1
|
Corso G, Fusco N, Guerini-Rocco E, Leonardi MC, Criscitiello C, Zagami P, Nicolò E, Mazzarol G, La Vecchia C, Pesapane F, Zanzottera C, Tarantino P, Petitto S, Bianchi B, Massari G, Boato A, Sibilio A, Polizzi A, Curigliano G, De Scalzi AM, Lauria F, Bonanni B, Marabelli M, Rotili A, Nicosia L, Albini A, Calvello M, Mukhtar RA, Robson ME, Sacchini V, Rennert G, Galimberti V, Veronesi P, Magnoni F. Invasive lobular breast cancer: Focus on prevention, genetics, diagnosis, and treatment. Semin Oncol 2024; 51:106-122. [PMID: 38897820 DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2024.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Revised: 05/05/2024] [Accepted: 05/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
Invasive lobular cancer (ILC) is the most common of the breast cancer special types, accounting for up to 15% of all breast malignancies. The distinctive biological features of ILC include the loss of the cell adhesion molecule E-cadherin, which drives the tumor's peculiar discohesive growth pattern, with cells arranged in single file and dispersed throughout the stroma. Typically, such tumors originate in the lobules, are more commonly bilateral compared to invasive ductal cancer (IDC) and require a more accurate diagnostic examination through imaging. They are luminal in molecular subtype, and exhibit estrogen and progesterone receptor positivity and HER2 negativity, thus presenting a more unpredictable response to neoadjuvant therapies. There has been a significant increase in research focused on this distinctive breast cancer subtype, including studies on its pathology, its clinical and surgical management, and the high-resolution definition of its genomic profile, as well as the development of new therapeutic perspectives. This review will summarize the heterogeneous pattern of this unique disease, focusing on challenges in its comprehensive clinical management and on future insights and research objectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Corso
- Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Fusco
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy; Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Guerini-Rocco
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy; Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Carmen Criscitiello
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy; Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Zagami
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy; Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Eleonora Nicolò
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Giovanni Mazzarol
- Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo La Vecchia
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Filippo Pesapane
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Cristina Zanzottera
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Tarantino
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy; Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Salvatore Petitto
- Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Beatrice Bianchi
- Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Massari
- Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Anthony Boato
- Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Sibilio
- Division of Breast Surgery Forlì (Ravenna), AUSL Romagna, Ravenna, Italy
| | - Andrea Polizzi
- Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy; Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Federica Lauria
- Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Bernardo Bonanni
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Monica Marabelli
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Rotili
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Nicosia
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Adriana Albini
- Scientific Directorate, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Mariarosaria Calvello
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Division of Hematology, Clinica Moncucco, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Rita A Mukhtar
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Mark E Robson
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Virgilio Sacchini
- Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Gad Rennert
- B. Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion and the Association for Promotion of Research in Precision Medicine (APRPM), Haifa, Israel
| | - Viviana Galimberti
- Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Veronesi
- Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Magnoni
- Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Christensen DM, Shehata MN, Javid SH, Rahbar H, Lam DL. Preoperative Breast MRI: Current Evidence and Patient Selection. JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING 2023; 5:112-124. [PMID: 38416933 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbac088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 03/01/2024]
Abstract
Breast MRI is the most sensitive imaging modality for the assessment of newly diagnosed breast cancer extent and can detect additional mammographically and clinically occult breast cancers in the ipsilateral and contralateral breasts. Nonetheless, appropriate use of breast MRI in the setting of newly diagnosed breast cancer remains debated. Though highly sensitive, MRI is less specific and may result in false positives and overestimation of disease when MRI findings are not biopsied prior to surgical excision. Furthermore, improved anatomic depiction of breast cancer on MRI has not consistently translated to improved clinical outcomes, such as lower rates of re-excision or breast cancer recurrence, though there is a paucity of well-designed studies examining these issues. In addition, current treatment paradigms have been developed in the absence of this more accurate depiction of disease span, which likely has limited the value of MRI. These issues have led to inconsistent and variable utilization of preoperative MRI across practice settings and providers. In this review, we discuss the history of breast MRI and its current use and recommendations with a focus on the preoperative setting. We review the evidence surrounding the use of preoperative MRI in the evaluation of breast malignancies and discuss the data on breast MRI in the setting of specific patient factors often used to determine breast MRI eligibility, such as age, index tumor phenotype, and breast density. Finally, we review the impact of breast MRI on surgical outcomes (re-excision and mastectomy rates) and long-term breast recurrence and survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana M Christensen
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Mariam N Shehata
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Sara H Javid
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Habib Rahbar
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Diana L Lam
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bredbeck BC, Mott NM, Wang T, Sinco BR, Hughes TM, Nathan H, Dossett LA. Facility-Level Variation of Low-Value Breast Cancer Treatments in Older Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Analysis of a Statewide Claims Registry. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:10.1245/s10434-022-11631-z. [PMID: 35380309 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11631-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2021] [Accepted: 02/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since 2004, national guidelines have supported the omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and radiotherapy for women ≥ 70 years of age with early-stage, hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer, but many women continue to receive at least one of these services. Provider- and patient-level factors may contribute to persistent utilization, but the role of facility-level factors is unknown. We aimed to determine facility-level variation of SLNB and adjuvant radiotherapy utilization in older women with early-stage, HR+ breast cancer undergoing breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Additionally, we aimed to explore factors associated with SLNB and radiotherapy utilization and the intra-facility correlation in their utilization. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a statewide registry of claims data. We included women ≥70 years of age diagnosed with breast cancer who underwent BCS from 2012 to 2019 at 80 hospitals in the Michigan Value Collaborative. The main outcome was inter-facility rates and variation of SLNB and radiotherapy, as well as intra-facility correlation in their utilization. RESULTS The cohort included 7253 women (median age 77 years). Only 20% (n = 1440) underwent BCS alone, whereas 71% (n = 5122) underwent SLNB and 52% (n = 3793) received radiotherapy. Inter-facility rates of SLNB ranged from 35 to 82% (median 70%), and radiotherapy ranged from 19 to 72% (median 49%). SLNB and radiotherapy were positively correlated (r = 0.27, p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS SLNB and radiotherapy rates remain high with significant variation in utilization at the facility level. High utilizers of SLNB are likely to be high utilizers of radiotherapy, suggesting the opportunity for strategic targeting of these facilities and their clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brooke C Bredbeck
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Nicole M Mott
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Ton Wang
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Brandy R Sinco
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Tasha M Hughes
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Hari Nathan
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Lesly A Dossett
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chang JS, Chang JH, Kim N, Kim YB, Shin KH, Kim K. Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy in the Treatment of Breast Cancer: An Updated Review. J Breast Cancer 2022; 25:349-365. [DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2022.25.e37] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2022] [Revised: 07/16/2022] [Accepted: 07/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jee Suk Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Hyun Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Nalee Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yong Bae Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyung Hwan Shin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyubo Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|