1
|
Fei S, Wu WD, Zhang HS, Liu SJ, Li D, Jin B. Primary coexisting adenocarcinoma of the colon and neuroendocrine tumor of the duodenum: A case report and review of the literature. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16:2724-2734. [PMID: 39220064 PMCID: PMC11362920 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i8.2724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2024] [Revised: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 06/07/2024] [Indexed: 08/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) arise from the body's diffuse endocrine system. Coexisting primary adenocarcinoma of the colon and NETs of the duodenum (D-NETs) is a rare occurrence in clinical practice. The classification and treatment criteria for D-NETs combined with a second primary cancer have not yet been determined. CASE SUMMARY We report the details of a case involving female patient with coexisting primary adenocarcinoma of the colon and a D-NET diagnosed by imaging and surgical specimens. The tumors were treated by surgery and four courses of chemotherapy. The patient achieved a favorable clinical prognosis. CONCLUSION Coexisting primary adenocarcinoma of the colon and D-NET were diagnosed by imaging, laboratory indicators, and surgical specimens. Surgical resection combined with chemotherapy was a safe, clinically effective, and cost-effective treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Song Fei
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Wei-Dong Wu
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Han-Shuo Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Shao-Jie Liu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Dan Li
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Bo Jin
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kuemmerli C, Hess V, Dutkowski P, Sinz S, Kessler U, Hess GF, Billeter AT, Müller-Stich BP, Kollmar O, Müller PC. Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy for Primary and Secondary Malignancies of the Liver: State of the Art and Current High-Level Evidence. Pharmacology 2024; 109:86-97. [PMID: 38368862 PMCID: PMC11008720 DOI: 10.1159/000537887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAI) has been proposed as a valuable adjunct for multimodal therapy of primary and secondary liver malignancies. This review provides an overview of the currently available evidence of HAI, taking into account tumor response and long-term oncologic outcome. SUMMARY In colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), HAI in combination with systemic therapy leads to high response rates (85-90%) and conversion to resectablity in primary unresectable disease in up to 50%. HAI in combination with systemic therapy in CRLM in the adjuvant setting shows promising long-term outcomes with up to 50% 10-year survival in a large, non-randomized single-center cohort. For hepatocellular carcinoma patients, response rates as high as 20-40% have been reported for HAI and long-term outcomes compare well to other therapies. Similarly, survival for patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma 3 years after treatment with HAI is reported as high as 34%, which compares well to trials of systemic therapy where 3-year survival is usually below 5%. However, evidence is mainly limited by highly selected, heterogenous patient groups, and outdated chemotherapy regimens. The largest body of evidence stems from small, often non-randomized cohorts, predominantly from highly specialized single centers. KEY MESSAGE In well-selected patients with primary and secondary liver malignancies, HAI might improve response rates and, possibly, long-term survival. Results of ongoing randomized trials will show whether a wider adoption of HAI is justified, particularly to increase rates of resectability in advanced malignant diseases confined to the liver.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Kuemmerli
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis – University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Viviane Hess
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Philipp Dutkowski
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis – University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Stefanie Sinz
- Department of Surgery, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Ulf Kessler
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Centre des Maladies Digestives, Clinique Cecil, Hirslanden, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Gabriel F. Hess
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis – University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Adrian T. Billeter
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis – University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Beat P. Müller-Stich
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis – University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Otto Kollmar
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis – University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Philip C. Müller
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis – University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Spiliopoulos S, Moschovaki-Zeiger O, Sethi A, Festas G, Reppas L, Filippiadis D, Kelekis N. An update on locoregional percutaneous treatment technologies in colorectal cancer liver metastatic disease. Expert Rev Med Devices 2023; 20:293-302. [PMID: 36825337 DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2023.2185137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Liver-dominant metastatic colorectal cancer is noted in approximately 20%-35% of the patients. Systemic chemotherapy remains the first-line treatment for mCRC, but the prognosis is poor due to liver failure. Novel minimally invasive technologies have enabled the optimization of locoregional treatment options. AREAS COVERED This is a comprehensive review of novel locoregional treatment technologies, both percutaneous ablation and transcatheter arterial treatments, which can be used to decrease hepatic disease progression in patients with mCRC. Trans-arterial radioembolization is the most recently developed locoregional treatment for metastatic liver disease, and robust evidence has been accumulated over the past years. EXPERT OPINION Image-guided techniques, endovascular and ablative, have gained wide acceptance for the treatment of liver malignancies, in selected patients with non-resectable disease. The optimization of dosimetry and microsphere technological advancement will certainly upgrade the role of liver radioembolization segmentectomy or lobectomy in the upcoming years, due to its curative intent. Also, ablative interventions provide local curative intent, offering significant and sustained local tumor control. Standardization protocols in terms of predictability and reliability using immediate treatment assessment and ablation zone software could further ameliorate clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stavros Spiliopoulos
- 2nd Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Ornella Moschovaki-Zeiger
- 2nd Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Akshay Sethi
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary Hospital, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK
| | - George Festas
- 2nd Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Lazaros Reppas
- 2nd Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitris Filippiadis
- 2nd Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Kelekis
- 2nd Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fidelman N, Atreya CE, Griffith M, Milloy MA, Carnevale J, Cinar P, Venook AP, Van Loon K. Phase I prospective trial of TAS-102 (trifluridine and tipiracil) and radioembolization with 90Y resin microspheres for chemo-refractory colorectal liver metastases. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:1307. [PMID: 36514060 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-10401-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Extrahepatic disease progression limits clinical efficacy of Yttrium-90 (90Y) radioembolization (TARE) for patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Trifluridine and tipiracil (TAS-102) has overall survival benefit for patients with refractory mCRC and may be a radiosensitizer. METHODS Sequential lobar TARE using 90Y resin microspheres in combination with TAS-102 in 28-day cycles were used to treat adult patients with bilobar liver-dominant chemo-refractory mCRC according to 3 + 3 dose escalation design with a 12-patient dose expansion cohort. Study objectives were to establish safety and determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of TAS-102 in combination with TARE. RESULTS A total of 21 patients (14 women, 7 men) with median age of 60 years were enrolled. No dose limiting toxicities were observed. Treatment related severe adverse events included cytopenias (10 patients, 48%) and radioembolization-induced liver disease (2 patients, 10%). Disease control rate in the liver lobes treated with TARE was 100%. Best observed radiographic responses were partial response for 4 patients (19%) and stable disease for 12 patients (57%). CONCLUSIONS The combination of TAS-102 and TARE for patients with liver-dominant mCRC is safe and consistently achieves disease control within the liver. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02602327 (first posted 11/11/2015).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Pelin Cinar
- University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Role of Transhepatic Arterial Radioembolization in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2022; 45:1579-1589. [DOI: 10.1007/s00270-022-03268-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
6
|
Sharma NK, Kappadath SC, Chuong M, Folkert M, Gibbs P, Jabbour SK, Jeyarajah DR, Kennedy A, Liu D, Meyer JE, Mikell J, Patel RS, Yang G, Mourtada F. The American Brachytherapy Society consensus statement for permanent implant brachytherapy using Yttrium-90 microsphere radioembolization for liver tumors. Brachytherapy 2022; 21:569-591. [PMID: 35599080 PMCID: PMC10868645 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2022.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Revised: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop a multidisciplinary consensus for high quality multidisciplinary implementation of brachytherapy using Yttrium-90 (90Y) microspheres transarterial radioembolization (90Y TARE) for primary and metastatic cancers in the liver. METHODS AND MATERIALS Members of the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) and colleagues with multidisciplinary expertise in liver tumor therapy formulated guidelines for 90Y TARE for unresectable primary liver malignancies and unresectable metastatic cancer to the liver. The consensus is provided on the most recent literature and clinical experience. RESULTS The ABS strongly recommends the use of 90Y microsphere brachytherapy for the definitive/palliative treatment of unresectable liver cancer when recommended by the multidisciplinary team. A quality management program must be implemented at the start of 90Y TARE program development and follow-up data should be tracked for efficacy and toxicity. Patient-specific dosimetry optimized for treatment intent is recommended when conducting 90Y TARE. Implementation in patients on systemic therapy should account for factors that may enhance treatment related toxicity without delaying treatment inappropriately. Further management and salvage therapy options including retreatment with 90Y TARE should be carefully considered. CONCLUSIONS ABS consensus for implementing a safe 90Y TARE program for liver cancer in the multidisciplinary setting is presented. It builds on previous guidelines to include recommendations for appropriate implementation based on current literature and practices in experienced centers. Practitioners and cooperative groups are encouraged to use this document as a guide to formulate their clinical practices and to adopt the most recent dose reporting policies that are critical for a unified outcome analysis of future effectiveness studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Navesh K Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Penn State Hershey School of Medicine, Hershey, PA
| | - S Cheenu Kappadath
- Department of Imaging Physics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Michael Chuong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL
| | - Michael Folkert
- Northwell Health Cancer Institute, Radiation Medicine at the Center for Advanced Medicine, New Hyde Park, NY
| | - Peter Gibbs
- Personalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Salma K Jabbour
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
| | | | | | - David Liu
- Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | | | - Rahul S Patel
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Gary Yang
- Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA
| | - Firas Mourtada
- Helen F. Graham Cancer Center & Research Institute, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sankhla T, Cheng B, Nezami N, Xing M, Sethi I, Bercu Z, Brandon D, Majdalany B, Schuster DM, Kokabi N. Role of Resin Microsphere Y90 Dosimetry in Predicting Objective Tumor Response, Survival and Treatment Related Toxicity in Surgically Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastasis: A Retrospective Single Institution Study. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13194908. [PMID: 34638392 PMCID: PMC8508412 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13194908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Revised: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Colorectal liver metastases are difficult to treat, with only a minority of patients eligible for surgical resection. Yttrium-90 selective internal radiation therapy is an alternative treatment currently used for patients who have progressed on chemotherapy. A technique called dosimetry allows clinicians to analyze how much radiation was delivered to target lesions post-treatment. The aim of this study is to evaluate the relationship of various dosimetric parameters with objective tumor response, overall survival, and treatment related toxicity with the potential goal of optimizing Yttrium-90 treatment in this patient population. Additionally, other potential predictors of survival outcomes, including clinical and demographic factors, were also evaluated. We found that delivering a mean tumor dose ≥100 Gy when using resin microspheres was significantly associated with objective tumor response and prolonged overall survival. In this study, no mean non-tumoral liver dose threshold was found to predict treatment related toxicity. Abstract Purpose: To Evaluate the correlation between tumor dosimetric parameters with objective tumor response (OR) and overall survival (OS) in patients with surgically unresectable colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) undergoing resin-based Ytrrium-90 selective internal radiation therapy (Y90 SIRT). Materials and Methods: 45 consecutive patients with CRLM underwent resin-based Y90 SIRT in one or both hepatic lobes (66 treated lobes total). Dose volume histograms were created with MIM Sureplan® v.6.9 using post-treatment SPECT/CT. Dosimetry analyses were based on the cumulative volume of the five largest tumors in each treatment session and non-tumoral liver (NTL) dose. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate tumor dosimetric factors in predicting OR by Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors at 3 months post-Y90. Additionally, ROC curve was used to evaluate non-tumoral liver dose as a predictor of grade ≥ 3 liver toxicity and radioembolization induced liver disease (REILD) 3 months post Y90. To minimize for potential confounding demographic and clinical factors, univariate and multivariate analysis of survival with mean tumor dose as one of the factors were also performed. Kaplan-Meier estimation was used for OS analysis from initial Y90 SIRT. Results: 26 out of 45 patients had OR with a median OS of 17.2 months versus 6.8 months for patients without OR (p < 0.001). Mean tumor dose (TD) of the five largest tumors was the strongest predictor of OR with an area under the curve of 0.73 (p < 0.001). Minimum TD, and TD to 30%, 50%, and 70% of tumor volume also predicted OR (p’s < 0.05). Mean TD ≥ 100 Gy predicted a significantly prolonged median OS of 19 vs. 11 months for those receiving TD < 100 Gy (p = 0.016). On univariate analysis, mean TD < 100 Gy, presence of any genomic mutation, presence of MAPK pathway mutation, bilobar hepatic metastases and diffuse metastatic disease (>10 lesions per liver lobe) were found to be predictors of shorter median OS. On multivariate analysis, mean TD < 100 Gy, presence of any genomic mutation, and diffuse hepatic metastatic disease were found to be independent predictors of shorter OS. Overall, six (13.3%) patients developed grade ≥ 3 liver toxicity post Y90 of whom two (4.4%) patients developed REILD. No dose threshold predicting grade ≥ 3 liver toxicity or REILD was identified. Conclusions: Mean TD ≥ 100 Gy in patients with unresectable CRLM undergoing resin-based Y90 SIRT predicts OR and prolonged OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tina Sankhla
- Division of Interventional Radiology and Image-Guided Medicine, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30308, USA; (T.S.); (N.N.); (M.X.); (Z.B.); (B.M.)
| | - Bernard Cheng
- Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30310, USA;
| | - Nariman Nezami
- Division of Interventional Radiology and Image-Guided Medicine, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30308, USA; (T.S.); (N.N.); (M.X.); (Z.B.); (B.M.)
| | - Minzhi Xing
- Division of Interventional Radiology and Image-Guided Medicine, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30308, USA; (T.S.); (N.N.); (M.X.); (Z.B.); (B.M.)
| | - Ila Sethi
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30308, USA; (I.S.); (D.B.); (D.M.S.)
| | - Zachary Bercu
- Division of Interventional Radiology and Image-Guided Medicine, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30308, USA; (T.S.); (N.N.); (M.X.); (Z.B.); (B.M.)
| | - David Brandon
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30308, USA; (I.S.); (D.B.); (D.M.S.)
| | - Bill Majdalany
- Division of Interventional Radiology and Image-Guided Medicine, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30308, USA; (T.S.); (N.N.); (M.X.); (Z.B.); (B.M.)
| | - David M. Schuster
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30308, USA; (I.S.); (D.B.); (D.M.S.)
| | - Nima Kokabi
- Division of Interventional Radiology and Image-Guided Medicine, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30308, USA; (T.S.); (N.N.); (M.X.); (Z.B.); (B.M.)
- Emory University Hospital Midtown, 550 Peachtree Street NE, Atlanta, GA 30308, USA
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-404-686-8715; Fax: +1-404-686-0104
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Schatka I, Tschernig M, Rogasch JMM, Bluemel S, Graef J, Furth C, Sehouli J, Blohmer JU, Gebauer B, Fehrenbach U, Amthauer H. Selective Internal Radiation Therapy in Breast Cancer Liver Metastases: Outcome Assessment Applying a Prognostic Score. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13153777. [PMID: 34359677 PMCID: PMC8345060 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13153777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Revised: 07/21/2021] [Accepted: 07/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) is a therapy option in patients with breast cancer liver metastasis (BCLM). This analysis aimed at identifying a prognostic score regarding overall survival (OS) after SIRT using routine pretherapeutic parameters. Retrospective analysis of 38 patients (age, 59 (39-84) years) with BCLM and 42 SIRT procedures. Cox regression for OS included clinical factors (age, ECOG and prior treatments), laboratory parameters, hepatic tumor load and dose reduction due to hepatopulmonary shunt. Elevated baseline ALT and/or AST was present if CTCAE grade ≥ 2 was fulfilled (>3 times the upper limit of normal). Median OS after SIRT was 6.4 months. In univariable Cox, ECOG ≥ 1 (hazard ratio (HR), 3.8), presence of elevated baseline ALT/AST (HR, 3.8), prior liver surgery (HR, 10.2), and dose reduction of 40% (HR, 8.1) predicted shorter OS (each p < 0.05). Multivariable Cox confirmed ECOG ≥ 1 (HR, 2.34; p = 0.012) and elevated baseline ALT/AST (HR, 4.16; p < 0.001). Combining both factors, median OS decreased from 19.2 months (0 risk factors; n = 14 procedures) to 5.9 months (1 factor; n = 20) or 2.2 months (2 factors; n = 8; p < 0.001). The proposed score may facilitate pretherapeutic identification of patients with unfavorable OS after SIRT. This may help to balance potential life prolongation with the hazards of invasive treatment and hospitalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imke Schatka
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.T.); (J.M.M.R.); (S.B.); (J.G.); (C.F.); (H.A.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-(0)30-450-627-045
| | - Monique Tschernig
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.T.); (J.M.M.R.); (S.B.); (J.G.); (C.F.); (H.A.)
| | - Julian M. M. Rogasch
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.T.); (J.M.M.R.); (S.B.); (J.G.); (C.F.); (H.A.)
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), 10178 Berlin, Germany
| | - Stephanie Bluemel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.T.); (J.M.M.R.); (S.B.); (J.G.); (C.F.); (H.A.)
| | - Josefine Graef
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.T.); (J.M.M.R.); (S.B.); (J.G.); (C.F.); (H.A.)
| | - Christian Furth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.T.); (J.M.M.R.); (S.B.); (J.G.); (C.F.); (H.A.)
| | - Jalid Sehouli
- Department of Gynecology and Breast Center, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (J.S.); (J.-U.B.)
| | - Jens-Uwe Blohmer
- Department of Gynecology and Breast Center, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (J.S.); (J.-U.B.)
| | - Bernhard Gebauer
- Department of Radiology, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (B.G.); (U.F.)
| | - Uli Fehrenbach
- Department of Radiology, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (B.G.); (U.F.)
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.T.); (J.M.M.R.); (S.B.); (J.G.); (C.F.); (H.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kwan J, Pua U. Review of Intra-Arterial Therapies for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13061371. [PMID: 33803606 PMCID: PMC8003062 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13061371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Revised: 03/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Colorectal cancer liver metastasis occurs in more than 50% of patients with colorectal cancer and is thought to be the most common cause of death from this cancer. The mainstay of treatment for inoperable liver metastasis has been combination systemic chemotherapy with or without the addition of biological targeted therapy with a goal for disease downstaging, for potential curative resection, or more frequently, for disease control. For patients with dominant liver metastatic disease or limited extrahepatic disease, liver-directed intra-arterial therapies including hepatic arterial chemotherapy infusion, chemoembolization and radioembolization are alternative treatment strategies that have shown promising results, most commonly in the salvage setting in patients with chemo-refractory disease. In recent years, their role in the first-line setting in conjunction with concurrent systemic chemotherapy has also been explored. This review aims to provide an update on the current evidence regarding liver-directed intra-arterial treatment strategies and to discuss potential trends for the future. Abstract The liver is frequently the most common site of metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer, occurring in more than 50% of patients. While surgical resection remains the only potential curative option, it is only eligible in 15–20% of patients at presentation. In the past two decades, major advances in modern chemotherapy and personalized biological agents have improved overall survival in patients with unresectable liver metastasis. For patients with dominant liver metastatic disease or limited extrahepatic disease, liver-directed intra-arterial therapies such as hepatic arterial chemotherapy infusion, chemoembolization and radioembolization are treatment strategies which are increasingly being considered to improve local tumor response and to reduce systemic side effects. Currently, these therapies are mostly used in the salvage setting in patients with chemo-refractory disease. However, their use in the first-line setting in conjunction with systemic chemotherapy as well as to a lesser degree, in a neoadjuvant setting, for downstaging to resection have also been investigated. Furthermore, some clinicians have considered these therapies as a temporizing tool for local disease control in patients undergoing a chemotherapy ‘holiday’ or acting as a bridge in patients between different lines of systemic treatment. This review aims to provide an update on the current evidence regarding liver-directed intra-arterial treatment strategies and to discuss potential trends for the future.
Collapse
|
10
|
Clinical Application of Trans-Arterial Radioembolization in Hepatic Malignancies in Europe: First Results from the Prospective Multicentre Observational Study CIRSE Registry for SIR-Spheres Therapy (CIRT). Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2020; 44:21-35. [PMID: 32959085 PMCID: PMC7728645 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-020-02642-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Accepted: 09/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Purpose To address the lack of prospective data on the real-life clinical application of trans-arterial radioembolization (TARE) in Europe, the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) initiated the prospective observational study CIRSE Registry for SIR-Spheres® Therapy (CIRT). Materials and Methods Patients were enrolled from 1 January 2015 till 31 December 2017. Eligible patients were adult patients treated with TARE with Y90 resin microspheres for primary or metastatic liver tumours. Patients were followed up for 24 months after treatment, whereas data on the clinical context of TARE, overall survival (OS) and safety were collected. Results Totally, 1027 patients were analysed. 68.2% of the intention of treatment was palliative. Up to half of the patients received systemic therapy and/or locoregional treatments prior to TARE (53.1%; 38.3%). Median overall survival (OS) was reported per cohort and was 16.5 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 14.2–19.3) for hepatocellular carcinoma, 14.6 months (95% CI 10.9–17.9) for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. For liver metastases, median OS for colorectal cancer was 9.8 months (95% CI 8.3–12.9), 5.6 months for pancreatic cancer (95% CI 4.1–6.6), 10.6 months (95% CI 7.3–14.4) for breast cancer, 14.6 months (95% CI 7.3–21.4) for melanoma and 33.1 months (95% CI 22.1–nr) for neuroendocrine tumours. Statistically significant prognostic factors in terms of OS include the presence of ascites, cirrhosis, extra-hepatic disease, patient performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group), number of chemotherapy lines prior to TARE and tumour burden. Thirty-day mortality rate was 1.0%. 2.5% experienced adverse events grade 3 or 4 within 30 days after TARE. Conclusion In the real-life clinical setting, TARE is largely considered to be a part of a palliative treatment strategy across indications and provides an excellent safety profile. Level of evidence Level 3. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02305459. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00270-020-02642-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
11
|
Kemeny N, Kurilova I, Li J, Camacho JC, Sofocleous CT. Liver-Directed and Systemic Therapies for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2019; 42:1240-1254. [DOI: 10.1007/s00270-019-02284-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2018] [Accepted: 07/03/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
12
|
Levy J, Zuckerman J, Garfinkle R, Acuna SA, Touchette J, Vanounou T, Pelletier JS. Intra-arterial therapies for unresectable and chemorefractory colorectal cancer liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford) 2018; 20:905-915. [PMID: 29887263 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2018] [Revised: 04/17/2018] [Accepted: 04/21/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A large proportion of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM) not amenable to curative liver resection will progress on systemic therapy. Intra-arterial therapies (IAT) including conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE), drug eluting beads (DEB-TACE) and yttrium-90 radioembolization (Y-90) are indicated to prolong survival and palliate symptoms. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare the survival benefit and radiologic response of three intra-arterial therapies in patients with chemorefractory and unresectable CRCLM. METHODS A systematic search for eligible references in the Cochrane Library and the EMBASE, MEDLINE and TRIP databases from January 2000 to November 2016 was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the MINORS scale. One-year overall survival rates and RECIST responder rates were pooled using inverse-variance weighted random-effects models. Overall survival outcomes were collected according to transformed pooled median survivals from first IAT with a subgroup analysis of patients with extrahepatic disease. RESULTS Twenty-three prospective studies were included and analyzed: 5 cTACE (n = 746), 5 DEB-TACE (n = 222) and 13 Y-90 (n = 615). All but five were clinical trials. Eleven of 13 Y-90 studies were industry funded. Pooled RECIST response rates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were: cTACE 23% (9.7, 36), DEB-TACE 36% (0, 73) and Y-90 23% (11, 34). The pooled 1-year survival rates with CI were: cTACE, 70% (49, 87), DEB-TACE, 80% (74, 86) and Y-90, 41% (28, 54). Transformed pooled median survivals from first IAT and ranges for cTACE, DEB-TACE and Y-90 were 16 months (9.0-23), 16 months (7.3-25) and 12 months (7.0-15), respectively. Significant heterogeneity in inclusion criteria and reporting of confounders, including previous therapy, tumor burden and post-IAT therapy, precluded statistical comparisons between the three therapies. CONCLUSION Methodological and statistical heterogeneity precluded consensus on the optimal treatment strategy. Given the common use and significant cost of radioembolization in this setting, a more robust prospective comparative trial is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan Levy
- University of Toronto Division of General Surgery, Toronto, ON, Canada; University of Toronto Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Jesse Zuckerman
- University of Toronto Division of General Surgery, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Richard Garfinkle
- Sir Mortimer B Davis Jewish General Hospital, Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Sergio A Acuna
- University of Toronto Division of General Surgery, Toronto, ON, Canada; University of Toronto Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jacynthe Touchette
- Sir Mortimer B Davis Jewish General Hospital Health Sciences Library, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Tsafrir Vanounou
- Sir Mortimer B Davis Jewish General Hospital, Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Jean-Sebastien Pelletier
- Sir Mortimer B Davis Jewish General Hospital, Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kurilova I, Beets-Tan RGH, Flynn J, Gönen M, Ulaner G, Petre EN, Edward Boas F, Ziv E, Yarmohammadi H, Klompenhouwer EG, Cercek A, Kemeny NA, Sofocleous CT. Factors Affecting Oncologic Outcomes of 90Y Radioembolization of Heavily Pre-Treated Patients With Colon Cancer Liver Metastases. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2018; 18:8-18. [PMID: 30297264 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2018.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2018] [Revised: 08/22/2018] [Accepted: 08/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study was to identify predictors of overall (OS) and liver progression-free survival (LPFS) following Yttrium-90 radioembolization (RAE) of heavily pretreated patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases (CLM), as well as to create and validate a predictive nomogram for OS. MATERIALS AND METHODS Metabolic, anatomic, laboratory, pathologic, genetic, primary disease, and procedure-related factors, as well as pre- and post-RAE therapies in 103 patients with CLM treated with RAE from September 15, 2009 to March 21, 2017 were analyzed. LPFS was defined by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors 1.1 and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria. Prognosticators of OS and LPFS were selected using univariate Cox regression, adjusted for clustering and competing risk analysis (for LPFS), and subsequently tested in multivariate analysis (MVA). The nomogram was built using R statistical software and internally validated using bootstrap resampling. RESULTS Patients received RAE at a median of 30.9 months (range, 3.4-161.7 months) after detection of CLM. The median OS and LPFS were 11.3 months (95% confidence interval, 7.9-15.1 months) and 4 months (95% confidence interval, 3.3-4.8 months), respectively. Of the 40 parameters tested, 6 were independently associated with OS in MVA. These baseline parameters included number of extrahepatic disease sites (P < .001), carcinoembryonic antigen (P < .001), albumin (P = .005), alanine aminotransferase level (P < .001), tumor differentiation level (P < .001), and the sum of the 2 largest tumor diameters (P < .001). The 1-year OS of patients with total points of < 25 versus > 80 was 90% and 10%, respectively. Bootstrap resampling showed good discrimination (optimism corrected c-index = 0.745) and calibration (mean absolute prediction error = 0.299) of the nomogram. Only baseline maximum standardized uptake value was significant in MVA for LPFS prediction (P < .001; SHR = 1.06). CONCLUSION The developed nomogram included 6 pre-RAE parameters and provided good prediction of survival post-RAE in heavily pretreated patients. Baseline maximum standardized uptake value was the single significant predictor of LPFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ieva Kurilova
- Department of Interventional Oncology/Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Regina G H Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jessica Flynn
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Mithat Gönen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Gary Ulaner
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Elena N Petre
- Department of Interventional Oncology/Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - F Edward Boas
- Department of Interventional Oncology/Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Etay Ziv
- Department of Interventional Oncology/Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Hooman Yarmohammadi
- Department of Interventional Oncology/Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Andrea Cercek
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Nancy A Kemeny
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Constantinos T Sofocleous
- Department of Interventional Oncology/Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Deipolyi AR, Riedl CC, Bromberg J, Chandarlapaty S, Klebanoff CA, Sofocleous CT, Yarmohammadi H, Brody LA, Boas FE, Ziv E. Association of PI3K Pathway Mutations with Early Positron-Emission Tomography/CT Imaging Response after Radioembolization for Breast Cancer Liver Metastases: Results of a Single-Center Retrospective Pilot Study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2018; 29:1226-1235. [PMID: 30078647 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2018.04.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2017] [Revised: 03/27/2018] [Accepted: 04/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe imaging response and survival after radioembolization for metastatic breast cancer and to delineate genetic predictors of imaging responses and outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective study included 31 women (average age, 52 y) with liver metastasis from invasive ductal carcinoma who underwent resin and glass radioembolization (average cumulative dose, 2.0 GBq ± 1.8) between January 2011 and September 2017 after receiving ≥ 3 lines of chemotherapy. Twenty-four underwent genetic profiling with MSK-IMPACT or Sequenom; 26 had positron-emission tomography (PET)/CT imaging before and after treatment. Survival after the first radioembolization and 2-4-month PET/CT imaging response were assessed. Laboratory and imaging features were assessed to determine variables predictive of outcomes. Unpaired Student t tests and Fisher exact tests were used to compare responders and nonresponders categorized by changes in fluorodeoxyglucose avidity. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to determine the impact of predictors on survival after radioembolization. RESULTS Median survival after radioembolization was 11 months (range, 1-49 mo). Most patients (18 of 26; 69%) had complete or partial response based on changes in fluorodeoxyglucose avidity. Imaging response was associated with longer survival (P = .005). Whereas 100% of patients with PI3K pathway mutations showed an imaging response, only 45% of wild-type patients showed a response (P = .01). Median survival did not differ between PI3K pathway wild-type (10.9 mo) and mutant (undefined) patients (P = .50). CONCLUSIONS These preliminary data suggest that genomic profiling may predict which patients with metastatic breast cancer benefit most from radioembolization. PI3K pathway mutations are associated with improved imaging response, which is associated with longer survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy R Deipolyi
- Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., H118-A, New York, NY 10065; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
| | - Christopher C Riedl
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., H118-A, New York, NY 10065; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Jacqueline Bromberg
- Department of Radiology, Breast Medicine Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., H118-A, New York, NY 10065; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Sarat Chandarlapaty
- Department of Radiology, Breast Medicine Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., H118-A, New York, NY 10065; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Christopher A Klebanoff
- Center for Cell Engineering and Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., H118-A, New York, NY 10065; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Constantinos T Sofocleous
- Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., H118-A, New York, NY 10065; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Hooman Yarmohammadi
- Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., H118-A, New York, NY 10065; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Lynn A Brody
- Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., H118-A, New York, NY 10065; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - F Edward Boas
- Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., H118-A, New York, NY 10065; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Etay Ziv
- Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., H118-A, New York, NY 10065; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
EZH2 inhibition promotes methyl jasmonate-induced apoptosis of human colorectal cancer through the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Oncol Lett 2018; 16:1231-1236. [PMID: 30061944 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2018.8779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2016] [Accepted: 11/02/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Methyl jasmonate potentially induces the differentiation of human myeloid leukemia cells and inhibits their proliferation; it may induce the differentiation and apoptosis of human lymphocytic leukemia cells, but does not exert a damaging effect on normal lymphocytes. In the present study, the anticancer effect of methyl jasmonate on human colorectal cancer cells was investigated. Cell viability and apoptosis was assessed using a Cell Counting kit-8 assay and flow cytometry, respectively. Methyl jasmonate suppressed cell viability and induced apoptosis in human colorectal cancer cells. Additionally, methyl jasmonate increased the activation of caspase-3, inhibited the expression levels of enhancer of zeste 2 polycomb repressive complex 2 subunit (EZH2) and the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in human colorectal cancer. Downregulation of EZH2 expression enhanced the anticancer effect of methyl jasmonate on human colorectal cancer cells through suppression of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Thus, EZH2 downregulation promotes the anticancer effect of methyl jasmonate by inducing apoptosis in human colorectal cancer cells through the Wnt/β-catenin pathway.
Collapse
|
16
|
Kurilova I, Beets-Tan RGH, Ulaner GA, Boas FE, Petre EN, Yarmohammadi H, Ziv E, Deipolyi AR, Brody LA, Gonen M, Sofocleous CT. 90Y Resin Microspheres Radioembolization for Colon Cancer Liver Metastases Using Full-Strength Contrast Material. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2018; 41:1419-1427. [PMID: 29766239 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-018-1985-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2018] [Accepted: 05/07/2018] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess safety and efficacy of 90Y resin microspheres administration using undiluted non-ionic contrast material (UDCM) {100% Omnipaque-300 (Iohexol)} in both the "B" and "D" lines. MATERIALS AND METHODS We reviewed all colorectal cancer liver metastases patients treated with 90Y resin microspheres radioembolization (RAE) from 2009 to 2017. As of April 2013, two experienced operators started using UDCM (study group) instead of standard sandwich infusion (control group). Occurrence of myelosuppression (leukopenia, neutropenia, erythrocytopenia or/and thrombocytopenia), stasis, nontarget delivery (NTD), median fluoroscopy radiation dose (FRD), median infusion time (IT), liver progression-free (LPFS) and overall survivals (OS) was evaluated. Complications within 6 months post-RAE were reported according to CTCAE v3.0 criteria. RESULTS Study and control groups comprised 23(28%) and 58(72%) patients, respectively. Median follow-up was 9.1 months. There was no statistically significant difference in myelosuppression incidence within 6 months post-RAE between groups. Median FRD and IT for study and control groups were 44.6 vs. 97.35 Gy/cm2 (p = 0.048) and 31 vs. 39 min (p = 0.006), respectively. A 38% lower stasis incidence in study group was not significant (p = 0.34). NTD occurred in 1/27(4%) study vs. 5/73(7%) control group procedures (p = 1). Grade 1-2 and grade 3-4 toxicities between study and control group patients were 36%(8/22) vs. 45%(26/58), p = 0.61 and 9%(2/22) vs. 16%(9/58), p = 0.72, respectively. There was no difference in LPFS and OS between groups. CONCLUSION Administration of 90Y resin microspheres using UDCM in both lines is safe and effective, resulting in lower fluoroscopy radiation dose and shorter infusion time, without evidence of myelosuppression or increased stasis incidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Kurilova
- Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA.,Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - R G H Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - G A Ulaner
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - F E Boas
- Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - E N Petre
- Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - H Yarmohammadi
- Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - E Ziv
- Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - A R Deipolyi
- Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - L A Brody
- Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - M Gonen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Constantinos T Sofocleous
- Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Aarntzen EH, Heijmen L, Oyen WJ. 18F-FDG PET/CT in Local Ablative Therapies: A Systematic Review. J Nucl Med 2018; 59:551-556. [DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.198184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2017] [Accepted: 12/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
|
18
|
Boas FE, Bodei L, Sofocleous CT. Radioembolization of Colorectal Liver Metastases: Indications, Technique, and Outcomes. J Nucl Med 2017; 58:104S-111S. [PMID: 28864605 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.187229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2017] [Accepted: 06/08/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Liver metastases are a major cause of death from colorectal cancer. Intraarterial therapy options for colorectal liver metastases include chemoinfusion via a hepatic arterial pump or port, irinotecan-loaded drug-eluting beads, and radioembolization using 90Y microspheres. Intraarterial therapy allows the delivery of a high dose of chemotherapy or radiation into liver tumors while minimizing the impact on liver parenchyma and avoiding systemic effects. Specificity in intraarterial therapy can be achieved both through preferential arterial flow to the tumor and through selective catheter positioning. In this review, we discuss indications, contraindications, preprocedure evaluation, activity prescription, follow-up, outcomes, and complications of radioembolization of colorectal liver metastases. Methods for preventing off-target embolization, increasing the specificity of microsphere delivery, and reducing the lung-shunt fraction are discussed. There are 2 types of 90Y microspheres: resin and glass. Because glass microspheres have a higher activity per particle, they can deliver a particular radiation dose with fewer particles, likely reducing embolic effects. Glass microspheres thus may be more suitable when early stasis or reflux is a concern, in the setting of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein invasion, and for radiation segmentectomy. Because resin microspheres have a lower activity per particle, more particles are needed to deliver a particular radiation dose. Resin microspheres thus may be preferable for larger tumors and those with high arterial flow. In addition, resin microspheres have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for colorectal liver metastases, whereas institutional review board approval is required before glass microspheres can be used under a compassionate-use or research protocol. Finally, radiation segmentectomy involves delivering a calculated lobar activity of 90Y microspheres selectively to treat a tumor involving 1 or 2 liver segments. This technique administers a very high radiation dose and effectively causes the ablation of tumors that are too large or are in a location considered unsafe for thermal ablation. The selective delivery spares surrounding normal liver, reducing the risk of liver failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Edward Boas
- Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; and
| | - Lisa Bodei
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Constantinos T Sofocleous
- Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; and
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Aranda E, Aparicio J, Bilbao JI, García-Alfonso P, Maurel J, Rodríguez J, Sangro B, Vieitez JM, Feliu J. Recommendations for SIR-Spheres Y-90 resin microspheres in chemotherapy-refractory/intolerant colorectal liver metastases. Future Oncol 2017; 13:2065-2082. [PMID: 28703622 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2017-0220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
A Spanish expert panel reviewed current evidence for the use of SIR-Spheres Y-90 resin microspheres in patients with chemotherapy refractory/intolerant unresectable colorectal liver metastases. Substantial evidence for its efficacy and safety is available from a randomized controlled study, retrospective comparative studies and several single arm studies. Clinical evidence data obtained from more than 1500 patients have led to the inclusion of selective internal radiation therapy in the 2016 ESMO Clinical Guidelines as third-line treatment. This publication results from an expert panel meeting, where published evidence and author's experiences were shared to position SIR-Spheres Y-90 resin microspheres in Spain for the treatment of chemotherapy refractory/intolerant unresectable colorectal liver metastases, and second, to define the patient subgroup that will benefit the most with this treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrique Aranda
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, CIBERONC, IMIBIC, UCO, Córdoba, Spain
| | - Jorge Aparicio
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitari I Politecnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - José Ignacio Bilbao
- Department of Vascular & Interventional Radiology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Navarra, Spain
| | - Pilar García-Alfonso
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Joan Maurel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Javier Rodríguez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Clínica Universitaria de Navarra, Navarra, Spain
| | - Bruno Sangro
- Liver Unit & HPB Oncology Area, Clínica Universitaria de Navarra-IDISNA-CIBEREHD, Pamplona, Spain
| | - José María Vieitez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Asturias, Spain
| | - Jaime Feliu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Paprottka KJ, Todica A, Ilhan H, Rübenthaler J, Schoeppe F, Michl M, Heinemann V, Bartenstein P, Reiser MF, Paprottka PM. Evaluation of Visualization Using a 50/50 (Contrast Media/Glucose 5% Solution) Technique for Radioembolization as an Alternative to a Standard Sandwich Technique. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2017; 40:1740-1747. [PMID: 28584948 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-017-1712-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2017] [Accepted: 05/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radioembolization (RE) with 90yttrium (90Y) resin microspheres generally employs a sandwich technique with separate sequential administration of contrast medium (CM), followed by vehicle (e.g., glucose 5% [G5] solution), then 90Y resin microspheres (in G5), then G5, and then CM again to avoid contact of CM and microspheres under fluoroscopic guidance. This study evaluates the visualization quality and safety of a modified sandwich technique with a 50/50-mixture of CM (Imeron 300) and G5 for administration of 90Y resin microspheres. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective analysis of 81 RE procedures in patients with primary or secondary liver tumors was performed. The quality of angiographic visualization of the hepatic vessels was assessed before the first injection and immediately before the whole dose has been injected. Visualization and flow rate were graded on a 5-point scale: 1 = very good to 5 = not visible/no antegrade flow. Univariate logistic regression models and multiple linear regression models were used to evaluate the prognostic variables associated with visualization and flow scores. RESULTS Visualization quality was inversely related to flow rate, the lower the flow rate the better the grade of the visualization. Visualization quality was also inversely related to body-mass-index (BMI). Performing RE with the 50/50-CM/G5 mixture resulted in a mean injection time for 1 GBq of 15 min. No clinically significant adverse events, including radiation-induced liver disease were reported. CONCLUSION RE with a 50/50-mixture of CM and G5 for administration of 90Y resin microspheres in a modified sandwich technique is a safe administration alternative and provides good visualization of hepatic vessels, which is inversely dependent on flow rate and BMI. Injection time was reduced compared with our experience with the standard sandwich technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karolin J Paprottka
- Department of Clinical Radiology, LMU - University of Munich, Marchioninistrasse. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - Andrei Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU - University of Munich, Marchioninistrasse. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU - University of Munich, Marchioninistrasse. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Johannes Rübenthaler
- Department of Clinical Radiology, LMU - University of Munich, Marchioninistrasse. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Franziska Schoeppe
- Department of Clinical Radiology, LMU - University of Munich, Marchioninistrasse. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Marlies Michl
- Department of Oncology, LMU - University of Munich, Marchioninistrasse. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Volker Heinemann
- Department of Oncology, LMU - University of Munich, Marchioninistrasse. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU - University of Munich, Marchioninistrasse. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian F Reiser
- Department of Clinical Radiology, LMU - University of Munich, Marchioninistrasse. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Philipp M Paprottka
- Department of Clinical Radiology, LMU - University of Munich, Marchioninistrasse. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Pinker K, Riedl C, Weber WA. Evaluating tumor response with FDG PET: updates on PERCIST, comparison with EORTC criteria and clues to future developments. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2017; 44:55-66. [PMID: 28361188 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-017-3687-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2017] [Accepted: 03/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Eighteen years ago, the EORTC PET criteria standardized for the first time response assessment by FDG PET. Response assessment by FDG PET has been further developed and refined by PERCIST (PET response criteria in solid tumors). This review describes the data underlying these two systems for assessing tumor response on FDG PET/CT. It also summarizes recent clinical studies that have compared EORTC criteria and PERCIST with each other as well as with the anatomically based "response criteria in solid tumors" (RECIST). These studies have shown that response assessment by EORTC criteria and PERCIST leads to very similar response classifications. In contrast, there are significant differences between response assessment by PERCIST and RECIST. Preliminary data also suggest that response assessment by PERCIST is better correlated with patient outcome and may be a better predictor for the effectiveness of new anti-cancer therapies than RECIST. If correct, this could have a significant impact on oncologic drug development. However, confirmation of the better predictive value of response assessment by PERCIST by data from randomized trials is still lacking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katja Pinker
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1250 1st Av, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Christopher Riedl
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1250 1st Av, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Wolfgang A Weber
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1250 1st Av, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
Radioembolization (RE) is a relatively novel treatment modality for primary and secondary hepatic malignancies. Microspheres embedded with a β-emitting radioisotope are injected into the hepatic artery, resulting in microsphere deposition in the tumor arterioles and normal portal triads. Microsphere deposition in nontumorous parenchyma can result in radiation-induced liver injury, with lethal RE-induced liver disease (REILD) at the outer end of the spectrum. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate RE-related hepatotoxicity and present an overview of the currently applied definitions and clinically relevant characteristics of REILD. A systematic literature search on REILD was performed. Studies after the introduction of the term REILD (2008) were screened for definitions of REILD. Hepatotoxicity and applied definitions of REILD were compared. Liver biochemistry test abnormalities occur in up to 100% of patients after RE, mostly self-limiting. The incidence of symptomatic REILD varied between 0 and 31%, although in most reports, the incidence was 0-8%, with a lethal outcome in 0-5%. With the exception of bilirubin, the presentation of hepatotoxicity and REILD was similar for cirrhotic and noncirrhotic patients. No uniform definition of REILD was established in the current literature. Here, we propose a unifying definition and grading system for REILD. RE-related hepatotoxicity is a common phenomenon; symptomatic REILD, however, is rare. Currently, reporting of REILD is highly variable, precluding reliable comparison between studies, identification of risk factors, and treatment developments.
Collapse
|
23
|
Fidelman N, Kerlan RK, Hawkins RA, Pampaloni M, Taylor AG, Kohi MP, Kolli KP, Atreya CE, Bergsland EK, Kelley RK, Ko AH, Korn WM, Van Loon K, McWhirter RM, Luan J, Johanson C, Venook AP. Radioembolization with 90Y glass microspheres for the treatment of unresectable metastatic liver disease from chemotherapy-refractory gastrointestinal cancers: final report of a prospective pilot study. J Gastrointest Oncol 2016; 7:860-874. [PMID: 28078110 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2016.08.04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This prospective pilot single-institution study was undertaken to document the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of radioembolization of liver-dominant metastatic gastrointestinal cancer using 90Y glass microspheres. METHODS Between June 2010 and October 2013, 42 adult patients (26 men, 16 women; median age 60 years) with metastatic chemotherapy-refractory unresectable colorectal (n=21), neuroendocrine (n=11), intrahepatic bile duct (n=7), pancreas (n=2), and esophageal (n=1) carcinomas underwent 60 lobar or segmental administrations of 90Y glass microspheres. Data regarding clinical and laboratory adverse events (AE) were collected prospectively for up to 5.5 years after radioembolization. Radiographic responses were evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), version 1.1. Time to maximum response, response duration, progression-free survival (PFS) (hepatic and extrahepatic), and overall survival (OS) were measured. RESULTS Median target dose and activity were 109.4 Gy and 2.6 GBq per treatment session, respectively. Majority of clinical AE were grade 1 or 2 in severity. Patients with colorectal cancer had hepatic objective response rate (ORR) of 25% and a hepatic disease control rate (DCR) of 80%. Median PFS and OS were 1.0 and 4.4 months, respectively. Patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NET) had hepatic ORR and DCR of 73% and 100%, respectively. Median PFS was 8.9 months for this cohort. DCR and median PFS and OS for patients with cholangiocarcinoma were 86%, 1.1 months, and 6.7 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS 90Y glass microspheres device has a favorable safety profile, and achieved prolonged disease control of hepatic tumor burden in a subset of patients, including all patients enrolled in the neuroendocrine cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Fidelman
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Robert K Kerlan
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Randall A Hawkins
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Miguel Pampaloni
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Andrew G Taylor
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Maureen P Kohi
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - K Pallav Kolli
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Chloe E Atreya
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Emily K Bergsland
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - R Kate Kelley
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Andrew H Ko
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - W Michael Korn
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Katherine Van Loon
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ryan M McWhirter
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jennifer Luan
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Curt Johanson
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Alan P Venook
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Surrogate Imaging Biomarkers of Response of Colorectal Liver Metastases After Salvage Radioembolization Using 90Y-Loaded Resin Microspheres. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016; 207:661-70. [PMID: 27384594 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.15.15202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of the present study is to evaluate Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, tumor attenuation criteria, Choi criteria, and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET criteria as measures of response and subsequent predictors of liver progression-free survival (PFS) after radioembolization (RE) of colorectal liver metastases (CLM). The study also assesses interobserver variability for measuring tumor attenuation using a single 2D ROI on a simple PACS workstation. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective review of the clinical RE database at our institution, to identify patients treated in the salvage setting for CLM between December 2009 and March 2013. Response was evaluated on FDG PET scans, with the use of EORTC PET criteria, and on portal venous phase CT scans, with the use of RECIST 1.1, tumor attenuation criteria, and Choi criteria. Two independent blinded observers measured tumor attenuation using a single 2D ROI. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for interobserver variability was assessed. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to calculate liver PFS, and the log-rank test was used to assess the response criteria as predictors of liver PFS. RESULTS A total of 25 patients with 46 target tumors were enrolled in the study. The ICC was 0.95 at baseline and 0.98 at response evaluation. Among the 25 patients, more responders (i.e., partial response) were identified on the basis of EORTC PET criteria (n = 14), Choi criteria (n = 15), and tumor attenuation criteria (n = 13) than on the basis of RECIST 1.1 (n = 2). The median liver PFS was 3.0 months (95% CI, 2.1-4.0 months). Response identified on the basis of EORTC PET criteria (p < 0.001), Choi criteria (p < 0.001), or tumor attenuation criteria (p = 0.01) predicted liver PFS; however, response identified by RECIST 1.1 did not (p = 0.1). CONCLUSION RECIST 1.1 has poor sensitivity for detecting metabolic responses classified by EORTC PET criteria. EORTC PET criteria, Choi criteria, and tumor attenuation criteria appear to be equally reliable surrogate imaging biomarkers of liver PFS after RE in patients with CLM.
Collapse
|
25
|
Bozkurt MF, Salanci BV, Uğur Ö. Intra-Arterial Radionuclide Therapies for Liver Tumors. Semin Nucl Med 2016; 46:324-39. [DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2016.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
26
|
Shady W, Kishore S, Gavane S, Do RK, Osborne JR, Ulaner GA, Gonen M, Ziv E, Boas FE, Sofocleous CT. Metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis on FDG-PET/CT can predict overall survival after (90)Y radioembolization of colorectal liver metastases: A comparison with SUVmax, SUVpeak, and RECIST 1.0. Eur J Radiol 2016; 85:1224-31. [PMID: 27161074 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.03.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2016] [Revised: 03/23/2016] [Accepted: 03/30/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the performance of 4 metrics of metabolic response on FDG-PET/CT against RECIST 1.0 for determining response and predicting overall survival (OS) following (90)Y resin microspheres radioembolization of colorectal liver metastases (CLM). METHODS We conducted an IRB-waived retrospective review of our radioembolization database to identify patients with unresectable CLM treated between December 2009 and December 2013. We included patients who had both PET/CT and contrast enhanced CT (CECT) available at baseline and on the first follow-up post-radioembolization. On baseline CECT up to five target tumors were chosen per patient according to RECIST 1.0. Four metrics of FDG-avidity (SUVmax, SUVpeak, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG)) on PET/CT were measured for the same target tumors. Using RECIST 1.0, patients were classified as no progression (partial response or stable disease) and progression. For each PET metric, a cut-off point of ≥30% decrease was chosen to define response. OS was calculated from the time of radioembolization using Kaplan-Meier methodology. The log-rank test was used for univariate analysis to identify predictors of OS. RESULTS The study enrolled 49 patients with 119 target tumors; a median of 2 (range: 1-5) tumors were selected per patient. Median OS was 12.7 months (95%CI: 7.2-16.7). Response by MTV (P=0.035) and TLG (P=0.044) reached statistical significance in predicting OS. Response by SUVmax (P=0.21), SUVpeak (P=0.20) or no progression by RECIST 1.0 (P=0.44) did not predict OS. CONCLUSION Metabolic response based on changes in MTV and TLG can predict OS post-radioembolization of CLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Waleed Shady
- Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Sirish Kishore
- Department of Nuclear medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Somali Gavane
- Department of Nuclear medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Richard K Do
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Joseph R Osborne
- Department of Nuclear medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Gary A Ulaner
- Department of Nuclear medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Mithat Gonen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Etay Ziv
- Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Franz E Boas
- Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Constantinos T Sofocleous
- Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Sag AA, Selcukbiricik F, Mandel NM. Evidence-based medical oncology and interventional radiology paradigms for liver-dominant colorectal cancer metastases. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22:3127-3149. [PMID: 27003990 PMCID: PMC4789988 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i11.3127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2015] [Revised: 12/22/2015] [Accepted: 01/18/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer metastasizes predictably, with liver predominance in most cases. Because liver involvement has been shown to be a major determinant of survival in this population, liver-directed therapies are increasingly considered even in cases where there is (limited) extrahepatic disease. Unfortunately, these patients carry a known risk of recurrence in the liver regardless of initial therapy choice. Therefore, there is a demand for minimally invasive, non-surgical, personalized cancer treatments to preserve quality of life in the induction, consolidation, and maintenance phases of cancer therapy. This report aims to review evidence-based conceptual, pharmacological, and technological paradigm shifts in parenteral and percutaneous treatment strategies as well as forthcoming evidence regarding next-generation systemic, locoregional, and local treatment approaches for this patient population.
Collapse
|
28
|
Kennedy AS, Ball DS, Cohen SJ, Cohn M, Coldwell DM, Drooz A, Ehrenwald E, Kanani S, Nutting CW, Moeslein FM, Putnam SG, Rose SC, Savin MA, Schirm S, Sharma NK, Wang EA. Hepatic imaging response to radioembolization with yttrium-90-labeled resin microspheres for tumor progression during systemic chemotherapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases. J Gastrointest Oncol 2015; 6:594-604. [PMID: 26697190 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2015.082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To assess response and the impact of imaging artifacts following radioembolization with yttrium-90-labeled resin microspheres ((90)Y-RE) based on the findings from a central independent review of patients with liver-dominant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS Patients with mCRC who received (90)Y-RE (SIR-Spheres(®); Sirtex Medical, Sydney, Australia) at nine US institutions between July 2002 and December 2011 were included in the analysis. Tumor response was assessed at baseline and 3 months using either the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.0 or 1.1. For each lesion, known artifacts affecting the interpretation of response (peri-tumoral edema and necrosis) were documented. Survivals (Kaplan-Meier analyses) were compared in responders [partial response (PR)] and non-responders [stable (SD) or progressive disease (PD)]. RESULTS Overall, 195 patients (mean age 62 years) received (90)Y-RE after a median of 2 (range, 1-6) lines of prior chemotherapy. Using RECIST 1.0 and RECIST 1.1, 7.6% and 6.9% of patients were partial responders, 47.3% and 48.1% had SD, and 55.0% and 55.0% PD, respectively. RECIST 1.0 and RECIST 1.1 showed excellent agreement {Kappa =0.915 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.856-0.975]}. Peri-tumoral edema was documented in 32.8%, necrosis in 48.1% and both in 57.3% of cases (using RECIST 1.0). Although baseline characteristics were similar in responders and non-responders (P>0.05), responders survived significantly longer in an analysis according to RECIST 1.0: PR median (95% CI) 25.2 (range, 9.2-49.4) months vs. SD 15.8 (range, 9.3-21.1) months vs. PD 7.1 (range, 6.0-9.5) months (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS RECIST 1.0 and RECIST 1.1 imaging responses provide equivalent interpretations in the assessment of hepatic tumors following (90)Y-RE. Radiologic lesion responses at 3 months must be interpreted with caution due to the significant proportion of patients with peri-tumoral edema and necrosis, which may lead to an under-estimation of PR/SD. Nevertheless, 3-month radiologic responses were predictive of prolonged survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew S Kennedy
- 1 Cancer Centers of North Carolina, Cary, NC, USA ; 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA ; 3 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA ; 5 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA ; 6 Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA ; 7 Abbot Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA ; 8 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, VA, USA ; 9 Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA ; 10 University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 11 University of California, San Diego Health Sciences, San Diego, CA, USA ; 12 Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI, USA ; 13 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 14 Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - David S Ball
- 1 Cancer Centers of North Carolina, Cary, NC, USA ; 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA ; 3 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA ; 5 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA ; 6 Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA ; 7 Abbot Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA ; 8 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, VA, USA ; 9 Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA ; 10 University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 11 University of California, San Diego Health Sciences, San Diego, CA, USA ; 12 Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI, USA ; 13 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 14 Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Steven J Cohen
- 1 Cancer Centers of North Carolina, Cary, NC, USA ; 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA ; 3 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA ; 5 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA ; 6 Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA ; 7 Abbot Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA ; 8 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, VA, USA ; 9 Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA ; 10 University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 11 University of California, San Diego Health Sciences, San Diego, CA, USA ; 12 Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI, USA ; 13 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 14 Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Michael Cohn
- 1 Cancer Centers of North Carolina, Cary, NC, USA ; 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA ; 3 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA ; 5 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA ; 6 Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA ; 7 Abbot Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA ; 8 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, VA, USA ; 9 Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA ; 10 University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 11 University of California, San Diego Health Sciences, San Diego, CA, USA ; 12 Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI, USA ; 13 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 14 Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Douglas M Coldwell
- 1 Cancer Centers of North Carolina, Cary, NC, USA ; 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA ; 3 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA ; 5 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA ; 6 Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA ; 7 Abbot Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA ; 8 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, VA, USA ; 9 Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA ; 10 University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 11 University of California, San Diego Health Sciences, San Diego, CA, USA ; 12 Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI, USA ; 13 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 14 Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Alain Drooz
- 1 Cancer Centers of North Carolina, Cary, NC, USA ; 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA ; 3 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA ; 5 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA ; 6 Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA ; 7 Abbot Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA ; 8 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, VA, USA ; 9 Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA ; 10 University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 11 University of California, San Diego Health Sciences, San Diego, CA, USA ; 12 Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI, USA ; 13 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 14 Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Eduardo Ehrenwald
- 1 Cancer Centers of North Carolina, Cary, NC, USA ; 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA ; 3 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA ; 5 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA ; 6 Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA ; 7 Abbot Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA ; 8 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, VA, USA ; 9 Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA ; 10 University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 11 University of California, San Diego Health Sciences, San Diego, CA, USA ; 12 Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI, USA ; 13 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 14 Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Samir Kanani
- 1 Cancer Centers of North Carolina, Cary, NC, USA ; 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA ; 3 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA ; 5 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA ; 6 Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA ; 7 Abbot Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA ; 8 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, VA, USA ; 9 Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA ; 10 University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 11 University of California, San Diego Health Sciences, San Diego, CA, USA ; 12 Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI, USA ; 13 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 14 Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Charles W Nutting
- 1 Cancer Centers of North Carolina, Cary, NC, USA ; 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA ; 3 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA ; 5 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA ; 6 Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA ; 7 Abbot Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA ; 8 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, VA, USA ; 9 Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA ; 10 University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 11 University of California, San Diego Health Sciences, San Diego, CA, USA ; 12 Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI, USA ; 13 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 14 Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Fred M Moeslein
- 1 Cancer Centers of North Carolina, Cary, NC, USA ; 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA ; 3 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA ; 5 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA ; 6 Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA ; 7 Abbot Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA ; 8 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, VA, USA ; 9 Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA ; 10 University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 11 University of California, San Diego Health Sciences, San Diego, CA, USA ; 12 Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI, USA ; 13 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 14 Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Samuel G Putnam
- 1 Cancer Centers of North Carolina, Cary, NC, USA ; 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA ; 3 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA ; 5 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA ; 6 Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA ; 7 Abbot Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA ; 8 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, VA, USA ; 9 Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA ; 10 University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 11 University of California, San Diego Health Sciences, San Diego, CA, USA ; 12 Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI, USA ; 13 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 14 Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Steven C Rose
- 1 Cancer Centers of North Carolina, Cary, NC, USA ; 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA ; 3 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA ; 5 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA ; 6 Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA ; 7 Abbot Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA ; 8 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, VA, USA ; 9 Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA ; 10 University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 11 University of California, San Diego Health Sciences, San Diego, CA, USA ; 12 Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI, USA ; 13 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 14 Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Michael A Savin
- 1 Cancer Centers of North Carolina, Cary, NC, USA ; 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA ; 3 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA ; 5 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA ; 6 Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA ; 7 Abbot Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA ; 8 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, VA, USA ; 9 Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA ; 10 University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 11 University of California, San Diego Health Sciences, San Diego, CA, USA ; 12 Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI, USA ; 13 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 14 Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Sabine Schirm
- 1 Cancer Centers of North Carolina, Cary, NC, USA ; 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA ; 3 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA ; 5 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA ; 6 Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA ; 7 Abbot Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA ; 8 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, VA, USA ; 9 Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA ; 10 University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 11 University of California, San Diego Health Sciences, San Diego, CA, USA ; 12 Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI, USA ; 13 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 14 Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Navesh K Sharma
- 1 Cancer Centers of North Carolina, Cary, NC, USA ; 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA ; 3 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA ; 5 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA ; 6 Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA ; 7 Abbot Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA ; 8 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, VA, USA ; 9 Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA ; 10 University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 11 University of California, San Diego Health Sciences, San Diego, CA, USA ; 12 Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI, USA ; 13 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 14 Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Eric A Wang
- 1 Cancer Centers of North Carolina, Cary, NC, USA ; 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA ; 3 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA ; 5 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA ; 6 Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA ; 7 Abbot Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA ; 8 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, VA, USA ; 9 Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA ; 10 University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 11 University of California, San Diego Health Sciences, San Diego, CA, USA ; 12 Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI, USA ; 13 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 14 Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hickey R, Lewandowski RJ, Prudhomme T, Ehrenwald E, Baigorri B, Critchfield J, Kallini J, Gabr A, Gorodetski B, Geschwind JF, Abbott A, Shridhar R, White SB, Rilling WS, Boyer B, Kauffman S, Kwan S, Padia SA, Gates VL, Mulcahy M, Kircher S, Nimeiri H, Benson AB, Salem R. 90Y Radioembolization of Colorectal Hepatic Metastases Using Glass Microspheres: Safety and Survival Outcomes from a 531-Patient Multicenter Study. J Nucl Med 2015; 57:665-71. [PMID: 26635340 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.166082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2015] [Accepted: 11/30/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
UNLABELLED Hepatic metastases of colorectal carcinoma are a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Most colorectal liver metastases become refractory to chemotherapy and biologic agents, at which point the median overall survival declines to 4-5 mo. Radioembolization with (90)Y has been used in the salvage setting with favorable outcomes. This study reports the survival and safety outcomes of 531 patients treated with glass-based (90)Y microspheres at 8 institutions, making it the largest (90)Y study for patients with colorectal liver metastases. METHODS Data were retrospectively compiled from 8 institutions for all (90)Y glass microsphere treatments for colorectal liver metastases. Exposure to chemotherapeutic or biologic agents, prior liver therapies, biochemical parameters before and after treatment, radiation dosimetry, and complications were recorded. Uni- and multivariate analyses for predictors of survival were performed. Survival outcomes and clinical or biochemical adverse events were recorded. RESULTS In total, 531 patients received (90)Y radioembolization for colorectal liver metastases. The most common clinical adverse events were fatigue (55%), abdominal pain (34%), and nausea (19%). Grade 3 or 4 hyperbilirubinemia occurred in 13% of patients at any time. The median overall survival from the first (90)Y treatment was 10.6 mo (95% confidence interval, 8.8-12.4). Performance status, no more than 25% tumor burden, no extrahepatic metastases, albumin greater than 3 g/dL, and receipt of no more than 2 chemotherapeutic agents independently predicted better survival outcomes. CONCLUSION This multiinstitutional review of a large cohort of patients with colorectal liver metastases treated with (90)Y radioembolization using glass microspheres has demonstrated promising survival outcomes with low toxicity and low side effects. The outcomes were reproducible and consistent with prior reports of radioembolization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Hickey
- Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Robert J Lewandowski
- Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Totianna Prudhomme
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Eduardo Ehrenwald
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Brian Baigorri
- Department of Radiology, Detroit Medical Center, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Jeffrey Critchfield
- Department of Radiology, Detroit Medical Center, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Joseph Kallini
- Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ahmed Gabr
- Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Boris Gorodetski
- Interventional Radiology Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Andrea Abbott
- Department of Surgery, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Ravi Shridhar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Sarah B White
- Division of Vascular/Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - William S Rilling
- Division of Vascular/Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Brendan Boyer
- Department of Radiology, Miami Valley Hospital, Dayton, Ohio
| | | | - Sharon Kwan
- Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; and
| | - Siddarth A Padia
- Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; and
| | - Vanessa L Gates
- Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Mary Mulcahy
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Sheetal Kircher
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Halla Nimeiri
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Al B Benson
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Riad Salem
- Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Maleux G, Deroose C, Laenen A, Verslype C, Heye S, Haustermans K, De Hertogh G, Sagaert X, Topal B, Aerts R, Prenen H, Vanbeckevoort D, Vandecaveye V, Van Cutsem E. Yttrium-90 radioembolization for the treatment of chemorefractory colorectal liver metastases: Technical results, clinical outcome and factors potentially influencing survival. Acta Oncol 2015; 55:486-95. [PMID: 26625262 DOI: 10.3109/0284186x.2015.1101151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to retrospectively assess the technical and clinical outcomes, overall survival and prognostic factors for prolonged survival after yttrium-90 ((90)Y) radioembolization as a salvage therapy for patients with chemorefractory liver-only or liver-dominant colorectal metastases. MATERIAL AND METHODS From January 2005 to January 2014, all the patients selected for (90)Y radioembolization to treat chemorefractory colorectal liver metastases were identified. Demographic, laboratory, imaging and dosimetry data were collected. Post-treatment technical and clinical outcomes were analyzed as well as overall survival; finally several factors potentially influencing survival were analyzed. RESULTS In total 88 patients were selected for angiographic workup; 71 patients (81%) finally underwent catheter-directed (90)Y microsphere infusion into the hepatic artery 25 days (standard deviation 13 days) after angiographic workup. Median infused activity was 1809 MBq; 30-day toxicity included: fatigue (n = 39; 55%), abdominal discomfort (n = 33; 47%), nausea (n = 5; 7%), fever (n = 14; 20%), diarrhea (n = 6; 9%), liver function abnormalities and elevated bilirubin (transient) (n = 3; 4%). Gastric ulcer was found in five patients (7%). A late complication was radioembolization-induced portal hypertension (REIPH) in three patients (4%). Median time to progression in the liver was 4.4 months. Estimated survival at six and 12 months was 65% and 30%, respectively, with a 50% estimated survival after 8.0 months in this group of chemorefractory patients. Prognostic factors for worse survival were high preprocedural bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase and tumor volume levels. CONCLUSION (90)Y microsphere radioembolization for chemorefractory colorectal liver metastases has an acceptable safety profile with a 50% estimated survival after 8.0 months. Pretreatment high bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase and tumor volume levels were associated with early death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geert Maleux
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Imaging & Pathology, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Annouschka Laenen
- Interuniversity Centre for Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics, Catholic University of Leuven and University Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Chris Verslype
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sam Heye
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Imaging & Pathology, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karin Haustermans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gert De Hertogh
- Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium
| | - Xavier Sagaert
- Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium
| | - Baki Topal
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium
| | - Raymond Aerts
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium
| | - Hans Prenen
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dirk Vanbeckevoort
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Imaging & Pathology, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Vincent Vandecaveye
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Imaging & Pathology, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Eric Van Cutsem
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Ablative and catheter-directed therapies for colorectal liver and lung metastases. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2015; 29:117-33. [PMID: 25475575 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2014.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Increasing data on treatment of liver metastases with locoregional therapies have solidified the expanding role of interventional radiologists (IRs) in the treatment of liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Ablative approaches such as radiofrequency ablation and microwave ablation have shown durable eradication of tumors. Catheter-directed therapies such as transarterial chemoembolization, drug-eluting beads, yttrium-90 radioembolization, and intra-arterial chemotherapy ports represent potential techniques for managing patients with unresectable liver metastases. Understanding the timing and role of these techniques in multidisciplinary care of patients is crucial. Implementation of IRs for consultation enables better integration of these therapies into patients' overall care.
Collapse
|
32
|
Rodríguez-Fraile M, Iñarrairaegui M. Radioembolization with 90Y-microspheres for liver tumors. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/j.remnie.2015.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
33
|
Sofocleous CT, Violari EG, Sotirchos VS, Shady W, Gonen M, Pandit-Taskar N, Petre EN, Brody LA, Alago W, Do RK, D'Angelica MI, Osborne JR, Segal NH, Carrasquillo JA, Kemeny NE. Radioembolization as a Salvage Therapy for Heavily Pretreated Patients With Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Factors That Affect Outcomes. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2015; 14:296-305. [PMID: 26277696 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2015.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2015] [Revised: 05/29/2015] [Accepted: 06/08/2015] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In this study we assessed the efficacy and factors that affect outcomes of radioembolization (RE) using yttrium-90 resin microspheres in patients with unresectable and chemorefractory colorectal cancer liver metastases (CLM). PATIENTS AND METHODS After an institutional review board waiver of approval, a review of a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-registered, prospectively created and maintained database was performed. Data on patient demographic and disease characteristics, RE treatment parameters, and additional treatments were evaluated for significance in predicting overall survival (OS) and liver progression-free survival (LPFS). Complications were evaluated according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for adverse events. RESULTS From September 2009 to September 2013, 53 patients underwent RE at a median of 35 months after CLM diagnosis. Median OS was 12.7 months. Multivariate analysis showed that carcinoembryonic antigen levels at the time of RE ≥ 90 ng/mL (P = .004) and microscopic lymphovascular invasion of the primary (P = .002) were independent predictors of decreased OS. Median LPFS was 4.7 months. At 4 to 8 and 12 to 16 weeks after RE, most patients (80% and 61%, respectively) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) had stable disease; additional evaluation using PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST) led to reclassification in 77% of these cases (response or progression). No deaths were noted within the first 30 days. Within the first 90 days after RE, 4 patients (8%) developed liver failure and 5 patients (9%) died, all with evidence of disease progression. CONCLUSION RE in the salvage setting was well-tolerated, and permitted the administration of additional therapies and led to a median OS of 12.7 months. Evaluation using PERCIST was more likely than RECIST to document response or progression compared with the baseline assessment before RE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elena G Violari
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Vlasios S Sotirchos
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Waleed Shady
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Mithat Gonen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Neeta Pandit-Taskar
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Elena N Petre
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Lynn A Brody
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - William Alago
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Richard K Do
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Joseph R Osborne
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Neil H Segal
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Nancy E Kemeny
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Hepatic arterial infusion plus systemic chemotherapy as third-line or later treatment in colorectal liver metastases. Clin Transl Oncol 2015; 17:870-5. [PMID: 26055340 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-015-1317-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2015] [Accepted: 05/30/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUNDS The present study aimed to evaluate benefit of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAI) combined with systemic chemotherapy (SCT) for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLMs) in a palliative setting. METHODS This was a retrospective single-center study including 43 consecutive patients with CLM after failure of standard SCT. Among them, 20 (47 %) patients underwent HAI combined with SCT (Group A) and 23 historical control patients who had received SCT with or without targeted agent treatment (Group B). RESULTS The two groups had similar characteristics. Compared with SCT alone, HAI combined with SCT prolonged survival (median 19.8 vs. 9.0 months; P = 0.045). Median hepatic progression-free survival was significantly longer for HAI combined with SCT vs. SCT alone (median 8.1 vs. 4.7 months; P = 0.027), as were response rates (25 and 0 %; P = 0.038) and progression-free survival (median 5.7 vs. 3.0 months; P = 0.02). Three patients (15 %) achieved conversion to potentially curative surgery. Grade 3/4 toxicities for Group A and Group B were neutropenia (5 and 8.7 %, respectively), anemia (5 and 0 %, respectively), and hyperbilirubinemia (0 and 4.3 %, respectively). Other complications were mostly grade 1 or 2. CONCLUSIONS HAI combined with SCT treatment can improve overall survival compared with SCT alone in highly advanced CLM refractory to intravenous chemotherapy.
Collapse
|
35
|
Rodríguez-Fraile M, Iñarrairaegui M. [Radioembolization with (90)Y-microspheres for liver tumors]. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2015; 34:244-57. [PMID: 25911062 DOI: 10.1016/j.remn.2015.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2015] [Revised: 03/12/2015] [Accepted: 03/13/2015] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- M Rodríguez-Fraile
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra; Área de Oncología Hepatobiliopancreática, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, España; Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias de Navarra (IDISNA), España.
| | - M Iñarrairaegui
- Unidad de Hepatología, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, España; Área de Oncología Hepatobiliopancreática, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, España; Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias de Navarra (IDISNA), España; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Pamplona, España
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Enzyme-free and label-free fluorescence sensor for the detection of liver cancer related short gene. Biosens Bioelectron 2015; 66:399-404. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2014.11.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2014] [Revised: 11/25/2014] [Accepted: 11/26/2014] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
37
|
Safe and Successful Yttrium-90 Resin Microsphere Radioembolization in a Heavily Pretreated Patient with Chemorefractory Colorectal Liver Metastases after Biliary Stent Placement above the Papilla. Case Reports Hepatol 2014; 2014:921406. [PMID: 25580316 PMCID: PMC4281443 DOI: 10.1155/2014/921406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2014] [Accepted: 11/28/2014] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
We report a case of safe and successful yttrium-90 resin microsphere radioembolization in a patient with a long history of multiple recurrent colon cancer hepatic metastases progressing after hepatic resections, hepatic arterial chemotherapy, and multiple regimens of systemic chemotherapy. One month prior to radioembolization, a biliary stent was placed above the level of the ampulla to relieve tumor-related biliary obstruction and normalize bilirubin levels.
Collapse
|
38
|
Akinwande OK, Philips P, Duras P, Pluntke S, Scoggins C, Martin RCG. Small versus large-sized drug-eluting beads (DEBIRI) for the treatment of hepatic colorectal metastases: a propensity score matching analysis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2014; 38:361-71. [PMID: 25366090 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-014-1011-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2014] [Accepted: 10/06/2014] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the feasibility, safety, and efficacy with small and large irinotecan drug-eluting beads (DEBIRI) for treating hepatic colorectal metastases. METHODS Using our prospectively maintained, multi-center, intra-arterial therapy registry, we identified 196 patients treated with a combination of large beads (100-300 to 500-700 μm) and patients treated with a combination of small beads (70-150 to 100-300 μm). To minimize selection bias, a propensity score analysis was performed to compare both groups. RESULTS Unadjusted analysis consisted of 196 and 30 patients treated with large and small beads, respectively. The adjusted analysis consisted of 19 patients each. Unadjusted analysis showed decreased all-grade (p = <0.001) and high-grade adverse effects (p = 0.02) in the small bead group, with a persisting trend toward decreased overall side effects in the adjusted analysis favoring small beads (p = 0.09) The adjusted analysis showed the percentage dose delivered (delivered dose/intended dose) was significantly greater in the small bead group compared to the large bead group (96 vs 79 %; p = 0.005). There were also a lower percentage of treatments terminating in complete stasis in the adjusted analysis (0.0035). Adjusted analysis also showed increased objective response rate (ORR) at 12 months (p = 0.04), with a corresponding trend also seen in the unadjusted analysis (0.09). CONCLUSION Smaller beads result in increased dose delivery probably due to less propensity to reach complete stasis. It may also lead to more durable long-term efficacy. Smaller beads also demonstrate similarly low toxicity compared to large-sized beads with a trend toward less toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olaguoke K Akinwande
- Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Louisville Hospital, Louisville, KY, USA,
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Gibbs P, Tie J, Bester L. Radioembolization for colorectal cancer liver metastases: current role and future opportunities – the medical oncologist’s perspective. COLORECTAL CANCER 2014. [DOI: 10.2217/crc.14.24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
SUMMARY The liver is the most common and often the only site of metastatic disease in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. For patients who do not have resectable disease, a number of liver-directed therapies are increasingly being used in routine clinical practice, including yttrium-90 radioembolization. The challenge for the medical oncologist is how best to integrate this promising new option into routine practice in the setting of ever-evolving standard systemic therapy options. Here we review the most recent data on the efficacy and safety of yttrium-90, considerations when selecting patients for treatment and we examine the potential impact of current clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Gibbs
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jeanne Tie
- Systems Biology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Lourens Bester
- Interventional Radiology, Department of Medical Imaging, St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Lewandowski RJ, Memon K, Mulcahy MF, Hickey R, Marshall K, Williams M, Salzig K, Gates VL, Atassi B, Vouche M, Atassi R, Desai K, Hohlastos E, Sato K, Habib A, Kircher S, Newman SB, Nimeiri H, Benson AB, Salem R. Twelve-year experience of radioembolization for colorectal hepatic metastases in 214 patients: survival by era and chemotherapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2014; 41:1861-9. [PMID: 24906565 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-014-2799-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2014] [Accepted: 05/02/2014] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to analyze the safety, treatment characteristics and survival outcomes of Yttrium-90 (Y90) radioembolization for unresectable colorectal carcinoma (CRC) liver metastases refractory to standard of care therapy. METHODS A total of 214 patients with CRC metastases were treated with Y90 radioembolization over 12 years. Toxicity was assessed using National Cancer Institute common terminology criteria. Overall survival was analyzed from date of diagnosis of primary cancer, hepatic metastases and from the first Y90. Uni/multivariate analyses were performed. Substratification by era of chemotherapeutics was performed. RESULTS Most patients were male (60 %) and <65 years old (61 %). Of them, 98 % had been exposed to chemotherapy. Grade 3 lymphocyte, bilirubin, albumin, ALP and AST toxicities were observed in 39 %, 11 %, 10 %, 8 % and 4 % of patients, respectively. Grade 4 lymphocyte and ALP toxicities were observed in 5 % and 3 % of patients, respectively. Median overall survival was 43.0, 34.6, and 10.6 months from date of diagnosis of primary cancer, hepatic metastases and first Y90, respectively. Survival was significantly longer in patients: (1) who received ≤2 cytotoxic drugs (n = 104) than those who received 3 (n = 110) (15.2 vs. 7.5 months, p = 0.0001); and (2) who received no biologic agents (n = 52) compared with those that did (n = 162) (18.6 vs. 9.4 months, p = 0.0001). Multivariate analyses identified ≤2 cytotoxic agents, no exposure to biologics, ECOG 0, tumor burden <25 %, lack of extrahepatic disease and albumin >3 g/dL as independent predictors of survival. CONCLUSION In this largest metastatic CRC series published to date, Y90 radioembolization was found to be safe; survival varied by prior therapy. Further studies are required to further refine the role of Y90 in metastatic CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J Lewandowski
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, 676 N. St. Clair, Suite 800, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|