A measure of tear inflow in habitual scleral lens wearers with and without midday fogging

Influence of midday removal and re-application of a scleral lens on fluid reservoir thickness, pre-lens tear film quality and visual acuity

PURPOSE

To investigate whether the midday removal and re-application of scleral lenses (SL) influences fluid reservoir (FR) thickness, pre-lens tear film quality and visual acuity.

METHODS

Two clinical experiments were conducted. A total of 49 keratoconic eyes were evaluated for Part1(tear film and visual acuity analysis) and 12 keratoconic eyes for Part2 (FR thickness analysis). All subjects were wearing 16.4 mm SL for more than 12-months. Tear Film Surface Quality (TFSQ) was evaluated with Medmont E300 at more than 120 min of SL wear, 10 min after SL removal (pre-corneal TFSQ) and 5 min after re-apply the same SL. High and Low Contrast Visual Acuity (HCVA and LCVA) were also assessed with the SL on eye (before and after re-application). For Part2, Anterior OCT (MOptim MOcean4000, China) measurements were taken with and without the SL (at the same time points of Part1) and three outcomes were evaluated: FR thickness, SL thickness (control measurement) and corneal thickness.

RESULTS

Removing and re-applying a SL had a statistically significant positive impact on TFSQ, with an improvement from 0.26 ± 011 to 0.16 ± 0.08 (p = 0.001). This was accompanied by a statistically significant improvement in LogMAR HCVA (from 0.10 ± 0.09 to 0.08 ± 0.08, p < 0.001) and LCVA (from 0.39 ± 0.13 to 0.36 ± 0.13, p < 0.001). Regarding Part2 of the study, a statistically significant increase in FR thickness was observed after SL re-application (from 223.64 ± 48.08 µm to 267.81 ± 80.03 µm, p = 0.007). No changes in corneal thickness were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Midday removal and re-application of a scleral lens positively impacted pre-lens tear film surface quality, although the observed improvement in visual acuity does not constitute a clinically significant change. Clinicians should consider that removing and reapplying a scleral lens may result in an overestimation of the fluid reservoir thickness, which could affect clinical assessments and treatment decisions.

Changes in bulbar conjunctival microcirculation and microvasculature during short-term scleral lens wearing and their associated factors

OBJECTIVE

To explore the changes in microcirculation and microvasculature of the bulbar conjunctiva during the short-term wearing of the scleral lenses (ScCL). And investigate the factors affecting the microcirculation and microvasculature of the bulbar conjunctiva.

METHODS

In this prospective cross-sectional study, functional slit lamp biomicroscopy (FSLB) was used to image the ocular surface microcirculation and microvascular images at two different sites (under the area of ScCL and outside of the area of ScCL) before (baseline) and during the wearing of ScCL at 0 h, 1 h, 2 h and 3 h. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) (RTVue, Optovue Inc, USA) was also used to image central post-lens tear film (PoLTF) and the morphology changes of the conjunctiva under the landing zone at the same time period. The semi-automatic quantification of microcirculation and microvasculature including vessel density (Dbox), vessel diameter (D), axial blood flow velocity (Va) and blood flow volume (Q). And the morphological changes of conjunctiva and PoLTF fogging grading were evaluated manually. The changes in the microcirculation and microvasculature of the ocular surface, PoLTF fogging grade and conjunctival morphology were compared before and during the ScCL wearing at different time periods, and the relationship between them was analyzed.

RESULTS

Nineteen eyes (11 right eyes, 8 left eyes) were analyzed in this study. Outside of the area of ScCL, the Dbox before wearing lenses was less than that at 0 h (P = 0.041). The Q at baseline was greater than that after 1 h ScCL wearing (P = 0.026). Under the area of the ScCL, the Q at 1 h was less than that at baseline and 3 h. During the ScCL wearing, statistically significant conjunctival morphology changes were found among different time stages (baseline (0 μm), 0 h (113.18 μm), 2 h (138.97 μm), 3 h (143.83 μm) (all P ＜0.05). Outside the area of the ScCL, the morphology changes of the conjunctiva were negatively correlated with the changes of Va (P＜0.001,r = -0.471) and Q (P = 0.003,r = -0.348),but positively correlated with the Dbox (P = 0.001,r = 0.386). Under the area of ScCL, the morphology changes of the conjunctiva were negatively correlated with the Q (P = 0.012, r = -0.291). The fogging grade was positively correlated with the Q under the area of the ScCL (P = 0.005, r = 0.331).

CONCLUSIONS

The microcirculation and microvasculature of the ocular surface and conjunctival morphology were changed after wearing ScCL in wearers, which indicated that the microvascular responses happened in the ScCL wearers and the severity of microvascular responses of the ocular surface related to the morphology changes of the conjunctiva. The quantification methods and findings in this study provide clues for the safety of ScCL wearing and may supervise the health of the wearer's ocular surface.

Lens and solution properties in patients with and without midday fogging

INTRODUCTION

Midday fogging is a complication of scleral lens (SL) wear that interrupts clear vision during the course of wear. SLs can be made with a variety of gas permeable materials, sizes and surface treatments, and various solutions are available for storing the lenses and for filling them before application on the eye. Many of these factors have been implicated as possible contributors to midday fogging. This study explored the lens and solution properties in habitual SL wearers with and without midday fogging.

METHODS

In this prospective study, 48 habitual SL wearers were evaluated and asked to report whether they experienced midday fogging and if they removed their lenses during the day. They completed the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), which is a validated tool for dry eye assessment. Lens parameters (material, coatings and diameter) and lens storage and filling solutions were documented. Backward elimination of regression terms evaluated the lens and solution properties in those with and without fogging. OSDI scores were compared using the Mann-Whitney analysis.

RESULTS

Collectively, the lens properties and solutions accounted for 27.7% of the variance related to midday fogging. None of the factors alone had a significant impact upon midday fogging. The median (interquartile range) OSDI score for those with fogging [37 (35)] was significantly different from those without fogging [10 (15)], with the scores corresponding to severe dry eye and normal eyes, respectively.

CONCLUSION

SL wearers with midday fogging exhibited similar symptoms to patients with severe dry eye. Lens and solution characteristics may play a small role in patients with midday fogging, although changing just a single factor is not likely to impact its presence.

Potential pro-inflammatory impact of scleral lens midday fogging on human corneal epithelial cells: An in vitro study

PURPOSE

Midday fogging (MDF) occurs when particulate material accumulates in the fluid reservoir (FR) beneath scleral lenses (SL), and its impact on epithelial cells is unknown. This study examines the in vitro pro-inflammatory effect of the FR on human corneal epithelial cells in varying degrees of MDF.

METHODS

Normal SL neophytes were recruited to wear SL 8 h daily for 4 days. Following 8 h on days 1 and 4, optical coherence tomography (OCT) images were acquired for MDF quantification using ImageJ, and the FR was collected. FR samples from the same eye were later pooled, diluted 2-fold and applied on human telomerase-immortalized corneal epithelial (hTCEpi) cells cultured on Terasaki microwell plates. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and culture media were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. After a 30-minute treatment, the nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) pathway was measured by NF-κB-p65 immunofluorescence and images were analyzed with ImageJ. Pearson's correlation was conducted to determine the association between median nuclear fluorescence and MDF.

RESULTS

Fourteen FR samples with a mean volume of 22 ± 16 µl were tested. Mean MDF severity following 8 h of SL wear was 25 ± 17 units (range 7 - 64). The median nuclear fluorescence (NF-κB-p65 translocation) in cultured hTCEpi cells ranged from 31.43 to 45.16 while the negative and positive controls were 44.71 ± 1.72 and 108.77 ± 68.38, respectively. Although a potential positive trend between MDF and median nuclear fluorescence was observed, Pearson's correlation analysis revealed no significant association (r = +0.48, P = 0.09).

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that the FR can trigger NF-κB-p65 translocation in hTCEpi cells, which may be associated with MDF severity. This study introduces the use of Terasaki microwell plates for immunofluorescence studies of the FR. The technique is simple, minimizes sample usage, and does not require expensive instrumentation.

Current Trends in Scleral Lens Prescription, Management, and Evaluation

OBJECTIVES

To report current trends in scleral contact lens prescription and management, including lens designs prescribed, care products recommended, and procedures performed during routine scleral lens (SL) evaluation.

METHODS

An online survey was designed by the Scleral Lenses in Current Ophthalmic Practice Evaluation study team and administered to eye care practitioners attending a specialty contact lens meeting. The survey was available from November 8, 2019, through March 31, 2020. Participants' demographic data were collected, along with information on lens diameters, landing zone (LZ) designs, recommended care products, and components of routine SL evaluation.

RESULTS

In total, 715 participants responded to at least one of the survey items of interest. Most lenses prescribed (63%) were 16 mm or more in diameter. Lenses with toric LZs were the most frequently prescribed (48%), followed by spherical (40%), quadrant-specific (8%), and impression-based or image-based designs (3%). Most participants (61%) recommended hydrogen peroxide products for lens care. Nonpreserved saline in a single-use vial was most frequently recommended to fill the bowl of the lens before application. Intraocular pressure was measured during SL evaluation by 45% of participants; 38% of participants routinely measured corneal thickness.

CONCLUSIONS

Practitioners increasingly are prescribing SLs with advanced LZ designs. Most practitioners recommend hydrogen peroxide-based disinfection systems and single-use vials of nonpreserved saline for lens care and application. Because differences in components of routine SL evaluations were reported, clinicians may benefit from reaching a consensus on essential components of SL evaluation.

Nonpolar Lipids Contribute to Midday Fogging During Scleral Lens Wear

Purpose

To determine correlations between lipids in the fluid reservoir (FR) and the severity of midday fogging (MDF) in scleral lens (SL) wear.

Methods

SL neophytes were recruited to wear custom SL for 4 days, examined after 8 hours on days 1 and 4. Lens vault and MDF were quantified from anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT), and the FR was collected and analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Relative abundance of lipids was compared to MDF scores using nonparametric correlation testing (Spearman rank). Ocular surface and SL fitting characteristics (lens vault, fitting curves) were likewise compared to MDF.

Results

Thirteen participants (26 eyes, 69% female, 28 ± 9 years old) were included in this study. MDF severity after 8 hours of SL wear was 33 ± 29 units on day 1 and 28 ± 24 units on day 4 (r = .94; P < 0.01). Twelve samples were analyzed using LC-MS/MS, and a total of 170 distinct lipid species were detected. The lipid classes with greatest correlation to MDF were the wax esters (r = .73, P = 0.01), cholesteryl esters (r = .59; P = 0.049), and triacylglycerols (r = .64, P = 0.03). Polar lipids were observed abundantly in all samples. None of the measured ocular surface or fitting outcomes were correlated to MDF.

Conclusions

Nonpolar lipids were the greatest contributors to MDF among these normal participants. Polar lipids may be due to cellular debris, although they do not appear contributory to MDF.

Tear Exchange, Intraocular Pressure, and Wear Characteristics of Quadrant-specific Versus Spherical Haptic Scleral Lenses

OBJECTIVES

To compare scleral lenses (SLs) with a quadrant-specific (study lens) or a spherical (habitual lens) landing zone in a crossover study.

METHODS

Seven participants (eight eyes) wore each of two lenses for 2 weeks before measurements. We measured visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, intraocular pressure (IOP), fluid reservoir clearance, corneal thickness, tear exchange, and lens experience. Variables were compared between lenses and before and after 2 hr of wear.

RESULTS

The visual acuity was not different between the study lens, 0.12 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), and habitual lens, 0.18 logMAR (median, P = 1.0). Contrast sensitivity was 1.3% under the study lens and 1.6% under the habitual lens ( P = 0.94). IOP did not change after 2 hr of wear for either lens (study lens, P = 0.33 and habitual lens, P = 0.74), and corneal thickness did not change during wear of either lens ( P = 0.44). The fluorescein concentration under the study lens did not change after 2 hr (99% of initial concentration; P = 0.84) but decreased to 46% of initial concentration under the habitual lens ( P = 0.008). Lens comfort was slightly better with the study lens (5.0 vs. 4.0, respectively; P = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

SLs with spherical or quadrant-specific landing zones provide good vision and do not affect IOP or corneal thickness. However, tear exchange is greater under spherical lenses than under quadrant-specific lenses. The quadrant-specific lens provides greater patient comfort.

How Can We Best Measure the Performance of Scleral Lenses? Current Insights

Scleral lenses (SLs) present several unique advantageous characteristics for patients. As these lenses are mainly fitted in severely diseased eyes, a thorough evaluation of the ocular surface before and after SL fitting and the on-eye SL fitting evaluation are essential and help minimize potential physiological complications. This review will explore the current and emerging techniques and instrumentation to best measure SL performance ensuring optimal lens fitting, visual quality, comfort and physiological responses, highlighting some potential complications and follow-up recommendations. A single physician could perform the great majority of evaluations. Still, the authors consider that the assessment of SL fitting should be a collaborative and multidisciplinary job, involving contact lens practitioners, ophthalmologists and the industry. This publication has reviewed the most up-to-date work and listed the most used techniques; however, the authors encourage the development of more evidence-based recommendations for SL clinical practice.

Subjective Responses to Various Filling Solutions in the Posterior Fluid Reservoir of Miniscleral Lenses at Application

PURPOSE

To compare the effect of the use of different lubrication eye drops and nonpreserved saline for the application of miniscleral contact lenses (CLs) on subjective experience during 6 hr of lens wear.

METHODS

Experienced soft CL wearers aged 18 to 45 years (inclusive) were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, double-masked, three arm comparison cross-over study. Subjects were custom fitted with KATT 16.5 mm diameter miniscleral lenses, ordered to their prescription. Subjects attended visits on three separate days and were randomized to receive instillation of an HP-guar/nanoemulsion drop or an HP-guar/sodium hyaluronate (HA) eye drop into the miniscleral lens before filling with saline or filling with saline alone (control). Subjective responses were collected up to 6 hr postapplication. Generalized linear mixed models with multinomial distribution and cumulative logit link were used to compare the rate at which responses improved post-CL application for the different treatments.

RESULTS

Twenty-four participants completed the study. Dryness symptoms were more likely to improve at a slower rate postlens application with saline alone compared with the addition of HP-guar/nanoemulsion (P=0.005) or HP-guar/HA (P=0.049) before lens application. Furthermore, the addition of HP-guar/nanoemulsion was more effective than saline alone in improving symptoms of fluctuating vision (P=0.011), grittiness/burning/stinging (P=0.001), and foreign body sensation (P=0.006) more quickly.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of postlens lubrication may be useful in enhancing adaptation to miniscleral lenses.

Quadrant-Specific Changes in Corneal and Tear Fluid Reservoir Thickness for After 2 Hours of Wear

OBJECTIVE

To measure corneal swelling and thickness of the tear fluid reservoir (TFR) after wearing scleral lenses (SLs).

METHODS

Thirty-five participants had 1 eye fitted with each of three SLs (15.0-mm Jupiter, 18.2-mm Jupiter, and 18.0-mm Digiform). Scheimpflug images were obtained before wear, after application, after 2 hr of wear, and after removal. Initial and final TFR thickness and corneal thickness were measured in the central cornea and 3 mm from the center in the superior, inferior, temporal, and nasal quadrants.

RESULTS

Corneal thickness increased with wear, but no between-lens differences were observed in the superior (P=0.09), inferior (P=0.38), or temporal (P=0.53) quadrants. The greatest change in central and nasal cornea thickness was with the 15.0-mm SL (P<0.001). All areas showed settling, with no between-lens differences. Greater final TFR thickness was noted for the superior and nasal quadrants with the 18.0-mm SL (P<0.001), and less final TFR thickness was noted in the inferior (P<0.001) and temporal (P<0.001) quadrants with the 15.0-mm SL. Corneal thickness was not associated with the final TFR thickness.

CONCLUSIONS

The greatest corneal swelling was observed in the inferior quadrant with the 15.0-mm SL, although this lens had the least TFR thickness inferiorly. TFR thickness alone did not account for observed corneal swelling.

Midday Fogging of Scleral Contact Lenses: Current Perspectives

Midday fogging is a common problem in scleral lens wear, as particles accumulate in the tear reservoir between the posterior surface of the lens and the front of the ocular surface during wear. As particulate waste collects, symptoms of blurred vision and discomfort arise, typically leading patients to remove their lenses for cleaning, refilling with fresh solution, and reinsertion into the eye. The appearance of the particulate can vary, likely due to different causes for midday fogging. Studies which attempted to identify the particulate have given some insight into some of the causes, but larger studies are needed to identify this debris. Research on lens solutions used for filling the lens reservoir and of various aspects of scleral lens fits have also begun to culminate in the concept that midday fogging may ultimately be related to inflammation. Since scleral lens wearers can have varied and multiple sources of inflammation, strategies in minimizing midday fogging can differ between patients.

CLEAR - Medical use of contact lenses

The medical use of contact lenses is a solution for many complex ocular conditions, including high refractive error, irregular astigmatism, primary and secondary corneal ectasia, disfiguring disease, and ocular surface disease. The development of highly oxygen permeable soft and rigid materials has extended the suitability of contact lenses for such applications. There is consistent evidence that bandage soft contact lenses, particularly silicone hydrogel lenses, improve epithelial healing and reduce pain in persistent epithelial defects, after trauma or surgery, and in corneal dystrophies. Drug delivery applications of contact lens hold promise for improving topical therapy. Modern scleral lens practice has achieved great success for both visual rehabilitation and therapeutic applications, including those requiring retention of a tear reservoir or protection from an adverse environment. This report offers a practical and relevant summary of the current evidence for the medical use of contact lenses for all eye care professionals including optometrists, ophthalmologists, opticians, and orthoptists. Topics covered include indications for use in both acute and chronic conditions, lens selection, patient selection, wear and care regimens, and recommended aftercare schedules. Prevention, presentation, and management of complications of medical use are reviewed.

CLEAR - Scleral lenses

Scleral lenses were the first type of contact lens, developed in the late nineteenth century to restore vision and protect the ocular surface. With the advent of rigid corneal lenses in the middle of the twentieth century and soft lenses in the 1970's, the use of scleral lenses diminished; in recent times there has been a resurgence in their use driven by advances in manufacturing and ocular imaging technology. Scleral lenses are often the only viable form of contact lens wear across a range of clinical indications and can potentially delay the need for corneal surgery. This report provides a brief historical review of scleral lenses and a detailed account of contemporary scleral lens practice including common indications and recommended terminology. Recent research on ocular surface shape is presented, in addition to a comprehensive account of modern scleral lens fitting and on-eye evaluation. A range of optical and physiological challenges associated with scleral lenses are presented, including options for the clinical management of a range of ocular conditions. Future applications which take advantage of the stability of scleral lenses are also discussed. In summary, this report presents evidence-based recommendations to optimise patient outcomes in modern scleral lens practice.

Microbiological Evaluation of Opened Saline Bottles for Scleral Lens Use and Hygiene Habits of Scleral Lens Patients

SIGNIFICANCE

Scleral lenses have become a widely used treatment option for patients with irregular corneas and ocular surface disease. Successful wear entails use of a nonpreserved saline solution to fill the lens before application on the eye.

PURPOSE

The purposes of this study were to evaluate solution from opened bottles of multidose preservative-free saline for microbiological growth and to better understand study participant hygiene habits while handling these bottles for scleral lens wear.

METHODS

Eligible study participants in this single-center prospective study were patients who routinely used multidose preservative-free saline solution for scleral lens rinsing and filling. Study participants completed a 12-question survey regarding their scleral lens hygiene habits and donated their opened multidose preservative-free saline bottle (PuriLens Plus; The Lifestyle Company, Inc., Freehold, NJ), which was processed for bacterial and fungal cultures.

RESULTS

Thirty-five participants (19 males, 16 females) with ages ranging from 6 to 81 years (mean, 47.9 years) were included. Indications for scleral lens wear included those with irregular corneas and ocular surface disease. The overall rate of microbial contamination among saline samples was 62.9% (n = 22). Twenty-one different microorganisms were identified. The survey responses did not differ significantly (P > .05) for any of the questions with regard to likelihood of positive culture. There were no significant age or sex differences between participants with positive or negative culture results. No significant differences were found between isolation of specific microorganisms and any of the survey responses.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that off-label multidose preservative-free saline commonly used to rinse and fill scleral lenses before application on the eye may become contaminated with microorganisms once the bottle has been opened. Eye care practitioners and scleral lens patients should be aware of these potential contaminations and prioritize lens, hand, and environmental hygiene to minimize the risk of ocular complications.

Anatomical and physiological considerations in scleral lens wear: Eyelids and tear film

Scleral lenses can affect a range of anterior segment structures including the eyelids and the tears. The eyelids, consisting of the outer skin layer, the middle tarsal plate, and the posterior palpebral conjunctiva, provide physical protection and house the meibomian glands and cilia which have important and unique functions. Tears consist of a mix of aqueous, mucus, and lipidomic components that serve vital functions of lubricity, protection, and nourishment to the ocular surface. Both the eyelids and the tear film interact directly with scleral lenses on the eye and can affect but also be impacted by scleral lens wear. The purpose of this paper is to review the anatomy and physiology of the eyelids and tear film, discuss the effects and impacts of the scleral lenses on these structures, and identify areas that require further research.

Factors associated with patient-reported midday fogging in established scleral lens wearers

PURPOSE

To estimate the prevalence of patient-reported midday fogging and to identify risk factors for midday fogging.

METHOD

A multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted with an electronic survey that was distributed to scleral lens practitioners. The survey asked them to describe their most recently examined established scleral lens patient. Respondents provided data about patient-reported midday fogging, patient demographic characteristics, indication for lens wear, lens-wearing schedule, lens design, and care products.

RESULTS

Of the 248 survey respondents who indicated whether their patients had midday fogging, 64 (25.8 %) had patients who self-reported such issues. Midday fogging was not associated with demographic characteristics (age, sex, race/ethnicity), indications for scleral lens wear, mean lens diameter (P = .30), haptic design (P = .29), use of a daily cleaner (P = .12), disinfection/storage solution used (P = .71), or filling solution (P = .65). Patients who reported midday fogging more commonly reported redness or irritation associated with scleral lens wear compared with those who did not experience midday fogging (P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Prevalence of midday fogging in this study was similar to previously reported rates. No specific lens design or care product was associated with patient-reported midday fogging. If inflammatory mediators are elevated in the postlens fluid reservoir of patients with midday fogging, as previously described, the redness or irritation associated with scleral lens wear suggests that ocular surface inflammation may be contributing to this phenomenon.

Scleral lens wear: Measuring inflammation in the fluid reservoir

PURPOSE

To measure inflammatory mediators in the scleral lens fluid reservoir (FR) in healthy eyes and to compare them to basal tear samples after 8-hs (8h) and 4-days (4d) of scleral lens (SL) wear.

METHODS

Fifteen normal, habitual soft contact lens wearers were fitted with 14.8- or 15.4-mm SLs (Zenlens, Alden Optical, USA). Basal ocular surface tears and FR samples were collected after 8h and 4d of daily SL wear. Levels of interleukin (IL) -4 and -8, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-7, -9, and -10, and tissue inhibitor of MMPs (TIMPs) 1-4 were measured in all samples using Luminex assays. Visual acuity, corneal and conjunctival staining, and comfort assessments were completed at the baseline, 8h and 4d time points.

RESULTS

MMP-9 and MMP-10 were greater in FR than basal ocular surface tears. After 8h of SL wear, the median concentration of MMP-9 in the FR and basal tears were 62.7 and 15.2 ng/mL, respectively (p = 0.047). Likewise, MMP-10 was significantly greater in FR compared to basal tears, after 8h (25.8 ng/mL vs 2.8 ng/mL, p < 0.001) and 4d (2.1 ng/mL vs17.2 ng/mL, p = 0.047). IL-4 and IL-8 levels were greater in FR but not significantly at 8h (2.2 vs 3.1 ng/mL; and 0.1 vs 0.4 ng/mL, respectively) or 4d (0.9 vs 3.5 ng/mL; 0.0 vs 0.2 ng/mL). MMP-7 was not affected by SL wear after 8h (46.0 basal vs 54.4 ng/mL FR) or 4d (34.2 vs 87.5 ng/mL). Visual acuity, corneal and conjunctival staining did not change; comfort was reduced in SL compared to soft contact lens wear.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to compare the FR with the basal ocular surface tears. MMP-9 and MMP-10 were elevated in the FR after several hours of SL wear, suggesting potential clinical implications of SL wear and deserves further investigation.