Significance of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology and Vacuum-Assisted Core Needle Biopsy for Small Breast Lesions

Evaluation of large language models in breast cancer clinical scenarios: a comparative analysis based on ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4.0, and Claude2

BACKGROUND

Large language models (LLMs) have garnered significant attention in the AI domain owing to their exemplary context recognition and response capabilities. However, the potential of LLMs in specific clinical scenarios, particularly in breast cancer diagnosis, treatment, and care, has not been fully explored. This study aimed to compare the performances of three major LLMs in the clinical context of breast cancer.

METHODS

In this study, clinical scenarios designed specifically for breast cancer were segmented into five pivotal domains (nine cases): assessment and diagnosis, treatment decision-making, postoperative care, psychosocial support, and prognosis and rehabilitation. The LLMs were used to generate feedback for various queries related to these domains. For each scenario, a panel of five breast cancer specialists, each with over a decade of experience, evaluated the feedback from LLMs. They assessed feedback concerning LLMs in terms of their quality, relevance, and applicability.

RESULTS

There was a moderate level of agreement among the raters (Fleiss' kappa=0.345, P<0.05). Comparing the performance of different models regarding response length, GPT-4.0 and GPT-3.5 provided relatively longer feedback than Claude2. Furthermore, across the nine case analyses, GPT-4.0 significantly outperformed the other two models in average quality, relevance, and applicability. Within the five clinical areas, GPT-4.0 markedly surpassed GPT-3.5 in the quality of the other four areas and scored higher than Claude2 in tasks related to psychosocial support and treatment decision-making.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed that in the realm of clinical applications for breast cancer, GPT-4.0 showcases not only superiority in terms of quality and relevance but also demonstrates exceptional capability in applicability, especially when compared to GPT-3.5. Relative to Claude2, GPT-4.0 holds advantages in specific domains. With the expanding use of LLMs in the clinical field, ongoing optimization and rigorous accuracy assessments are paramount.

Evaluating breast ultrasound S-detect image analysis for small focal breast lesions

Background

S-Detect is a computer-assisted, artificial intelligence-based system of image analysis that has been integrated into the software of ultrasound (US) equipment and has the capacity to independently differentiate between benign and malignant focal breast lesions. Since the revision and upgrade in both the breast imaging-reporting and data system (BI-RADS) US lexicon and the S-Detect software in 2013, evidence that supports improved accuracy and specificity of radiologists' assessment of breast lesions has accumulated. However, such assessment using S-Detect technology to distinguish malignant from breast lesions with a diameter no greater than 2 cm requires further investigation.

Methods

The US images of focal breast lesions from 295 patients in our hospital from January 2019 to June 2022 were collected. The BI-RADS data were evaluated by the embedded program and as manually modified prior to the determination of a pathological diagnosis. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to compare the diagnostic accuracy between the assessments of the conventional US images, the S-Detect classification, and the combination of the two.

Results

There were 326 lesions identified in 295 patients, of which pathological confirmation demonstrated that 239 were benign and 87 were malignant. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the conventional imaging group were 75.86%, 93.31%, and 88.65%. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the S-Detect classification group were 87.36%, 88.28%, and 88.04%, respectively. The assessment of the amended combination of S-Detect with US image analysis (Co-Detect group) was improved with a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 90.80%, 94.56%, and 93.56%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of the conventional US group, the S-Detect group, and the Co-Detect group using area under curves was 0.85, 0.88 and 0.93, respectively. The Co-Detect group had a better diagnostic efficiency compared with the conventional US group (Z = 3.882, p = 0.0001) and the S-Detect group (Z = 3.861, p = 0.0001). There was no significant difference in distinguishing benign from malignant small breast lesions when comparing conventional US and S-Detect techniques.

Conclusions

The addition of S-Detect technology to conventional US imaging provided a novel and feasible method to differentiate benign from malignant small breast nodules.

Horizontal Rotary Cutting Technique for Skin Injury Avoidance in Superficial Benign Breast Masses

Objective

This study aims to investigate the feasibility of the horizontal rotary-cut technique in the removal of superficial benign breast tumors with a ≤1.0 cm distance between the upper margin of the tumor and the skin.

Patients and Methods

A total of 69 patients with superficial benign breast tumors received horizontal rotary-cut surgery between July 2018 and June 2019 (horizontal group). The rotary cutter groove was in the true lateral position of the tumor and the ultrasonic probe was vertical to the rotary cutter groove. The patients were compared with 33 patients who underwent the traditional vertical rotary-cut surgery between July 2017 and June 2018 (traditional group) regarding the aspects of operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative skin ecchymosis, skin damage, and tumor residue. The rotary cutter groove was directly below the tumor and the ultrasonic probe was parallel to the rotary cutter groove in the traditional vertical rotary-cut surgery.

Results

The operation time in the horizontal group was significantly shorter than in the traditional group (7.7 ± 1.1 minutes vs 9.5 ± 1.3 minutes, with t = -7.458 and p = 0.000) and there was significantly less skin damage in the horizontal group than in the traditional group (0 cases vs 3 cases, with p = 0.032). The differences in intraoperative bleeding and postoperative skin ecchymosis between the two groups were not statistically significant (6.0 ± 1.3 mL vs 6.5 ± 1.5 mL, with t = -1.853 and p = 0.067; 4 cases vs 2 cases, with χ ² = 0.003 and p = 0.958). Ninety-seven patients attended follow-ups for 6-30 (16.5 ± 4.5) months. No residues or recurrences were observed under ultrasound reviews in either group.

Conclusion

In superficial benign breast tumor removal, the horizontal rotary-cut breast technique can help avoid skin injury, shorten the operation time, and reduce tumor residue more effectively compared with the traditional vertical rotary-cut technique. It has certain popularization and application values.

Wireless ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: Experience in clinical practice at European Institute of Oncology

In the last few years, ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (US-VABB) has replaced surgical biopsy due to higher diagnostic accuracy and lower patient discomfort, and, at present, an even greater possibility is represented by the new wireless ultrasound-guided VAB device (Wi-UVAB). The purpose of our study is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of this new device in a sizeable representative number of patients. From January 2014 to June 2018, 168 biopsies were performed in our institution using the new Wi-UVAB device. We analyzed sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of biopsies obtained with the new device using surgical results as reference point, following patients for at least one year. In our cohort, we obtained a complete sensitivity of 97.5%, an absolute sensitivity of 94.3%, a complete specificity of 98%, and an absolute specificity of 98%. The positive predictive value of the procedure was 97.5% while the negative predictive value was 98%. The diagnostic accuracy was 98%. The Wi-UVAB is a safe procedure with high diagnostic accuracy, comparable to that of the traditional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy and even higher than that of core needle biopsy (CNB). Moreover, the Wi-UVAB is easy to use and shows low costs as core needle biopsy (CNB).

Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) is a reliable diagnostic tool for small breast lesions (≤ 1.0 cm): a 20-year retrospective study

Background

Breast cancer is a major public health problem worldwide. It is recommended that small breast lesions or those suspicious for malignancy be evaluated via histopathological examination (“core biopsy” or surgical specimens), and lesions that are probably benign and palpable should be examined via fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). This study aimed to assess the accuracy of FNAC for the diagnosis of small breast lesions.

Methods

We reviewed all anatomopathological reports of FNACs collected between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2019 (n = 24,721) in a private community pathology service. Lesions up to 1.0 cm (≤1.0 cm) (n = 8334) were included for evaluation and classified according to the recommendation of the International Academy of Cytology Yokohama System for Reporting Breast Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy Cytopathology in the following categories: (1) insufficient/inadequate; (2) benign; (3) atypical, probably benign; (4) suspicious of malignancy; and (5) malignant. Subsequently, the results of the FNACs were compared to those of the respective histopathological examinations (n = 785).

Results

FNAC had a specificity of 99.6%; sensitivity, 97.4%; positive predictive value, 99.6%; negative predictive value, 97.6%; and accuracy, 98.5%.

Conclusions

FNAC is a reliable method for diagnosing small breast lesions (≤1.0 cm).

Elite VABB 13G: A New Ultrasound-Guided Wireless Biopsy System for Breast Lesions. Technical Characteristics and Comparison with Respect to Traditional Core-Biopsy 14-16G Systems

The typification of breast lumps with fine-needle biopsies is often affected by inconclusive results that extend diagnostic time. Many breast centers have progressively substituted cytology with micro-histology. The aim of this study is to assess the performance of a 13G-needle biopsy using cable-free vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB) technology. Two of our operators carried out 200 micro-histological biopsies using the Elite 13G-needle VABB and 1314 14–16G-needle core biopsies (CBs) on BI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 lesions. Thirty-one of the procedures were repeated following CB, eighteen following cytological biopsy, and three after undergoing both procedures. The VABB Elite procedure showed high diagnostic performance with an accuracy of 94.00%, a sensitivity of 92.30%, and a specificity of 100%, while the diagnostic underestimation was 11.00%, all significantly comparable to of the CB procedure. The VABB Elite 13G system has been shown to be a simple, rapid, reliable, and well-tolerated biopsy procedure, without any significant complications and with a diagnostic performance comparable to traditional CB procedures. The histological class change in an extremely high number of samples would suggest the use of this procedure as a second-line biopsy for suspect cases or those with indeterminate cyto-histological results.

Ultrasound-Guided Breast Biopsy: Improved Accuracy of 10-G Cable-Free Elite Compared With 14-G CCNB

BACKGROUND

Imaging-guided breast biopsy is crucial for breast lesion evaluation. We aim to make the first comprehensive comparison of two different ultrasound-guided breast biopsy devices: 14-G conventional core needle biopsy (CCNB) and the newly applied cable-free, low-vacuum-assisted 10-G breast biopsy system, Elite.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected patients with suspected breast cancer who underwent ultrasound-guided 14-G CCNB or 10-G Elite from October 2013 through March 2018 and compared the biopsy result with the result after operation. We analyzed the test performance of the two methods and their accuracy in immunohistochemistry assays mainly including estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, and Ki67. We also analyzed the accuracy of 10-G Elite with frozen sections.

RESULTS

Six hundred seventy-four patients who underwent 14-G CCNB and 592 patients who underwent 10-G Elite were finally included in the research. Negative predictive value with Elite was higher than with CCNB (Elite 86.5%, CCNB 41.7%, P < 0.001). Sensitivity (Elite 97.7%, CCNB 96.2%, P = 0.1), specificity (Elite 98.7%, CCNB 90.0%, P = 0.1), positive predictive value (Elite 99.8%, CCNB 99.7%, P = 0.7), and false negative rate (Elite 2.3%, CCNB 3.8%, P = 0.1) showed no difference between two devices. In terms of immunohistochemistry assay, Ki67 agreement of Elite was higher than that of CCNB (Elite 79.5%, CCNB 73.4%, P = 0.045). Estrogen receptor agreement (Elite 90.6%, CCNB 87.7%, P = 0.2), progesterone receptor agreement (Elite 83.9%, CCNB 80.9%, P = 0.3), and human epidermal growth factor receptor two agreement (Elite 94.2%, CCNB 93.5%, P = 0.7) showed no difference between Elite and CCNB. The rate of an inconclusive biopsy result was lower with Elite than with CCNB (Elite 1.5%, CCNB 3.3%, P = 0.045).

CONCLUSIONS

10-G Elite has higher negative predictive value, higher Ki67 agreement, and lower inconclusive results than 14-G CCNB. Elite can be a reliable substitute for 14-G CCNB.

Differentiating vacuum-assisted breast biopsy from core needle biopsy: Is it necessary?

Needle biopsy has replaced excisional biopsy as a definitive diagnostic technique for breast tumours, although excisional biopsy is still used for complete tumour removal for therapeutic and/or diagnostic purposes. Many vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VAB) systems have been made available by several manufacturers since the release of the Mammotome (MMT) by Johnson & Johnson in 1995. Several recent discussions have been conducted to identify whether core needle biopsy (CNB) or VAB, is more appropriate. However, currently available VAB systems differ from the conventional system (i.e. articulate arm type 11-gauge(G) MMT), and the characteristics of both CNB and VAB have been improved. In CNB, a 14-G needle is frequently used to obtain a larger sample. By contrast, VAB is considered easier to perform because it uses a thinner needle and a lighter, non-tethered system. When differentiating CNB from VAB, the type of VAB should also be defined. In this review, we discuss the characteristics of ultrasonography-guided VAB and CNB with a focus on practical issues such as the number of samples and volume of tissue obtained during ultrasonography-guided needle biopsy.

[Efficacy of ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted Mammotome excision for management of benign breast diseases: analysis of 1267 cases]

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical value of ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted Mammotome (MMT) system for surgical resection of benign breast disease.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted among 1267 patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery with ultrasound-guided MMT system for benign breast disease at our center between January, 2009 and January, 2014. The resection rate, incidence of complication, recurrence rate, patients' satisfaction, clinical follow-up results and risk factors were analyzed. The patients were followed up at 1 month, 6 months and every 6 months thereafter for up to 2 years with a median follow-up of 22 months.

RESULTS

Of the total of 1267 patients, 1259 (99.36%) had complete resection of the breast lesions, and residual lesions were found in 8 cases 1 month after the operation. The resection rate was significantly associated with lesion size (P=0.003) but not with the patients'age, pathology, BI-RADS classification, or the number or location of the lesions (P>0.05). Eighty-nine (7.02%) patients showed postoperative complications, and hematoma occurred in 70 (5.52%) patients after the operation. The complication rate was significantly associated with the number and location of lesions (P=0.000) but not with age, pathology, BI-RADS classification or the lesion size (P>0.05). A total of 193 (15.23%) patients had recurrence after the operation, including 65 (5.13%) with in situ recurrence and 128 (10.1%) with new lesions. The recurrence rate was significantly associated with the number and size of lesions (P=0.000) but not with age, pathology, BI-RADS classification or location of lesions(P>0.05). Six patients were not satisfied with the appearance of the incision, and the overall satisfaction rate of the patients was 99.52%.

CONCLUSION

s Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted MMT excision is a safe and effective procedure for benign breast disease with a low surgical complication rate, a high resection rate and a low recurrence rate. This technique results in good postoperative appearance for treatment of benign and high-risk breast lesions, especially multiple benign breast lesions.

The role of fine needle aspiration cytology and core biopsy in the diagnosis of palpable breast masses

Background:

The modern approach to palpable breast masses is to get cytopathologic diagnosis before definitive surgery. We aimed to compare fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) with core biopsy in histopathologic diagnosis of palpable breast masses.

Materials and Methods:

Data were collected on 123 women who have suspicious palpable breast masses from 2007 to 2010.

Results:

Of the 123 patients, core biopsies were performed on 64 patients (Group 1) and FNAC on 59 patients (Group 2). Malignancy was confirmed in 25 out of 32 clinically suspicious patients in Group 1 (78.1%), and 20 out of 21 participants in Group 2 (95.2%). Among the clinically suspicious patients, 81.8% of 33 patients in Group 1, and 90.3% of 31 patients in Group 2 were identified malignancy. Sensitivity was 100% for core biopsy and 95% for FNAC. Specificity was 100% in both procedures. False negativity rate in FNAC were 5%.

Conclusion:

Sensitivity and specificity showed that in the case of true histopathologic classification, core biopsy is superior to FNAC. Nevertheless, FNAC's role as a fast, simple and cheap diagnosis cannot be ignored. It is an effective diagnostic tool in most patients, in comparison to the correct and specific typing of core biopsies in benign lesions which protect patients from the open biopsy.