Differences in corneo-scleral topographic profile between healthy and keratoconus corneas

The effect of landing zone toricity on scleral lens fitting characteristics and optics

PURPOSE

The fit and optical performance of a scleral lens is affected by the alignment of the landing zone with the underlying ocular surface. The aim of this research was to quantify the effect of landing zone toricity upon scleral lens fitting characteristics (rotation and decentration) and optics (lens flexure) during short-term wear.

METHODS

Scleral lenses with nominal landing zone toricities of 0, 100, 150 and 200 μm were worn in a randomised order by 10 young healthy participants (mean [SD] 24 [7] years) for 30 min, with other lens parameters held constant. Scleral toricity was quantified using a corneo-scleral profilometer, and lens flexure, rotation, and decentration were quantified using over-topography during lens wear. Repeated measures analyses were conducted as a function of landing zone toricity and residual scleral toricity (the difference between scleral and lens toricity) for eyes with 'low' magnitude scleral toricity (mean: 96 μm) and 'high' magnitude scleral toricity (mean: 319 μm).

RESULTS

Toric landing zones significantly reduced lens flexure (by 0.37 [0.21] D, p < 0.05) and lens rotation (by 20 [24]°, p < 0.05) compared with a spherical landing zone. Horizontal and vertical lens decentration did not vary significantly with landing zone toricity. These trends for flexure, rotation, and decentration were also observed for eyes with 'low' and 'high' magnitude scleral toricity as a function of residual scleral toricity.

CONCLUSION

Landing zones with 100-200 μm toricity significantly reduced lens flexure (by ~62%) and rotation (by ~77%) but not horizontal or vertical lens decentration, compared with a spherical landing zone, when controlling for other confounding variables. The incorporation of a toric landing zone, even for eyes with lower magnitude scleral toricity (~100 μm), may be beneficial, particularly for front surface optical designs.

Orthokeratology effect on the corneoscleral profile: Beyond the bull's eye

PURPOSE

To assess the impact of 3 months of orthokeratology (ortho-k) contact lenses (CLs) for myopia correction on the corneoscleral profile, as changes in scleral geometry could serve as indirect evidence of alteration in the corneal biomechanical properties.

METHODS

Twenty subjects (40 eyes) were recruited to wear ortho-k lenses overnight; however, after discontinuation (two CL fractures, one under-correction and two non-serious adverse events), 16 subjects (31 eyes) finished a 3-month follow-up. Corneoscleral topographies were acquired using the Eye Surface Profiler (ESP) system before and after 3 months of lens wear. Steep (SimKs) and flat (SimKf) simulated keratometry and scleral sagittal height measurements for 13-, 14- and 15-mm chord lengths were automatically calculated by the ESP software. Additionally, sagittal height and slope were calculated in polar format from 21 radii (0-10 mm from the corneal apex) at 12 angles (0-330°). Linear mixed models were fitted to determine the differences between visits.

RESULTS

SimKs and SimKf were increased significantly (p ≤ 0.02). The sagittal height in polar format increased significantly (p = 0.046) at a radius of 2.5 mm for 150°, 180°, 210° and 240° orientations and at a radius of 3.0 mm for 210°. Additionally, the slope in polar format significantly decreased (p ≤ 0.04) at radii ranges of 0.0-0.5, 0.5-1.0 and 1.0-1.5 mm for multiple angles and at a radii range of 5.0-5.5 mm for 90°. It also increased significantly (p ≤ 0.045) at a radii range of 1.5-2.0 mm for 30° and at radii ranges of 2.0-2.5, 2.5-3.0 and 3.0-3.5 mm for multiple angles. No significant changes were found for any parameter measured from the scleral area.

CONCLUSIONS

Three months of overnight ortho-k lens wear changed the central and mid-peripheral corneal geometry as expected, maintaining the peripheral cornea and the surrounding sclera stability.

Reliability and Agreement of Keratometry Measurements Obtained With Eye Surface Profilometry and Partial Coherence Interferometry

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the repeatability of keratometry parameters obtained using the Eye Surface Profiler (ESP) system and their agreement with the IOL Master 500 device.

METHODS

Seventy-one eyes of 71 healthy participants were evaluated. Three repeated measurements were performed using the ESP system. Simulated keratometry in the flat (SimKf) and steep (SimKs) meridians, astigmatism, and axis were obtained. The same parameters were measured using the IOL Master 500 device. The J0 and J45 vector components of the astigmatism were calculated. The intrasession repeatability was analyzed using within-subject SD (Sw) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Agreement was assessed using paired statistical tests and the Bland-Altman method.

RESULTS

The Sw was 0.07 mm, 0.04 mm, 0.51 D, 0.33 D, and 0.22 D, and the ICC was 0.96, 0.98, 0.74, 0.61, and 0.55 for SimKf, SimKs, astigmatism, J0, and J45, respectively. The mean difference and limits of agreement when comparing the ESP system with the IOL Master 500 device were 0.37 mm (0.08/0.66) for SimKf ( P < 0.001), 0.18 mm (0.00/0.35) for SimKs ( P < 0.001), -0.93 D (-2.42/0.56) for astigmatism ( P < 0.001), 0.51 D (-0.22/1.24) for J0 ( P < 0.001), and 0.06 D (-0.48/0.60) for J45 ( P = 0.09).

CONCLUSIONS

The ESP system provides consistent values for simulated keratometry, showing moderate consistency for astigmatism parameters. Contact lens practitioners should be aware that the ESP system and IOL Master 500 device provide different simulated keratometry from a clinically viewpoint.

Process and Outcomes of Fitting Corneoscleral Profilometry-Driven Scleral Lenses for Patients With Ocular Surface Disease

OBJECTIVES

To assess the feasibility of obtaining cornea scleral profile (CSP) measurements using Scheimpflug imaging and report on the fitting process of free-form custom scleral lenses (SLs) for patients with ocular surface disease (OSD).

METHODS

This prospective study of patients fit with free-form SLs collected data on the following: demographics, indications for wear, corneal and scleral tomography, scan acquisition process, and SL fitting process.

RESULTS

Cornea scleral profile scans were acquired on 15 eyes of nine patients. Mean scan time for right eyes was 10.7, and 9.7 min for left eyes. A mean of 2.9 follow-up visits were required to complete SL fitting, with a mean of 2.1 lenses ordered. One eye did not tolerate lens wear, and one eye could not be fit using the CSP scan because of insufficient data. The initial lens ordered was dispensed at the first follow-up visit for seven of the remaining 13 eyes, all of which were ultimately fit successfully in free-form lenses.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study of profilometry-guided SL fitting for eyes with OSD and low magnitude corneal astigmatism, the number of lenses and follow-up visits required were similar to outcomes of previous studies that described the diagnostic approach to SL fitting. In addition, imaging technology does not negate the need for skilled clinical observation while fitting SLs.

Subfoveal and Parafoveal Choroidal Thickening in Patients with Keratoconus Using the ETDRS Grid on Swept-Source OCT

INTRODUCTION

There is growing evidence that confirms morphological changes in the posterior structures in patients with keratoconus (KC); however, isolated alterations could have been missed. This study assesses choroidal thickness (CT) in the fovea and beyond in KC eyes.

METHODS

This prospective case-control and non-randomized study enrolled 107 eyes, 62 eyes of 62 patients with KC, and 45 age-matched eyes of 45 control subjects with axial length in the range of 22-26 mm. Swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) was performed to manually measure the subfoveal choroidal thickness (SCT) using a single-line scan. CT was obtained automatically from the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) grid using the 12-lines radial scan pattern. A two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to evaluate CT variations among macular eccentricity, parafoveal area, and the interaction between both factors. CT was compared in all parafoveal areas between groups and subgroups of KC.

RESULTS

SCT was significantly thicker in KC eyes (357 ± 57 µm) than in healthy eyes (325 ± 63 µm) (p < 0.001). Significant choroidal thickening was observed in the central ring and outer and inner rings of the temporal, superior, and inferior parafoveal macular areas (p < 0.001), except in the outer ring of the nasal macular zone (p > 0.05) of KC compared to healthy eyes. The CT significantly decreased from the center to the outer ring regardless of the presence of KC (p < 0.001). The choroid in the nasal macular zone was significantly thinner than that in the temporal, superior, and inferior parafoveal areas (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The choroidal structure increased its thickness not only in the subfoveal area, but also in eight parafoveal areas of the ETDRS grid encompassing a wider area of macular examination. These findings demonstrate and corroborate that keratoconus is not a purely corneal disease. Furthermore, it confirms the role that the choroidal structure has in the pathophysiology of keratoconus.

Case Report: Remote Scleral Lens Fitting for High Toric Scleras in a Keratoconus Patient

SIGNIFICANCE

Technology plays a crucial role in customizing scleral lenses and improving lens alignment, especially in challenging scleral shapes. In addition, remote fitting technology allows optometrists to extend their expertise globally, empowering patients to access to customized lenses without travel expenses.

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to document the difficulties encountered in fitting a scleral lens in a patient with keratoconus and pronounced scleral toricity. In addition, the study aimed to present the successful remote fitting achieved by using advanced technology.

CASE REPORT

An Irish male patient diagnosed with keratoconus exhibited high scleral toricity. Generally, keratoconus eyes often exhibit significant scleral asymmetry associated with cone decentration and disease severity. Improperly aligned scleral lenses can lead to regional changes in scleral shape, lens decentration, discomfort, and visual disturbances. Indeed, previous scleral lens fits were unsuccessful because of these issues. Corneoscleral profilometry was acquired in Ireland and then used in Italy to design customized lenses, which were then delivered to the patient's optometrist in Ireland. The first lenses designed and delivered demonstrated excellent overall performance without requiring adjustments.

CONCLUSIONS

This report highlights the importance of corneoscleral profilometry to increase efficiency and reduce lens reorders and chair time, and the remote fitting in overcoming barriers to accessing specialized lens fitting.

Anterior Scleral Thickness Profile in Keratoconus

PURPOSE

Considering that peripheral corneal thinning occurs in keratoconus (KC), the anterior scleral thickness (AST) profile was measured to compare thickness variations in healthy and KC eyes across several meridians.

METHODS

This cross-sectional case-control study comprised 111 eyes of 111 patients: 61 KC eyes and 50 age- and axial-length-matched healthy eyes. The AST was explored at three scleral eccentricities (1, 2, and 3 mm from the scleral spur) across four scleral zones (nasal, temporal, superior, and inferior) by using swept-source optical coherence tomography. The AST variations among eccentricities and scleral regions within and between groups were investigated.

RESULTS

The AST significantly varied with scleral eccentricity in healthy eyes over the temporal meridian (p = 0.009), whereas in KC eyes, this variation was observed over the nasal (p = 0.001), temporal (p = 0.029) and inferior (p = 0.006) meridians. The thinnest point in both groups was 2 mm posterior to the scleral spur (p < 0.001). The sclera was thickest over the inferior region (control 581 ± 52 μm, KC 577 ± 67 μm) and thinnest over the superior region (control 448 ± 48 μm, KC 468 ± 58 μm) in both populations (p < 0.001 for all eccentricities). The AST profiles were not significantly different between groups (p > 0.05). The inferior-superior thickness asymmetry was statistically different 2 mm posterior to the scleral spur between groups (p = 0.009), specifically with subclinical KC (p = 0.03). There is a trend where the asymmetry increases, although not significantly, with the KC degree (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

KC eyes presented significant thickness variations among eccentricities over the paracentral sclera. Although AST profiles did not differ between groups, the inferior-superior asymmetry differences demonstrated scleral changes over the vertical meridian in KC that need further investigation.

Repeatability and Reproducibility of Corneoscleral Topography Measured With Scheimpflug Imaging in Keratoconus and Control Eyes

OBJECTIVES

To determine and compare the repeatability and reproducibility of anterior scleral parameters measured by the corneoscleral profile (CSP) module of Pentacam in keratoconus (KC) and control eyes.

METHODS

This is a prospective observational study. Thirty KC participants (30 eyes) and 24 control participants (24 eyes) were examined three times using the CSP. Sagittal height mean (SHM), sagittal height astigmatism (SHA), and mean bulbar slope (BSM) were measured in 12 mm and 16 mm chord lengths. The repeatability and reproducibility of these measurements were also assessed. Coefficients of variation (CoV), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of repeatability (CoR1), and coefficient of reproducibility (CoR2) were adopted to assess the reliability.

RESULTS

In the KC and control groups, SHM showed high repeatability and reproducibility (coefficients of variation [CoVs]≤0.96%, intraclass correlation coefficient [ICCs]≥0.97), and SHM of control eyes showed higher repeatability and reproducibility than that of KC eyes at 12 mm chord length (KC group, CoRs ranged from 35.56 μm to 43.52 μm, control group, ranged from 23.50 μm to 30.31 μm) and 16 mm chord length (KC group, CoRs ranged from 79.54 μm to 81.58 μm, control group, ranged from 48.25 μm to 66.10 μm). Mean bulbar slope also showed high repeatability and reproducibility (CoVs≤3.65%, CoRs≤2.64). Furthermore, the SHA of control eyes showed higher repeatability and reproducibility when compared with KC eyes (control group: CoVs≤29.95%, KC group: CoVs≥32.67%).

CONCLUSIONS

Keratoconus and control eyes demonstrated high repeatability and reproducibility when using CSP measurements, which may prove helpful in fitting contact lenses.

Dynamic topography analysis of the cornea and its application to the diagnosis of keratoconus

PROPOSE

To establish a dynamic topography analysis method which simulates the dynamic biomechanical response of the cornea and reveals the variations of such response within the corneal surface, and thereafter to propose and clinically evaluate new parameters for the definite diagnosis of keratoconus.

METHODS

58 normal (Normal) and 56 keratoconus (KC) subjects were retrospectively included. Personalized corneal air-puff model was established using corneal topography data by Pentacam for each subject, and the dynamic deformation under air-puff loading was simulated using finite element method, which then enabled calculations of corneal biomechanical parameters of the entire corneal surface along any meridian. Variations in these parameters across different meridians and between different groups were explored by two-way repeated measurement analysis of variance. New dynamic topography parameters were proposed as the range of the calculated biomechanical parameters within the entire corneal surface, and the AUC of ROC curve was used to compare the diagnostic efficiency of newly proposed and existing parameters.

RESULTS

Corneal biomechanical parameters measured in different meridians varied significantly which were more pronounced in KC group due to its irregularity in corneal morphology. Considering such between-meridian variations thus led to improved diagnostic efficiency of KC as presented by the proposed dynamic topography parameter rIR with an AUC of 0.992 (sensitivity: 91.1%, specificity: 100%), significantly better than the current topography and biomechanical parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnosis of keratoconus may be affected by the significant variations of corneal biomechanical parameters due to corneal morphology irregularity. By considering such variations, the current study established the dynamic topography analysis process which benefits from the high accuracy of (static) corneal topography measurement while improving its diagnosis capacity. The proposed dynamic topography parameters, especially the rIR parameter, showed comparable or better diagnostic efficiency for KC than existing topography and biomechanical parameters, which can be of great clinical significance for clinics without access to instrument for biomechanical evaluations.

Comparing sagittal heights calculated using corneal parameters and those measured with profilometry

PURPOSE

To compare the sagittal height of the anterior eye (OC-SAG) calculated using corneal parameters with the OC-SAG measured by profilometry.

METHOD

Seventy right eyes of soft contact lens wearers measured with the ESP (Eaglet Eye, The Netherlands) after lens removal were retrospectively analyzed for this study. The OC-SAG of the eyes was calculated using mean k-values, eccentricity and the inner (corneal) radius obtained with the ESP for an 11-mm cord diameter. It was then extrapolated to chord diameters of 14, 14.5 and 15 mm. These values were compared with OC-SAG values obtained with the ESP for the same chord diameters. Additionally, the OC-SAG was calculated through the formula used by a lab that manufactures custom soft lenses (mark'ennovy, Madrid, Spain) and compared again with the values obtained using the ESP.

RESULTS

Differences between calculated OC-SAG obviating the shape factor were 121 ± 44, 155 ± 105, 172 ± 117 and 189 ± 129 µm for chord diameters of 11, 14, 14.5 and 15 mm, respectively (p < 0.001). When the shape factor was included in the calculation, differences were 28 ± 48, 62 ± 102, 79 ± 113 and 96 ± 123 µm (p < 0.001). When the inner best fit sphere was used to estimate OC-SAG, differences were 34 ± 11, 0 ± 72, 17 ± 86 and 34 ± 99, respectively, with no significant differences for the 14 and 14.5 mm-chord diameters (p = 0.99 and 0.11, respectively). Correlation coefficients between OC-SAG calculated and measured OC-SAG ranged from 0.53 to 0.90 depending on the chord diameter used. When the mark'ennovy formula was used to calculate the OC-SAG as the lens diameter proposed by the formula, the difference was -47 ± 147 µm (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Differences between the OC-SAG calculated using corneal parameters and that measured with a profilometer are statistically and clinically significant, especially for large chord diameters. The impact of this on contact lens fitting should be addressed in future studies.

Characterization and prediction of the clinical result with a specific model of mini-scleral contact lens in corneas with keratoconus

Background

To investigate which factors are correlated with the visual improvement achieved with a specific model of scleral contact lens (SCL) in keratoconus (KC) eyes and to define a model to predict such improvement according to the pre-fitting data. In addition, the changes occurred with the fitting of a specific model of SCL during a period of 3 months in corneas with KC have been investigated.

Methods

Longitudinal retrospective study including 30 eyes of 18 patients (age, 14–65 years) with KC fitted with the SCL ICD16.50 (Paragon Vision Sciences). Visual, refractive, corneal tomographic and ocular aberrometric changes were evaluated during a 3-month follow-up. Likewise, the characterization of the post-lens meniscus was performed by optical coherence tomography (OCT) with the measurement of central, nasal and temporal vaults.

Results

The visual acuity increased significantly from a mean pre-fitting value with spectacles of 0.23 ± 0.07 logarithm of minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) to a mean value of 0.10 ± 0.04 logMAR after 1 month of SCL wear (P < 0.001). An improvement of 1 or more lines of visual acuity with the SCL occurred in 62.1% of the eyes. A significant decrease in central, nasal, and temporal vault was observed after 1 month of SCL wear (P ≤ 0.046). Likewise, there was a significant difference between nasal and temporal vaults during the first month of SCL use (P = 0.008). Furthermore, a significant reduction of ocular high order (P = 0.028) and primary coma root mean square (P = 0.018) was found with the SCL. A predicting linear equation of the change in visual acuity achievable with the SCL was obtained (P < 0.001, R² = 0.878) considering the pre-fitting spectacle corrected distance visual acuity, and the power and sagittal lens of SCL.

Conclusions

The scleral contact lens evaluated provides an efficacious visual rehabilitation in KC due to the improvement of visual acuity and the correction of low and high-order ocular aberrations. This visual acuity improvement can be predicted from some pre-fitting variables.

What we know about the scleral profile and its impact on contact lens fitting

Scleral contact lens fitting has provided practitioners with one of the earliest pieces of evidence that the sclera was more often asymmetric than symmetric. Some preliminary observations such as different haptic alignment patterns over the sclera in 360 degrees, the appearance of fogging in the fluid chamber and excessive tear out-in flow through specific meridians, quadrants, or areas of the haptic provide evidence of some scleral asymmetry. The advent of technologies that allowed measurement of the scleral profile led to formal research confirming that only about 6% of scleras are symmetric, while the rest are toric, quad-specific, or irregular. This has an evident impact on how to focus scleral lens fitting. Measuring the scleral profile also provided us with true ocular sagittal height data for cord diameters beyond the cornea. Although high variability was expected in pathological eyes, healthy eyes also showed a wide range of ocular sagittal heights. Due to this variability among healthy eyes, a discussion has emerged on whether the one-size-fits-all approach to soft lens fitting is a proper strategy to fit the whole spectrum of sagittal heights. The traditional mode of selecting the parameters for custom soft lenses through corneal parameters is also questioned.

Optical Impact of Corneal Clearance in Healthy Eyes Fitted with Scleral Contact Lenses: A Pilot Study

This pilot study was conducted to evaluate the effect on refraction and optical quality of the increase in the corneal clearance after fitting a specific model of scleral contact lens (ScCL) in healthy subjects. A total of 15 eyes from 15 subjects were enrolled in the study, with evaluation of refraction, ocular aberrations and central corneal clearance with the same model of ScCL (ICD Toric, Paragon Vision Science, Gilbert, AZ, USA), but using 3 different sagittal heights: 4200, 4500 and 4800 µm. Mean values of corneal clearance for each ScCL fitted were 418.1 ± 112.1, 706.5 ± 120.3 and 989.9 ± 117.0 µm, respectively. Significant changes were detected in the spherical equivalent and high-order aberrations, especially coma and spherical aberration, when fitting ScCLs of increasing sagittal heights compared to the pre-fitting values. In conclusion, the increase in central corneal clearance when fitting ScCLs affects refraction, leading to a more myopic refractive error, and inducing an increase in different ocular HOAs. This should be considered when fitting ScCLs, especially multifocal designs.

Repeatability of Anterior Eye Surface Topography Parameters from an Anterior Eye Surface Profilometer

SIGNIFICANCE

Anterior eye shape measurements are important for clinical contact lens fitting. The detailed assessment of measurement repeatability using the Eye Surface Profiler (ESP; Eaglet Eye B.V., AP Houten, the Netherlands) allows for more reliable interpretation of eye surface topography measurements.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine the repeatability of the ESP for anterior central corneal power and anterior eye surface height measurements.

METHODS

A Badal optometer was mounted on the ESP to provide an external fixation target with appropriate accommodation control and refractive correction. Forty-five healthy young adults underwent two sessions of anterior eye measurements, separated by 20 minutes, using the ESP. In each session, three consecutive scans were captured. Sagittal height data were obtained from 8-mm central cornea and from 8- to 14-mm diameter (encompassing the corneal periphery and anterior sclera). Anterior corneal powers were determined from the central cornea. Intersessional and intrasessional repeatability values were determined as coefficients of repeatability and root mean square error differences.

RESULTS

Sagittal height intersessional coefficients of repeatability for central nasal (5 μm) and central temporal (7 μm) were better than peripheral nasal (24 μm) and peripheral temporal (21 μm) regions. Sagittal height intrasessional coefficients of repeatability were 9, 8, 28, and 31 μm for central nasal, central temporal, peripheral nasal, and peripheral temporal regions, respectively. Intersessional coefficients of repeatability of mean sphere, 90/180° (J0) astigmatism, and oblique (J45) astigmatism were 0.67, 0.22, and 0.13 D, respectively, with corresponding intrasessional coefficients of repeatability of 1.27, 0.21, and 0.27 D.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified measuring procedure for the ESP used in this study provides highly repeatable sagittal height measurements in the central cornea but is less repeatable in the corneal periphery and scleral region. Results of the current study can be considered when using ESP in the interpretation of anterior eye surface shape measurements and in contact lens fitting and design.

Corneoscleral Topography Measured with Fourier-based Profilometry and Scheimpflug Imaging

SIGNIFICANCE

Precise measurement of corneoscleral topography makes a valuable contribution to the understanding of anterior eye anatomy and supports the fitting process of contact lenses. Sagittal height data, determined by newer noninvasive techniques, are particularly useful for initial scleral lens selection.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the agreement and repeatability of Fourier-based profilometry and Scheimpflug imaging, in the measurement of sagittal height and toricity of the corneoscleral region.

METHODS

Minimal (Minsag), maximal (Maxsag) sagittal height, toricity (Maxsag - Minsag), and the maximum possible measurement zone diameter of 38 subjects were compared using the Eye Surface Profiler (ESP; Eagle Eye, Houten, the Netherlands) and the corneoscleral profile module of the Pentacam (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) at two different sessions. Correlations between the instruments were analyzed using the Pearson coefficient. Differences between sessions and instruments were analyzed using Bland-Altman and paired t tests.

RESULTS

For an equal chord length, the measurement with Pentacam was significantly greater for Minsag (344 μm; 95% confidence interval [CI], 322 to 364 μm; P < .001) and significantly greater for Maxsag (280 μm; 95% CI, 256 to 305 μm; P < .001), but significantly smaller for toricity (-63 μm; 95% CI, -95 to -31 μm; P < .001). Maximum possible measurement zone diameter with ESP (16.4 ± 1.3 mm) was significantly greater than with Pentacam (14.8 ± 1.1 mm) (P < .001). Repeated measurements from session 1 and session 2 were not significantly different for Pentacam and ESP (P = .74 and P = .64, respectively). The 95% CIs around differences indicate good repeatability for Pentacam (mean difference, -0.9 μm; 95% CI, -6.7 to 4.8 μm) and ESP (4.6 μm; -22.4 to 31.6).

CONCLUSIONS

Although both instruments deliver useful data especially for the fitting of scleral and soft contact lenses, the sagittal height and the toricity measurements cannot be considered as interchangeable.

CLEAR - Scleral lenses

Scleral lenses were the first type of contact lens, developed in the late nineteenth century to restore vision and protect the ocular surface. With the advent of rigid corneal lenses in the middle of the twentieth century and soft lenses in the 1970's, the use of scleral lenses diminished; in recent times there has been a resurgence in their use driven by advances in manufacturing and ocular imaging technology. Scleral lenses are often the only viable form of contact lens wear across a range of clinical indications and can potentially delay the need for corneal surgery. This report provides a brief historical review of scleral lenses and a detailed account of contemporary scleral lens practice including common indications and recommended terminology. Recent research on ocular surface shape is presented, in addition to a comprehensive account of modern scleral lens fitting and on-eye evaluation. A range of optical and physiological challenges associated with scleral lenses are presented, including options for the clinical management of a range of ocular conditions. Future applications which take advantage of the stability of scleral lenses are also discussed. In summary, this report presents evidence-based recommendations to optimise patient outcomes in modern scleral lens practice.

Intrasession repeatability of corneal, limbal and scleral measurements obtained with a fourier transform profilometer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the intrasession repeatability of corneal, limbal and scleral measurements obtained by an experienced operator with a Fourier transform profilometer in healthy eyes.

METHODS

Prospective, single-center study including 35 eyes of 35 participants with ages ranging from 13 to 52 years. All patients underwent three consecutive corneoscleral topographic evaluations with the Eye Surface Profiler (ESP) system (Eaglet Eye b.v.). Intrasession repeatability was analyzed for different geometric and sagittal height variables using the following parameters: the within-subject standard deviation (S_w) of the three consecutive measurements, intrasubject precision (1.96 × S_w), coefficient of variation (CV) and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

Inner best fit sphere (BFS) showed good repeatability, with ICC of 0.844. Higher variability was observed for the repeated measurements of limbus and outer BFS, with ICCs of 0.636 and 0.739, respectively. For mean corneal and scleral radius, ICCs were 0.933 and 0.888, respectively. The repeatability of all sagittal height data was good for all chords evaluated (11-15 mm), with Sw values from 0.02 to 0.11 mm, and ICCs from 0.568 to 0.909. A significant positive correlation was found between the magnitude of temporal-nasal sagittal height difference for all measured chords and its S_w associated.

CONCLUSION

The ESP system can provide consistent measurements of sagittal height data for different chord diameters as well as for mean corneal and scleral radius in healthy eyes. Best fit approaches for limbal and scleral areas were less repeatable, although within a clinically acceptable range.

Characterization of the geometric properties of the sclero-conjunctival structure: a review

To revise the peer-reviewed literature on geometric properties of the scleral-conjunctival structure in order to define their clinical relevance and the potential relationship between their changes and myopia development or progression. A bibliographic search focused on the study of the geometry of conjunctiva and/or sclera as well as those studies evaluating the relationship between geometric changes in the scleral-conjunctival structure and myopia was carried out. Several studies have been performed with different diagnostic technologies, including optical coherence tomography, profilometry and Scheimpflug imaging, to detect geometric changes of the scleral-conjunctival tissue in different physiological conditions of the eye, after use of contact lenses and in different ocular pathologies. Likewise, these technologies have been shown to be a valuable clinical tool to optimize scleral contact lens fitting. Future studies should investigate new potential clinical applications of such technologies, including the evaluation of anterior scleral changes related to myopia, as well as to define standardized clinical standard operating procedures for obtaining accurate and reproducible clinical measurement of the scleral-conjunctival morphology.

Anatomical and physiological considerations in scleral lens wear: Conjunctiva and sclera

While scleral lenses have been fitted using diagnostic lenses or impression moulding techniques for over a century, recent advances in anterior segment imaging such as optical coherence tomography and corneo-scleral profilometry have significantly improved the current understanding of the anatomy of the anterior eye including the morphometry of the conjunctiva, sclera, and corneo-scleral junction, as well as the ocular surface shape and elevation. These technological advances in ocular imaging along with continual improvements and innovations in scleral lens design and manufacturing have led to a global increase in scleral lens prescribing. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the conjunctiva and sclera in the context of modern scleral lens practice, including anatomical variations in healthy and diseased eyes, the physiological impact of scleral lens wear, potential fitting challenges, and current approaches to lens modifications in order to minimise lens-induced complications and adverse ocular effects. Specific topics requiring further research are also discussed.

Bifocal and Multifocal Contact Lenses for Presbyopia and Myopia Control

Bifocal and multifocal optical devices are intended to get images into focus from objects placed at different distances from the observer. Spectacles, contact lenses, and intraocular lenses can meet the requirements to provide such a solution. Contact lenses provide unique characteristics as a platform for implementing bifocality and multifocality. Compared to spectacles, they are closer to the eye, providing a wider field of view, less distortion, and their use is more consistent as they are not so easily removed along the day. In addition, contact lenses are also minimally invasive, can be easily exchangeable, and, therefore, suitable for conditions in which surgical procedures are not indicated. Contact lenses can remain centered with the eye despite eye movements, providing the possibility for simultaneous imaging from different object distances. The main current indications for bifocal and multifocal contact lenses include presbyopia correction in adult population and myopia control in children. Considering the large numbers of potential candidates for optical correction of presbyopia and the demographic trends in myopia, the potential impact of contact lenses for presbyopia and myopia applications is undoubtedly tremendous. However, the ocular characteristics and expectations vary significantly between young and older candidates and impose different challenges in fitting bifocal and multifocal contact lenses for the correction of presbyopia and myopia control. This review presents the recent developments in material platforms, optical designs, simulated visual performance, and the clinical performance assessment of bifocal and multifocal contact lenses for presbyopia correction and/or myopia progression control.

Artefact-free topography based scleral-asymmetry

PURPOSE

To present a three-dimensional non-parametric method for detecting scleral asymmetry using corneoscleral topography data that are free of edge-effect artefacts.

METHODS

The study included 88 participants aged 23 to 65 years (37.7±9.7), 47 women and 41 men. The eye topography data were exported from the Eye Surface Profiler software in MATLAB binary data container format then processed by custom built MATLAB codes entirely independent from the profiler software. Scleral asymmetry was determined initially from the unprocessed topography before being determined again after removing the edge-effect noise. Topography data were levelled around the limbus, then edge-effect was eliminated using a robust statistical moving median technique. In addition to comparing raw elevation data, scleral elevation was also compared through fitting a sphere to every single scleral surface and determining the relative elevation from the best-fit sphere reference surface.

RESULTS

When considering the averaged raw topography elevation data in the scleral section of the eye at radius 8 mm, the average raw elevations of the right eyes' sclera were -1.5±1.77, -1.87±2.12, -1.36±1.82 and -1.57±1.87 mm. In the left eyes at the same radius the average raw elevations were -1.62±1.78, -1.82±2.07, -1.28±1.76 and -1.68±1.93 mm. While, when considering the average raw elevation of the sclera after removing the edge effect, the average raw elevations of the right eyes were -3.71±0.25, -4.06±0.23, -3.95±0.19 and -3.95±0.23 mm. In the left eyes at the same radius the average raw elevations were -3.71±0.19, -3.97±0.22, -3.96±0.19 and -3.96±0.18 mm in the nasal, temporal, superior and inferior sides respectively. Maximum raw elevation asymmetry in the averaged scleral raw elevation was 1.6647±0.9015 mm in right eyes and 1.0358±0.6842 mm in left eyes, both detected at -38° to the nasal side. Best-fit sphere-based relative elevation showed that sclera is more elevated in three main meridians at angles -40°, 76°, and 170° in right eyes and -40°, 76°, and 170° in left eyes, all measured from the nasal meridian. Maximum recorded relative elevation asymmetries were 0.0844±0.0355 mm and 0.068±0.0607 mm at angular positions 76° and 63.5° for right and left eyes in turn.

CONCLUSIONS

It is not possible to use corneoscleral topography data to predict the scleral shape without considering a method of removing the edge-effect from the topography data. The nasal side of the sclera is higher than the temporal side, therefore, rotationally symmetric scleral contact lenses are more likely to be translated towards the temporal side. The scleral shape is best described by levelled raw elevation rather than relative elevation.

Practitioner Learning Curve in Fitting Scleral Lenses in Irregular and Regular Corneas Using a Fitting Trial

Purpose

To assess the learning curve of a novel practitioner with minor previous experience with scleral lenses (SL) fitting in the initial 156 consecutive fittings in irregular and regular corneas using a fitting trial.

Methods

Prospective dispensing case series involving a total of 85 subjects (156 eyes), 122 eyes with irregular corneas (IC Group) and 34 eyes with regular corneas (RC Group). All lenses were fitted by the same practitioner with minimal previous knowledge and practice on SL fitting. The first 156 consecutive fits were studied to estimate the number of trial lenses required to achieve the optimal fit and the number of reorders required. The results were divided into 8 chronological groups of 20 fittings (eyes) each.

Results

There was a decrease in the number of trial lenses required to achieve the optimal fit from 2.35±0.18 lenses in the first 20 fittings to 1.56±0.13 in the last fittings (p<0.05, Wilcoxon). There were no statistically significant differences between IC and RC groups. Regarding the number of reorders, there was also a decrease from 0.95±0.17 in the first fittings to 0.25±0.11 in the last fittings (p<0.05, Wilcoxon). Thought not statistically significant, there was an increase in the use of toric designs with increasing experience.

Conclusions

Practitioner fitting experience reduced both the number of trial lenses required to achieve the best fit and the number of reorders with time. After the first 60 cases, there was a significant reduction in the trial lenses and reorders necessity.