Intraocular pressure measurement with ocular response analyzer over soft contact lens

A Corneal Biomechanical Study Measured with a Scheimpflug Dynamic Analyser in Soft Contact Lens Wearers

The aim of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical changes in the cornea after wearing soft contact lenses (CLs) in healthy myopic patients measured with a Corvis ST® (CST, Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) analyser. This prospective, cross-sectional, single-centre study was performed on twenty-two Caucasian patients aged between 19 and 24 years (20.64 ± 1.21 years) range. Five device-specific biomechanical parameters, the central corneal thickness (CCT), and biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure (bIOP) were measured prior to fitting and one month after CL wear. Differences between the means of the deflection amplitude ratio (DA Ratio) and the standard deviation of the DA Ratio (SD DA Ratio) pre- and post-CL wear were found to be significant (p value = 0.002 in both cases). Significant differences were found between pre- and post-CL wear values in CCT (p value = 0.013). For all other biomechanical measures, no significant differences were observed before and after treatment. A significant association was found between changes in bIOP and classification according to changes in Int. Radius (p value = 0.047) and SSI (p value = 0.026) standard deviations. The corneal biomechanical indices provided by CST demonstrate that the fitting of soft CLs is a safe optical compensation method for the stability of corneal stiffness. No significant differences were found pre- and post-CL wear in the assessment of bIOP.

Comparison Between Ocular Biometric Parameters and Intraocular Pressure With and Without Contact Lenses

OBJECTIVES

To compare the values of central corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), vitreous length (VL), axial length (AL), and corneal-compensated intraocular pressure performed with and without contact lenses (CL).

METHODS

Forty volunteer participants (16 men and 24 women, 24.2±2.9 years) were recruited. In a single visit, participants underwent autorefraction, keratometry, biometry, topography, pachymetry, and tonometry with the naked eye (without CL). Then, biometry, pachymetry, and tonometry were repeated twice wearing two CL (somofilcon A and nesofilcon A) fitted in a random order.

RESULTS

Many of the ocular biometric values were affected by the use of CL during measurements (paired t test; all P ≤0.003), except for LT and VL (Wilcoxon test; both P ≥0.272). Corneal-compensated intraocular pressure was also affected by contact lens wear during measurements, obtaining lower values when wearing them (Wilcoxon test; all P ≤0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Central corneal thickness, ACD, AL, and corneal-compensated intraocular pressure measurements cannot be performed while wearing CL. However, LT and VL measurements were not affected by any contact lens use. In addition, it was observed that ACD results from both devices are not interchangeable either when measured with the naked eye or using any contact lens.

Adaptive finite element eye model for the compensation of biometric influences on acoustic tonometry

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Glaucoma is currently a major cause for irreversible blindness worldwide. A risk factor and the only therapeutic control parameter is the intraocular pressure (IOP). The IOP is determined with tonometers, whose measurements are inevitably influenced by the geometry of the eye. Even though the corneal mechanics have been investigated to improve accuracy of Goldmann and air pulse tonometry, influences of geometric properties of the eye on an acoustic self-tonometer approach are still unresolved.

METHODS

In order to understand and compensate for measurement deviations resulting from the geometric uniqueness of eyes, a finite element eye model is designed that considers all relevant eye components and is adjustable to all physiological shapes of the human eye.

RESULTS

The general IOP-dependent behavior of the eye model is validated by laboratory measurements on porcine eyes. The difference between simulation and measurement is below 8 µm for IOP levels from 5 to 40 mmHg. The adaptive eye model is then used to quantify systematic uncertainty contributions of a variation of eye length and central corneal thickness based on input statistics of a clinical trial series. The adaptive eye model provides the required relation between biometric eye parameters and the corneal deflection amplitude, which here is the measured quantity to trace back to the IOP. Implementing the relations provided by the eye model in a Gaussian uncertainty propagation calculation now allows the quantification of the uncertainty contributions of the biometric parameters on the overall measurement uncertainty of the acoustic self-tonometer. As a result, a systematic uncertainty contribution resulting from deviations in eye length dominate stochastic deviations of the sensor equipment by a factor of 3.5.

CONCLUSION

As perspective, the proposed adaptive eye model provides the basis to compensate for systematic deviations of (but not only) the acoustic self-tonometer.

Optical measurement of the corneal oscillation for the determination of the intraocular pressure

Motivation

Glaucoma is currently the most common irreversible cause of blindness worldwide. A significant risk factor is an individually increased intraocular pressure (IOP). A precise measurement method is needed to determine the IOP in order to support the diagnosis of the disease and to monitor the outcome of the IOP reduction as a medical intervention. A handheld device is under development with which the patient can perform self-measurements outside the clinical environment.

Method

For the measurement principle of the self-tonometer the eye is acoustically excited to oscillate, which is analyzed and attributed to the present IOP. In order to detect the corneal oscillation, an optical sensor is required which meets the demands of a compact, battery driven self-tonometer. A combination of an infrared diode and a phototransistor provides a high-resolution measurement of the corneal oscillation in the range of 10 μm–150 μm, which is compared to a reference sensor in the context of this study. By means of an angular arrangement of the emitter and the detector, the degree of reflected radiation of the cornea can be increased, allowing a measurement with a high signal-to-noise ratio.

Results

By adjusting the angle of incidence between the detector and the emitter, the signal-to-noise ratio was improved by 40 dB which now allows reasonable measurements of the corneal oscillation. For low amplitudes (10 μm) the signal-to-noise ratio is 10% higher than that of the commercial reference sensor. On the basis of amplitude variations at different IOP levels, the estimated standard uncertainty amounts to <0.5 mm Hg in the physiological pressure range with the proposed measuring approach.

Conclusion

With a compact and cost-effective approach, that suits the requirements for a handheld self-tonometer, the corneal oscillation can be detected with high temporal resolution. The cross-sensitivity of the sensor concept concerning a distance variation can be reduced by adding a distance sensor. Existing systematic influences of corneal biomechanics will be integrated in the sensor concept as a consecutive step.

The measurement of intraocular pressure over positive soft contact lenses by rebound tonometry

PURPOSE

To investigate if the accuracy of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements using rebound tonometry over disposable hydrogel (etafilcon A) contact lenses (CL) is affected by the positive power of the CLs.

METHODS

The experimental group comprised 26 subjects, (8 male, 18 female). IOP measurements were undertaken on the subjects' right eyes in random order using a Rebound Tonometer (ICare). The CLs had powers of +2.00D and +6.00D. Measurements were taken over each contact lens and also before and after the CLs had been worn.

RESULTS

The IOP measure obtained with both CLs was significantly lower compared to the value without CLs (t test; p<0.001) but no significant difference was found between the two powers of CLs.

CONCLUSIONS

Rebound tonometry over positive hydrogel CLs leads to a certain degree of IOP underestimation. This result did not change for the two positive lenses used in the experiment, despite their large difference in power and therefore in lens thickness. Optometrists should bear this in mind when measuring IOP with the rebound tonometer over plus power contact lenses.