1
|
Sarofim M, Ashrafizadeh A, Gill AJ, de Silva K, Evans J, Clarke S, Pavlakis N, Norton I, Engel A. National screening for colorectal cancer is associated with stage shift to earlier diagnosis. ANZ J Surg 2024; 94:1279-1285. [PMID: 38553882 DOI: 10.1111/ans.18985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2024] [Revised: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 08/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Australia's National Bowel Cancer Screening Program consists of an immunohistochemical faecal occult blood test, targeting adults aged 50-74. Existing literature supports the principle of early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) via national screening, but little is known about the association between colonoscopy or polypectomy rates and CRC stage over time. The aim of this study is to identify the longitudinal change to colonoscopy and polypectomy rates, and any stage shift associated with this screening program. METHODS A retrospective data-linkage study was performed using the Australian national health database (Medicare) to obtain colonoscopy and polypectomy rates between 1998 and 2017. A second prospective database of CRC resection specimens was analysed for this period. The cohort was divided based on time intervals related to the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program: pre-commencement 1998-2006 (Period A), immediately post-commencement 2007-2011 (Period B), and subsequent years 2012-2017 (Period C). Linear regression was used to test relation between annualized predictor and response variables. RESULTS Annual colonoscopy rates doubled, and polypectomy rates tripled during the study (P < 0.001). Annual colonoscopy rate correlated to a lower T-stage (P = 0.038) and lower N-stage (P = 0.026), and there was a 7% increase in early CRC (stage I-II) in Period C (P < 0.001). Across the study period there was also a significant increase in right-sided tumours, and concurrent MMR deficiency and BRAF mutation. CONCLUSION Polypectomy and colonoscopy rates increased after the introduction of the National Bowel Cancer screening program. There was a clinically significant shift to earlier CRC stage which manifested 5 years after its implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mina Sarofim
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Amir Ashrafizadeh
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anthony J Gill
- School of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- NSW Health Pathology, Department of Anatomical Pathology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Cancer Diagnosis and Pathology Group, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Keshani de Silva
- NSW Health Pathology, Department of Anatomical Pathology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Justin Evans
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Stephen Clarke
- School of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nick Pavlakis
- School of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ian Norton
- School of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alexander Engel
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang X, Frohlich MM, Chu E. Suboptimal Completion Rates, Adverse Events, Costs, Resource Utilization, and Cost Impact of Noncompletion in Oral Adjuvant Capecitabine-Based Chemotherapy in Patients With Early-Stage Colon Cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2021; 20:e215-e225. [PMID: 34112610 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2021.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2021] [Revised: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 05/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Suboptimal completion of chemotherapy, which may involve reduced patient adherence, remains a serious issue and leads to reduced treatment efficacy. This study assessed the completion rates, risk factors for noncompletion, and cost impact for noncompletion in patients on capecitabine monotherapy (Cape) or capecitabine with oxaliplatin (CAPOX) for the adjuvant treatment of early-stage colon cancer. METHODS Patients with a diagnosis of early-stage colon cancer between April 2013 and March 2017 were retrospectively identified. Treatment completion was evaluated. Multivariate logistic regressions analyses were used to assess the baseline factors associated with noncompletion. Adverse events, costs, healthcare resource utilization, and cost impact for noncompletion were investigated. RESULTS A total of 673 patients met the eligibility criteria, of which 382 (57%) were treated with Cape and 291 (43%) with CAPOX. The overall completion rate for adjuvant therapy was 40% (Cape 46%; CAPOX 33%). Noncompletion was associated with CAPOX treatment and higher healthcare costs within 6 months prior to chemotherapy. The 6-month unadjusted total healthcare costs were $44,444 for Cape and $71,247 for CAPOX. The nonchemotherapy costs were 41% higher for noncompleters than completers in both treatment groups (P = .002). CONCLUSIONS The real-world completion rates for adjuvant capecitabine-based chemotherapy in early-stage colon cancer patients are low. Noncompletion of therapy is associated with higher baseline healthcare costs. The nonchemotherapy costs are significantly higher in noncompleters than completers, highlighting the financial burden of managing adverse events and preexisting comorbidities, which may lead to early discontinuation of therapy. Effective strategies to optimize completion of oral chemotherapy may consider adherence monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xue Wang
- Formerly Proteus Digital Health Inc, 2600 Bridge Pkwy, Redwood City, CA 94065.
| | - Maxfield M Frohlich
- Formerly Proteus Digital Health Inc, 2600 Bridge Pkwy, Redwood City, CA 94065
| | - Edward Chu
- Albert Einstein Cancer Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Ave, Bronx, NY 10461
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Eaglehouse YL, Aljehani M, Georg MW, Castellanos O, Lee JSH, Seabury SA, Shriver CD, Zhu K. Contribution Of Care Source To Cancer Treatment Cost Variation In The US Military Health System. Health Aff (Millwood) 2019; 38:1335-1342. [PMID: 31381409 DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
The US Military Health System (MHS) provides universal access to health care for more than nine million eligible beneficiaries through direct care in military treatment facilities or purchased care in civilian facilities. Using information from linked cancer registry and administrative databases, we examined how care source contributed to cancer treatment cost variation in the MHS for patients ages 18-64 who were diagnosed with colon, female breast, or prostate cancer in the period 2003-14. After accounting for patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics, we found the independent contribution of care source to total variation in cost to be 8 percent, 12 percent, and 2 percent for colon, breast, and prostate cancer treatment, respectively. About 20-50 percent of the total cost variance remained unexplained and may be related to organizational and administrative factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yvonne L Eaglehouse
- Yvonne L. Eaglehouse is a health services researcher in the Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS); is an assistant professor in the Department of Surgery at USUHS; and is employed by the Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, all in Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Mayada Aljehani
- Mayada Aljehani is a biostatistician in the Lawrence J. Ellison Institute for Transformative Medicine, University of Southern California (USC), in Los Angeles
| | - Matthew W Georg
- Matthew W. Georg is a research associate in the Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, USUHS; and is employed by the Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine
| | - Olga Castellanos
- Olga Castellanos is a clinical research program manager in the Lawrence J. Ellison Institute for Transformative Medicine, USC
| | - Jerry S H Lee
- Jerry S. H. Lee is the chief science and innovation officer in the Lawrence J. Ellison Institute for Transformative Medicine, USC; is an associate professor in the Departments of Clinical Medicine and Chemical Engineering, both at USC; and is employed by the Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine
| | - Seth A Seabury
- Seth A. Seabury is the director of the Keck-Schaeffer Initiative for Population Health Policy at the Leonard D. Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics and an associate professor in the Department of Pharmaceutical and Health Economics at the School of Pharmacy, both at USC
| | - Craig D Shriver
- Craig D. Shriver is the director of the Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, USUHS; director of the Murtha Cancer Center at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center; and a professor in the Department of Surgery at USUHS
| | - Kangmin Zhu
- Kangmin Zhu ( ) is the director of Military Epidemiology and Population Science in the Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, USUHS; is a professor in the Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics at USUHS; and is employed by the Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wilczak W, Wittmer C, Clauditz T, Minner S, Steurer S, Büscheck F, Krech T, Lennartz M, Harms L, Leleu D, Ahrens M, Ingwerth S, Günther CT, Koop C, Simon R, Jacobsen F, Tsourlakis MC, Chirico V, Höflmayer D, Vettorazzi E, Haese A, Steuber T, Salomon G, Michl U, Budäus L, Tilki D, Thederan I, Fraune C, Göbel C, Henrich MC, Juhnke M, Möller K, Bawahab AA, Uhlig R, Adam M, Weidemann S, Beyer B, Huland H, Graefen M, Sauter G, Schlomm T. Marked Prognostic Impact of Minimal Lymphatic Tumor Spread in Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 2018; 74:376-386. [PMID: 29908878 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.05.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2017] [Accepted: 05/28/2018] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nodal metastasis (N1) is a strong prognostic parameter in prostate cancer; however, lymph node evaluation is always incomplete. OBJECTIVE To study the prognostic value of lymphatic invasion (L1) and whether it might complement or even replace lymph node analysis in clinical practice. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Retrospective analysis of pathological and clinical data from 14 528 consecutive patients. INTERVENTION Radical prostatectomy. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The impact of L1 and N1 on patient prognosis was measured with time to biochemical recurrence as the primary endpoint. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Nodal metastases were found in 1602 (12%) of 13 070 patients with lymph node dissection. L1 was seen in 2027 of 14 528 patients (14%) for whom lymphatic vessels had been visualized by immunohistochemistry. N1 and L1 continuously increased with unfavorable Gleason grade, advanced pT stage, and preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values (p<0.0001 each). N1 was found in 4.3% of 12 501 L0 and in 41% of 2027 L1 carcinomas (p<0.0001). L1 was seen in 11% of 9868 N0 and in 61% of 1360 N1 carcinomas (p<0.0001). Both N1 and L1 were linked to PSA recurrence (p<0.0001 each). This was also true for 17 patients with isolated tumor cells (ie, <200 unequivocal cancer cells without invasive growth) and 193 metastases ≤1mm. Combined analysis of N and L status showed that L1 had no prognostic effect in N1 patients but L1 was strikingly linked to PSA recurrence in N0 patients. N0L1 patients showed a similar outcome as N1 patients. CONCLUSIONS Analysis of lymphatic invasion provides comparable prognostic information than lymph node analysis. Even minimal involvement of the lymphatic system has pivotal prognostic impact in prostate cancer. Thus, a thorough search for lymphatic involvement helps to identify more patients with an increased risk for disease recurrence. PATIENT SUMMARY Already minimal amounts of tumor cells inside the lymph nodes or intraprostatic lymphatic vessels have a severe impact on patient prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Waldemar Wilczak
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Corinna Wittmer
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Till Clauditz
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sarah Minner
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Steurer
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Franziska Büscheck
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Till Krech
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Lennartz
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Luisa Harms
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Diane Leleu
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marc Ahrens
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Ingwerth
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Christina Koop
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ronald Simon
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Frank Jacobsen
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Maria C Tsourlakis
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Viktoria Chirico
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Doris Höflmayer
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Eik Vettorazzi
- Department of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alexander Haese
- Martini-Clinic Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Steuber
- Martini-Clinic Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Georg Salomon
- Martini-Clinic Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Uwe Michl
- Martini-Clinic Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lars Budäus
- Martini-Clinic Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Clinic Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Imke Thederan
- Martini-Clinic Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Fraune
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Cosima Göbel
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Manuela Juhnke
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Katharina Möller
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ahmed Abdullah Bawahab
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ria Uhlig
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Meike Adam
- Martini-Clinic Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sören Weidemann
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Burkhard Beyer
- Martini-Clinic Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hartwig Huland
- Martini-Clinic Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Clinic Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Guido Sauter
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Thorsten Schlomm
- Martini-Clinic Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, Section for Translational Prostate Cancer Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|