Prolonged corneal anaesthesia by proxymetacaine hydrochloride detected by a thermal cooling stimulus

Relationship Between the Degree of Iris Pigmentation and Corneal Sensitivity to a Cooling Stimulus

PURPOSE

To explore the relationship between the degree of iris pigmentation and corneal sensitivity threshold (CST) on a variety of different ethnicities, using the air-jet noncontact corneal aesthesiometer and by applying a consistent method of subject iris pigmentation classification.

METHODS

A total of 200 subjects (mean age 23.7 ± 3.1 years, 127 women) participated in this clinical cross-sectional study: 100 whites, 40 Asians, 40 Chinese, and 20 Afro-Caribbeans. CST was assessed within the central cornea using a noncontact corneal aesthesiometer, and the degree of iris pigmentation of each subject was noted according to the Seddon method using a set of graded photographs of iris pigmentation (grades 1-5). Inclusion criteria were absence of ocular disease including dry eye, no contact lens wear, and no use of artificial tears. Statistical testing between ethnicities was made by the pairwise t test with Holm adjustment, and a linear model was set up to analyze the effects of ethnicity and iris grade.

RESULTS

A moderate trend for increasing CST with increasing iris pigmentation grade for all ethnicities was observed (R = 0.46; P < 0.0001), with CST changing from 0.66 ± 0.16 mbars for grade 1, 0.74 ± 0.18 mbars for grade 2, 0.86 ± 0.31 mbars for grade 3, 0.85 ± 0.32 mbars for grade 4, and 1.08 ± 0.40 mbars for grade 5. This correlation was stronger within the white group, representing the only ethnicity with all iris pigmentation grades (R = 0.50; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a moderate relationship between corneal sensitivity and the degree of iris pigmentation, with sensitivity increasing as iris pigmentation decreases. This relationship is stronger within whites.

Adding Dopamine to Proxymetacaine or Oxybuprocaine Solutions Potentiates and Prolongs the Cutaneous Antinociception in Rats

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the interaction of dopamine-proxymetacaine and dopamine- oxybuprocaine antinociception using isobolograms.

METHODS

This experiment uses subcutaneous drug (proxymetacaine, oxybuprocaine, and dopamine) injections under the skin of the rat's back, thus simulating infiltration blocks. The dose-related antinociceptive curves of proxymetacaine and oxybuprocaine alone and in combination with dopamine were constructed, and then the antinociceptive interactions between the local anesthetic and dopamine were analyzed using isobolograms.

RESULTS

Subcutaneous proxymetacaine, oxybuprocaine, and dopamine produced a sensory block to local skin pinpricks in a dose-dependent fashion. The rank order of potency was proxymetacaine (0.57 [0.52-0.63] μmol/kg) > oxybuprocaine (1.05 [0.96-1.15] μmol/kg) > dopamine (165 [154-177] μmol/kg; P < .01 for each comparison) based on the 50% effective dose values. On the equianesthetic basis (25% effective dose, 50% effective dose, and 75% effective dose), the nociceptive block duration of proxymetacaine or oxybuprocaine was shorter than that of dopamine (P < .01). Oxybuprocaine or proxymetacaine coinjected with dopamine elicited a synergistic antinociceptive effect and extended the duration of action.

CONCLUSIONS

Oxybuprocaine and proxymetacaine had a higher potency and provoked a shorter duration of sensory block compared with dopamine. The use of dopamine increased the quality and duration of skin antinociception caused by oxybuprocaine and proxymetacaine.

Does air gas aesthesiometry generate a true mechanical stimulus for corneal sensitivity measurement?

BACKGROUND

Belmonte Ocular Pain Meter (OPM) air jet aesthesiometry overcomes some of the limitations of the Cochet-Bonnet aesthesiometer. However, for true mechanical corneal sensitivity measurement, the airflow stimulus temperature of the aesthesiometer must equal ocular surface temperature (OST), to avoid additional response from temperature-sensitive nerves. The aim of this study was to determine: (A) the stimulus temperature inducing no or least change in OST; and (B) to evaluate if OST remains unchanged with different stimulus durations and airflow rates.

METHODS

A total of 14 subjects (mean age 25.14 ± 2.18 years; seven women) participated in this clinical cohort study: (A) OST was recorded using an infrared camera (FLIR A310) during the presentation of airflow stimuli, at five temperatures, ambient temperature (AT) +5°C, +10°C, +15°C, +20°C and +30°C, using the OPM aesthesiometer (duration three seconds; over a four millimetre distance; airflow rate 60 ml/min); and (B) OST measurements were repeated with two stimulus temperatures (AT +10°C and +15°C) while varying stimulus durations (three seconds and five seconds) and airflow rates (30, 60, 80 and 100 ml/min). Inclusion criteria were age <40 years, no contact lens wear, absence of ocular disease including dry eye, and no use of artificial tears. Repeated measures (analysis of variance) and appropriate post-hoc t-tests were applied.

RESULTS

(A) Stimulus temperatures of AT +10°C and +15°C induced the least changes in OST (-0.20 ± 0.13°C and 0.08 ± 0.05°C). (B) OST changes were statistically significant with both stimulus temperatures and increased with increasing airflow rates (p < 0.001), and were more marked with stimulus temperature AT +10°C.

CONCLUSION

A true mechanical threshold for corneal sensitivity cannot be established with the air stimulus of the Belmonte OPM because its air jet stimulus with mechanical setting is likely to have a thermal component. Appropriate stimulus selection for an air jet aesthesiometer must incorporate stimulus temperature control that can vary with stimulus duration and airflow rate.

The Addition of Epinephrine to Proxymetacaine or Oxybuprocaine Solution Increases the Depth and Duration of Cutaneous Analgesia in Rats

BACKGROUND

The aim of this experiment was to investigate the interaction between epinephrine and 2 local anesthetics (proxymetacaine or oxybuprocaine) using subcutaneous injections under the hairy skin, thereby simulating infiltration blocks.

METHODS

Using a rat model of cutaneous trunci muscle reflex in response to local skin pinpricks, the anesthetic properties of proxymetacaine and oxybuprocaine alone and in combination with epinephrine as an infiltrative anesthetic were tested. Isobolographic analysis was used for the analgesic interactions between adjuvant epinephrine and the local anesthetics. Lidocaine was used as a control group.

RESULTS

Oxybuprocaine, proxymetacaine, and lidocaine elicited a dose-dependent block to pinpricks. On the 50% effective dose (ED50) basis, their relative potencies were proxymetacaine [0.126 (0.113-0.141) μmol] greater than oxybuprocaine [0.208 (0.192-0.226) μmol] greater than lidocaine [6.331 (5.662-7.079) μmol] (P < 0.01 for each comparison). On an equipotent basis (ED25, ED50, and ED75), sensory block duration elicited by oxybuprocaine or proxymetacaine was greater than that elicited by lidocaine (P < 0.01). Coadministration of proxymetacaine, oxybuprocaine, or lidocaine with epinephrine produced a synergistic analgesic effect and prolonged the cutaneous analgesic effect. After adding epinephrine, oxybuprocaine was much faster, reaching its maximal blockade, than proxymetacaine or lidocaine (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that proxymetacaine and oxybuprocaine were more potent and produced greater duration of nociceptive block than lidocaine. The use of epinephrine augmented the potency and prolonged the duration of proxymetacaine, oxybuprocaine, and lidocaine as an infiltrative anesthetic.