Adjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer patients after preoperative chemoradiotherapy: when, and for whom?

Post-Chemoradiation Metastatic, Persistent and Resistant Nodes in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Metrics and Their Impact on Long-Term Outcome

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term oncological progression pattern of locally advanced rectal cancer patients with post-neoadjuvant nodal metastatic disease (ypN+) and correlate potential prognostic features associated with proven radiochemoresistant nodal biology.

METHODS

Individual patient data (100 variables) from a 20-year consecutive single-institution multidisciplinary experience (1995-2015), delivering multimodal therapy to rectal cancer patient candidates for radical treatment, including a neoadjuvant component and surgical resection with or without intraoperative radiotherapy followed by optional adjuvant chemotherapy. The ypN+ disease data was registered in the context of initial staging categories post-neoadjuvant T status (ypT).

RESULTS

Data on 487 patients showed histologically confirmed diagnoses of metastatic nodal disease in 108 specimens (ypN+, 22.1). There was a significant age difference (p = 0.009) between the ypN groups: age ≥ 65 was 57.6% in pN0 and 43.5% in ypN+ and patients aged < 65 constituted 42.4% of pN0 and 56.5% of ypN+. According to the clinical stage there were statistically significant differences (p = 0.001) in the categories' distribution: ypN+ patients 10.8% were stage II and 89.2% were stage III. Univariant analysis on outcome variables showed statistically significant differences in overall survival at 7 years (63.8% vs. 55.7%, p = 0.016) disease-free survival (DFS) (78% vs. 53.8%, p = 0.000) and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) (93.6% vs. 84%, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of nodal metastases (ypN+) after neoadjuvant therapy containing long-course pelvic irradiation severely impacts the long-term outcome for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and correlates with multiple clinical and therapeutic variable metrics. Implementation of local and systemic therapies should be adapted and intensified in relation to the finding of ypN+ category in surgical specimens.

Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Does Not Contribute to Worse Survival in Pathological Node-Negative Rectal Cancer

Purpose: The prognostic significance of ypN0 rectal cancer with comparison to pN0 disease still remains poorly defined. This study aimed to compare the prognosis of ypN0 and pN0 rectal cancer.

Methods: Eligible patients were identified from the SEER18 registries research database (the latest data up to date was on April 15, 2019). Propensity score (PS) matching was usually performed to reduce the imbalance and potential confounding that were introduced by inherent differences between the groups. The cause-specific survival (CSS) was analyzed to evaluate the prognostic prediction of ypN0 and pN0 groups using the Kaplan–Meier method with the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazard model was also used to identify independent prognostic variables.

Results: In total, 26,832 patients diagnosed with pN0 or ypN0 rectal cancer were confirmed as the final cohort, including 7,237 (27.0%) patients with radiation and 19,595 (73.0%) patients without radiation prior to surgery. The median follow-up time was up to 81 months. After adjusting for other prognostic factors, neoadjuvant radiotherapy was not an independent prognostic variable of CSS (HR = 1.100, 95%CI = 0.957–1.265, P = 0.180, using pN0 group as the reference).

Conclusions: ypN0 rectal cancer was strongly associated with worse pathological diagnoses compared with pN0 rectal cancer, contributing to worse oncologic outcomes. However, the receipt of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was not an independent prognostic factor of worse prognosis in pathological node-negative patients. Our study could give guidance to the treatment of ypN0 rectal cancer.

Oncologic effects of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with ypT0-2N0 rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and curative surgery: a meta-analysis

Purpose

The role of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with ypT0–2N0 rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and curative surgery is uncertain. We performed a meta-analysis using selected studies to compare adjuvant chemotherapy with observation for this cohort of patients.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched. Data were pooled, and overall effect size was calculated using random effect models. Outcome measures were 5-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), local, and distant recurrence.

Results

We included 17 nonrandomized studies for qualitative analysis and 16 nonrandomized studies that examined 4,747 patients for the meta-analysis. In analysis of patients with ypT0N0 rectal cancer, adjuvant chemotherapy had no significant effect on OS (odds ratio [OR], 1.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86–2.72; I² = 27%), DFS (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.61–2.42; I² = 5%), local recurrence (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.08–7.37; I² = 0%), and distant recurrence (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.41–2.62; I² = 0%). In analysis of patients with ypT1–2N0 rectal cancer, adjuvant chemotherapy also had no significant effect on OS (OR, 2.15; 95% CI, 0.59–7.80; I² = 26%), DFS (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 0.35–7.85; I² = 44%), local recurrence (OR, 2.56; 95% CI, 0.72–9.13; I² = 0%), and distant recurrence (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.23–5.87; I² = 0%).

Conclusion

Adjuvant chemotherapy may have no oncologic benefits in patients with ypT0–2N0 rectal cancer after nCRT and radical surgery. Routine use of adjuvant chemotherapy for those patients may be avoided.

Development of Novel Prognostic Prediction Models including the Prognostic Nutritional Index for Patients with Colorectal Cancer after Curative Resection

Objectives: It has been reported that there is an association between the nutritional condition and the prognosis of cancer. Here, we evaluated the relation between the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods: A total of 184 patients with CRC who underwent curative surgery from October 2011 to December 2012 at the Osaka University Hospital were investigated. According to the median PNI value of our data set, patients were classified into a high-PNI (≥46) group and a low-PNI (<46) group. The relationship between the PNI and the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was analyzed by a Cox regression model. Results: A low PNI was significantly associated with poor DFS (P = 0.006) and OS (P < 0.001). A multivariate analysis showed that low PNI, venous invasion (present), and tumor location (rectum) were independent risk factors for recurrence. Low PNI, advanced age, and venous invasion were found to be independent risk factors for mortality. Using these clinicopathological factors, we developed nomograms to predict DFS and OS. The concordance index was 0.828 for DFS and 0.756 for OS. Conclusions: A low PNI is a prognostic indicator for recurrence and mortality in CRC. Nomograms constructed by clinicopathological factors including the PNI can provide individual prognostic outcomes.

Prognostic Implication of Negative Lymph Node Count in ypN+ Rectal Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy and Construction of a Prediction Nomogram

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of negative lymph nodes (NLNs) for ypN+ rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and radical surgery and to construct a nomogram predicting disease-free survival (DFS).

METHOD

One hundred fifty-eight eligible patients were included. X-tile analysis was performed to determine cutoff values of NLNs. Clinicopathological and survival outcomes were compared. A Cox regression analysis was performed to identify prognostic factors of DFS. A nomogram was constructed and validated internally.

RESULTS

X-tile analysis identified cutoff values of 4 and 16 in terms of DFS (χ² = 8.129, p = 0.017). The 3-year DFS rates for low (≤ 4), middle (5-16), and high (≥ 17) NLNs group was 15.2, 55.5, and 73.1%, respectively (P = 0.017). NLN count (NLNs ≥ 17, HR = 0.400, P = 0.022), IMA nodal metastasis (HR = 1.944, P = 0.025), tumor differentiation (poor/anaplastic, HR = 1.805, P = 0.021), and ypT4 stage (HR = 7.787, P = 0.047) were independent prognostic factors of DFS. A predicting nomogram incorporating the four significant predictors was developed with a C-index of 0.64.

CONCLUSION

NLN count was an independent prognostic factor of DFS in patients with ypN+ rectal cancer following nCRT. A nomogram incorporating NLN count, IMA nodal metastasis, tumor differentiation, and ypT stage could stratify rectal cancer patients with different DFS and might be helpful during clinical decision-making.

Is adjuvant chemotherapy necessary for patients with ypT0-2N0 rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and curative surgery?

Background and objective

The benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy for patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) and curative surgery remains controversial, particularly among those responding well to NCRT. This retrospective study aimed to clarify the benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy in terms of the oncological outcomes of patients with ypT0–2N0 rectal cancer after NCRT and curative surgery.

Methods

All patients with ypT0–2N0 rectal cancer after NCRT and curative resection between 2005 and 2014 were examined. The oncological outcomes between patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy and those without any chemotherapy were compared.

Results

The clinicopathological characteristics of 110 patients were reviewed in this study; one patient was excluded due to lack of follow-up. Of the 109 patients included, 58 (53.2%) underwent adjuvant chemotherapy (chemo group), whereas the remaining 51 (46.8%) did not receive any chemotherapy (non-chemo group). After a median follow-up of 50 months, there were no significant differences in the 5-year overall survival (OS) or recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates between the groups (OS: 92.1 vs 86.3%, P = 0.375; RFS: 80.9 vs 74.7%, P = 0.534). Subgroup analysis also demonstrated no significant differences in 5-year OS and RFS rates between patients with ypT0N0 rectal cancer (P = 0.712 and P = 0.599, respectively) and those with ypT1–2N0 disease (P = 0.255 and P = 0.278, respectively).

Conclusions

These results indicate that patients with ypT0–2N0 rectal cancer after NCRT followed by curative surgery may not derive significant benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. However, further prospective randomized trials, with larger sample sizes, are warranted to confirm this conclusion.

Prognostic value of pathological node status after neoadjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer

Background

The prognostic value of pathological lymph node status following neoadjuvant radiotherapy (ypN) remains unclear. This study was designed to determine whether ypN status predicted overall survival.

Methods

Patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent neoadjuvant long-course radiation between 2005 and 2014 were identified from the National Cancer Data Base, and divided into ypN0, ypN1 and ypN2 groups. The primary outcome was overall survival. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to determine factors associated with overall survival.

Results

Of 12 271 patients, 3713 (30·3 per cent) were found to have residual nodal positivity. A majority of patients with ypN1 (1663 of 2562) and ypN2 (878 of 1151) disease had suspected lymph node-positive disease before neoadjuvant therapy, compared with 3959 of 8558 with ypN0 tumours (P &lt; 0·001). Moreover, ypN1 and ypN2 were significantly associated with ypT3–4 disease (65·7 and 83·0 per cent respectively versus 39·4 per cent for ypN0; P &lt; 0·001). In unadjusted analyses, survival differed significantly between ypN groups (P &lt; 0·001). Five-year survival rates were 81·6, 71·3 and 55·0 per cent for patients with ypN0, ypN1 and ypN2 disease respectively. After adjustment for confounding variables, ypN1 and ypN2 remained independently associated with overall survival: hazard ratio (HR) 1·61 (95 per cent c.i. 1·46 to 1·77) and 2·63 (2·34 to 2·95) respectively (P &lt; 0·001). Overall survival was significantly longer in patients with ypN1–2 combined with ypT0–2 status than among those with ypT3–4 tumours even with ypN0 status (P = 0·031). Clinical nodal status before neoadjuvant therapy was not significantly associated with overall survival (HR 1·05, 0·97 to 1·13; P = 0·259).

Conclusion

Both ypT and ypN status is of prognostic significance following neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer.

Prognostic significance of preoperative prognostic nutritional index in colorectal cancer: results from a retrospective cohort study and a meta-analysis

The preoperative prognostic nutritional index (PNI) may forecast colorectal cancer (CRC) outcomes, but the evidence is not conclusive. Here, we retrospectively analyzed a cohort of patients from the Department of Surgical Oncology at the First Hospital of China Medical University (CMU-SO). We also conducted a meta-analysis of eleven cohort studies. Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) was used to determine the optimal PNI cut-off values for classifying prognosis in the patients from the CMU-SO. The result from CMU-SO and meta-analysis both confirmed that low PNI was significantly associated with a poor prognosis and advanced TNM stages. Among the patients from the CMU-SO, the optimal cut-off values were “41-45-58” (PNI < 41, 41 ≤ PNI < 45, 45 ≤ PNI < 58, PNI ≥ 58), which divided patients into 4 stages. The BIC value for TNM staging combined with the PNI was smaller than that of TNM staging alone (−325.76 vs. −310.80). In conclusion, low PNI was predictive of a poor prognosis and was associated with clinicopathological features in patients with CRC, and the 41-45-58 four-stage division may be suitable for determining prognosis. PNI may thus provide an additional index for use along with the current TNM staging system to determine more accurate CRC prognoses.

Prognostic significance of neoadjuvant rectal score in locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and construction of a prediction model

AIM

To evaluate the prognostic significance of neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), and to develop a nomogram predicting disease-free survival (DFS).

METHOD

A total of 522 LARC patients undergoing nCRT and surgery were included. NAR scores were calculated using the equation [5pN-3(cT-pT) + 12]^2/9.61, and classified as low (<8), intermediate (8-16), and high (>16). Clinicopathological and survival outcomes were compared. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors of DFS. A predicting nomogram was developed and validated internally.

RESULTS

For NAR score classification, 193 (37.0%) were low, 183 (35.0%) were intermediate, and 146 (28.0%) were high. Higher NAR score was associated with fewer pCR, lower tumor regression grade (TRG), and higher ypTNM stage. A total of 5-year DFS for low, intermediate, and high NAR groups was 85.6%, 71.9%, and 47.2%, respectively (P < 0.001). NAR score (HR = 2.488, P = 0.002), TRG (HR = 2.811, P = 0.047), CRM involvement (HR = 2.703, P = 0.002), and IMA nodal metastasis (HR = 2.441, P = 0.001) were independent prognostic factors of DFS. A predicting nomogram was developed with C-index of 0.701.

CONCLUSION

NAR score could help in predicting DFS after nCRT. A nomogram was developed to identify subpopulations with aggressive tumors during clinical decision-making.

A nomogram to predict distant metastasis after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and radical surgery in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

PURPOSE

To compare distant metastasis (DM) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and surgery alone, and to develop a predictive nomogram for DM following nCRT.

METHODS

Propensity-scoring match analysis was performed to compare DM in LARC treated with nCRT (n = 375) and surgery alone (n = 375). Cox regression was performed to identify predictors of DM following nCRT. A nomogram was developed and validated by internal (n = 425) and external validation (n = 97).

RESULTS

The 5-year local recurrence rate was significantly lower in the nCRT group (5.6% vs. 10.4%; P = 0.020). The 5-year DM rates (nCRT vs. surgery alone: 25.3% vs. 24.4%; P = 0.235) were similar between groups. Cox regression showed that the post-nCRT pathologic stage (ypTNM stage, OR = 2.022, P = 0.002), IMA nodal metastasis (OR = 2.171, P = 0.023), and CRM involvement (OR = 2.535, P = 0.016) were independently associated with DM following nCRT. A predictive nomogram was developed with a C-index of 0.70 on internal validation, and 0.71 on the external validation.

CONCLUSION

NCRT improved local control, but not distant metastasis. A nomogram to predict 3- and 5-year DM rates, using clinicopathological parameters, was successfully developed. This prognostic tool could support decision-making in clinical practice and follow-up strategies.

Oxaliplatin/fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

AIM

Previous randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses have demonstrated the ineffectiveness of fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with rectal cancer who have undergone neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and subsequent surgery. The role of oxaliplatin/fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy in such patients is unknown. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of oxaliplatin/fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy based on a comparison with fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with rectal cancer.

METHOD

A literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov was performed to identify eligible studies. The primary end-point of interest was disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary end-points were overall survival, compliance and the incidence of Grade 3 or 4 toxicity.

RESULTS

The literature search identified four randomized controlled trials that met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis, and 2793 patients with pathological TNM or clinical TNM Stage II or III disease were included. The meta-analysis showed that oxaliplatin/fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a significantly improved DFS (hazard ratio 0.85; 95% CI 0.73-0.98; P = 0.03), comparable compliance (OR 1.18; 95% CI 0.95-1.46; P = 0.13) and a higher incidence of vomiting or nausea (OR 2.47; 95% CI 1.21-5.05; P = 0.01). No significant differences were observed between the groups with respect to overall survival and the incidence of leucopaenia, anaemia, thrombocytopaenia and diarrhoea.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant oxaliplatin/fluorouracil-based chemotherapy can improve the DFS of patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and radical surgery, compared with adjuvant fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. Data of the longer-term survival outcome are needed.

Is adjuvant chemotherapy necessary for patients with pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and radical surgery in locally advanced rectal cancer? Long-term analysis of 40 ypCR patients at a single center

OBJECTIVES

According to practice guidelines, adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) is required for all patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who have received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) and total mesorectal excision (TME). The objective of this study was to determine whether ACT is necessary for patients achieving pathological complete response (pCR) after NCRT followed by surgery.

METHODS

By retrospectively reviewing a prospectively collected database in our single tertiary care center, 210 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent NCRT followed by TME were identified between February 2005 and August 2013. All patients achieving ypCR were enrolled in this study, in which who underwent ACT (chemo group) and who did not (non-chemo group) were compared in terms of local recurrence (LR) rate, 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate and overall survival (OS) rate.

RESULTS

Forty consecutive patients with ypCR were enrolled, 19 (47.5 %) in chemo group and 21 (52.5 %) in non-chemo group. After a median follow-up of 57 months, five patients developed systemic recurrences, with the 5y-DFS rate of 83.5 %. No LR occurred in the two groups. The 5y-DFS rates for patients in chemo group and non-chemo group was 90.9 and 76.0 %, respectively, showing no statistically significant difference (p = 0.142). Multivariate analysis showed that tumor grade was the only independent prognostic factor for 5y-DFS and 5y-OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of this study suggested that it may not be necessary for all rectal cancer patients with ypCR after NCRT and radical surgery to receive ACT. Prospective randomized trials are warranted to further determine the value of ACT for ypCR patients.

A population-based study elicits a reverse correlation between age and overall survival in elderly patients with rectal carcinoma receiving adjuvant chemotherapy

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer and the fourth most common cause of cancer-related death globally. This population-based study aimed to explore the predictive factors that affected the overall survival of rectal cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy plus radical surgery using a Cox proportional hazards modeling approach. A total of 619 patients with rectal cancer who underwent surgery were enrolled between October 2006 and May 2013. Clinical characteristics of the patients were compared among the groups and potential prognostic factors were analyzed using the spss program, version 19.0. Patients aged ≥ 70 years have distinctive characteristics such as lager tumour size (≥ 5 cm), damaged micturition and higher incidence of diabetes compared to younger and middle-aged patients. Male gender, tumour size (≥ 5 cm), poor differentiation, later stage, adjuvant chemotherapy, damaged micturition, hypertension or diabetes are associated with a worse prognosis for rectal cancer patients (P < 0.05). However, smoking is a favourable factor to the patients (P = 0.018). Age of ≥ 70 years is an independent prognostic factor for patients with rectal cancer after surgery (P = 0.000) and elderly patients with Stage II and III disease receiving adjuvant chemotherapy show a favourable prognosis. The elderly patients who suffered from diabetes receiving adjuvant chemotherapy have a poor prognosis. Further prospective and large population studies are warranted to confirm the findings of this study.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for rectal cancer: Is it needed?

Adjuvant chemotherapy has become a standard treatment of advanced rectal cancer in the West. The benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery alone have been well established. However, controversy surrounds the use adjuvant chemotherapy in patients who received preoperative chemoradiotherapy, despite it being recommended by a number of international guidelines. Results of recent multicentre randomised control trials showed no benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in terms of survival and rates of distant metastases. However, concerns exist regarding the quality of the studies including inadequate staging modalities, out-dated chemotherapeutic regimens and surgical approaches and small sample sizes. It has become evident that not all the patients respond to adjuvant chemotherapy and more personalised approach should be employed when considering the benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy. The present review discusses the strengths and weaknesses of the current evidence-base and suggests improvements for future studies.

Rectal cancer patients after neoadjuvant radiotherapy (30Gy/10f) with negative lymph node may not benefit from postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether adjuvant chemotherapy could bring oncologic benefit to all patients who underwent neoadjuvant radiotherapy (30Gy/10f).

METHODS

Rectal cancer patients receiving preoperative radiotherapy between July 2002 and April 2009 were retrospectively identified.

RESULTS

A total of 225 patients were enrolled in this study. One hundred thirty-one patients received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, and 94 patients did not. The 120 ypN+ and 105 ypN- patients were divided into chemo and non-chemo groups. Two groups of patients did not show any significant difference in terms of gender, age, ypT stage, preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, differentiation, circumferential margin (CRM), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), surgical approach, local recurrence, and distant metastasis (P > 0.05). Survival analysis showed that in ypN+ patients, the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate in chemo group were both significantly higher than non-chemo group (P < 0.05). In ypN- patients, the 5-year OS rate and 5-year DFS rate did not show any significant difference in the two groups (P > 0.05). Subgroup analysis showed that the 5-year OS rate and 5-year DFS rate in ypT0-2 N- patients (P > 0.05) and ypT3-4 N- patients (P > 0.05) did not show any significant difference, either.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on a Chinese protocol, patients with ypN- stage may not benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy, regardless of the ypT stage, while the ypN+ patients may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. More randomized clinical trials are needed in the future.

The influence of neoadjuvant therapy for the prognosis in patients with rectal carcinoma: a retrospective study

Rectal cancer, defined as a cancerous lesion of the colon distal to the rectosigmoid junction, is the fourth most common cancer cause of death globally. There were 474 patients with rectal cancer who underwent surgery between October 2007 and May 2013 enrolled in our center. Patients were respectively categorized by neoadjuvant therapy. This study aimed to explore the predictive factors that affected the Progression-free survival and overall survival of the patients with rectal cancer. Clinical characteristics of patients were compared with the groups and potential prognostic factors were analyzed by SPSS 19.0. In our study, neoadjuvant therapy increased the anus-retained rate (64.4 vs 53.4 % P = 0.016) and remission rate in the treatment group, compared to the non-treatment group (62.6 vs 34.8 %; P = 0.000). The neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy, more operative duration, anus retained and micturition damaged are positive prognostic factors of PFS to patients. Poor differentiation, the tumor of ulcer, invasive, and pT4 stage, contributed the poor factors for PFS of patients (P < 0.05). Additionally, the patients with neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy underwent the better prognosis of OS. Adjuvant chemotherapy cannot increase PFS of the patients who accepted neoadjuvant therapy after surgery get pCR, but can improve OS. The anus-retained and neoadjuvant radiotherapy, duration of surgery in rectal cancer have the positive correlation. Micturition damaged and neoadjuvant radiotherapy were positively correlated as well. In conclusion, adjuvant chemotherapy does not improve the PFS of patients with pCR to neoadjuvant therapy, but is good for OS. Further prospective and large population-based clinical studies are needed to establish clinical guidelines for the use of neoadjuvant therapy and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with rectal cancer.

Risk-Adapted Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Concomitant Fluoropyrimidine-Radiotherapy Neoadjuvant Treatment for Patients With Resectable CT3-4 or N+ Rectal Cancer: Five-Year Disease-Free Survival Results of a Single-Center Series

BACKGROUND

Providing adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation is currently a matter of debate. Recommendations from clinical guidelines range from offering no treatment to oxaliplatin-based combinations. We present a risk-adapted approach based on the response to initial chemoradiation as the strongest prognostic factor for disease-free survival (DFS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred one patients were treated at a single institution with preoperative long-course radiotherapy plus concurrent fluoropyrimidines. Patients with disease downstaged to pT0-2N0 received adjuvant fluoropyrimidines alone, while the remaining received an oxaliplatin-based combination. The primary study end point was 5-year DFS.

RESULTS

Overall, the disease of 54 patients was downstaged to pT0-2N0 (53.5%), while that of 47 patients was staged as pT3-4 or N+ (46.5%) after surgery. In the intention-to-treat analysis, 5-year DFS for patients in the good-prognosis group (downstaging to pT0-2 N0) and for those with poor prognosis (pT3-4 or N+) were 79.4% and 66.3%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.489; P = .043). Downstaging and pN+ were independent prognostic factors for DFS.

CONCLUSION

A risk-adapted adjuvant therapy strategy based on pathologic stage after neoadjuvant chemoradiation is feasible and achieves high rates of 5-year DFS. Patients with good prognostic factors can be treated with adjuvant fluoropyrimidines alone, thus permitting the avoidance of oxaliplatin-derived toxicities.

Prognostic value of perineural invasion in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The prognostic value of perineural invasion (PNI) in colorectal cancer (CRC) does not reach a consensus.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search for relevant reports published up to October 2014 was performed using the electronic databases: PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) was used to estimate the prognostic effects.

RESULT

Thirty-eight studies comprising 12,661 CRC patients were analyzed. Our results showed that PNI is significantly associated with poor prognosis in OS (overall survival) (HR = 2.07, 95 % CI = 1.87-2.29, P < 0.01) and DFS (disease-free survival) (HR = 2.23, 95 % CI = 1.79-2.78, P < 0.01). There was no significant prognostic difference in DFS between stage II CRC patients with PNI(+) and stage III patients (HR = 1.67, 95 % CI = 0.53-5.25, P = 0.38). Further subgroup analysis revealed that the significance of the association between PNI and worse prognosis in CRC patients is not affected by many factors, including geographic setting, PNI positive rate, treatment, TNM stage, tumor site, and quality of the study.

CONCLUSIONS

The meta-analysis indicates that PNI is a poor prognostic factor in CRC patients. The postoperative survival of stage II CRC patients with PNI(+) is probably more similar to that of stage III patients. Currently available adjuvant therapy should be considered in stage II CRC patients with PNI(+).