 4-78 months). In the MfPM group the local complication rate was 10% (2/10 patients), both corresponding to minor wound problems which required no surgical intervention. No infection or other neural or vascular complications were found. In the PL group a complication rate of 8,19% (5/61 patients) was found, all of them corresponding to minor wound problems which required no surgical intervention. No infection or other neural or vascular complications were found. There were no significant differences between the two approaches regarding postoperative local complications (z score 0.249 - P: 0.803).

CONCLUSION

The MfPM approach is safe and may become as readily used as the PL due to the low incidence of postoperative local complications, especially in fractures with a large fragment and posteromedial extension in which greater access to the posterior pilon can facilitate instrumentation for anatomic reduction and fixation.