BRCAness Combined With a Family History of Cancer Is Associated With a Poor Prognosis for Breast Cancer Patients With a High Risk of BRCA Mutations

Genetic medicine is accelerating in Japan

Background

In 2018, BRACAnalysis® was covered by medical insurance in Japan as a companion diagnostic test for the poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitor olaparib. In April 2020, eligibility for BRCA1/2 genetic testing was expanded to the diagnosis of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome, and medical management including prophylactic surgery and surveillance were covered by public insurance for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers who developed breast or ovarian cancer. The amount of BRCA1/2 genetic testing has been increasing recently, but the number of subjects and the impact of testing for patients’ outcomes remain unclear.

Patients and methods

This study explored the potential number of patients who will be eligible for new insurance coverage for BRCA1/2 genetic testing. We analyzed 868 patients from 938 surgeries between January 2014 and September 2020 from our database.

Results

Overall, 372 patients (43%) were eligible for new insurance coverage for BRCA1/2 genetic testing. The most common category was family history of breast or ovarian cancer within third-degree relatives. We found that 202 patients (23%) had family history of breast or ovarian cancer. In addition, the progression-free survival was significantly lower in triple-negative breast cancer patients aged 60 years or younger compared with the other patients (P = 0.0005).

Conclusion

The genetic medicine for primary breast cancer patients with BRCA1/2 germline mutation is accelerating rapidly in Japan. Therefore, establishing a system for the genetic medicine would be urgent.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12282-022-01342-4.

Predictive and prognostic significance of BRCAness in HER2-negative breast cancer

BACKGROUND

BRCAness is characterized as the phenotypes shared between some sporadic tumors and BRCA1/2 mutation cancers resulting in defective homologous recombination. The predictive or prognostic value of BRCAness in HER2-negative breast cancer patients who have received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is not fully elucidated.

METHODS

We retrospectively selected 101 high-risk HER2-negative patients diagnosed with stage I-III breast cancer who underwent NAC treatment and evaluated BRCA1-like phenotype using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification assay. In an analysis of BRCAness, 95 out of 101 patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 70 (74%) patients had sporadic-type tumors and 25 (26%) had BRCA1-like tumors according to pre-treatment samples. The BRCA1-like phenotype was not associated with pathological complete response (pCR) rate in the entire cohort. In survival analysis, pre-treatment BRCA1-like phenotype was not associated with survival. On the other hand, post-treatment BRCA1-like patients apparently showed shorter relapse-free survival (log-rank P = 0.016) and breast cancer-specific survival (P < 0.001) compared with sporadic features. In multivariate analysis, only the post-treatment BRCA1-phenotype was significant prognostic factors (HR 5.67, 95% CI 1.19-29.3). Furthermore, we found phenotype change between BRCA1-like and sporadic type through NAC in 19% of non-pCR patients. Post-treatment Ki67 significantly decreased in the persistent sporadic tumors during treatment or sporadic tumors changed after NAC (P < 0.0001, P = 0.0078, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

BRCAness may be useful biomarkers to predict prognosis for HER2-negative breast cancer refractory to standard chemotherapy. Our results pave the way for identifying patients who require alternative therapies.

Prognostic Prediction of BRCA Mutations by 18F-FDG PET/CT SUVmax in Breast Cancer

Objectives:

This study aimed to investigate the prognostic prediction of germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations by comparing the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max) obtained from ¹⁸fluoride-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT), which is considered a prognostic factor in breast cancer (BC).

Methods:

Retrospective interdisciplinary laboratory results of 92 patients with BC who had germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation profiles and underwent ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT were compared. Genotyping was made by next-generation sequencing, and PET/CT scans were re-evaluated. The histopathological data, genetic results, and clinical demographics of all patients were recorded. Patients were divided into two groups in accordance with the presence of germline BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutations. Between-group statistical comparison was performed.

Results:

In PET/CT performed for primary staging, patients with BRCA-positive BC had significantly higher SUV_max (p=0.039), larger tumor size (p=0.025), and presence of axillary nodal metastases (p=0.023) than patients with BRCA-negative BC. Although the Ki-67 index was higher in the BRCA-positive group than BRCA-negative group, this difference was not significant (p=0.157). Moreover, in the BRCA-positive and negative groups, SUV_max, Ki-67 index, and tumor size, grade, and stage were significantly correlated with each other.

Conclusion:

The results of this study showed a strong association between BRCA mutations and SUV_max, which indicates the poor prognosis of BC.

Prevalence of mutations in BRCA and homologous recombination repair genes and real-world standard of care of Asian patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer starting first-line systemic cytotoxic chemotherapy: subgroup analysis of the global BREAKOUT study

Background

The multinational BREAKOUT study (NCT03078036) sought to determine the prevalence of germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA1/2) and somatic BRCA1/2 (sBRCA1/2) mutations and mutations in other homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes in women with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) starting first-line chemotherapy.

Methods

Genetic testing for gBRCA, sBRCA, and HRR gene mutations was performed in patients who started first-line chemotherapy for MBC in the last 90 days (341 patients across 14 countries) who were not selected based on risk factors for gBRCA mutations. We report data from the Asian cohort, which included patients in Japan (7 sites), South Korea (10 sites), and Taiwan (8 sites).

Results

Of 116 patients screened, 104 patients were enrolled in the Asian cohort. The median age was 53.0 (range 25–87) years. gBRCA1/2, gBRCA1, and gBRCA2 mutations were detected in 10.6% (11/104), 5.8% (6/104), and 4.8% (5/104) of patients, respectively; none had mutations in both gBRCA1 and gBRCA2. gBRCA1/2 mutations were detected in 10.0% (6/60) and 11.6% (5/43) of patients with hormone receptor-positive and triple-negative MBC, respectively. HRR gene mutations were tested in 48 patients without gBRCA mutations, and 5 (10.4%) had at least one HRR mutation in sBRCA, ATM, PALB2, and CHEK2.

Conclusion

We report for the first time the prevalence of gBRCA and HRR mutations in an Asian cohort of patients with HER2-negative MBC. Our results suggest that BRCA mutation testing is valuable to determine appropriate treatment options for patients with hormone receptor-positive or triple-negative MBC.

Study registration

NCT03078036.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12282-021-01283-4.

Glyoxalase 1 expression analysis by immunohistochemistry in breast cancer

Glyoxalase-1 (GLO-1) is the key enzyme in aldehyde defence in cancer cells. We here evaluated the prognostic impact and association with clinico-pathological parameters and relapse-free as well as overall survival in tumor samples from 187 breast cancer patients. The determined GLO1-immunoreactive score (GLO1-IRS) did not correlate with parameters such as grading, size, hormone receptors or ki67. However, an association of GLO1-IRS with the advanced glycation end product N^ε-(carboxymethyl)lysine (p = 0.07) and HER2 (p = 0.06), and a strong correlation with VEGF (p = 0.008) was found. In survival analysis, no significant impact of GLO-1 IRS could be deduced for all patients. However, GLO1-IRS correlated with treatment by radiotherapy (p = 0.008) and high GLO1-IRS predicted a shorter relapse free survival after radiotherapy (log-rank p = 0.067). METABRIC- and TCGA expression-data were analyzed for correlation of regulatory genes of the NF-κB-pathway (RELA, RELB, IRAK1), the oxidative-stress associated transcription factor nrf2 (NFE2L2), the receptor for AGEs (AGER, RAGE) as well as enzymes associated with aldehyde defense. Here, RELA, RELB and NFE2L2 correlated significantly with GLO1 expression, but there were conflicting results between the two data sources. In conclusion, GLO1 was highly expressed in cancer cells, correlated surprisingly weak with survival, but we could show a positive association with the AGE CML as well as VEGF. Gene expression data suggest a regulation of GLO-1 mRNA via both, inflammation (NF-kB) and oxidative stress (NFE2L2) in tumors.

Are Basal-Like and Non-Basal-Like Triple-Negative Breast Cancers Really Different?

Objective

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for 15–25% of breast cancers. It is increasingly recognized that TNBC is a motley disease. TNBC and basal-like (BL) subtype are different molecular classes of breast cancer with a high degree of overlap. However, a smaller fraction lacks the expression of basal markers in spite of being TNBC and is called non-basal-like (NBL). The aim of this study is to assess the clinicopathological features in TNBC and compare its BL and NBL subtypes. Material and Methods. A total of 200 subjects fulfilling the inclusion criteria of study were identified from the electronic medical records of institution. The tumor sections of subjects were immunohistochemically stained for basal markers, namely, 34βE12, c-Kit, and EGFR, in order to differentiate between BL and NBL subtypes. Comprehensive data were assembled from subjects' clinical records. The features of TNBC and their associations with the two subtypes were assessed using statistical analyses.

Results

TNBC constituted 22% of all breast cancers. The family history of cancer was observed to be significantly associated with stage (p=0.013). The proportions of BL and NBL subtypes were equal. Of all parameters compared between two subtypes, only lymphovascular invasion was found to have statistically significant difference (p=0.019). Though no statistical significant difference between overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of two subgroups was found, BL subtype has slightly shorter DFS and OS compared to NBL.

Conclusion

Both BL and NBL subtypes occur in equal proportions; hence, basalness and triple negativity are not synonyms. Though BL and NBL are prognostically similar, BL subtype shows a trend towards slightly shorter DFS and OS compared to NBL.