Gastrointestinal Perforation and Fistula Formation in 5 Patients With Colorectal Cancer During Treatment With Regorafenib

Recurrent hepatogastric fistula during lenvatinib therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma managed by over-the-scope clip closure: a case report

Objective: Lenvatinib is an oral multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor (mTKI) and is recommended for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with Child-Pugh A liver function, who are not amenable to surgical resection, locoregional treatment, or transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. Hepatogastric fistula is a rare complication with a poor prognosis in patients with HCC. Previous reports on fistula formation during mTKI therapy for HCC were all associated with sorafenib. Here, we report the first case of recurrent hepatogastric fistula during lenvatinib therapy for advanced HCC managed using an over-the-scope clip (OTSC). Patient: We present the case of a 73-year-old man with alcoholic liver cirrhosis who was treated for multiple HCC for 7 years. HCC was treated using repetitive transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, radiofrequency ablation, and sorafenib. Owing to disease progression, lenvatinib treatment was started. During lenvatinib treatment, recurrent hepatogastric fistulas developed. An OTSC was useful for fistula closure and prevention of recurrence. Results: The major cause of fistula formation is considered to be the direct invasion of HCC; however, HCC treatment might also be a contributing factor in our case. In addition, OTSC was useful for fistula closure. Conclusion: Clinicians should be aware of the fatal complications during HCC treatment.

Lessons learned from successful autologous gastrointestinal reconstruction in patients with intestinal failure: a case series

Background

Intestinal failure (IF) is a rare but severe form of organ failure. The condition is defined as body’s inability to absorb adequate fluids, macronutrients and minerals for growth and development, so that intravenous supplementation is necessary. A broad spectrum of diseases, trauma and complications of surgery might eventually end up with intestinal failure. Nowadays, intestinal failure patients are preferably cared for in intestinal rehabilitation units (IRU). Autologous gastrointestinal reconstruction (AGIR) refers to non-transplant operative management of IF patients designed to improve enteral tolerance and gut absorptive capacity.

Case presentation

Herein we present five cases with complications of surgeries due to peptic ulcer bleeding, blunt abdominal trauma, obesity and gastric tumor. The surgeries were complicated by anastomotic leak, peritonitis and fistula formation. By adopting multidisciplinary decisions and special care for each complication, all the five patients were successfully managed and discharged.

Discussion and conclusions

As presented, re-anastomosis in presence of abdominal contamination will probably fail. In patients with intestinal failure, PN should start as soon as possible to increase the success rate of future surgeries and prevent potential need for intestinal transplantation. We suggest referring patients with complicated outcomes of gastrointestinal surgeries to the IRUs to reduce morbidity and mortality.

Intestinal Perforation in a Patient with Colon Cancer during Treatment with Regorafenib: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

The multikinase inhibitor, regorafenib, is known to exert its antitumor effects by targeting several kinases, inhibiting interstitial intracellular signaling and suppressing tumor cell proliferation. Regorafenib causes gastrointestinal perforation and gastrointestinal fistula as adverse events, and discontinuation is recommended if these adverse events occur during administration. However, there are no prescribed standards for re-administration after discontinuation and for administration in patients with a history of gastrointestinal perforation. Herein, we report a case of gastrointestinal perforation in a patient, with a history of gastrointestinal microperforation, undergoing bevacizumab therapy, within a few days of starting regorafenib; this had a significant effect on the prognosis. The site of gastrointestinal perforation was consistent with previously reported sites around the tumor and at the anastomotic site. Based on a review of literature and our experience with the case presented here, we recommend that administration of regorafenib to patients with a history of gastrointestinal perforation should be avoided to the extent possible. Moreover, in case of prior administration of a drug reported to cause gastrointestinal perforation, such as an anti-VEGFR drug, the risk of gastrointestinal perforation should be considered during the administration of regorafenib. In the event of complaints, such as abdominal pain, gastrointestinal perforation should be considered as a differential diagnosis and appropriate tests and treatments should be initiated at an early stage.

Meta-Analysis of Regorafenib-Associated Adverse Events and Their Management in Colorectal and Gastrointestinal Stromal Cancers

INTRODUCTION

To assess the risk factors associated with regorafenib-related adverse events (AEs) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). We also evaluated different measures of combatting AEs and their success rate to aid physicians in early identification and management of reported AEs.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted through the electronic databases PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to May 2018 according to the pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Pooled estimates with Pearson correlation were obtained with fixed or random-effects models.

RESULTS

From our analysis, it was evident that AEs were more common in patients aged less than 65 years compared to those aged at least 65 years (71.3% vs. 27.6%, p = 0.001). A statistically significant correlation was observed between the occurrence of AEs and a dose of 160 mg (r = 0.967; p = 0.001) while no significant correlation was found at 120 mg and 80 mg. The common measures used to manage AEs included lowering the regorafenib dose (41%), intermittent drug withdrawal (66.7%), and complete drug withdrawal (19%). About 57% of patients recovered from AE after their initiating dose was lowered.

CONCLUSION

Regorafenib-associated AEs are more common at an initiating dose of 160 mg. Considering that the efficacy depends on the dosage, 120 mg might be a better choice for mCRC and GIST patients; further studies are needed to validate the results of our analysis. Further prompt identification and management of AEs are required to help the patients continue with drug therapy.