The impact of exposure on the magnitude of astigmatism formed within the precorneal tear film over the central optical zone of the cornea in ocular surface disease

Management of Dry Eye Disease for Intraocular Lens Power Calculation in Cataract Surgery: A Systematic Review

Cataracts are characterized by the crystalline lens of the eye becoming cloudy, and dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial disease in which the homeostasis of the tear film is lost. As the prevalence of both diseases increases with age, there is a high prevalence of DED among patients who are candidates for cataract surgery. In recent years, cataract surgery has evolved from vision restoration surgery to refractive surgery. To achieve good surgical outcomes, it is necessary to minimize postoperative refractive error in intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation, which requires accurate preoperative keratometry measurements. A stable tear film is important for the accuracy and reproducibility of keratometry measurements, and DED may have a deleterious effect. In this study, original articles that focused primarily on findings related to this topic were evaluated. A systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Although appropriate DED diagnoses were not presented in the articles evaluated in this review, it was confirmed that the clinical signs of DED, particularly the shortening of the tear film break-up time (TBUT), negatively impact IOL power calculations. Improvement in these clinical signs might mitigate the negative effects on these calculations.

Corneal Surface Elevation and Thickness in Relation to the Fit of Rigid Contact Lenses in Keratoconus and After Corneal Cross-Linking

Purpose

To determine if factors pertaining to corneal thickness and elevation were linked to the prescribed back optic zone radius and overall diameter in keratoconus (group I), and cross-linked keratoconus (group II), cases successfully fitted with rigid contact lenses.

Patients and Methods

A review of cases adapted to contact lens wear (Rose K™) and assessed using Pentacam™ (for corneal anterior surface topography, astigmatism, elevation, and topographic thickness variation) was undertaken to determine the significance of any correlation with comfort, lens usage, grading of keratoconus, corrected distance visual acuity (with glasses and contacts), refractive error, prescribed lens powers, back optic zone radius and overall diameter values were assessed.

Results

Chief findings were, comfort was rated highly, lenses were worn for more than 10 hours/day in 75% of cases. RCL corrected distance logMAR acuities (median, mode, inter-quartile ranges) were 0.11, 0.12 (0.08-0.13) and 0.08, 0.08 (0.06-0.11) in groups I and II, respectively. Multiple linear regression revealed significant correlations (p<0.01) between the [A] back optic zone radius, the thinnest value of corneal thickness (x1) and anterior corneal surface elevation (x2). The respective r2 values were 0.471 in group I and 0.512 in group II. [B] overall diameter, x1 and x2. The respective r2 values were 0.282 in group I and 0.505 in group II.

Conclusion

RCLs were well-tolerated in both groups. The r2 values imply there is a 50% chance of correctly predicting the suitable back optic zone radius in both groups, a 50% chance of correctly predicting the overall diameter in group II and 28% in group I cases using just x1 and x2. The thinnest value of corneal thickness and anterior corneal surface elevation could be used to quickly select the BOZR and OD during RCL fitting. This has the potential to reduce chair-time, waste and improve efficiency.

The relationship between angle kappa and astigmatism after phacoemulsification with implanting of spherical and aspheric intraocular lens

Purpose:

To determine the significance of any association between either change in angle kappa (K°) or the rectilinear displacement (L, mm) of the first Purkinje image relative to the pupil center and unexpected changes in astigmatism after phacoemulsification.

Methods:

Orbscan II (Bausch and Lomb) measurements were taken at 1, 2, and 3 months after unremarkable phacoemulsification in patients implanted with spherical (group 1, SA60AT, Alcon) or aspheric (group 2, SN60WF, Alcon) nontoric IOLs. The outputs were used to calculate L. Astigmatism, measured by autorefractometry and subjective refraction, was subjected to vector analysis (polar and cartesian formats) to determine the actual change induced over the periods 1–2 and 2–3 months postop.

Results:

Chief findings were that the mean (n, ±SD, 95%CI) values for L over each period were as follows: Group 1, 0.407 (38, ±0.340, 0.299–0.521), 0.315 (23, ±0.184, 0.335–0.485); Group 2, 0.442 (45, ±0.423, 0.308–0.577), 0.372 (26, ±0.244, 0.335–0.485). Differences between groups were not significant. There was a significant linear relationship between (A) the change in K (ΔK = value at 1 month-value at 2 months) and K at 1 month (x), where ΔK =0.668-3.794X (r = 0.812, n = 38, P = <0.001) in group 1 and ΔK = 0.263x -1.462 (r = 0.494, n = 45, P = 0.002) in group 2, (B) L and the J₄₅ vector describing the actual change in astigmatism between 1 and 2 months in group 2, where J₄₅ (by autorefractometry) =0.287L-0.160 (r = 0.487, n = 38, P = 0.001) and J₄₅ (by subjective refraction) =0.281L-0.102 (r = 0.490, n = 38, P = 0.002), and (C) J₄₅ and ΔK between 2 and 3 months in group 2, where J₄₅ (by subjective refraction) =0.086ΔK-0.063 (r = 0.378, n = 26, P = 0.020).

Conclusion:

Changes in the location of the first Purkinje image relative to the pupil center after phacoemulsification contributes to changes in refractive astigmatism. However, the relationship between the induced change in astigmatism resulting from a change in L is not straightforward.

Spotlight on the Corneal Back Surface Astigmatism: A Review

Recent evidence indicates that the corneal back surface astigmatism (CBSA) contributes to the refractive state of the eye in cataract surgery, especially with the implantation of toric intraocular lenses. But this has been met with some scepticism. A review of key studies performed over the past three decades shows that the mean CBSA power ranges from 0.18(±0.16)D to 1.04(±0.20)D. The clinical assessment of CBSA is problematic. There is poor agreement between the current automated systems for assessment of CBSA and it is assumed that these systems directly measure the CBSA. But CBSA cannot be measured directly in vivo. A historical review of methods used to quantify the curvature of the posterior corneal surface reveals that CBSA estimated by current systems is based on values for corneal front surface astigmatism, corneal refractive index, central corneal thickness, corneal thickness at peripheral locations and the exact distance between the corneal apex and each one of these peripheral locations. Doubts and errors in these values, coupled with the precise details of the algorithm incorporated to estimate CBSA, are the likely sources of the lack of agreement between current systems. These systematic errors cloud the assessment of CBSA. Mean CBSA may be low, but it varies from case to case. There is a clear need for a realistic, practical procedure for clinicians to independently calibrate systems for estimating CBSA. This would help to reduce uncertainty and the discrepancies between instruments designed to measure the same parameter.