1
|
Kuo AN, Cortina MS, Greiner MA, Li JY, Miller DD, Shtein RM, Veldman PB, Yin J, Kim SJ, Shen JF. Advanced Corneal Imaging in Keratoconus: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 2024; 131:107-121. [PMID: 37855776 DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2023.07.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Revised: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To review the published literature on the diagnostic capabilities of the newest generation of corneal imaging devices for the identification of keratoconus. METHODS Corneal imaging devices studied included tomographic platforms (Scheimpflug photography, OCT) and functional biomechanical devices (imaging an air impulse on the cornea). A literature search in the PubMed database for English language studies was last conducted in February 2023. The search yielded 469 citations, which were reviewed in abstract form. Of these, 147 were relevant to the assessment objectives and underwent full-text review. Forty-five articles met the criteria for inclusion and were assigned a level of evidence rating by the panel methodologist. Twenty-six articles were rated level II, and 19 articles were rated level III. There were no level I evidence studies of corneal imaging for the diagnosis of keratoconus found in the literature. To provide a common cross-study outcome measure, diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were extracted. (A perfect diagnostic test that identifies all cases properly has an AUC of 1.0.) RESULTS: For the detection of keratoconus, sensitivities for all devices and parameters (e.g., anterior or posterior corneal curvature, corneal thickness) ranged from 65% to 100%. The majority of studies and parameters had sensitivities greater than 90%. The AUCs ranged from 0.82 to 1.00, with the majority greater than 0.90. Combined indices that integrated multiple parameters had an AUC in the mid-0.90 range. Keratoconus suspect detection performance was lower with AUCs ranging from 0.66 to 0.99, but most devices and parameters had sensitivities less than 90%. CONCLUSIONS Modern corneal imaging devices provide improved characterization of the cornea and are accurate in detecting keratoconus with high AUCs ranging from 0.82 to 1.00. The detection of keratoconus suspects is less accurate with AUCs ranging from 0.66 to 0.99. Parameters based on single anatomic locations had a wide range of AUCs. Studies with combined indices using more data and parameters consistently reported high AUCs. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S) Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony N Kuo
- Duke Eye Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Maria S Cortina
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Mark A Greiner
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Carver College of Medicine and Institute for Vision Research, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Jennifer Y Li
- University of California, Davis Eye Center, University of California, Davis, California
| | - Darby D Miller
- Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Roni M Shtein
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Peter B Veldman
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Jia Yin
- Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Stephen J Kim
- Department of Ophthalmology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Joanne F Shen
- Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ambrósio R, Salomão MQ, Barros L, da Fonseca Filho JBR, Guedes J, Neto A, Machado AP, Lopes BT, Sena N, Esporcatte LPG. Multimodal diagnostics for keratoconus and ectatic corneal diseases: a paradigm shift. EYE AND VISION (LONDON, ENGLAND) 2023; 10:45. [PMID: 37919821 PMCID: PMC10623885 DOI: 10.1186/s40662-023-00363-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
Different diagnostic approaches for ectatic corneal diseases (ECD) include screening, diagnosis confirmation, classification of the ECD type, severity staging, prognostic evaluation, and clinical follow-up. The comprehensive assessment must start with a directed clinical history. However, multimodal imaging tools, including Placido-disk topography, Scheimpflug three-dimensional (3D) tomography, corneal biomechanical evaluations, and layered (or segmental) tomography with epithelial thickness by optical coherence tomography (OCT), or digital very high-frequency ultrasound (dVHF-US) serve as fundamental complementary exams for measuring different characteristics of the cornea. Also, ocular wavefront analysis, axial length measurements, corneal specular or confocal microscopy, and genetic or molecular biology tests are relevant for clinical decisions. Artificial intelligence enhances interpretation and enables combining such a plethora of data, boosting accuracy and facilitating clinical decisions. The applications of diagnostic information for individualized treatments became relevant concerning the therapeutic refractive procedures that emerged as alternatives to keratoplasty. The first paradigm shift concerns the surgical management of patients with ECD with different techniques, such as crosslinking and intrastromal corneal ring segments. A second paradigm shift involved the quest for identifying patients at higher risk of progressive iatrogenic ectasia after elective refractive corrections on the cornea. Beyond augmenting the sensitivity to detect very mild (subclinical or fruste) forms of ECD, ectasia risk assessment evolved to characterize the inherent susceptibility for ectasia development and progression. Furthermore, ectasia risk is also related to environmental factors, including eye rubbing and the relational impact of the surgical procedure on the cornea.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renato Ambrósio
- Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University the State of Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
- Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
- Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
- Rio Vision Hospital, Rua Prudente de Moraes, 1276, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 22420-042, Brazil.
- Brazilian Study Group of Artificial Intelligence and Corneal Analysis - BrAIN, Rio de Janeiro & Maceió, Brazil.
| | - Marcella Q Salomão
- Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Rio Vision Hospital, Rua Prudente de Moraes, 1276, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 22420-042, Brazil
- Brazilian Study Group of Artificial Intelligence and Corneal Analysis - BrAIN, Rio de Janeiro & Maceió, Brazil
- Benjamin Constant Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Lorena Barros
- Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University the State of Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Rio Vision Hospital, Rua Prudente de Moraes, 1276, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 22420-042, Brazil
| | - João Batista R da Fonseca Filho
- Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University the State of Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Rio Vision Hospital, Rua Prudente de Moraes, 1276, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 22420-042, Brazil
| | - Jaime Guedes
- Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Alexandre Neto
- Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University the State of Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Aydano P Machado
- Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Brazilian Study Group of Artificial Intelligence and Corneal Analysis - BrAIN, Rio de Janeiro & Maceió, Brazil
- Computing Institute, Federal University of Alagoas, Maceió, Brazil
| | - Bernardo T Lopes
- Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Brazilian Study Group of Artificial Intelligence and Corneal Analysis - BrAIN, Rio de Janeiro & Maceió, Brazil
- Department of Ophthalmology, Alder Hey Children's Hospital, Liverpool, L12 2AP, UK
| | - Nelson Sena
- Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University the State of Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Rio Vision Hospital, Rua Prudente de Moraes, 1276, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 22420-042, Brazil
| | - Louise Pellegrino Gomes Esporcatte
- Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Rio Vision Hospital, Rua Prudente de Moraes, 1276, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 22420-042, Brazil
- Brazilian Study Group of Artificial Intelligence and Corneal Analysis - BrAIN, Rio de Janeiro & Maceió, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Changes in Corneal Morphology and Biomechanics in Cases of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction with Prophylactic Accelerated Collagen Cross-Linking. J Ophthalmol 2022; 2022:1640249. [PMID: 35859778 PMCID: PMC9293522 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1640249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 06/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To study the corneal morphology and biomechanics in cases of small incision lenticule extraction with prophylactic accelerated collagen cross-linking (SMILE Xtra). Methods This study was a retrospective study. 28 eyes of 14 patients with moderate-high risk of postoperative ectasia according to the Randleman scoring system underwent SMILE Xtra procedure. Outcome data were recorded including uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE), surface regularity index (SRI), surface asymmetry index (SAI), simulated keratometry (SimK), posterior axial curvature (PAC), anterior and posterior corneal elevations (ACE and PCE), central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal resistance factor (CRF), corneal hysteresis (CH), and cornea-compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc). The follow-up period was 12 months. Results There were 28, 26, 22, 12, and 10 eyes enrolled at postoperative 1st day and 1st, 3rd, 6th, and 12th months, respectively. The UDVA improved from 1.27 ± 0.18 logMAR preoperatively to -0.06 ± 0.04 logMAR postoperatively (P < 0.05). The MRSE improved from -5.05 ± 1.15 D preoperatively to -0.14 ± 0.30 D postoperatively (P < 0.05). SAI, SimK, PAC, PCE, and CCT all changed significantly at 1st month postoperatively (P < 0.05) and stabilized during the remainder of the follow-up (P > 0.05). There was no significant change in SRI or ACE before and after surgery (P > 0.05). CRF, CH, and IOPcc all decreased significantly at 1st month postoperatively (P < 0.05) and remained stable afterwards (P > 0.05). Conclusions The changes in the corneal morphology and biomechanics remained stable after SMILE Xtra, and there was no sign of postoperative ectasia or refractive regression. Combined with the improvement of visual and refractive results, SMILE Xtra may be a promising method for corneal refractive surgeries in patients at risk.
Collapse
|
4
|
Henriquez MA, Hadid M, Moctezuma C, Izquierdo L, Binder PS. The false positive rates for detecting keratoconus and potential ectatic corneal conditions when evaluating astigmatic eyes with Scheimpflug Technology. Eur J Ophthalmol 2022; 32:2532-2546. [PMID: 35313744 DOI: 10.1177/11206721221081467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To quantify the false positive rates for keratoconus (KC) and potential ectatic corneal conditions in highly astigmatism eyes when using published parameters/indices obtained from the Pentacam and Galilei units. SETTING Oftalmosalud Instituto de Ojos, Lima, Peru. DESIGN Prospective cohort study. METHODS 67 consecutive eyes with corneal astigmatism > 1.5 D, with a minimum follow ups of 36 months after an uneventful LASIK procedure were included. Indices for KC and other potential ectatic corneal conditions (subclinical KC, forme fruste KC, suspect KC) were obtained using the Pentacam and Galilei Scheimpflug cameras. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The false positive rates for KC and potential ectatic corneal conditions were measured. Cut off values provided by previous studies and company-based parameters were used to assess the rate of false positivity. RESULTS The range of false positive rates for a KC diagnosis depending on the lowest and highest cutoff values were: index of height decentration (61% - 1%), index of surface variance (76% - 0%), Posterior elevation (55% - 0%), maximum Ambrosio Relational thickness (100% - 13%), Belin Ambrosio enhanced ectasia display total deviation value (100% - 4%), Average pachymetric progression index (69% - 3%), Pachymetry at the thinnest point (58% - 1%), CSI Center Surround Index (100%), Differential sector index (51%). CONCLUSION The false positive rates for KC and ectatic corneal conditions vary dramatically depending on the cut-off values used. Some indexes used for diagnosis of potential ectatic corneal conditions are inaccurate in normal, highly astigmatic eyes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria A Henriquez
- Research Department, 568280Oftalmosalud Institute of Eyes, Av. Javier Prado Este 1142, San Isidro, Lima 27, Perú
| | - Marta Hadid
- Research Department, 568280Oftalmosalud Institute of Eyes, Av. Javier Prado Este 1142, San Isidro, Lima 27, Perú
| | - Cristobal Moctezuma
- Research Department, 568280Oftalmosalud Institute of Eyes, Av. Javier Prado Este 1142, San Isidro, Lima 27, Perú
| | - Luis Izquierdo
- Research Department, 568280Oftalmosalud Institute of Eyes, Av. Javier Prado Este 1142, San Isidro, Lima 27, Perú
| | - Perry S Binder
- 481087Gavin Herbert Eye Institute, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Clinical evaluation of ocular biometry of dual Scheimpflug analyzer, GALILEI G6 and swept source optical coherence tomography, ANTERION. Sci Rep 2022; 12:3602. [PMID: 35246594 PMCID: PMC8897498 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-07696-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
To evaluate the performance of a new swept source optical coherence tomography optical biometer, ANTERION, in ocular biometry and intraocular lens (IOL) calculation compared with the reference standard of Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer (GALILEI, G6). A prospective comparative study was conducted in a tertiary eye center. Cataract patients were scanned with both devices in a random fashion, and parameters from the devices were analyzed in terms of mean difference and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Bland–Altman plots were performed to compare agreement between the devices. Ninety-six eyes from 96 patients were enrolled for evaluation. With the exception of ACD, all parameters were significantly different, but excellent agreement was revealed for all of them. The mean difference in axial length was 0.03 mm, and ICC was 0.999. Calculated IOL power with Barrett formula revealed that 93.75% were within 1 diopter and the prediction error was 0.03 diopter. Biometry of the devices were arithmetically different. However, the mean difference of the key factors in IOL calculation were small and appeared to be negligible for the purposes of clinical application. The performance of ANTERION was comparable to that of G6 in biometric measurement and IOL calculation; however, the devices cannot be used interchangeably.
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Ectatic corneal disease (ECD) comprises a group of disorders characterized by progressive thinning and subsequent bulging of the corneal structure. Different phenotypes have been recognized, including keratoglobus, pellucid marginal degeneration (PMD), and keratoconus (KC). Keratoconus has been widely investigated throughout the years, but the advent of laser refractive surgery boosted an immediate need for more knowledge and research about ectatic diseases. This article discusses nomenclature of ectatic disease, etiology and pathogenesis, along with treatment options, with special focus ok KC and forme fruste keratoconus.
Collapse
|
7
|
Hashemi H, Yekta A, Yazdani N, Ostadimoghaddam H, Khabazkhoob M. Comparison of Anterior Chamber Depth between Normal and Keratoconic Eyes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Curr Ophthalmol 2020; 32:94-98. [PMID: 32510020 PMCID: PMC7265264 DOI: 10.1016/j.joco.2019.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2018] [Revised: 01/11/2019] [Accepted: 01/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To review the published data about changes in the anterior chamber depth (ACD) in keratoconus patients. Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies, we reviewed the available and relevant literature on anterior segment changes in keratoconic eyes, with a special focus on the ACD, an effective factor in many surgical methods. Articles published up to December 2017 were identified in the following data sources: PubMed, Scopus, Ovid, ISI, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. Databases were comprehensively searched using the key words “Anterior Chamber Depth AND Anterior segment AND Keratoconus”. Results: A total of 496 studies including these key words were detected. Four hundred fifty-three studies were excluded, and overall 16 studies which precisely described the change in ACD were included in the literature review. The results show that with respect to the applied device, there was a statistically significant difference in ACD between keratoconic eyes and normal eyes except for Galilei analyzer. Conclusion: Summarizing the results of studies, this review revealed that ACD is significantly deeper in keratoconic eyes as compared with normal eyes, which could be explained by the steeper corneal curvature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hassan Hashemi
- Noor Research Center for Ophthalmic Epidemiology, Noor Eye Hospital, Tehran, Iran
| | - AbbasAli Yekta
- Department of Optometry, School of Paramedical Sciences, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Negareh Yazdani
- Student Research Committee, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Hadi Ostadimoghaddam
- Refractive Errors Research Center, School of Paramedical Sciences, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Mehdi Khabazkhoob
- Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Salomão M, Hoffling-Lima AL, Lopes B, Belin MW, Sena N, Dawson DG, Ambrósio R. Recent developments in keratoconus diagnosis. EXPERT REVIEW OF OPHTHALMOLOGY 2018. [DOI: 10.1080/17469899.2018.1555036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Marcella Salomão
- Instituto de Olhos Renato Ambrósio, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Instituto Benjamin Constant, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Bernardo Lopes
- Instituto de Olhos Renato Ambrósio, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Instituto Benjamin Constant, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Biomaterial Mechanics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, Tucson, UK
| | - Michael W. Belin
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Arizona, USA
| | - Nelson Sena
- Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Daniel G. Dawson
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Renato Ambrósio
- Instituto de Olhos Renato Ambrósio, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Martínez-Abad A, Piñero DP. New perspectives on the detection and progression of keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 2017; 43:1213-1227. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.07.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2017] [Revised: 06/03/2017] [Accepted: 07/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
|
10
|
Comparison of anterior segment measurements obtained by three different devices in healthy eyes. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2014; 2014:498080. [PMID: 24987687 PMCID: PMC4060781 DOI: 10.1155/2014/498080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2014] [Revised: 05/08/2014] [Accepted: 05/14/2014] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose. To assess the normal values and the repeatability of the Galilei Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer (GDSA), the biometer IOL Master, and the autokerato/refractometer WAM 5500 in anterior segment examinations. Methods. Eighty-eight eyes from 88 healthy volunteers were prospectively and consecutively recruited. The repeatability was assessed, calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results. The correlations among the repeated measurements showed nearly perfect reliability (ICC > 0.81) for all of the parameters, except corneal astigmatism Galilei (0.79) and WAM (0.68). There were statistically significant differences (P < 0.001) between the values of the flat simulated keratometry (SimK) and the steep SimK measured by GDSA and the other methods; however, there were no statistically significant differences for the values obtained with the IOL Master and WAM 5500 (P = 0.302 and P = 0.172, resp.) or between the values of the ACD (P < 0.001) and WTW (P = 0.007) measured by the IOL Master and GDSA. Conclusions. The anterior segment measurements from the IOL Master and WAM 5500 were highly repeatable, comparable, and well correlated. In healthy young persons, the evaluated parameters had very good repeatability, although significant differences were found between the GDSA and IOL Master and between the GDSA and WAM 5500.
Collapse
|