Variations in observable lid wiper epitheliopathy (LWE) staining patterns in wearers of silicone hydrogel lenses

Lid wiper epitheliopathy: Topical review of current identification strategies and future perspectives

Lid Wiper Epitheliopathy (LWE) is a recognized ocular condition affecting visual quality and ocular comfort, characterized by the damage of the marginal conjunctiva of the upper eyelid. This review critically examines the current strategies for LWE identification and explores the multifactorial etiology of LWE and its association with various ocular surface diseases. A literature review conducted on PubMed identified 67 relevant studies, which were analyzed to enhance understanding of LWE's diagnostic criteria and its clinical implications, offering future perspectives on improving diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes. The association between LWE and contact lens-related discomfort is examined, with studies reporting conflicting findings regarding its prevalence and severity among soft contact lens wearers. Moreover, LWE has been linked to tear film abnormalities, altered tear composition, and eyelid margin abnormalities in non-contact lens wearers, further complicating diagnosis and management. Current LWE grading systems, including subjective methods and semi-objective approaches, are reviewed, highlighting challenges such as subjectivity, complexity, and variability. Recent advances in LWE grading, including semi-automated methods and photographic scales, show promise but face implementation challenges in clinical settings. The review concludes by proposing areas for further research, including investigating factors contributing to LWE onset and development, developing more sensitive diagnostic tools, and exploring the impact of LWE on ocular surface health and visual function. Standardization, validation, and innovation in grading systems are emphasized to enhance diagnostic accuracy and improve clinical outcomes for patients with LWE. Ongoing research in LWE grading is essential for addressing diagnostic challenges and optimizing assessment methodologies in clinical practice.

A Hue-Value method for semi-automated assessment of Lid Wiper Epitheliopathy

BACKGROUND

Lid wiper epitheliopathy (LWE) is a marker of an abnormal lid/cornea interaction. This study proposes an automated Hue-Value grading algorithm of LWE staining following manual selection of the region of interest.

METHODS

Images of LWE staining were processed using Hue and Value from HSV (Hue-Saturation-Value) color space with a custom MATLAB program. Thirty-one images were successfully analyzed. Examiners analyzed images in random order twice, separated by more than a week. Bland Altman and Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) were performed.

RESULTS

There was no difference (p > 0.05) between upper (UL) and lower (LL) eyelids for LWE height (UL: 0.12 ± 0.12 mm, LL: 0.12 ± 0.07 mm), width (UL: 10.70 ± 3.84 mm, LL: 10.26 ± 3.49 mm), or area (UL: 2.85 ± 2.67 mm2, LL: 2.63 ± 1.71 mm2). There was no between examiner difference for all eyelid LWE height or area (p > 0.05), but a difference in LWE width (0.16 mm; p = 0.031). ICC for LWE height, width and area were 0.996 (95% CI: 0.993 to 0.998), 0.997 (95% CI: 0.992 to 0.998) and 0.999 (95% CI: 0.998 to 0.999). There was no between examiner difference for height or area (p > 0.05) for UL, but a difference in LWE width (0.28 mm; p = 0.026). ICC for height, width and area were 0.999 (95% CI: 0.996 to 1.00), 0.995 (95% CI: 0.982 to 0.999) and 1.00 (95% CI: 0.999 to 1.00). There was no difference in LWE height, width or area for LL (all p > 0.05). ICC were 0.991 (95% CI: 0.973 to 0.997) for height, 0.998 (95% CI: 0.995 to 0.999) for width and 0.997 (95% CI: 0.990 to 0.999) for area.

CONCLUSIONS

This novel method results in highly repeatable interexaminer measures of LWE staining after general lid region delineation. Small differences in LWE width were observed between examiners.

CLEAR - Evidence-based contact lens practice

Evidence-based contact lens -->practice involves finding, appraising and applying research findings as the basis for patient management decisions. These decisions should be informed by the strength of the research study designs that address the question, as well as by the experience of the practitioner and the preferences and environment of the patient. This reports reviews and summarises the published research evidence that is available to inform soft and rigid contact lens history and symptoms taking, anterior eye health examination (including the optimised use of ophthalmic dyes, grading scales, imaging techniques and lid eversion), considerations for contact lens selection (including the ocular surface measurements required to select the most appropriate lens parameter, lens modality and material selection), evaluation of lens fit, prescribing (teaching self-application and removal, adaptation, care regimen and cleaning instructions, as well as -->minimising risks of lens wear through encouraging compliance) and an aftercare routine.

CLEAR - Effect of contact lens materials and designs on the anatomy and physiology of the eye

This paper outlines changes to the ocular surface caused by contact lenses and their degree of clinical significance. Substantial research and development to improve oxygen permeability of rigid and soft contact lenses has meant that in many countries the issues caused by hypoxia to the ocular surface have largely been negated. The ability of contact lenses to change the axial growth characteristics of the globe is being utilised to help reduce the myopia pandemic and several studies and meta-analyses have shown that wearing orthokeratology lenses or soft multifocal contact lenses can reduce axial length growth (and hence myopia). However, effects on blinking, ptosis, the function of Meibomian glands, fluorescein and lissamine green staining of the conjunctiva and cornea, production of lid-parallel conjunctival folds and lid wiper epitheliopathy have received less research attention. Contact lens wear produces a subclinical inflammatory response manifested by increases in the number of dendritiform cells in the conjunctiva, cornea and limbus. Papillary conjunctivitis is also a complication of all types of contact lenses. Changes to wear schedule (daily disposable from overnight wear) or lens materials (hydrogel from SiHy) can reduce papillary conjunctivitis, but the effect of such changes on dendritic cell migration needs further study. These changes may be associated with decreased comfort but confirmatory studies are needed. Contact lenses can affect the sensitivity of the ocular surface to mechanical stimulation, but whether these changes affect comfort requires further investigation. In conclusion, there have been changes to lens materials, design and wear schedules over the past 20+ years that have improved their safety and seen the development of lenses that can reduce the myopia development. However, several changes to the ocular surface still occur and warrant further research effort in order to optimise the lens wearing experience.

The impact of contact lens wear on ocular surface mucins using a novel clinical fluorescence imaging system

PURPOSE

Fluorescein-labelled wheat germ agglutinin (F-WGA) acts as a marker for ocular surface mucins. This clinical study sought to investigate whether the degree of F-WGA fluorescence observed at the ocular surface differed between symptomatic contact lens wearers, asymptomatic contact lens wearers and non-contact lens wearers, using a novel imaging system.

METHODS

Twenty-five participants (10 symptomatic contact lens wearers, 10 asymptomatic contact lens wearers and 5 non-contact lens wearers) attended a single study visit. Photographs of the cornea, bulbar and tarsal conjunctiva were captured following application of F-WGA solution.

RESULTS

The imaging system captured high-resolution images of F-WGA fluorescence at the ocular surface. The degree of fluorescence differed between the ocular surface regions (p < 0.001). A significant difference in fluorescence was observed between participant groups for the cornea (p = 0.01), with both the symptomatic and asymptomatic contact lens wearers showing lower fluorescence than the non-lens wearers. F-WGA associated fluorescence appeared diminished in the lid wiper region of the symptomatic lens wearers, compared to the asymptomatic group (p = 0.025).

CONCLUSION

The use of F-WGA as a clinical marker for ocular surface mucins allows an improved understanding of their distribution across the ocular surface. Contact lens wear appears to negatively impact mucin density across the ocular surface, with the most marked effect on the cornea. F-WGA fluorescence appeared diminished in the lid wiper region for the symptomatic contact lens wearing group, indicating that mechanical interaction in this region may play a role in the aetiology of contact lens discomfort. Given the ability of F-WGA to disclose mucin distribution across the ocular surface it is likely to be a key clinical tool in furthering our understanding of (i) the aetiology of contact lens related discomfort, (ii) contact lens designs/materials to minimise interaction with the ocular surface and (iii) dry eye disease and other ocular surface diseases.

A Comparison of Dry Eye Diagnostic Tests Between Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Age-Matched Females

PURPOSE

To quantify the strength of association of dry eye (DE) symptoms to DE diagnostic tests in age-matched females.

METHODS

Twenty females with DE symptoms (Ocular Surface Disease Index, OSDI, ≥13) were age-matched with 20 females without DE symptoms (OSDI<13) in this cross-sectional study. Noninvasive tear breakup time (NIBUT), ocular staining, meibum quality, number of obstructed meibomian glands (MGs), lid wiper epitheliopathy, Marx line placement, eyelid margin score, Schirmer test, meibography, and visual acuity were assessed in both groups.

RESULTS

Twenty participant pairs completed the study. The age (median/interquartile range [IQR]) of the symptomatic group was 60/15 and the asymptomatic group was 62/15. The tests (median/IQR, P value) that were significantly different between the symptomatic group and the asymptomatic group were OSDI (35.4/35.4 vs. 3.1/6.7, P<0.01), NIBUT (2.1/0.7 sec vs. 3.0/3.0 sec, P=0.01), meibum quality (3.0/0.0 grade units vs. 2.0/1.0 grade units, P<0.01), number of obstructed MGs (7.0/2.0 glands vs. 5.0/4.8 glands, P<0.01), and ocular staining (5.5/3.8 grade units vs. 0.5/1.0 grade units, P<0.01). The tests (area under curve, [AUC], odds ratio [OR]) that were most strongly associated with DE symptoms were ocular staining (0.93, 5.0), number of obstructed MGs (0.79, 2.6), meibum quality (0.76, 2.4), and NIBUT (0.74, 3.2) (all P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups for the other DE tests (all P>0.05), and similarly, no significant association to DE symptoms (all P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic tests most strongly associated with DE symptoms in older women were ocular staining, meibum quality, number of obstructed MGs, and tear film stability.

Comparison of subjective grading of lid wiper epitheliopathy with a semi-objective method

PURPOSE

To validate a semi-objective method of grading lid wiper epitheliopathy (LWE) compared to subjective assessment.

METHODS

Twenty upper and 20 lower eyelid margins of patients with LWE were photographed after instillation of fluorescein and lissamine green. The images were graded by two observers using a 0-3 grading scale for height (%) and width (mm) of the lid staining. The images were also processed using custom designed software in MATLAB. After manual delineation of the staining area, width and perpendicular height were automatically measured throughout the selected area. The height as a proportion of the lid margin width and width measures were then categorized into the same bins as in the grading scale.

RESULTS

Repeatability of the image analysis system showed a mean difference (95% limits of agreement) between repeats of -0.01mm (0.03 and -0.05mm) for LWE height, 0.04mm (1.16 and -1.08mm) for LWE width, and -0.11mm² (0.32 and -0.53mm²) for LWE area. The mean difference (95% limits of agreement) between image analysis and human grading for LWE height was -0.84 grades (0.54 and -2.21 grades), for LWE width was 0.31 grades (1.22 and -0.59 grades), and for the final grade (mean height and width) was -0.26 (0.44 and -0.96 grades) (all p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Human observers tend to overestimate the height and underestimate the width of LWE staining. Lid wiper region is not well defined, thus, it might be a difficult process for human observers to judge the stained region as a proportion of the lid wiper total region.

Lid wiper epitheliopathy

Some recent research has resulted in a hypothesis that there is a common 'lid wiper' region that is apposite to the ocular surface or anterior lens surface (where contact lenses are worn), responsible for spreading tears during blinking. In the upper eyelid, it extends about 0.6 mm from the crest of the sharp posterior (inner) lid border (i.e. the mucocutaneous junction, or line of Marx) to the subtarsal fold superiorly and from the medial upper punctum to the lateral canthus horizontally. Histologically, it is seen as an epithelial elevation comprising of stratified epithelium with a transitional conjunctival structure of (moving posteriorly) squamous cells then cuboidal cells, with some parakeratinised cells and goblet cells. Lid wiper epitheliopathy (LWE) denotes staining of the lid wiper observed after instillation of dyes such as fluorescein, rose bengal or lissamine green. There have been some reports of higher rates of LWE in dry eye patients and contact lens wearers, but others have failed to find such associations. The primary cause of LWE is thought to be increased friction between the lid wiper and ocular or anterior contact lens surface due to inadequate lubrication, which could be caused by dry eye and may be exacerbated by factors such as abnormal blinking patterns, poor contact lens surface lubricity and adverse environmental influences. Recent evidence suggests that LWE is associated with sub-clinical inflammation. LWE has the potential to provide the missing mechanistic link between clinical observation and symptoms associated with dry eye and contact lens wear. Clinical and fundamental research into LWE is still in its infancy and in many instances equivocal; however, it is an idea that provides a potentially important new avenue for further investigation of anterior eye discomfort associated with ocular dryness and contact lens wear.

"Coffee Ring Effect" in Ophthalmology: "Anionic Dye Deposition" Hypothesis Explaining Normal Lid Margin Staining

The process of formation of Marx line is studied in this article. Various theories have been proposed previously, in order to explain the mechanisms which lead to the development of Marx line. These theories are based on the characteristics of stained area and do not pay attention to the behavior of dye solution itself on the surface. The aim of this study is to investigate the latter behavior and introduce a new theory based on it, in order to explain the process of the Marx line formation.This study also introduces "Coffee Ring Effect" and its possible applications in explaining some ophthalmological phenomena.The effect of dye solution's behavior on the beneath surface is adopted in order to propose a novel theory. This new hypothesis is called "Anionic Dye Deposition" which was based on "Coffee Ring Effect" phenomenon. For evaluation of this theory, Evaporation pattern of Rose Bengal and fluorescein were analyzed on different surfaces. Furthermore, the effect of tear meniscus alteration on lid margin staining is studied.During the evaporation process of dye solutions, it was observed that almost all of the solute was deposited at the edge of the drop on hydrophilic surfaces. Furthermore, in the study of lid margin staining, it is observed that tear meniscus alteration during gaze affects staining pattern. This observation invalidates former hypotheses which only focus on stained surface characteristics.According to the observations in this study, it is proposed that Marx line staining occurs as a result of "anionic dye deposition" due to evaporation.