1
|
Wenkel E, Wunderlich P, Fallenberg EM, Platz Batista da Silva N, Preibsch H, Sauer S, Siegmann-Luz K, Weigel S, Wessling D, Wilpert C, Baltzer PAT. Recommendations of the German Radiological Society's breast imaging working group regarding breast MRI. ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG 2024; 196:939-944. [PMID: 38237631 DOI: 10.1055/a-2216-0782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/17/2024]
Abstract
· Breast MRI is an essential part of breast imaging. · The recommendations for performing breast MRI have been updated. · A table provides a compact and quick overview. More detailed comments supplement the table.. · The "classic" breast MRI can be performed based on the recommendations. Tips for special clinical questions, such as implant rupture, mammary duct pathology or local lymph node status, are included.. CITATION FORMAT: · Wenkel E, Wunderlich P, Fallenberg E et al. Aktualisierung der Empfehlungen der AG Mammadiagnostik der Deutschen Röntgengesellschaft zur Durchführung der Mamma-MRT. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2024; 196: 939 - 944.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evelyn Wenkel
- Radiology, Radiology München, München, Germany
- Medical Faculty, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Petra Wunderlich
- Radiologische Gemeinschaftspraxis Radebeul, Elblandklinikum Radebeul, Germany
| | | | | | - Heike Preibsch
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Germany
| | - Stephanie Sauer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Germany
| | - Katja Siegmann-Luz
- Referenzzentrum Mammographie Berlin, German Breast Cancer Screening Program, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stefanie Weigel
- Clinic for Radiology and Reference Center for Mammography, University of Münster Faculty of Medicine, Münster, Germany
| | - Daniel Wessling
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Germany
| | - Caroline Wilpert
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Freiburg Department of Radiology, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Pascal Andreas Thomas Baltzer
- Unit of General Radiology and Paediatric Radiology, Medical University of Vienna Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pessoa EC, Moares TP, de Amorim HLE, Couto HL, Abbade JF, Shinomia S, Pessoa CPKC, Nahas EAP. Maintaining accuracy and expanding access: evaluating the efficacy of the Botucatu Abbreviated Breast MRI Protocol. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRÍCIA 2024; 46:e-rbgo55. [PMID: 39176207 PMCID: PMC11341192 DOI: 10.61622/rbgo/2024rbgo55] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 08/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective Our study evaluated the effectiveness of the Botucatu Abbreviated Protocol in breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within Brazil's public healthcare system, focusing on its impact on patient access to MRI exams. Methods This retrospective study involved 197 breast MRI exams of female patients over 18 years with histological breast carcinoma diagnosis, conducted at Hospital das Clínicas de Botucatu - UNESP between 2014 and 2018. Two experienced examiners prospectively and blindly analyzed the exams using an Integrated Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS). They first evaluated the Botucatu Abbreviated Protocol, created from sequences of the complete protocol (PC), and after an average interval of 30 days, they reassessed the same 197 exams with the complete protocol. Dynamic and morphological characteristics of lesions were assessed according to BI-RADS 5th edition criteria. The study also analyzed the average number of monthly exams before and after the implementation of Botucatu Abbreviated Protocol. Results The Botucatu Abbreviated Protocol showed high sensitivity (99% and 96%) and specificity (90.9% and 96%). There was a significant increase in the average monthly MRI exams from 6.62 to 23.8 post-implementation. Conclusion The Botucatu Abbreviated Protocol proved effective in maintaining diagnostic accuracy and improving accessibility to breast MRI exams, particularly in the public healthcare setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduardo Carvalho Pessoa
- Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsUniversidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”BotucatuSPBrazilDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
| | - Thais Paiva Moares
- Rede Mater Dei de Saúde e RedimamaBelo HorizonteMGBrazil Rede Mater Dei de Saúde e Redimama, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
- RedimamaBelo HorizonteMGBrazilRedimama, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
| | | | - Henrique Lima Couto
- Department of RadiologyBotucatu Medical SchoolUniversidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”BotucatuSPBrazilDepartment of Radiology, Botucatu Medical School, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
| | - Joelcio Francisco Abbade
- Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsUniversidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”BotucatuSPBrazilDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
| | - Suzana Shinomia
- Department of RadiologyBotucatu Medical SchoolUniversidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”BotucatuSPBrazilDepartment of Radiology, Botucatu Medical School, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
| | - Carla Priscila Kamiya Carvalho Pessoa
- Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsUniversidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”BotucatuSPBrazilDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
| | - Eliana Aguiar Petri Nahas
- Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsUniversidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”BotucatuSPBrazilDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Seely JM, Domonkos V, Verma R. Auditing Abbreviated Breast MR Imaging: Clinical Considerations and Implications. Radiol Clin North Am 2024; 62:687-701. [PMID: 38777543 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2023.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
Abbreviated breast MR (AB-MR) imaging is a relatively new breast imaging tool, which maintains diagnostic accuracy while reducing image times compared with full-protocol breast MR (FP-MR) imaging. Breast imaging audits involve calculating individual and organizational metrics, which can be compared with established benchmarks, providing a standard against which performance can be measured. Unlike FP-MR imaging, there are no established benchmarks for AB-MR imaging but studies demonstrate comparable performance for cancer detection rate, positive predictive value 3, sensitivity, and specificity with T2. We review the basics of performing an audit, including strategies to implement if benchmarks are not being met.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean M Seely
- Department of Radiology, The Ottawa Hospital, General Campus, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L6, Canada.
| | - Victoria Domonkos
- Department of Radiology, The Ottawa Hospital, General Campus, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Raman Verma
- Department of Radiology, The Ottawa Hospital, General Campus, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L6, Canada. https://twitter.com/RamanVermaMD
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kuhl CK. Abbreviated Breast MRI: State of the Art. Radiology 2024; 310:e221822. [PMID: 38530181 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.221822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
Abbreviated MRI is an umbrella term, defined as a focused MRI examination tailored to answer a single specific clinical question. For abbreviated breast MRI, this question is: "Is there evidence of breast cancer?" Abbreviated MRI of the breast makes maximum use of the fact that the kinetics of breast cancers and of benign tissue differ most in the very early postcontrast phase; therefore, abbreviated breast MRI focuses on this period. The different published approaches to abbreviated MRI include the following three subtypes: (a) short protocols, consisting of a precontrast and either a single postcontrast acquisition (first postcontrast subtracted [FAST]) or a time-resolved series of postcontrast acquisitions with lower spatial resolution (ultrafast [UF]), obtained during the early postcontrast phase immediately after contrast agent injection; (b) abridged protocols, consisting of FAST or UF acquisitions plus selected additional pulse sequences; and (c) noncontrast protocols, where diffusion-weighted imaging replaces the contrast information. Abbreviated MRI was proposed to increase tolerability of and access to breast MRI as a screening tool. But its widening application now includes follow-up after breast cancer and even diagnostic assessment. This review defines the three subtypes of abbreviated MRI, highlighting the differences between the protocols and their clinical implications and summarizing the respective evidence on diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christiane K Kuhl
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Aachen, RWTH Pauwelsstr 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hellgren R, Tolocka E, Saracco A, Wilczek B, Sundbom A, Hall P, Dickman PW. Comparing the diagnostic accuracy, reading time, and inter-rater agreement of breast MRI abbreviated and full protocols: a multi-reader study. Acta Radiol 2024; 65:195-201. [PMID: 38115682 PMCID: PMC10903132 DOI: 10.1177/02841851231216552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Earlier studies have shown that abbreviated protocol magnetic resonance imaging (AB-MRI) has similar diagnostic accuracy as the full protocol (Full MRI). PURPOSE To compare the diagnostic accuracy, reading time, and inter-rater agreement of AB-MRI to Full MRI among women without known increased familial risk of breast cancer or prior biopsy. MATERIAL AND METHODS In total, 395 MRI examinations were included in this study. Three readers were blinded to all patient information. The AB-MRI and Full MRI were read separately and in a different random order for each of the readers. Scores 1-2 were considered test negative while scores 3-5 were test positive. A positive reference test was the diagnosis of malignancy; a negative reference test was the absence of a diagnosis of breast cancer within a two-year follow-up. We used a generalized estimating equations approach to compare sensitivity and specificity between the two protocols. We used t-tests to compare the average reading time and Krippendorff's alpha to compare inter-rater agreement. RESULTS MRI examinations of 395 women (median age=56 years) were evaluated. For AB-MRI and Full MRI, respectively, the sensitivity was 93.0% (95% CI=90.6-95.0) vs. 92.0% (95% CI=89.4-94.1), the specificity was 91.7% (95% CI=90.3-92.9) vs. 94.3% (95% CI=93.2-95.3), average reading time was 67 vs. 126 s, and the inter-rater agreement 0.79 vs. 0.83. The difference in sensitivity was not statistically significant (P=0.840), but the difference in specificity was significant (P=0.003). CONCLUSION AB-MRI has similar sensitivity, but somewhat lower specificity. The average reading time for the abbreviated protocol is lower, as is inter-rater agreement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roxanna Hellgren
- Department of Medical Imaging, Division of Breast Imaging, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ernst Tolocka
- Department of Medical Imaging, Division of Breast Imaging, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ariel Saracco
- Department of Mammography, Evidia, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Brigitte Wilczek
- Department of Medical Imaging, Division of Breast Imaging, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ann Sundbom
- Department of Medical Imaging, Division of Breast Imaging, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Per Hall
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Paul W Dickman
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Marshall H, Burkard-Mandel L, Hsu J, Durieux J, Shikhman R, Plecha D. Abbreviated Breast MRI: Our Two-Year Initial Experience. JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING 2023; 5:318-328. [PMID: 38416894 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbad017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Indexed: 03/01/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate and present our two-year experience with abbreviated breast MRI at our academic institution as a screening tool to identify primary breast cancers. METHODS Employing eight specialty trained breast radiologists, studies were interpreted using the BI-RADS MRI lexicon in this IRB-approved retrospective study. The protocol utilized T1-weighted, fat-saturated, pre- and post-contrast, short T1 inversion recovery images, and was completed within 10 minutes. Abbreviated breast MRI was offered to asymptomatic women of all breast densities, whose ages ranged from 24 to 90 years. Statistical analysis was performed for comparative data utilizing estimated odds ratios. RESULTS Of 1338 patients that met inclusion criteria, 83% (1111/1338) were BI-RADS 1 or 2, 9.0% (121/1338) were BI-RADS 3, and 8% (106/1338) were categorized as either BI-RADS 4 or 5 with recommended biopsy. Biopsy of BI-RADS 4 and 5 categorized patients yielded 15 cancers for a positive predictive value (PPV) 2 of 14.2% and a PPV3 of 18.5%, with 76% (81/106) of patients undergoing the recommended biopsy. An additional cancer was detected in a BI-RADS 3 finding. All cancers detected were in women with heterogeneously dense or extremely dense breasts. Therefore, 16 cancers were detected, yielding a cancer detection rate of 12.0 per 1000. Over the next 12 to 24 months, no interval cancers were detected. CONCLUSION Abbreviated breast MRI demonstrates a higher cancer detection rate compared with mammography only and may provide a supplemental screening method to detect breast cancers in patients with varying risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly Marshall
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Lauren Burkard-Mandel
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jerry Hsu
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jared Durieux
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Donna Plecha
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kim H, Ko EY, Kim KE, Kim MK, Choi JS, Ko ES, Han BK. Assessment of Enhancement Kinetics Improves the Specificity of Abbreviated Breast MRI: Performance in an Enriched Cohort. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 13:diagnostics13010136. [PMID: 36611428 PMCID: PMC9818206 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13010136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2022] [Revised: 12/28/2022] [Accepted: 12/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the added value of kinetic information for breast lesion evaluation on abbreviated breast MRI (AB-MRI). Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 207 breast lesions with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System categories 3, 4, or 5 on AB-MRI in 198 consecutive patients who had breast MRI for screening after breast cancer surgery between January 2017 and December 2019. All lesions were pathologically confirmed or stable on follow-up images for 2 years or more. Kinetic information of the lesions regarding the degree and rate of enhancement on the first post-contrast-enhanced image and the enhancement curve type from two post-contrast-enhanced images were analyzed on a commercially available computer-assisted diagnosis system. The diagnostic performances of AB-MRI with morphological analysis alone and with the addition of kinetic information were compared using the McNemar test. Results: Of 207 lesions, 59 (28.5%) were malignant and 148 (71.5%) were benign. The addition of an enhancement degree of ≥90% to the morphological analysis significantly increased the specificity of AB-MRI (29.7% vs. 52.7%, p < 0.001) without significantly reducing the sensitivity (94.9% vs. 89.8%, p = 0.083) compared to morphological analysis alone. Unnecessary biopsy could have been avoided in 34 benign lesions, although three malignant lesions could have been missed. For detecting invasive cancer, adding an enhancement degree ≥107% to the morphological analysis significantly increased the specificity (26.5% vs. 57.6%, p < 0.001) without significantly decreasing the sensitivity (94.6% vs. 86.5%, p = 0.083). Conclusion: Adding the degree of enhancement on the first post-contrast-enhanced image to the morphological analysis resulted in higher AB-MRI specificity without compromising its sensitivity.
Collapse
|
8
|
Rahmat K, Mumin NA, Hamid MTR, Hamid SA, Ng WL. MRI Breast: Current Imaging Trends, Clinical Applications, and Future Research Directions. Curr Med Imaging 2022; 18:1347-1361. [PMID: 35430976 DOI: 10.2174/1573405618666220415130131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Revised: 02/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is the most sensitive and advanced imaging technique in diagnosing breast cancer and is essential in improving cancer detection, lesion characterization, and determining therapy response. In addition to the dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) technique, functional techniques such as magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), and intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) further characterize and differentiate benign and malignant lesions thus, improving diagnostic accuracy. There is now an increasing clinical usage of MRI breast, including screening in high risk and supplementary screening tools in average-risk patients. MRI is becoming imperative in assisting breast surgeons in planning breast-conserving surgery for preoperative local staging and evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response. Other clinical applications for MRI breast include occult breast cancer detection, investigation of nipple discharge, and breast implant assessment. There is now an abundance of research publications on MRI Breast with several areas that still remain to be explored. This review gives a comprehensive overview of the clinical trends of MRI breast with emphasis on imaging features and interpretation using conventional and advanced techniques. In addition, future research areas in MRI breast include developing techniques to make MRI more accessible and costeffective for screening. The abbreviated MRI breast procedure and an area of focused research in the enhancement of radiologists' work with artificial intelligence have high impact for the future in MRI Breast.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kartini Rahmat
- Department of Biomedical Imaging, University Malaya Research Imaging Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Nazimah Ab Mumin
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University Teknologi MARA, Sungai Buloh, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Marlina Tanty Ramli Hamid
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University Teknologi MARA, Sungai Buloh, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Shamsiah Abdul Hamid
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University Teknologi MARA, Sungai Buloh, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Wei Lin Ng
- Department of Biomedical Imaging, University Malaya Research Imaging Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Performance of abbreviated protocols versus unenhanced MRI in detecting occult breast lesions of mammography in patients with dense breasts. Sci Rep 2022; 12:13660. [PMID: 35953551 PMCID: PMC9372172 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-17945-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
To assess the diagnostic ability of abbreviated protocols of MRI (AP-MRI) compared with unenhanced MRI (UE-MRI) in mammographically occult cancers in patients with dense breast tissue. The retrospective analysis consisted of 102 patients without positive findings on mammography who received preoperative MRI full diagnostic protocols (FDP) between January 2015 and December 2018. Two breast radiologists read the UE, AP, and FDP. The interpretation times were recorded. The comparisons of the sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve of each MRI protocol, and the sensitivity of these protocols in each subgroup of different size tumors used the Chi-square test. The paired sample t-test was used for evaluating the difference of reading time of the three protocols. Among 102 women, there were 68 cancers and two benign lesions in 64 patients and 38 patients had benign or negative findings. Both readers found the sensitivity and specificity of AP and UE-MRI were similar (p > 0.05), whereas compared with FDP, UE had lower sensitivity (Reader 1/Reader 2: p = 0.023, 0.004). For different lesion size groups, one of the readers found that AP and FDP had higher sensitivities than UE-MRI for detecting the lesions ≤ 10 mm in diameter (p = 0.041, p = 0.023). Compared with FDP, the average reading time of UE-MRI and AP was remarkably reduced (p < 0.001). AP-MRI had more advantages than UE-MRI to detect mammographically occult cancers, especially for breast tumors ≤ 10 mm in diameter.
Collapse
|
10
|
Fonseca MM, Alhassan T, Nisha Y, Koszycki D, Schwarz BA, Segal R, Arnaout A, Ramsay T, Lau J, Seely JM. Randomized trial of surveillance with abbreviated MRI in women with a personal history of breast cancer- impact on patient anxiety and cancer detection. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:774. [PMID: 35840916 PMCID: PMC9287889 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09792-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2021] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Abbreviated breast MRI (A-MRI) substantially reduces the image acquisition and reading times and has been reported to have similar diagnostic accuracy as a full diagnostic protocol but has not been evaluated prospectively with respect to impact on psychological distress in women with a prior history of breast cancer (PHBC). This study aimed to determine if surveillance mammography (MG) plus A-MRI reduced psychological distress and if A-MRI improved cancer detection rates (CDR) as compared to MG alone. METHODS This prospective controlled trial of parallel design was performed at a tertiary cancer center on asymptomatic women with PHBC who were randomized into two groups: routine surveillance with MG or intervention of MG plus A-MRI in a 1:1 ratio. Primary outcome was anxiety measured by four validated questionnaires at three different time-points during the study. Other parameters including CDR and positive predictive value for biopsy (PPV3) were compared between imaging modalities of MG and A-MRI. Tissue diagnoses or 1 year of follow-up were used to establish the reference standard. Linear mixed models were used to analyze anxiety measures and Fisher's exact test to compare imaging outcomes. RESULTS One hundred ninety-eight patients were allocated to either MG alone (94) or MG plus A-MRI (104). No significant group difference emerged for improvement in trait anxiety, worry and perceived health status (all Time-by-surveillance group interaction ps > .05). There was some advantage of A-MRI in reducing state anxiety at Time 2 (p < .05). Anxiety scores in all questionnaires were similarly elevated in both groups (50.99 ± 4.6 with MG alone vs 51.73 ± 2.56 with MG plus A-MRI, p > 0.05) and did not change over time. A-MRI detected 5 invasive cancers and 1 ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and MG detected 1 DCIS. A-MRI had higher incremental CDR (48/1000(5/104) vs MG 5/1000(1/198, p = 0.01)) and higher biopsy rates (19.2% (20/104) vs MG 2.1% (2/94), p < 0.00001) with no difference in PPV3 (A-MRI 28.6% (6/21) vs MG 16.7% (1/6, p > .05). CONCLUSION There was no significant impact of A-MRI to patient anxiety or perceived health status. Compared to MG alone, A-MRI had significantly higher incremental cancer detection in PHBC. Despite a higher rate of biopsies, A-MRI had no demonstrable impact on anxiety, worry, and perceived health status. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02244593 ). Prospectively registered on Sept. 14, 2014.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tasneen Alhassan
- Breast Imaging fellow 2016-2017, Former University of Ottawa, Now Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | - Yashmin Nisha
- University of Ottawa, Breast Imaging fellow, Ottawa, 2019-2020, Canada
| | - Diana Koszycki
- Research Chair in Mental Health, Institut du Savoir Montfort, Ottawa, Canada.,Faculty of Education (Counselling Psychology), Faculty of Medicine (Psychiatry), Institut du Savoir Monfort, Ottawa, Canada
| | | | - Roanne Segal
- Department of Medicine, Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Center, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Angel Arnaout
- Breast Surgical Oncology and Oncoplastic Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Tim Ramsay
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Jacqueline Lau
- Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Jean M Seely
- Departments of Radiology and Surgery, Department of Medical Imaging, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, General Campus, 501 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Stelzer P, Clauser P, Vatteroni G, Kapetas P, Helbich T, Baltzer P. How much can abbreviated protocols for breast MRI increase patient throughput? A multi-centric evaluation. Eur J Radiol 2022; 154:110436. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Revised: 06/23/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
12
|
Shahraki Z, Ghaffari M, Nakhaie Moghadam M, Parooie F, Salarzaei M. Preoperative evaluation of breast cancer: Contrast-enhanced mammography versus contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Dis 2022; 41:303-315. [PMID: 35754256 DOI: 10.3233/bd-210034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide. It is responsible for about 23% of cancer in females in both developed and developing countries. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CEMRI) in preoperative evaluations of breast lesions. METHODS We searched for published literature in the English language in MEDLINE via PubMed and EMBASETM via Ovid, The Cochrane Library, and Trip database. For literature published in other languages, we searched national databases (Magiran and SID), KoreaMed, and LILACS. Metadisc1.4 software was used for statistical analysisRESULTS:A total of 1225 patients were included. The pooled sensitivity of CEM and CEMRI was 0.946 (95% CI, 0.931-0.958) and 0.935 (95% CI, 0.920-0.949), respectively. The pooled specificity of CEM and CEMRI was 0.783 (95% CI, 0.758-0.807) and 0.715 (95% CI, 0.688-0.741), respectively. The sensitivity of CEM was the most in the United States (97%) and the specificity of CEM was the most in Brazil (88%). MRI sensitivity was the most in USA and Egypt (99%) and China had the most MRI specificity (81%) in diagnosis of breast lesions. CONCLUSION Contrast-enhanced mammography, a combination of high energy image and low energy image, can well display breast lesions and has the diagnostic efficacy equivalent to MRI. Importantly, CEM imaging shows higher specificity, positive predictive value, and diagnostic conformance rate than MRI. Despite some drawbacks such as higher irradiation and iodine usage, CEM has such advantages as convenient and fast examination, strong applicability, and low costs; thus, it can be popularized as a useful tool in breast disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zahra Shahraki
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zabol University of Medical Science, Zabol, Iran
| | - Mehrangiz Ghaffari
- Department of Pathology, Zabol University of Medical Science, Zabol, Iran
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Al Ewaidat H, Ayasrah M. A Concise Review on the Utilization of Abbreviated Protocol Breast MRI over Full Diagnostic Protocol in Breast Cancer Detection. Int J Biomed Imaging 2022; 2022:8705531. [PMID: 35528224 PMCID: PMC9071885 DOI: 10.1155/2022/8705531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast MRI possesses high sensitivity for detecting breast cancer among the current clinical modalities and is an indispensable imaging practice. Breast MRI comprises diffusion-weighted imaging, ultrafast, and T2 weighted and T1 weighted CE (contrast-enhanced) imaging that may be utilized for improving the characterization of the lesions. This multimodal evaluation of breast lesions enables outstanding discrimination between the malignant and benign and malignant lesions. The expanding indications of breast MRI confirm the far superiority of MRI in preoperative staging, especially in the estimation of tumour size and identifying tumour foci in the contralateral and ipsilateral breast. Recent studies depicted that experts can meritoriously utilize this tool for improving breast cancer surgery despite their existence of no significant long term outcomes. For managing the, directly and indirectly, associated screening cost, abbreviated protocols are found to be more beneficial. Further, in some of the patients who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, breast MRI is utilized for documenting response. It is therefore essential to realise that oncological screening must be easily available, cost-effective, and time-consuming. Earlier detection of this short sequence protocol leads to prior and early breast cancer disease in high risky female populations like women with dense breasts, prehistoric evidence, etc. This proper utilization of AP reduces unnecessary mastectomies. Hence, this review focused on the explorative information for strongly suggesting the benefits of AP breast MRI compared to full diagnostic protocol MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haytham Al Ewaidat
- Department of Allied Medical Sciences-Radiologic Technology, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Jordan
| | - Mohammad Ayasrah
- Jordan University of Science and Technology, Department of Allied Medical Sciences-Radiologic Technology, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Jordan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Moraes MO, Forte GC, Guimarães ADSG, Grando MBFDP, Junior SA, Kepler C, Hochhegger B. Breast MRI: Simplifying protocol and BI-RADS categories. Clin Breast Cancer 2022; 22:e615-e622. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2022.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
15
|
Liu Z, Liang K, Zhang L, Lai C, Li R, Yi L, Li R, Zhang L, Long W. Small lesion classification on abbreviated breast MRI: training can improve diagnostic performance and inter-reader agreement. Eur Radiol 2022; 32:5742-5751. [PMID: 35212772 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08622-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2021] [Revised: 12/25/2021] [Accepted: 01/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine whether the diagnostic performance and inter-reader agreement for small lesion classification on abbreviated breast MRI (AB-MRI) can be improved by training, and can achieve the level of full diagnostic protocol MRI (FDP-MRI). METHODS This retrospective study enrolled 1165 breast lesions (≤ 2 cm; 409 malignant and 756 benign) from 1165 MRI examinations for reading test. Twelve radiologists were assigned into a trained group and a non-trained group. They interpreted each AB-MRI twice, which was extracted from FDP-MRI. After the first read, the trained group received a structured training for AB-MRI interpretation while the non-trained group did not. FDP-MRIs were interpreted by the trained group after the second read. BI-RADS category for each lesion was compared to the standard of reference (histopathological examination or follow-up) to calculate diagnostic accuracy. Inter-reader agreement was assessed using multirater k analysis. Diagnostic accuracy and inter-reader agreement were compared between the trained and non-trained groups, between the first and second reads, and between AB-MRI and FDP-MRI. RESULTS After training, the diagnostic accuracy of AB-MRI increased from 77.6 to 84.4%, and inter-reader agreement improved from 0.410 to 0.579 (both p < 0.001), which were higher than those of the non-trained group (accuracy, 84.4% vs 78.0%; weighted k, 0.579 vs 0.461; both p < 0.001). The post-training accuracy and inter-reader agreement of AB-MRI were lower than those of FDP-MRI (accuracy, 84.4% vs 92.8%; weighted k, 0.579 vs 0.602; both p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Training can improve the diagnostic performance and inter-reader agreement for small lesion classification on AB-MRI; however, it remains inferior to those of FDP-MRI. KEY POINTS • Training can improve the diagnostic performance for small breast lesions on AB-MRI. • Training can reduce inter-observer variation for breast lesion classification on AB-MRI, especially among junior radiologists. • The post-training diagnostic performance and inter-reader agreement of AB-MRI remained inferior to those of FDP-MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhuangsheng Liu
- Department of Medical Imaging Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, 601 West Huangpu Street, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong, China.,Department of Radiology, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Affiliated Jiangmen Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Jiangmen, 529000, China
| | - Keming Liang
- Department of Radiology, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Affiliated Jiangmen Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Jiangmen, 529000, China
| | - Ling Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China
| | - Chan Lai
- Department of Radiology, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Affiliated Jiangmen Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Jiangmen, 529000, China
| | - Ruqiong Li
- Department of Radiology, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Affiliated Jiangmen Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Jiangmen, 529000, China
| | - Lilei Yi
- Department of Radiology, Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Foshan, 528000, China
| | - Ronggang Li
- Department of Pathology, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Affiliated Jiangmen Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Jiangmen, 529000, China
| | - Ling Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
| | - Wansheng Long
- Department of Medical Imaging Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, 601 West Huangpu Street, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong, China. .,Department of Radiology, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Affiliated Jiangmen Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Jiangmen, 529000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Wu Y, Wu J, Dou Y, Rubert N, Wang Y, Deng J. A deep learning fusion model with evidence-based confidence level analysis for differentiation of malignant and benign breast tumors using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI. Biomed Signal Process Control 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2021.103319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
|
17
|
Shao Z, Liu P, Zhang S, Lu H. Abbreviated protocol combining quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging: a new strategy increasing diagnostic accuracy for breast magnetic resonance imaging? Gland Surg 2021; 10:2705-2714. [PMID: 34733720 DOI: 10.21037/gs-21-463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Background To compare the diagnostic accuracy of an abbreviated protocol (AP) with or without quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and a full diagnostic protocol (FDP) in terms of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods Our study sample consisted of 436 patients undergoing breast MRI from January to October 2015 in a clinical setting. The three reviews included a pre-contrast and the first single post-contrast T1-weighted (T1W) sequences (AP1), AP1 combined with quantitative DWI (AP2), and the FDP, the AP1 of which were assessed independently by a junior and senior radiologist. Agreement on the evaluation of the BI-RADS classifications (between the junior and senior radiologists, between AP1 and FDP, and between AP2 and FDP) was assessed using the kappa test statistic. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were compared between AP1 and FDP plus between AP2 and FDP. Diagnostic parameters of these reviews were examined using the McNemar test. Results The study included 436 patients, with 251 breast cancers, 99 benign lesions, and 86 patients with benign or no lesions and followed up for at least 24 months. The agreement of the BI-RADS classifications between the junior and senior radiologists was very good (kappa =0.847). The agreement between AP2 and FDP (kappa =0.931) was higher than the agreement between AP1 and FDP (kappa =0.872) on evaluating the BI-RADS benign and malignant classifications. The sensitivity/specificity/PPV/NPV was 95.6%/83.8%/88.9%/93.4% for AP1, 98.0%/83.8%/89.1%/96.9% for AP2, 98.8%/83.8%/89.2%/98.1% for FDP, respectively. Conclusions The addition of quantitative DWI to the abbreviated MRI protocol based on the pre-and first post-contrast sequence improved diagnostic performance for characterizing breast lesions. Quantitative DWI may be a useful adjunct to dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) of breast MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenzhen Shao
- Department of Breast Imaging, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute, and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China
| | - Peifang Liu
- Department of Breast Imaging, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute, and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China
| | - Shuping Zhang
- Department of Breast Imaging, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute, and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China
| | - Hong Lu
- Department of Breast Imaging, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute, and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Dane B, Bearison C, Kim S. Frequency and significance of incidental liver lesions on MR enterography in adult patients. Clin Imaging 2021; 80:6-10. [PMID: 34217035 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2021] [Revised: 05/24/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the frequency and significance of incidental liver lesions identified on MR enterography (MRE) examinations to determine if dedicated sequences for liver evaluation are necessary in the routine MRE protocol. METHODS A retrospective departmental database search identified 353 adult (212 women and 141 men; mean [±SD] age, 41.4 [17.0] years; range 18.1-91.9 years) MRE examinations performed in 2017. Radiology reports were reviewed for the presence and characterization of liver lesions, follow-up recommendation, and known malignancy. Follow-up cross-sectional imaging reports were reviewed for liver lesion stability. A senior abdominal radiologist with expertise in liver imaging categorized liver lesions as benign, indeterminate, or malignant and re-characterized indeterminate lesions using follow-up imaging as benign or malignant. RESULTS Seventy-nine MRE (22.4%) described liver lesions and follow-up imaging was recommended in 4/79 (5.1%). Seventy-six liver lesions (96.2%) were characterized as benign (cysts/hemangiomas) on routine interpretation and expert review. One of these was recommended for follow-up imaging on initial report, which was characterized as hemangioma by expert review. The remaining 3 lesions (3.8%) were characterized as indeterminate both by initial report and expert radiologist review but re-characterized as benign after reviewing follow-up examinations. CONCLUSION All incidental liver lesions identified on MRE in our cohort were benign. Therefore, additional sequences evaluating the liver are unnecessary for routine MRE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bari Dane
- Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY 10016, United States of America.
| | - Craig Bearison
- Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY 10016, United States of America.
| | - Sooah Kim
- Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY 10016, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Samreen N, Mercado C, Heacock L, Chacko C, Partridge SC, Chhor C. Screening Breast MRI Primer: Indications, Current Protocols, and Emerging Techniques. JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING 2021; 3:387-398. [PMID: 38424773 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbaa116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
Breast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) is the most sensitive imaging modality for the detection of breast cancer. Screening MRI is currently performed predominantly in patients at high risk for breast cancer, but it could be of benefit in patients at intermediate risk for breast cancer and patients with dense breasts. Decreasing scan time and image interpretation time could increase cost-effectiveness, making screening MRI accessible to a larger group of patients. Abbreviated breast MRI (Ab-MRI) reduces scan time by decreasing the number of sequences obtained, but as multiple delayed contrast enhanced sequences are not obtained, no kinetic information is available. Ultrafast techniques rapidly acquire multiple sequences during the first minute of gadolinium contrast injection and provide information about both lesion morphology and vascular kinetics. Diffusion-weighted imaging is a noncontrast MRI technique with the potential to detect mammographically occult cancers. This review article aims to discuss the current indications of breast MRI as a screening tool, examine the standard breast DCE-MRI technique, and explore alternate screening MRI protocols, including Ab-MRI, ultrafast MRI, and noncontrast diffusion-weighted MRI, which can decrease scan time and interpretation time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naziya Samreen
- New York University, Department of Radiology, Garden City, NY, USA
| | - Cecilia Mercado
- NYU School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, New York, NY, USA
| | - Laura Heacock
- NYU School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, New York, NY, USA
| | - Celin Chacko
- New York University, Department of Radiology, Garden City, NY, USA
| | | | - Chloe Chhor
- NYU School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ultrafast Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Using Compressed Sensing: Associations of Early Kinetic Parameters With Prognostic Factors of Breast Cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2021; 217:56-63. [PMID: 33909465 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.20.23457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether early kinetic parameters derived from ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) using compressed sensing are associated with prognostic factors for breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We evaluated 201 consecutive women (mean age, 54.6 years) with breast cancer (168 invasive, 33 ductal carcinoma in situ) who underwent both ultrafast DCE-MRI using compressed sensing (temporal resolution, 4.7 seconds; spatial resolution, 0.8 × 1.1 × 0.9 mm) and surgery between 2018 and 2019. Early kinetic parameters (time to enhancement [TTE] and maximum slope [MS]) were measured in breast lesions by two radiologists using a software program and were correlated with histopathologic prognostic factors. The Mann-Whitney U test and linear regression analysis were used. RESULTS. The median TTE and MS values for breast cancer were 11.9 seconds and 7.7%/s, respectively. The median MS was significantly larger in invasive cancer lesions than in ductal carcinoma in situ lesions (8.4%/s vs 4.7%/s, p < .001). In women with invasive cancer, multivariate linear regression analyses showed that a larger tumor size (> 2 cm) (p = .048) and estrogen receptor-negative status (p < .001) were significantly associated with a shorter TTE. A higher histologic grade (grade 3) (p = .01) was significantly associated with a larger MS. We observed excellent interobserver agreement between two readers in the measurements of TTE and MS (intraclass correlation coefficients, 0.943 and 0.890, respectively). CONCLUSION. Ultrafast MRI-derived early enhancement parameters, such as TTE and MS, are associated with histopathologic prognostic factors in women with breast cancer.
Collapse
|
21
|
Tollens F, Baltzer PA, Dietzel M, Rübenthaler J, Froelich MF, Kaiser CG. Cost-Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs. Abbreviated Breast MRI for Screening Women with Intermediate Risk of Breast Cancer-How Low-Cost Must MRI Be? Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13061241. [PMID: 33808955 PMCID: PMC8000655 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13061241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Revised: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and abbreviated breast MRI (AB-MRI) offer superior diagnostic performance compared to conventional mammography in screening women with intermediate risk of breast cancer due to dense breast tissue. The aim of this model-based economic evaluation was to analyze whether AB-MRI is cost-effective in this cohort compared to DBT. METHODS Decision analysis and Markov simulations were used to model the cumulative costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) over a time horizon of 30 years. Model input parameters were adopted from recent literature. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were applied to test the stability of the model. RESULTS In the base-case scenario, the costs of an AB-MRI examination were defined to equal the costs of a full protocol acquisition. Two-yearly screening of women with dense breasts resulted in cumulative discounted costs of $8798 and $9505 for DBT and AB-MRI, and cumulative discounted effects of 19.23 and 19.27 QALYs, respectively, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $20,807 per QALY gained in the base-case scenario. By reducing the cost of an AB-MRI examination below a threshold of $241 in sensitivity analyses, AB-MRI would become cost-saving compared to DBT. CONCLUSION In comparison to DBT, AB-MRI can be considered cost-effective up to a price per examination of $593 in screening patients at intermediate risk of breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian Tollens
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; (F.T.); (M.F.F.)
| | - Pascal A.T. Baltzer
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Wien, Austria;
| | - Matthias Dietzel
- Department of Radiology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Hospital Erlangen, 91054 Erlangen, Germany;
| | - Johannes Rübenthaler
- Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, 80331 München, Germany;
| | - Matthias F. Froelich
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; (F.T.); (M.F.F.)
| | - Clemens G. Kaiser
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; (F.T.); (M.F.F.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-0621-383-2067
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kwon MR, Choi JS, Won H, Ko EY, Ko ES, Park KW, Han BK. Breast Cancer Screening with Abbreviated Breast MRI: 3-year Outcome Analysis. Radiology 2021; 299:73-83. [PMID: 33620293 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021202927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Background Data are limited regarding the performance of abbreviated screening breast MRI during consecutive years and the characteristics of breast cancers missed and detected with it. Purpose To assess the longitudinal diagnostic performance of abbreviated screening MRI and to determine whether the screening outcomes of abbreviated MRI differed between yearly time periods for 3 consecutive years. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included 1975 consecutive women who underwent abbreviated screening MRI between September 2015 and August 2018. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) categories 3-5 defined positive results, and BI-RADS categories 1-2 defined negative results. Cancer detection rate (CDR), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), abnormal interpretation rate (AIR), and interval cancer rate were assessed annually. Yearly performance measures were compared with the Fisher exact test by using the permutation method. Clinical-pathologic and imaging characteristics of the missed and detected cancers were compared by using the Fisher exact test and the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Results A total of 1975 women (median age, 49 years; interquartile range, 44-56 years) underwent 3037 abbreviated MRI examinations over 3 years. CDR (year 1 to year 3, 6.9-10.7 per 1000 examinations), positive predictive value for recall (9.7% [six of 62] to 15.6% [12 of 77]), positive predictive value for biopsy (31.6% [six of 19] to 63.2% [12 of 19]), sensitivity (75.0% [six of eight] to 80.0% [12 of 15]), and specificity (93.5% [807 of 863] to 94.1% [1041 of 1106]) were highest in year 3, and AIR (7.1% [62 of 871] to 6.9% [77 of 1121]) was lowest in year 3. However, all outcome measures did not differ statistically between years 1, 2, and 3 (all P > .05). The interval cancer rate was 0.66 per 1000 examinations (two of 3037). Thirty-eight breast cancers were identified in 36 women; 29 were detected with abbreviated MRI, but nine were missed. Of these, seven were detected with other imaging modalities after negative results at the last screening MRI examination, and two were interval cancers. All missed cancers were node-negative early-stage invasive cancers and were smaller (median size, 0.8 cm vs 1.2 cm; P = .01) than detected cancers. Conclusion Screening outcome measures of abbreviated MRI were sustained without significant differences between 3 consecutive years. All cancers missed at abbreviated MRI were node-negative invasive cancers and tended to be smaller than detected cancers. © RSNA, 2021 See also the editorial by Lee in this issue. Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mi-Ri Kwon
- From the Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06351, South Korea (M.R.K., J.S.C., E.Y.K., E.S.K., K.W.P., B.K.H.); Department of Radiology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (M.R.K.); Department of Digital Health, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea (J.S.C.); and Statistics and Data Center, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (H.W.)
| | - Ji Soo Choi
- From the Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06351, South Korea (M.R.K., J.S.C., E.Y.K., E.S.K., K.W.P., B.K.H.); Department of Radiology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (M.R.K.); Department of Digital Health, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea (J.S.C.); and Statistics and Data Center, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (H.W.)
| | - Hojeong Won
- From the Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06351, South Korea (M.R.K., J.S.C., E.Y.K., E.S.K., K.W.P., B.K.H.); Department of Radiology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (M.R.K.); Department of Digital Health, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea (J.S.C.); and Statistics and Data Center, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (H.W.)
| | - Eun Young Ko
- From the Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06351, South Korea (M.R.K., J.S.C., E.Y.K., E.S.K., K.W.P., B.K.H.); Department of Radiology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (M.R.K.); Department of Digital Health, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea (J.S.C.); and Statistics and Data Center, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (H.W.)
| | - Eun Sook Ko
- From the Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06351, South Korea (M.R.K., J.S.C., E.Y.K., E.S.K., K.W.P., B.K.H.); Department of Radiology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (M.R.K.); Department of Digital Health, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea (J.S.C.); and Statistics and Data Center, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (H.W.)
| | - Ko Woon Park
- From the Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06351, South Korea (M.R.K., J.S.C., E.Y.K., E.S.K., K.W.P., B.K.H.); Department of Radiology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (M.R.K.); Department of Digital Health, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea (J.S.C.); and Statistics and Data Center, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (H.W.)
| | - Boo-Kyung Han
- From the Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06351, South Korea (M.R.K., J.S.C., E.Y.K., E.S.K., K.W.P., B.K.H.); Department of Radiology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (M.R.K.); Department of Digital Health, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea (J.S.C.); and Statistics and Data Center, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (H.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Baxter GC, Selamoglu A, Mackay JW, Bond S, Gray E, Gilbert FJ. A meta-analysis comparing the diagnostic performance of abbreviated MRI and a full diagnostic protocol in breast cancer. Clin Radiol 2021; 76:154.e23-154.e32. [PMID: 33032820 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2020.08.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2020] [Accepted: 08/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
AIM To undertake a meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of abbreviated (ABB) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and full diagnostic protocol MRI (FDP-MRI) in breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS This meta-analysis was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis for Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA) guidelines. The PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched through August 2019 for studies comparing the diagnostic performance of ABB-MRI and FDP-MRI in the breast. Studies were reviewed by two authors independently according to eligibility and exclusion criteria and split into two subgroups (screening population studies and studies using cohorts enriched with known cancers) to avoid bias. Quality assessment and bias for diagnostic accuracy was determined with Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2). The diagnostic accuracy for each subgroup was pooled using a bivariate random effects model and summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curves produced. Sensitivities and specificities were compared using a paired t-test. RESULTS Five screening (62/2,588 cancers/patients) and eight enriched cohort (540/1,432 cancers/patients) studies were included in the meta-analysis. QUADAS-2 assessment showed a low risk of bias in most studies. The pooled sensitivity/specificity/area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for screening studies was 0.90/0.92/0.94 for ABB-MRI and 0.92/0.95/0.97 for FDP-MRI. The pooled sensitivity/specificity/AUC for enriched cohort studies was 0.93/0.83/0.94 for ABB-MRI and 0.93/0.84/0.95 for FDP-MRI. There was no significant difference in sensitivity or specificity using ABB-MRI or FDP-MRI (p=0.18 and 0.27, p=0.18 and 0.93, respectively). CONCLUSION The diagnostic performances of the ABB-MRI and FDP-MRI protocols used in either screening or enriched cohorts were comparable. There was a large variation in patient population, study methodology, and abbreviated protocols reported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G C Baxter
- Department of Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - A Selamoglu
- Department of Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - J W Mackay
- Department of Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - S Bond
- National Institute for Health Research, Cambridge Clinical Trials Unit, Cambridge, UK
| | - E Gray
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - F J Gilbert
- Department of Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK; National Institute for Health Research, Cambridge Clinical Trials Unit, Cambridge, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
Breast MR imaging is the most sensitive imaging method for the detection of breast cancer and detects more aggressive malignancies than mammography and ultrasound examination. Despite these advantages, breast MR imaging has low use rates for breast cancer screening. Abbreviated breast MR imaging, in which a limited number of breast imaging sequences are obtained, has been proposed as a way to solve cost and patient tolerance issues while preserving the high cancer detection rate of breast MR imaging. This review discusses abbreviated breast MR imaging, including protocols, multicenter clinical trial results, clinical workflow implementation challenges, and future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Heacock
- Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA.
| | - Alana A Lewin
- Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Hildegard K Toth
- Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Linda Moy
- Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Beatriu Reig
- Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Hernández ML, Osorio S, Florez K, Ospino A, Díaz GM. Abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer: A systematic review of literature. Eur J Radiol Open 2020; 8:100307. [PMID: 33364260 PMCID: PMC7750142 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejro.2020.100307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2020] [Revised: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND : magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been increasingly used to study breast cancer for screening high-risk cases, pre-operative staging, and problem-solving because of its high sensitivity. However, its cost-effectiveness is still debated. Thus, the concept of abbreviated MRI (ABB-MRI) protocols was proposed as a possible solution for reducing MRI costs. PURPOSE : to investigate the role of the abbreviated MRI protocols in detecting and staging breast cancer. METHODS : a systematic search of the literature was carried out in the bibliographic databases: Scopus, PubMed, Medline, and Science Direct. RESULTS : forty-one articles were included, which described results of the assessment of fifty-three abbreviated protocols for screening, staging, recurrence assessing, and problem-solving or clarification. CONCLUSIONS : the use of ABB-MRI protocols allows reducing the acquisition and reading times, maintaining a high concordance with the final interpretation, in comparison to a complete protocol. However, larger prospective and multicentre trials are necessary to validate the performance in specific clinical environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María Liliana Hernández
- Grupo de Investigación del Instituto de Alta Tecnología Médica (IATM), Ayudas Diagnósticas Sura, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Santiago Osorio
- Grupo de Investigación del Instituto de Alta Tecnología Médica (IATM), Ayudas Diagnósticas Sura, Medellín, Colombia
- Especialización en Radiología, Universidad CES, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Katherine Florez
- Grupo de Investigación del Instituto de Alta Tecnología Médica (IATM), Ayudas Diagnósticas Sura, Medellín, Colombia
- Especialización en Radiología, Universidad CES, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Alejandra Ospino
- Grupo de Investigación del Instituto de Alta Tecnología Médica (IATM), Ayudas Diagnósticas Sura, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Gloria M. Díaz
- MIRP Lab–Parque i, Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitano (ITM), Medellín, Colombia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Jeong SM, Ha SM, Ahn HS, Woo S, Sung JK, Shin HC. A preliminary study of the combination of ultrafast and abbreviated dynamic contrast: Enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99:e23415. [PMID: 33327267 PMCID: PMC7738033 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000023415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
We combined the abbreviated and ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique with the standard MRI protocol and compared lesion characterization quantitatively and qualitatively to the standard MRI protocol.Fifty-six patients with breast cancer who underwent MRI from June 2017 to May 2018 and fulfilled our inclusion criteria were included. Three radiologists measured the lesion sizes, described the MRI findings using BI-RADS lexicon, and demarcated the regions of interest to extract the volumetric quantitative and semi-quantitative parameters. We used Pearson's correlation analysis comparing the quantitative and semi-quantitative parameters. To evaluate the inter-observer variability, we calculated the intra-correlation coefficient (ICC). We also analysed the correlation in BI-RADS lexicon.There were 45 (80.4%) luminal and 11 (19.6%) non-luminal breast cancers, and the most common tumour subtype was invasive carcinoma (n = 48, 85.7%), followed by ductal carcinoma in situ (n = 8, 14.3%). Regarding correlation between the quantitative and semi-quantitative parameters, K significantly correlated with the wash-in factor (r, 0.862; P < .001) and AUC value (r, 0.951; P < .001). The lesion size measured by standard and combined abbreviated-ultrafast phases and that from the surgical pathological specimens showed moderate agreement (ICC range, 0.516-0.578). The ICCs among the 3 readers were excellent for lesion size measurement, BI-RADS lexicon regarding lesion type, mass shape, margin, internal enhancement, non-mass enhancement distribution, and internal enhancement by the standard and combined abbreviated-ultrafast protocols.The use of the modified and combined abbreviated-ultrafast MRI protocol provides a reliable measurement of the quantitative parameters and may aid in the screening of breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seok-min Jeong
- Department of Radiology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine
| | - Su Min Ha
- Department of Radiology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital
| | - Hye Shin Ahn
- Department of Radiology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine
| | - SeungTae Woo
- Radiology, Bayer Korea, Samsung Boramae Omni Tower
| | - Jae Kon Sung
- Siemens-healthineers, Poongsan Bldg., Chungjeong-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul
| | - Hee-Chul Shin
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Geonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kim ES, Cho N, Kim SY, Kwon BR, Yi A, Ha SM, Lee SH, Chang JM, Moon WK. Comparison of Abbreviated MRI and Full Diagnostic MRI in Distinguishing between Benign and Malignant Lesions Detected by Breast MRI: A Multireader Study. Korean J Radiol 2020; 22:297-307. [PMID: 33289355 PMCID: PMC7909852 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2020.0311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2020] [Revised: 09/11/2020] [Accepted: 09/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To compare the performance of simulated abbreviated breast MRI (AB-MRI) and full diagnostic (FD)-MRI in distinguishing between benign and malignant lesions detected by MRI and investigate the features of discrepant lesions of the two protocols. Materials and Methods An AB-MRI set with single first postcontrast images was retrospectively obtained from an FD-MRI cohort of 111 lesions (34 malignant, 77 benign) detected by contralateral breast MRI in 111 women (mean age, 49.8. ± 9.8; range, 28–75 years) with recently diagnosed breast cancer. Five blinded readers independently classified the likelihood of malignancy using Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System assessments. McNemar tests and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analyses were performed. The imaging and pathologic features of the discrepant lesions of the two protocols were analyzed. Results The sensitivity of AB-MRI for lesion characterization tended to be lower than that of FD-MRI for all readers (58.8–82.4% vs. 79.4–100%), although the findings of only two readers were significantly different (p < 0.05). The specificity of AB-MRI for lesion characterization was higher than that of FD-MRI for 80% of readers (39.0–74.0% vs. 19.5–45.5%, p ≤ 0.001). The AUC of AB-MRI was comparable to that of FD-MRI for all readers (p > 0.05). Fifteen percent (5/34) of the cancers were false-negatives on AB-MRI. More suspicious margins or internal enhancement on the delayed phase images were related to the discrepancies. Conclusion The overall performance of AB-MRI was similar to that of FD-MRI in distinguishing between benign and malignant lesions. AB-MRI showed lower sensitivity and higher specificity than FD-MRI, as 15% of the cancers were misclassified compared to FD-MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eun Sil Kim
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Nariya Cho
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Soo Yeon Kim
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Bo Ra Kwon
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ann Yi
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Su Min Ha
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Su Hyun Lee
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung Min Chang
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Woo Kyung Moon
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Gao Y, Heller SL. Abbreviated and Ultrafast Breast MRI in Clinical Practice. Radiographics 2020; 40:1507-1527. [DOI: 10.1148/rg.2020200006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Yiming Gao
- From the Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, 160 E 34th St, New York, NY 10016
| | - Samantha L. Heller
- From the Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, 160 E 34th St, New York, NY 10016
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Geach R, Jones LI, Harding SA, Marshall A, Taylor-Phillips S, McKeown-Keegan S, Dunn JA. The potential utility of abbreviated breast MRI (FAST MRI) as a tool for breast cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Radiol 2020; 76:154.e11-154.e22. [PMID: 33010932 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2020.08.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Accepted: 08/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
AIM To synthesise evidence comparing abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (abMRI) to full-protocol MRI (fpMRI) in breast cancer screening. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic search was undertaken in multiple databases. Cohort studies without enrichment, presenting accuracy data of abMRI in screening, for any level of risk (population, moderate, high risk) were included. Level of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Meta-analyses (bivariate random effects model) were performed for abMRI, with fpMRI and histology from fpMRI-positive cases as reference standard, and with follow-up to symptomatic detection added to the fpMRI. The review also covers evidence comparing abMRI with mammographic techniques. RESULTS The title and abstract review retrieved 23 articles. Five studies (six articles) were included (2,763 women, 3,251 screening rounds). GRADE assessment of the evidence was very low because the reference standard was interpreted with knowledge of the index test and biopsy was not obtained for all abMRI positives. The overall sensitivity for abMRI, with fpMRI (and histology for fpMRI positives) as reference standard, was 94.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 85.5-98.2) and specificity as 94.6% (95% CI: 91.5-96.6). Three studies (1,450 women, 1,613 screening rounds) presented follow-up data, enabling comparison between abMRI and fpMRI. Sensitivities and specificities for abMRI did not differ significantly from those for fpMRI (p=0.83 and p=0.37, respectively). CONCLUSION A very low level of evidence suggests abMRI could be accurate for breast cancer screening. Research is required, with follow-up to interval cancer, to determine the effect its use could have on clinical outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Geach
- North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Southmead Road, Westbury on Trym, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK
| | - L I Jones
- North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Southmead Road, Westbury on Trym, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.
| | - S A Harding
- North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Southmead Road, Westbury on Trym, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK
| | - A Marshall
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
| | - S Taylor-Phillips
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
| | - S McKeown-Keegan
- North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Southmead Road, Westbury on Trym, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK
| | - J A Dunn
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Weinstein SP, Korhonen K, Cirelli C, Schnall MD, McDonald ES, Pantel AR, Zuckerman S, Borthakur A, Conant EF. Abbreviated Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Supplemental Screening of Women With Dense Breasts and Average Risk. J Clin Oncol 2020; 38:3874-3882. [PMID: 32931396 DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.02198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Although mammography is the standard of care for breast cancer screening, dense breast tissue decreases mammographic sensitivity. We report the prevalent cancer detection rate (CDR) from the first clinical implementation of abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (AB-MR) as a supplemental screening test in women with dense breasts. METHODS The study was approved by the institutional review board and is Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act complaint. This retrospective review includes women who were imaged between January 1, 2016 and February 28, 2019. On a 1.5 Tesla magnet, the imaging protocol consisted of three sequences: Short-TI Inversion Recovery (STIR), precontrast, and postcontrast. A subtraction sequence and a maximum intensity projection were generated. We report the patient-level CDR and the positive predictive value of AB-MR examinations after negative/benign digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). RESULTS Out of 511 prevalent rounds of AB-MR examinations, 36 women were excluded. The remaining 475 asymptomatic women with dense breasts had negative/benign DBT examinations before the AB-MR. There were 420 of 475 (88.4%) benign/negative examinations, 13 of 475 (2.7%) follow-up recommendations, and 42 biopsy recommendations. Thirty-nine biopsies were completed, resulting in 12/39 (30.8%) malignancies in 12 women: seven invasive carcinomas and five ductal carcinoma in situ. One additional patient was diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma at the time of 6-month follow-up. The CDR was 27.4 per 1,000 (13 of 475; 95% CI, 16.1 to 46.3). The size of invasive carcinomas ranged from 0.6-1.0 cm (mean, 0.5 cm). Of the seven women who underwent surgical evaluation of the axilla, zero of seven patients had positive nodes. There were no interval cancers at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSION Preliminary results from clinical implementation of screening AB-MR resulted in a CDR of 27.4/1,000 at the patient level after DBT in women with dense breasts. Additional evaluation is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan P Weinstein
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Katrina Korhonen
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Claire Cirelli
- Department of Computer Science, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ
| | - Mitchell D Schnall
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Elizabeth S McDonald
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Austin R Pantel
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Samantha Zuckerman
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Ari Borthakur
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Emily F Conant
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Plaza MJ, Perea E, Sanchez-Gonzalez MA. Abbreviated Screening Breast MRI in Women at Higher-than-Average Risk for Breast Cancer with Prior Normal Full Protocol MRI. JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING 2020; 2:343-351. [PMID: 38424958 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbaa032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2020] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the performance of abbreviated screening breast MRI (ABMR) versus full protocol MRI (FPMR) in women at higher-than-average risk for breast cancer with a prior normal FPMR. METHODS ABMR was performed on higher-than-average-risk women who had a prior normal FPMR. ABMR protocol consisted of short inversion time inversion recovery imaging, precontrast, and two early postcontrast sequences acquired in under 10 minutes. Retrospective review of ABMR examinations performed from July 2016 to July 2018 was compared with a control group who underwent routine screening with FPMR who had a prior normal FPMR performed from July 2014 to June 2016. Screening outcome metrics were calculated and compared, adjusting for differences in patient demographics. RESULTS The study cohort included 481 ABMR examinations, while the control group included 440 FPMR studies. There was no significant difference in the abnormal interpretation rate (AIR) or cancer detection rate (CDR) for the ABMR versus the FPMR group (AIR 6.0% vs 6.8% respectively, odds ratio (OR) 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.53-1.5, P = 0.73; CDR 8.3 vs 11 cancers detected per 1000 examinations respectively, OR 0.73, 95% CI: 0.20-2.7, P = 0.64). The PPV2 and PPV3 for the ABMR group was 19% and 21% versus 16% and 16% for the FPMR group, with no statistical difference. Sensitivity was 100% in each group with no interval cancers. There was no difference in specificity between the ABMR and FPMR groups, 93% versus 94%, respectively (P = 0.73). CONCLUSION ABMR may be used to screen higher-than-average-risk women with a prior normal FPMR as outcome metrics are equivalent to FPMR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elizabeth Perea
- Ponce Health Sciences University School of Medicine, Department of Graduate Medical Education, MD Program, Ponce, Puerto Rico
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Scoggins ME, Arun BK, Candelaria RP, Dryden MJ, Wei W, Son JB, Ma J, Dogan BE. Should abbreviated breast MRI be compliant with American College of Radiology requirements for MRI accreditation? Magn Reson Imaging 2020; 72:87-94. [PMID: 32622851 DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2020.06.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2020] [Revised: 06/01/2020] [Accepted: 06/24/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate non-inferiority and diagnostic performance of an American College of Radiology compliant abbreviated MRI protocol (AB-MRI) compared with standard-of-care breast MRI (SOC-BMRI) in patients with increased breast cancer risk. MATERIAL AND METHODS Women with increased lifetime breast cancer risk by American Cancer Society guidelines underwent breast MRI at a single institution between October 2015 and February 2018. AB-MRI was acquired at 3.0 T with T2-weighted extended fast spin echo triple-echo Dixon and pre- and post-contrast 3D dual-echo fast spoiled gradient echo two-point Dixon sequences with an 8-channel breast coil 1-7 days after SOC-BMRI. Three readers independently reviewed AB-MRI and assigned BI-RADS categories for maximum intensity projection images (AB1), dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) images (AB2), and DCE and non-contrast T2 and fat-only images (AB3). These scores were compared to those from SOC-BMRI. RESULTS Cancer yield was 14 per 1000 (women-years) in 73 women aged 26-75 years (mean 53.5 years). AB-MRI acquisition times (mean 9.63 min) and table times (mean 15.07 min) were significantly shorter than those of SOC-BMRI (means 19.46 and 36.3 min, respectively) (p < .001). Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were identical for AB3 and SOC-BMRI (93%, 100%, 93%, 16.7%, and 100%, respectively). AB-MRI with AB1 and AB2 had significantly lower specificity (AB1 = 73.6%, AB2 = 77.8%), positive predictive values (AB1 = 5%, AB2 = 5.9%), and accuracy (AB1 = 74%, AB2 = 78%) than those of SOC-BMRI (p = .002 for AB1, p = .01 for AB2). CONCLUSION AB-MRI was acquired significantly faster than SOC-BMRI and its diagnostic performance was non-inferior. Inclusion of T2 and fat-only images was necessary to achieve non-inferiority by multireader evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marion E Scoggins
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Unit 1350, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, Texas 77030, United States of America.
| | - Banu K Arun
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 1354, Houston, TX 77030-4009, United States of America.
| | - Rosalind P Candelaria
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Unit 1350, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, Texas 77030, United States of America.
| | - Mark J Dryden
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Unit 1350, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, Texas 77030, United States of America.
| | - Wei Wei
- Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH 44195, United States of America.
| | - Jong Bum Son
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 1472, Houston, TX 77030-4009, United States of America.
| | - Jingfei Ma
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 1472, Houston, TX 77030-4009, United States of America.
| | - Basak E Dogan
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, 2201 Inwood Rd, Dallas, TX 75390-8585, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Alonso Roca S, Delgado Laguna A, Arantzeta Lexarreta J, Cajal Campo B, Santamaría Jareño S. Screening in patients with increased risk of breast cancer (part 1): Pros and cons of MRI screening. RADIOLOGIA 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rxeng.2020.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
34
|
Heacock L, Reig B, Lewin AA, Toth HK, Moy L, Lee CS. Abbreviated Breast MRI: Road to Clinical Implementation. JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING 2020; 2:201-214. [PMID: 38424988 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbaa020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2020] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
Breast MRI offers high sensitivity for breast cancer detection, with preferential detection of high-grade invasive cancers when compared to mammography and ultrasound. Despite the clear benefits of breast MRI in cancer screening, its cost, patient tolerance, and low utilization remain key issues. Abbreviated breast MRI, in which only a select number of sequences and postcontrast imaging are acquired, exploits the high sensitivity of breast MRI while reducing table time and reading time to maximize availability, patient tolerance, and accessibility. Worldwide studies of varying patient populations have demonstrated that the comparable diagnostic accuracy of abbreviated breast MRI is comparable to a full diagnostic protocol, highlighting the emerging role of abbreviated MRI screening in patients with an intermediate and high lifetime risk of breast cancer. The purpose of this review is to summarize the background and current literature relating to abbreviated MRI, highlight various protocols utilized in current multicenter clinical trials, describe workflow and clinical implementation issues, and discuss the future of abbreviated protocols, including advanced MRI techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Heacock
- New York University Langone Health, Department of Radiology, New York, NY
| | - Beatriu Reig
- New York University Langone Health, Department of Radiology, New York, NY
| | - Alana A Lewin
- New York University Langone Health, Department of Radiology, New York, NY
| | - Hildegard K Toth
- New York University Langone Health, Department of Radiology, New York, NY
| | - Linda Moy
- New York University Langone Health, Department of Radiology, New York, NY
- New York University Langone, Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), New York, NY
| | - Cindy S Lee
- New York University Langone Health, Department of Radiology, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Value of an abbreviated protocol of breast magnetic resonance imaging for screening high-risk patients. RADIOLOGIA 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rxeng.2019.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
36
|
Choudhery S, Chou SHS, Chang K, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Lehman CD. Kinetic Analysis of Lesions Identified on a Rapid Abridged Multiphase (RAMP) Breast MRI Protocol. Acad Radiol 2020; 27:672-681. [PMID: 31147233 PMCID: PMC6879810 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2019] [Revised: 04/26/2019] [Accepted: 05/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES We implemented a rapid abridged multiphase (RAMP) breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol to reduce scan time and increase workflow efficiency. In this study, we compared delayed-phase kinetic analyses of benign and malignant lesions on the RAMP protocol versus a full dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI protocol. MATERIALS AND METHODS Consecutive breast MRI examinations obtained from October 2015 to August 2016 with tissue diagnoses of suspicious MRI lesions were identified. RAMP MRI included one precontrast and two postcontrast phases. Full DCE MRI included one precontrast and at least three postcontrast phases. Lesion kinetic analyses including mean delayed-phase volume percentage of washout, predominant curve type, and worst curve type were assessed. Kinetic analyses assessed on RAMP and DCE MRI protocols were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Chi-Square test. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to discriminate benign and malignant lesions based on delayed-phase parameters. RESULTS The study included 177 consecutive breast lesions (50 benign, 127 malignant) in 162 women. RAMP MRI (23 benign, 61 malignant) and DCE MRI examinations (27 benign, 66 malignant) demonstrated 8.4% vs 9.3% washout (p = 0.36) for benign lesions and 18.5% vs 17% washout (p = 0.66) for malignancies, respectively. There was no difference in the predominant and worst curve types for malignant and benign lesions or in area under the receiver operating characteristic curves for delayed-phased parameters between the two protocols (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION Lesion kinetic analyses from the RAMP MRI protocol can achieve the same discriminatory ability as the full DCE protocol. By reducing scan time, the RAMP MRI protocol improves patient comfort and enhances workflow efficiency and can be easily implemented in any clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sadia Choudhery
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Shinn-Huey S Chou
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, WAC 240, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Ken Chang
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Constance D Lehman
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, WAC 240, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Alonso Roca S, Delgado Laguna AB, Arantzeta Lexarreta J, Cajal Campo B, Santamaría Jareño S. Screening in patients with increased risk of breast cancer (part 1): pros and cons of MRI screening. RADIOLOGIA 2020; 62:252-265. [PMID: 32241593 DOI: 10.1016/j.rx.2020.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2019] [Revised: 12/23/2019] [Accepted: 01/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Screening plays an important role in women with a high risk of breast cancer. Given this population's high incidence of breast cancer and younger age of onset compared to the general population, it is recommended that screening starts earlier. There is ample evidence that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most sensitive diagnostic tool, and American and the European guidelines both recommend annual MRI screening (with supplementary annual mammography) as the optimum screening modality. Nevertheless, the current guidelines do not totally agree about the recommendations for MRI screening in some subgroups of patients. The first part of this article on screening in women with increased risk of breast cancer reviews the literature to explain and evaluate the advantages of MRI screening compared to screening with mammography alone: increased detection of smaller cancers with less associated lymph node involvement and a reduction in the rate of interval cancers, which can have an impact on survival and mortality (with comparable effects to other preventative measures). At the same time, however, we would like to reflect on the drawbacks of MRI screening that affect its applicability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Alonso Roca
- Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Alcorcón, Madrid, España.
| | - A B Delgado Laguna
- Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Alcorcón, Madrid, España
| | - J Arantzeta Lexarreta
- Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Alcorcón, Madrid, España
| | - B Cajal Campo
- Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Alcorcón, Madrid, España
| | - S Santamaría Jareño
- Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Alcorcón, Madrid, España
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Kwon MR, Ko EY, Han BK, Ko ES, Choi JS, Park KW. Diagnostic performance of abbreviated breast MRI for screening of women with previously treated breast cancer. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99:e19676. [PMID: 32311941 PMCID: PMC7220756 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000019676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES To evaluate the diagnostic performance of abbreviated screening breast magnetic resonance imaging (AB-MRI) for screening in women with previously treated breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective study included consecutive AB-MRI from September 2015 to December 2016 in patients with previously treated breast cancer. Longitudinal medical record of patients' demographics, outcomes of imaging surveillance and results of biopsy was reviewed. Protocol consisted of T2-weighted scanning and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging including one pre-contrast and two post-contrast scans. A positive examination was defined as final assessment of BI-RADS 4 or 5 and negative was defined as BI-RADS 1, 2, or 3. Abnormal interpretation rate, cancer detection rate (CDR), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were analyzed. RESULTS Among total 1043 AB-MRI, 29 (2.8%) AB-MRI had suspicious findings including 26 (2.5%) BI-RADS 4 and 3 (0.3%) BI-RADS 5 assessments. CDR was 9.59 per 1000. Performance outcomes were as follows: sensitivity, 71.4%; specificity, 98.2%; accuracy, 97.8%; PPV 1, 35.7%; PPV3 50%; and NPV 99.6%. Four cancers with false negative MRI were all early cancers of <1.0 cm with node negative. One was palpable interval cancer while the others were alternative screening modality-detected asymptomatic cancers before the next MRI screening. CONCLUSION AB-MRI showed high accuracy and NPV for detecting cancer recurrence in women with previously treated breast cancer. Missed cancers were all minimal cancers with node negative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mi-ri Kwon
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine
- Department of Radiology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun Young Ko
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine
| | - Boo-Kyung Han
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine
| | - Eun Sook Ko
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine
| | - Ji Soo Choi
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine
| | - Ko Woon Park
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Miller MM, Repich K, Patrie JT, Anderson RT, Harvey JA. Preferences and Attitudes Regarding Adjunct Breast Cancer Screening Among Patients with Dense Breasts. JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING 2020; 2:119-124. [PMID: 38424895 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbz093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2019] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE New breast screening modalities are being investigated to address the need for more sensitive breast cancer screening in women with dense breasts. We investigated the preferences and attitudes of these patients regarding adjunct screening modalities to help evaluate the acceptability of these exams. METHODS In this institutional review board-approved prospective study, patients with dense breasts on their prior mammogram were invited to complete a survey. Patients were asked to estimate their personal breast cancer risk compared with peers, indicate their level of concern related to screening callbacks, radiation exposure, and intravenous (IV) contrast allergies, and identify which factors might deter them from getting adjunct screening exams. RESULTS Five hundred eight patients with dense breasts presenting for screening mammography completed surveys. While most patients (304/508, 59.9%) felt it was likely or very likely that cancer could be missed on their mammogram, only 8.9% (45/508) had undergone adjunct screening exams in the past 3 years. The most commonly cited deterrents to adjunct screening were cost (340/508, 66.9%), pain (173/508, 34.1%), and concern that adjunct screening could lead to additional procedures (158/508, 31.1%). When asked to select among three hypothetical breast cancer screening modalities, patients strongly preferred the more sensitive examination, even if this involved greater cost (162/508, 31.9%) or IV-contrast administration (315/508, 62.0%). CONCLUSION Our data suggest that patients with dense breasts prefer adjunct screening exams that are both sensitive and inexpensive, although an increase in sensitivity could outweigh additional cost or even IV-line placement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew M Miller
- University of Virginia Health System, Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Kathy Repich
- University of Virginia Health System, Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Charlottesville, VA
| | - James T Patrie
- University of Virginia School of Medicine, Department of Public Health Sciences, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Roger T Anderson
- University of Virginia School of Medicine, Department of Public Health Sciences, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Jennifer A Harvey
- University of Virginia Health System, Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Charlottesville, VA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Lee-Felker S, Joines M, Storer L, Li B, DeBruhl N, Sayre J, Hoyt A. Abbreviated Breast MRI for Estimating Extent of Disease in Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer. JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING 2020; 2:43-49. [PMID: 38424993 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbz071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2019] [Accepted: 10/01/2019] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate extent of disease estimation of abbreviated protocol (ap) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared with full protocol (fp) MRI in newly diagnosed breast cancer. METHODS In this institutional review board-approved, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant, retrospective study of women with breast cancer who underwent pretreatment fpMRI on a 3 Tesla MRI in 2013, axial fat-saturated pre- and first postcontrast T1, maximum-intensity projection, and subtraction sequences were interpreted independently by three breast radiologists in two sessions, without and with prior imaging, respectively. Agreement was calculated using Cohen's kappa. Interpretations were compared with histology or clinical stability. Diagnostic performances were compared using Bennett's statistic. P < 0.05 was significant. RESULTS Eighty-one women (mean age 56 years, range 32-92 years), 116 lesions, and 95 cancers (mean size 27 mm, range 4-110 mm) were included. Agreement among radiologists for lesion assessment was excellent (0.83). apMRI cancer detection improved with prior imaging (mean sensitivity from 95% to 99%, specificity from 91% to 97%, positive predictive value [PPV] from 92% to 98%, and negative predictive value [NPV] from 95% to 99%) versus fpMRI (sensitivity 98% [93/95], specificity 94% [76/81], PPV 95% [93/98], and NPV 97% [76/78]). apMRI detected all multifocal, multicentric, and contralateral disease seen in 19% (15/81) of women to the same extent as fpMRI. apMRI axillary metastases detection improved with prior imaging (mean sensitivity from 78% to 86%, specificity from 90% to 92%, PPV from 76% to 82%, and NPV from 89% to 94%) versus fpMRI (sensitivity 71% [17/24], specificity 88% [51/58]), PPV 71% [17/24], and NPV 88% [51/58]). CONCLUSION apMRI may be acceptable for women with newly diagnosed cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Lee-Felker
- David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Radiological Sciences, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Melissa Joines
- David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Radiological Sciences, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Lindsey Storer
- David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Radiological Sciences, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Bo Li
- David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Radiological Sciences, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Nanette DeBruhl
- David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Radiological Sciences, Los Angeles, CA
| | - James Sayre
- University of California, Los Angeles, Fielding School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Anne Hoyt
- David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Radiological Sciences, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Peter SC, Wenkel E, Weiland E, Dietzel M, Janka R, Hartmann A, Emons J, Uder M, Ellmann S. Combination of an ultrafast TWIST-VIBE Dixon sequence protocol and diffusion-weighted imaging into an accurate easily applicable classification tool for masses in breast MRI. Eur Radiol 2020; 30:2761-2772. [PMID: 32002644 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06608-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2019] [Revised: 11/18/2019] [Accepted: 12/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to develop a tool for the classification of masses in breast MRI, based on ultrafast TWIST-VIBE Dixon (TVD) dynamic sequences combined with DWI. TVD sequences allow to abbreviate breast MRI protocols, but provide kinetic information only on the contrast wash-in, and because of the lack of the wash-out kinetics, their diagnostic value might be hampered. A special focus of this study was thus to maintain high diagnostic accuracy in lesion classification. MATERIALS AND METHODS Sixty-one patients who received breast MRI between 02/2014 and 04/2015 were included, with 83 reported lesions (60 malignant). Our institute's standard breast MRI protocol was complemented by an ultrafast TVD sequence. ADC and peak enhancement of the TVD sequences were integrated into a generalised linear model (GLM) for malignancy prediction. For comparison, a second GLM was calculated using ADC and conventional DCE curve type. The resulting GLMs were evaluated for standard diagnostic parameters. For easy application of the GLMs, nomograms were created. RESULTS The GLM based on peak enhancement of the TVD and ADC was as equally accurate as the GLM based on conventional DCE and ADC, with no significant differences (sensitivity, 93.3%/93.3%; specificity, 91.3%/87.0%; PPV, 96.6%/94.9%; NPV, 84.0%/83.3%; all, p ≥ 0.315). CONCLUSIONS This study presents a method to integrate ultrafast TVD sequences into a breast MRI protocol, allowing a reduction of the examination time while maintaining diagnostic accuracy. A GLM based on the combination of TVD-derived peak enhancement and ADC provides high diagnostic accuracy, and can be easily applied using a nomogram. KEY POINTS • Ultrafast TWIST-VIBE Dixon sequence protocols in combination with diffusion-weighted imaging allow to shorten breast MRI examinations, while diagnostic accuracy is maintained. • Integrating peak enhancement from the TWIST-VIBE Dixon sequence and the apparent diffusion coefficient into a generalised linear model provides a comprehensible image evaluation approach. • This approach is further facilitated by nomograms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra C Peter
- Department of Radiology, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Maximiliansplatz 3, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Evelyn Wenkel
- Department of Radiology, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Maximiliansplatz 3, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Elisabeth Weiland
- Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Allee am Röthelheimpark 2, 91052, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias Dietzel
- Department of Radiology, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Maximiliansplatz 3, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Rolf Janka
- Department of Radiology, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Maximiliansplatz 3, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Julius Emons
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - EMN, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael Uder
- Department of Radiology, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Maximiliansplatz 3, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Stephan Ellmann
- Department of Radiology, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Maximiliansplatz 3, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Park KW, Han SB, Han BK, Ko ES, Choi JS, Rhee SJ, Ko EY. MRI surveillance for women with a personal history of breast cancer: comparison between abbreviated and full diagnostic protocol. Br J Radiol 2020; 93:20190733. [PMID: 31868524 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the diagnostic performance of breast MRI with abbreviated protocol (AB-MRI) and full ddiagnostic protocol (FDP-MRI) for surveillance of females with a personal history of breast cancer. METHODS In this retrospective study, we analyzed the outcomes of total 1312 post-operative screening breast MRI matched from 1045 AB-MRI and 677 FDP-MRI, which had histologic confirmation for suspicious MRI findings or 1 year negative follow-up images. This study was approved by the institutional review board and informed patient consent was waved. AB-MRI consists of T2 weighted scanning and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging including one pre-contrast and two post-contrast scans. We compared the diagnostic performance for recurrent breast cancer in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive-predictive value, negative-predictive value, and accuracy and area under the curve between the screening AB-MRI and FDP-MRI. RESULTS Overall, 13 recurrent tumors among 1312 post-operative cases screened with breast MRI (1.0%) were detected including 8 invasive cancer, 2 cases of in situ cancer, and 3 cases of metastatic lymph nodes. The sensitivity and negative predictive value were 70 vs 100 and 99.5% vs 100% in AB-MRI and FDP-MRI. Specificity, positive predictive value, accuracy, and area under the curve of AB-MRI and FDP-MRI were 98.0% vs 96.9%, 35.0% vs 23.1%, 97.6% vs 97.0%, and 0.840 vs 0.985, respectively. CONCLUSION The performance of AB-MRI was comparable to that of FDP-MRI in detecting recurrent breast cancer and decreased false positive cases. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE AB-MRI provides a reliable alternative with similar diagnostic performance and shorter MRI acquisition time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ko Woon Park
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Ko ES, Morris EA. Abbreviated Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Breast Cancer Screening: Concept, Early Results, and Considerations. Korean J Radiol 2020; 20:533-541. [PMID: 30887736 PMCID: PMC6424827 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2018.0722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2018] [Accepted: 12/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been increasingly utilized, especially in screening for high-risk cases, because of its high sensitivity and superior ability to detect cancers as compared with mammography and ultrasound. Several limitations such as higher cost, longer examination time, longer interpretation time, and low availability have hindered the wider application of MRI, especially for screening of average-risk women. To overcome some of these limitations and increase access to MRI screening, an abbreviated breast MRI protocol has been introduced. Abbreviated breast MRI is becoming popular and challenges the status quo. This review aims to present an overview of abbreviated MRI, discuss the current findings, and introduce ongoing prospective trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eun Sook Ko
- Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Elizabeth A Morris
- Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. Fast breast MRI protocols have the same sensitivity as conventional protocols, but their specificity is variable and can be inadequate. An ultrafast sequence provides early enhancement of lesion characteristics that optimize the characterization of the fast protocol, increasing positive predictive values without increasing time. CONCLUSION. These new abbreviated protocols could constitute a viable screening tool both for women at high risk of breast cancer and for those at intermediate risk with high breast density.
Collapse
|
45
|
Kuhl CK. Abbreviated Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for Breast Cancer Screening: Rationale, Concept, and Transfer to Clinical Practice. Annu Rev Med 2019; 70:501-519. [PMID: 30691370 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-med-121417-100403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Given the increasing understanding of cancer as a heterogeneous group of diseases, detection methods should offer a sensitivity profile that ensures perfect sensitivity for biologically important cancers while screening out self-limiting pseudocancers. However, mammographic screening is biased toward detection of ductal carcinoma in situ and slowly growing cancers-and thus frequently fails to detect biologically aggressive cancers. This explains the persistently high rates of interval cancers and high rates of breast cancer mortality observed in spite of decades of mammographic screening. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in contrast, has a sensitivity profile that matches clinical needs. Conventional MRI is not suitable for population-wide screening due to high cost, limited tolerability, and lack of availability. We introduced abbreviated MRI in 2014. Abbreviated MRI will change the way MRI is used in clinical medicine. This article describes the rationale to use MRI in general, and abbreviated MRI in particular, for breast cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christiane K Kuhl
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Partovi S, Sin D, Lu Z, Sieck L, Marshall H, Pham R, Plecha D. Fast MRI breast cancer screening - Ready for prime time. Clin Imaging 2019; 60:160-168. [PMID: 31927171 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2019.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2019] [Revised: 10/14/2019] [Accepted: 10/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The manuscript discusses landmark studies using abbreviated MRI for breast cancer screening. This includes abbreviated dynamic contrast enhanced MRI and diffusion weighted imaging. Our institutional experience with abbreviated MR protocol for breast cancer screening is also described. CONCLUSION Abbreviated MRI protocols were found to demonstrate value for screening of breast cancer. It has been shown that abbreviated protocol MRI provides similar diagnostic sensitivities to full protocol MRI for breast cancer in women with increased lifetime risk. Our institutional abbreviated MRI protocol for breast cancer offers improved time and workflow efficiencies and has the potential to increase the number of breast cancers detected and the detection of pathologically relevant invasive breast cancer at earlier stages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sasan Partovi
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States of America.
| | - David Sin
- School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| | - Ziang Lu
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| | - Leah Sieck
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| | - Holly Marshall
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| | - Ramya Pham
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| | - Donna Plecha
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Marquina Martínez D, Cruz Ciria S, García Barrado AI, Suñén Amador I, García Mur C. Value of an abbreviated protocol of breast magnetic resonance imaging for screening high-risk patients. RADIOLOGIA 2019; 62:198-204. [PMID: 31623849 DOI: 10.1016/j.rx.2019.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2019] [Revised: 06/28/2019] [Accepted: 08/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Value the utility of breast MRI abbreviated protocols for the screening of breast cancer in high-risk patients compared to the full protocol. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of 157 breast MRI of 82 high-risk patients practiced in our hospital between January 2011 and January 2017. Clinical, radiological and anatomopathological parameters were analyzed. Reading of the different protocols (MIP, abbreviated and full) was made by an expert radiologist. Subsequent statistical analysis was done. RESULTS A total amount of 12 findings classified as BI-RADS 4 and 5 were identified and performed a biopsy, resulting 11 of them to be malignant (91.67%) and 1 benign (8.33%). The malignant wounds included 4 intraductal carcinoma (33.33%) and 7 infiltrating ductal carcinoma (58.33%). All injuries were detected with the three protocols and no significant differences were found between their respective area under the ROC curve (p=0.0650). CONCLUSIONS In our study there are no significant differences between the different protocols (MIP, abbreviated and full), which places the abbreviated protocol as a promising tool for breast cancer screening in high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Marquina Martínez
- Sección de Radiología Mamaria, Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, España; Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital San Jorge, Huesca, España.
| | - S Cruz Ciria
- Sección de Radiología Mamaria, Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, España; Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital San Jorge, Huesca, España
| | - A I García Barrado
- Sección de Radiología Mamaria, Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, España
| | - I Suñén Amador
- Sección de Radiología Mamaria, Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, España
| | - C García Mur
- Sección de Radiología Mamaria, Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, España
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Borthakur A, Weinstein SP, Schnall MD, Conant EF. Comparison of Study Activity Times for “Full” versus “Fast MRI” for Breast Cancer Screening. J Am Coll Radiol 2019; 16:1046-1051. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2018] [Revised: 01/02/2019] [Accepted: 01/03/2019] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
|
49
|
Abbreviated breast MRI combining FAST protocol and high temporal resolution (HTR) dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) sequence. Eur J Radiol 2019; 117:199-208. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.06.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2018] [Revised: 06/21/2019] [Accepted: 06/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
50
|
Dialani V, Tseng I, Slanetz PJ, Fein-Zachary V, Phillips J, Karimova E, Brook A, Mehta TS. Potential role of abbreviated MRI for breast cancer screening in an academic medical center. Breast J 2019; 25:604-611. [PMID: 31206889 DOI: 10.1111/tbj.13297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2018] [Revised: 10/24/2018] [Accepted: 10/25/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
The purpose is to determine whether an abbreviated MRI protocol (ABMR) is ready to be used for breast cancer screening in an academic practice setting. Two hundred and fifty nine breast MRIs from 1/1/2012 to 6/30/2012 were retrospectively reviewed using ABMR (MIP, Pre-contrastT1, single dynamic post-contrastT1, and subtraction). Five breast radiologists (4-28 year-expr) participated in this reader study performed in two phases: Phase1 - radiologist's privy to clinical history but not to comparison imaging. Phase2 - radiologists provided comparison imaging. For phase1, studies were reviewed using three steps: (a) MIP only (positive/negative/intermediate); (b) ABMR (recall/no recall) and (c) With T2 (for changes in recommendations). Radiologist also recorded total time for interpretation. In Phase2 the MRIs coded as "recall" were re-reviewed with available comparison studies, noting changes in final recommendation. The abnormal interpretation rates (AIRs) were calculated for phase1 and phase2 results with comparison to the original full protocol. Of the 259 patients (avg. age-52 years; range 26-78), there were seven cancers (three invasive, three DCIS and one breast lymphoma). Acquisition time for ABMR was 3 minutes, ABMR + T2-8 minutes, and original full protocol 16 minutes. Average MIP was positive or indeterminate in 86% (6/7) and negative in 14% (1/7) cancers. The average AIR for MIP only was 20.8% (sens-77.1%; spec-80.8%. The AIR w/o comparisons was 25.6% (sens-91.4%; spec- 76.2%); however the average AIR decreased in phase 2 with comparisons to 13.7% (sens-91.4%; spec-88.5%). The AIR of the original full protocol read was 16.2% (sens-100%; spec-85.7%). Addition of T2 changed assessment in only 3% (1.2%-6.5%). Avg. read time for ABMR including T2 was 2.5 minutes (1.6-4.0 minutes). ABMR is reliable for breast cancer screening, with acceptable interpretation time and acceptable AIR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vandana Dialani
- Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Irene Tseng
- Department of Radiology, Winchester Hospital, Lahey Health, Winchester, Massachusetts
| | - Priscilla J Slanetz
- Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Valerie Fein-Zachary
- Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jordana Phillips
- Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Evguenia Karimova
- Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Alexander Brook
- Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tejas S Mehta
- Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|