Results of treatment of chronic hepatitis B with pegylated interferon

Safety profile, antiviral capacity, and liver protection of a nasal therapeutic vaccine in patients with chronic hepatitis B: Five-year-follow-up outcomes after the end of treatment

Introduction

There is a pressing need to develop novel drugs for treating patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), as commercially available antiviral drugs are endowed with safety and efficacy concerns.

Methods

A phase III clinical trial was conducted with a therapeutic vaccine containing two antigens of the hepatitis B virus (HBV; named NASVAC) in 78 patients with CHB expressing both HBV DNA and elevated levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) in the blood. Five years after the end of treatment (EOT), 60 NASVAC-recipient patients were enrolled in this long-term follow-up study to evaluate the safety, antiviral potential, and liver-protective capacity of NASVAC.

Results

NASVAC exhibited an excellent safety profile 5 years after EOT. The levels of HBV DNA in the sera were reduced in 55 of the 60 patients, and 45 of them were negative for HBV DNA in the sera. ALT levels were also normalized in 40 of the 60 patients 5 years after EOT. None of the patients receiving NASVAC developed liver cirrhosis or cancer.

Discussion

The present study is the first to exhibit long-term follow-up data of a finite immune therapy for CHB that is safe and endowed with potent antiviral and liver-protecting capacities.

Novel long-acting ropeginterferon alfa-2b: Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety in a phase I clinical trial

AIMS

Ropeginterferon alfa-2b is a novel, long-acting pegylated interferon alfa-2b. We aimed to evaluate its safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD).

METHODS

Thirty-six subjects received single subcutaneous injection of ropeginterferon alfa-2b at doses ranging from 24 to 270 μg, and 12 subjects received pegylated IFN alfa-2a subcutaneously at 180 μg. Primary endpoints were safety/PK profiles of ropeginterferon alfa-2b, while secondary endpoints were to compare PK/PD parameters with pegylated IFN alfa-2a.

RESULTS

Adverse events in ropeginterferon alfa-2b and pegylated IFN alfa-2a groups were similar, and most of them were mild or moderate. Mean C_max increased from 1.78 to 24.84 ng/mL along with the dose escalations in ropeginterferon alfa-2b groups and was 12.95 ng/mL for pegylated IFN alfa-2a. At 180 μg, ropeginterferon alfa-2b showed statistically significant C_max geometric mean ratio (1.76; P = .0275). Mean T_max ranged from 74.52 to 115.69 h for ropeginterferon alfa-2b groups, and was 84.25 h for pegylated IFN alfa-2a. Mean AUC_0-t increased from 372.3 to 6258 ng•h/mL with the dose escalations in the ropeginterferon alfa-2b groups, while for pegylated IFN alfa-2a it was found to be 2706 ng•h/mL in pegylated IFN alfa-2a. For neopterin and 2',5'-oligoadenylate synthase, mean E_max , T_max and AUC_0-t of ropeginterferon alfa-2b were similar to those of pegylated IFNα-2a at 180 μg.

CONCLUSION

Ropeginterferon alfa-2b up to 270 μg was safe and well tolerated. The PK/PD parameters of ropeginterferon alfa-2b showed increase in dose-response. Ropeginterferon alfa-2b had higher drug exposures and showed similar safety profile when compared to pegylated IFN alfa-2a at the same dose level.

Antiviral treatment and liver-related complications in hepatitis delta

Hepatitis delta virus (HDV) is the most severe form of viral hepatitis. Pegylated interferon alfa (PEG-IFNα) is effective in only 25%-30% of patients and is associated with frequent side effects. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical long-term outcome of hepatitis delta in relation to different antiviral treatment strategies. We studied 136 anti-HDV-positive patients who were followed for at least 6 months in a retrospective single-center cohort (mean time of follow-up, 5.2 years; range, 0.6-18.8). Liver cirrhosis was already present in 62 patients at first presentation. Twenty-nine percent of patients did not receive any antiviral treatment, 38% were treated with interferon alfa (IFNα)-based therapies, and 33% received nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) only. Clinical endpoints defined as hepatic decompensation (ascites, encephalopathy, and variceal bleeding), hepatocellular carcinoma, liver transplantation, and liver-related death developed in 55 patients (40%). Patients who received IFNα-based therapies developed clinical endpoints less frequently than those treated with NA (P = 0.02; HR, 4.0) or untreated patients (P = 0.05; HR, 2.2; 17%, 64%, and 44%), respectively, which was significant in both chi-square and Kaplan-Meier analysis. In addition, considering various clinical and virological parameters, IFNα therapy was independently associated with a more benign clinical long-term outcome in multivariate logistic regression analysis (P = 0.04; odds ratio, 0.25; 95% confidence interval, 0.07-0.9). Loss of HDV RNA during follow-up was more frequent in IFNα-treated patients and strongly linked with a lower likelihood to experience liver-related complications.

CONCLUSION

IFNα-based antiviral therapy of hepatitis delta was independently associated with a lower likelihood for clinical disease progression. Durable undetectability of HDV RNA is a valid surrogate endpoint in the treatment of hepatitis delta. (Hepatology 2017;65:414-425).

Protease inhibitors partially overcome the interferon nonresponse phenotype in patients with chronic hepatitis C

The outcome of triple therapy with protease inhibitors (PI) depends on the intrinsic response to interferon. Interferon-stimulated gene (ISG) expression differs by cell type in the liver and is a strong predictor of interferon responsiveness. Patients who respond well to interferon have low/absent ISG expression in hepatocytes but significant ISG expression in macrophages. Nonresponders (NRs) show the opposite pattern. We aimed to determine the association between cell-type-specific ISG staining and treatment outcome with PI-based triple therapy. Liver biopsy tissue from consecutive patients treated with boceprevir or telaprevir with peginterferon and ribavirin was stained for myxovirus A (MxA). Staining was scored 0-3 in macrophages (M-MxA) and hepatocytes (H-MxA), and IL28B genotyping was performed. Of 56 patients included 41 achieved SVR (73%) (sustained virological response), 2 (4%) relapsed, 10 (18%) were NRs, and 3 (5%) were lost to follow-up. Median M-MxA staining was stronger and H-MxA staining was weaker in patients who achieved SVR. MxA staining correlated with IL28B genotype and with the HCV RNA decline during lead-in phase. However, unlike with dual therapy, the negative predictive value (NPV) of absent or weak M-MxA staining was poor (42%), while the positive predictive value improved (93%). Although by multivariable logistic regression M-MxA staining was significantly associated with SVR (OR 4.35, 1.32-14.28, P = 0.012), the predictive ability was inadequate to withhold therapy. The interaction between macrophages and hepatocytes plays a critical role in interferon responsiveness; however, the addition of a PI at least partially overcomes the interferon nonresponse phenotype making the predictive ability of ISG staining less clinically useful.

Update on Hepatitis B Virus Infection: Focus on Treatment

This review article is an update of the current treatment strategies available for chronic hepatitis B. In addition to achieving on-therapy clinical remission and suppression of HBV replication without resistance, the ultimate goal of therapy is the development of sustained remission and HBsAg loss after discontinuation of treatment. This is the closest possible to cure outcome for hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. These goals can be achieved by response-guided courses of pegylated interferon (peg-IFN)-alpha at rates higher than 30%, both in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive and HBeAg-negative patients. Review of the data regarding discontinuation of long term NA treatment in HBeAg-negative patients revealed that stopping such therapy is safe with high rates of sustained off treatment responses that appear to be immunologically induced. Decreasing hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) titers under therapy to <500, particularly <100 IU/mL, and adding a course of peg-IFN to ongoing long term nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) therapy increase the percentage of sustained responses following discontinuation of NA treatment.

HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B: why do I treat my patients with nucleos(t)ide analogues?

The aim of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) antiviral therapy is to persistently suppress HBV and improve survival by preventing the progression of liver damage to cirrhosis, end-stage liver disease or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), thus preventing early liver-related death. In HBeAg-negative patients who do not or will not respond to or be treated with pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN), the administration of third generation nucleot(s)ide analogues (NAs), i.e., entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), is the treatment of choice. Long-term administration of ETV or TDF suppresses HBV replication in >95% of patients after 5 years of treatment with high rates of biochemical normalization, regression of fibrosis and cirrhosis at histology as well as preventing clinical decompensation but not HCC, in compensated cirrhosis and improving survival. No major safety issues have been recorded with either drug. The need for long-term, perhaps indefinite, treatment is the main limitation of NA therapy with possible associated costs, unknown long-term safety and the low rates of HBsAg seroclearance. The latter is important since HBsAg seroclearance is still the best stopping rule for HBeAg-negative NA-treated patients, including those with cirrhosis. For this reason new trials based upon a combination of PEG-IFN and third generation NAs in both naïve and NA-responder HBeAg-negative patients are ongoing.