Surgical Delay of Nipple Areola Complex: A Powerful Technique to Extend the Indication of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy

Evaluating the Quality of Online Patient Information for Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction Using Polyurethane-Coated Breast Implants

Background

An increasing number of patients are using online information regarding medical issues; however, the Internet is not subject to content ratings or filters. Unreliable information found on the web can heavily influence patients to the extent that it can lead to wrong decisions in the choice of treatment. In our daily experience we meet more informed patients and given the increasing use of polyurethane-coated implants in breast reconstruction in Europe, we wondered about the level of information available online. Our study aims to assess the quality of information available online on breast reconstruction with polyurethane-coated implants.

Materials and Methods

Assuming that the most used search engines are Google and Yahoo, we used a search strategy to identify online information regarding prepectoral breast reconstruction with polyurethane-coated implants. The selected websites were divided into 5 groups (practitioners, hospitals, healthcare portals, professional societies, and encyclopedias), and the quality of information was assessed by using an expanded version of the Ensuring Quality Information for Patients (EQIP) tool, which is a checklist applicable to all existing types of information.

Results

Fifty-six websites were selected and were categorized into 5 groups: 17 practitioners, 9 hospitals, 13 healthcare portals, 7 professional societies, 10 encyclopedias. The average score was 17 points (range: 12 - 25). We found 13 reliable websites with a score higher than 20 using the expanded version of the EQIP tool, whereas 43 were deemed unreliable, as they scored lower.

Conclusion

Proper communication between surgeon and patient is crucial in the therapeutic choice, as the available online information presently is scarce and can lead to wrong decisions if not properly verified.

Horizontal pillar technique: A single pedicle septum-based approach in reduction mammaplasty with a twist

Breast reduction surgery has proven to be a successful treatment for various conditions such as postural disorders, anxiety, dermatological problems, and body image disorders, and is tailored to accommodate each patient's needs and anatomical variations. The author presents a modified approach for reduction mammaplasty using a septum-based superomedial pedicled nipple-areola complex (NAC) flap combined with horizontal dermoglandular pillars. This adjustment enhances desired breast projection, potentially eliminating the need for alternative pedicles in most cases. The limitations and disadvantages of this new technique are discussed. Between July 2015 and July 2021, 85 patients underwent surgery using the horizontal pillar reduction mammaplasty. Clinical data obtained during follow-up visits were recorded. Patients were asked to answer the local version of the Breast-Q, version 2.0, reduction module postoperative scale questionnaire to evaluate breast shape contentment and patient satisfaction at the 1-year follow-up. Necrosis of the NAC was not observed in any patient. The most common complaints in the early postoperative period were pain along the inframammary fold and swelling that extended into the axillary region. The mean values and standard deviations of the postoperative Breast-Q scores were calculated. The postoperative satisfaction with breasts scale mean value was 84.11 ± 12.86, and the postoperative satisfaction with outcomes scale mean value was 81.08 ± 9.97. The horizontal pillar reduction mammaplasty technique is safe, reliable, and easy to perform in breast reduction. Although the initial findings are encouraging, future anatomical and clinical studies are necessary to fully explore this modified technique's functional limitations and long-term outcomes.