Immunohistochemistry to Enhance Prognostic Allocation and Guide Decision-Making of Patients With Advanced Urothelial Cancer Receiving First-Line Chemotherapy

HER2 expression in urothelial carcinoma, a systematic literature review

Background

Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is a common malignancy with significant associated mortality. Recent clinical trials suggest an emerging role for HER2-targeted therapy. Testing for HER2 expression in UC is not part of current routine clinical practice. In consequence, the prevalence of HER2 expression in UC is not well defined.

Methods

A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted to characterize HER2 expression in both locally advanced unresectable or metastatic (LA/mUC) and earlier stage UC, classified as HER2+, HER2-low, HER2-. HER2+ was defined as an immunohistochemistry (IHC) score of 3+ or IHC 2+ and ISH/FISH+. HER2-low was defined as an IHC score of 2+ and ISH/FISH- or IHC 1+. HER2- was defined as an IHC score of 0. Weighted averages were calculated to generate an estimate of the population prevalence.

Results

A total of 88 studies were identified, with 45, 30, and 13 studies investigating LA/mUC, earlier stage UC, and mixed stage/unspecified, respectively. The most common assays used were Dako HercepTest and Ventana Pathway anti-HER2/neu (4B5) for IHC to assess HER2 protein expression; Abbott PathVysion HER-2 DNA Probe Kit, FoundationOne CDx, and Guardant360 CDx for assessing HER2 gene amplification. The most frequently cited scoring guidelines were ASCO/CAP guidelines for breast cancer and gastric cancer, though most studies defined their own criteria for HER2 expression. Using the pre-specified definition, HER2+ prevalence ranged from 6.7% to 37.5% with a weighted average of 13.0% in LA/mUC. Only 1 study presented data that could be classified as HER2+ based on pre-specified criteria in earlier stage UC patients, and this study represented a likely outlier, at 76.0%.

Conclusion

The results from this SLR help to shed light on HER2 expression in UC, a potentially clinically relevant biomarker-driven subpopulation for emerging HER2-directed regimens. Results of this SLR illuminate the variability in how HER2+ status expression levels are being assessed and how HER2+ is defined. Consensus on standardized HER2 testing and scoring criteria is paramount to better understand the clinical relevance in patients with UC.

Is ERCC1 a prognostic biomarker for urothelial cancer following radical cystectomy? A long-term analysis

INTRODUCTION

Excision repair cross-complementation 1 protein (ERCC1) plays a vital role in cancer cells enabling DNA repair via nucleotide excision repair. Thus, we hypothesized whether expression of this protein may be utilized as a prognostic marker in patients after radical cystectomy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The final analysis involved 123 patients with urothelial bladder carcinoma who underwent radical cystectomy with bilateral lymphadenectomy. The median follow-up time was equal to 853 days. ERCC1 status was evaluated immunohistochemically with the application of tissue microarrays.

RESULTS

Positive ERCC1 expression was noted in 46% of the studied cases. Among the analyzed clinical and pathological factors, we could not establish a statistically significant correlation with ERCC1. Similarly, survival curves were statistically indifferent in patients with tumors categorized according to both expression categories. We did not confirm a prognostic value of ERCC1 in the multivariate regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

ERCC1 expression does not influence the overall survival of patients with urothelial bladder carcinoma after radical cystectomy.

p63 expression in human tumors and normal tissues: a tissue microarray study on 10,200 tumors

Background

Tumor protein 63 (p63) is a transcription factor of the p53 gene family involved in differentiation of several tissues including squamous epithelium. p63 immunohistochemistry is broadly used for tumor classification but published data on its expression in cancer is conflicting.

Methods

To comprehensively catalogue p63 expression, tissue microarrays (TMAs) containing 12,620 tissue samples from 115 tumor entities and 76 normal tissue types were analyzed.

Results

p63 expression was seen in various normal tissues including squamous epithelium and urothelium. At least occasional weak p63 positivity could be detected in 61 (53%) of 115 different tumor types. The frequencies of p63 positivity was highest in squamous cell carcinomas irrespective of their origin (96–100%), thymic tumors (100%), urothelial carcinomas (81–100%), basal type tumors such as basal cell carcinomas (100%), and various salivary gland neoplasias (81–100%). As a rule, p63 was mostly expressed in cancers derived from p63 positive normal tissues and mostly not detectable in tumors derived from p63 negative cancers. However, exceptions from this rule occurred. A positive p63 immunostaining in cancers derived from p63 negative tissues was unrelated to aggressive phenotype in 422 pancreatic cancers, 160 endometrium cancers and 374 ovarian cancers and might be caused by aberrant squamous differentiation or represent stem cell properties. In 355 gastric cancers, aberrant p63 expression occurred in 4% and was linked to lymph node metastasis (p = 0.0208). Loss of p63 in urothelial carcinomas - derived from p63 positive urothelium - was significantly linked to advanced stage, high grade (p < 0.0001 each) and poor survival (p < 0.0001) and might reflect clinically relevant tumor dedifferentiation.

Conclusion

The high prevalence of p63 expression in specific tumor types makes p63 immunohistochemistry a suitable diagnostic tool. Loss of p63 expression might constitute a feature of aggressive cancers.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40364-021-00260-5.

Clinical Perspectives of ERCC1 in Bladder Cancer

ERCC1 is a key regulator of nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway that repairs bulky DNA adducts, including intrastrand DNA adducts and interstrand crosslinks (ICLs). Overexpression of ERCC1 has been linked to increased DNA repair capacity and platinum resistance in solid tumors. Multiple single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been detected in ERCC1 gene that may affect ERCC1 protein expression. Platinum-based treatment remains the cornerstone of urothelial cancer treatment. Given the expanding application of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced bladder cancer, there is an emerging need for biomarkers that could distinguish potential responders to cisplatin treatment. Extensive research has been done regarding the prognostic and predictive role of ERCC1 gene expression and polymorphisms in bladder cancer. Moreover, novel compounds have been recently developed to target ERCC1 protein function in order to maximize sensitivity to cisplatin. We aim to review all the existing literature regarding the role of the ERCC1 gene in bladder cancer and address future perspectives for its clinical application.

Neoadjuvant sorafenib, gemcitabine, and cisplatin administration preceding cystectomy in patients with muscle-invasive urothelial bladder carcinoma: An open-label, single-arm, single-center, phase 2 study

BACKGROUND

Outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with muscle-invasive urothelial bladder carcinoma (MIUBC) should be improved. Sorafenib was combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy (SGC) in an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial (NCT01222676).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

After transurethral resection of the bladder, T2-T4a N0 patients received four cycles of SGC followed by cystectomy. Sorafenib 400mg q12h daily, continuously, was added to standard GC chemotherapy. In a Simon's 2-stage design, the primary endpoint was the pathologic complete response (pT0), assuming H0: ≤0.20 and H1: ≥0.40, with a type I and type II error of 5% and 10%, respectively.

RESULTS

From April 2011 to June 2016, 46 patients were enrolled. Pathologic T0 response was obtained in 20 patients (43.5%, 95% CI: 28.9-58.9); pT ≤ 1 in 25 (54.3%, 95% CI: 39.0-69.1). After a median follow-up of 35 months, the median progression-free survival was not reached (NR, interquartile range: 23.6-NR), nor was median overall survival (interquartile range: 30.3-NR). Hematologic and extrahematologic grade 3 to 4 adverse events occurred in 45.6% and 26.1% of patients, respectively. In 29 samples from responders (pT ≤ 1) and nonresponders, different distribution of missense mutations involved DNA-repair genes, RAS-RAF pathway genes, chromatin-remodeling genes, and HER-family genes. ERCC1 immunohistochemical expression was associated with pT ≤ 1 response (P = 0.047). The absence of a comparator arm prevented us to quantify sorafenib contribution.

CONCLUSIONS

SGC combination was active in MIUBC, and the identified molecular features included alterations that may help personalize treatment in MIUBC with new more potent targeted agents, combined with chemotherapy.

Ten Years of Complete Remission of Pulmonary Metastasis after Post-Cystectomy Palliative Cisplatin-Gemcitabine Chemotherapy with Gefitinib for Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Case Report

Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is considered one of the most lethal malignancies with high metastatic potential. Usually, metastatic bladder cancer carries worse prognosis with a median survival rate of approximately 6 months, which can be prolonged for up to 14 months with palliative systemic chemotherapy. We present the case of a 61-year-old male patient diagnosed with localized MIBC 10 years ago. He underwent nerve-sparing radical cystectomy with ileal neobladder, but developed pulmonary metastatic disease 7 months postoperatively. Six cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin combination chemotherapy with an addition of gefitinib as daily oral medication were administered within a randomized phase II clinical trial; this resulted in complete remission of the pulmonary metastases. Until now, the patient is still on gefitinib daily without any side effects. Although, the addition of gefitinib to standard systemic chemotherapy has not been shown to improve the survival in metastatic urothelial cancer, this case represents a very pleasant albeit uncommon long-term outcome.