1
|
Santoni M, Massari F, Takeshita H, Tapia JC, Dionese M, Pichler R, Rizzo M, Lam ET, Grande E, Kemp R, Molina-Cerrillo J, Calabrò F, Tural D, Küronya Z, Kucharz J, Fiala O, Seront E, Kopp RM, Abahssain H, Kopecky J, Martignetti A, Kanesvaran R, Zakopoulou R, Ansari J, Landmesser J, Mollica V, Porta C, Bellmunt J, Salah S, Santini D. Bone targeting agents, but not radiation therapy, improves survival in patients with bone metastases from advanced urothelial carcinoma receiving pembrolizumab: results from the ARON-2 study. Clin Exp Med 2023; 23:5413-5422. [PMID: 37917218 DOI: 10.1007/s10238-023-01235-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
The ARON-2 study (NCT05290038) aimed to assess the real-world efficacy of pembrolizumab in patients recurred or progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy. This retrospective analysis reports the outcomes of urothelial carcinoma (UC) patients with bone metastases (BM). Medical records of patients with documented metastatic UC treated by pembrolizumab as second-line therapy were reviewed from60 institutions in 20 countries. Patients were assessed for Overall Response Rate (ORR), Progression-Free Survival (PFS), and Overall Survival (OS). Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to explore the association of variables of interest with OS and PFS. 881 patients were included; of them, 263 (30%) presented BM. Median follow-up time was 22.7 months. Patients with BM showed both shorter median OS (5.9 months vs 13.1 months, p < 0.001) and PFS (3.5 months, vs 7.3 months, p < 0.001) compared to patients without BM. Patients who received bone targeted agents (BTAs) showed a significantly longer median OS (8.5 months vs 4.6 months, p = 0.003) and PFS (6.1 months vs 3.2 months, p = 0.003), while no survival benefits were observed among patients who received radiation therapy for BM during pembrolizumab treatment compared to those who did not. In multivariate analysis, performance status, concomitant liver metastases, and the lack of use of BTAs were significantly associated with worse OS and PFS. Bone involvement in UC patients treated with pembrolizumab predicts inferior survival. Poor performance status and liver metastases may further worsen outcomes, while the use of BTAs is associated with improved outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Santoni
- Oncology Unit, Macerata Hospital, via Santa Lucia 2, 62100, Macerata, Italy
| | - Francesco Massari
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Albertoni - 15, Bologna, Italy
| | - Hideki Takeshita
- Department of Urology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Jose Carlos Tapia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau, Hospital de la Santa Creui Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Michele Dionese
- Medical Oncology 1 Unit, Department of Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV - IRCCS, 35128, Padua, Italy
| | - Renate Pichler
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Mimma Rizzo
- Division of Medical Oncology, A.O.U. Consorziale Policlinico di Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Elaine T Lam
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Enrique Grande
- Department of Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Robert Kemp
- Southampton Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Fabio Calabrò
- Department of Oncology, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Deniz Tural
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bakirköy Dr.SadiKonuk Training and Research Hospital, Zuhuratbaba District, TevfikSaglam St. No: 11, Bakirkoy, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Zsófia Küronya
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology and Clinical Pharmacology, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Jakub Kucharz
- Department of Uro-Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Ondrej Fiala
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapeutics, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic
- Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, alejSvobody 76, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - Emmanuel Seront
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de Jolimont, Haine Saint Paul, La Louvière, Belgium
| | - Ray Manneh Kopp
- Clinical Oncology, Sociedad de Oncología y Hematología del Cesar, Valledupar, Colombia
| | - Halima Abahssain
- Medicine and Pharmacy Faculty, National Institute of Oncology, Medical Oncology Unit, Mohamed V University, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Jindrich Kopecky
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
| | - Angelo Martignetti
- Dipartimento oncologico usl sud-est toscana-area senese, Località Campostaggia s.n.c., 53036, Poggibonsi, Italy
| | | | - Roubini Zakopoulou
- 2nd Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, ATTIKON University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Jawaher Ansari
- Medical Oncology, Tawam Hospital, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | | | - Veronica Mollica
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Albertoni - 15, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Camillo Porta
- Chair of Oncology, Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Joaquim Bellmunt
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Samer Salah
- Department of Medical Oncology, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan
| | - Daniele Santini
- UOC Oncologia A, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Apolo AB, Ellerton JA, Infante JR, Agrawal M, Gordon MS, Aljumaily R, Gourdin T, Dirix L, Lee KW, Taylor MH, Schöffski P, Wang D, Ravaud A, Manitz J, Pennock G, Ruisi M, Gulley JL, Patel MR. Avelumab as second-line therapy for metastatic, platinum-treated urothelial carcinoma in the phase Ib JAVELIN Solid Tumor study: 2-year updated efficacy and safety analysis. J Immunother Cancer 2021; 8:jitc-2020-001246. [PMID: 33037118 PMCID: PMC7549450 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2020-001246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1)/programmed cell death 1 antibodies have shown clinical activity in platinum-treated metastatic urothelial carcinoma, resulting in regulatory approval of several agents, including avelumab (anti-PD-L1). We report ≥2-year follow-up data for avelumab treatment and exploratory subgroup analyses in patients with urothelial carcinoma. Methods Patients with previously treated advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma, pooled from two cohorts of the phase Ib JAVELIN Solid Tumor trial, received avelumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal. End points included best overall response and progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST V.1.1, overall survival (OS) and safety. Post hoc analyses included objective response rates (ORRs) in subgroups defined by established high-risk/poor-prognosis characteristics and association between time to response and outcome. Results 249 patients received avelumab; efficacy was assessed in 242 postplatinum patients. Median follow-up was 31.9 months (range 24–43), and median treatment duration was 2.8 months (range 0.5–42.8). The confirmed ORR was 16.5% (95% CI 12.1% to 21.8%; complete response in 4.1% and partial response in 12.4%). Median duration of response was 20.5 months (95% CI 9.7 months to not estimable). Median PFS was 1.6 months (95% CI 1.4 to 2.7 months) and the 12-month PFS rate was 16.8% (95% CI 11.9% to 22.4%). Median OS was 7.0 months (95% CI 5.9 to 8.5 months) and the 24-month OS rate was 20.1% (95% CI 15.2% to 25.4%). In post hoc exploratory analyses, avelumab showed antitumor activity in high-risk subgroups, including elderly patients and those with renal insufficiency or upper tract disease; ORRs were numerically lower in patients with liver metastases or low albumin levels. Objective response achieved by 3 months versus later was associated with longer OS (median not reached (95% CI 18.9 months to not estimable) vs 7.1 months (95% CI 5.2 to 9.0 months)). Safety findings were consistent with previously reported 6-month analyses. Conclusions After ≥2 years of follow-up, avelumab showed prolonged efficacy and acceptable safety in patients with platinum-treated advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma, including high-risk subgroups. Survival appeared longer in patients who responded within 3 months. Long-term safety findings were consistent with earlier reports with avelumab treatment in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea B Apolo
- Hematology Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - John A Ellerton
- Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Manish Agrawal
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | | | - Raid Aljumaily
- Nevada Cancer Research Foundation, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.,HonorHealth Research Institute, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - Theodore Gourdin
- Hematology/Oncology, The University of Oklahoma Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Luc Dirix
- Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Keun-Wook Lee
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sint-Augustinus Hospital Oncology Centre, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Matthew H Taylor
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Patrick Schöffski
- Department of General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Laboratory of Experimental Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ding Wang
- Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Alain Ravaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Juliane Manitz
- EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc, Billerica, Massachusetts, USA; a business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Gregory Pennock
- EMD Serono, Inc, Rockland, Massachusetts, USA; a business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Mary Ruisi
- EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc, Billerica, Massachusetts, USA; a business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - James L Gulley
- Hematology Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Manish R Patel
- Florida Cancer Specialists/Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Sarasota, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Naiki T, Iida K, Etani T, Nagai T, Tanaka Y, Sugiyama Y, Ando R, Hamamoto S, Banno R, Nagata D, Kawai N, Yasui T. Gemcitabine and docetaxel as second-line chemotherapy in elderly patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a retrospective analysis. Cancer Manag Res 2018; 10:3669-3677. [PMID: 30271215 PMCID: PMC6152597 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s172913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel (GD) as a second-line treatment for elderly patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). Patients and methods A total of 122 patients with mUC who were previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy received second-line GD therapy from July 2010 to June 2016. This consisted of 800 mg/m2 gemcitabine and 40 mg/m2 docetaxel on days 1 and 8 in each 21-day cycle. Using pooled cumulative data, we divided patients into the following three groups based on age: <65 years (Group A), from 65 to 74 years (Group B), and ≥75 years (Group C), and then the data were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were evaluated for treatment-related toxicities and assessed at every cycle by imaging studies. Kaplan-Meier curves were used for survival and recurrence analyses. Furthermore, potential prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed via univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Results The median follow-up period was 8.2 months (range: 2.1-100). The median number of treatment cycles was three (range: 1-16) in Group A, three (1-15) in Group B, and two (1-11) in Group C. The objective response rate was not significantly different between the three groups. In addition, PFS and OS from the start of second-line GD therapy were also not significantly different. According to univariate and multivariate analyses of the second-line GD-treated cohort, a good performance status was the only prognostic factor for PFS and OS. In Group C, myelosuppression including predominant neutropenia and anemia, fatigue, and nausea were the main common adverse events. However, the incidence of neutropenia and a reduction in platelets were not significantly different between the three groups. Treatment-related deaths did not occur in this study. Conclusion In this study, GD combination therapy as a second-line treatment for mUC resulted in favorable tumor responses and few treatment-related toxicities, even among elderly patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taku Naiki
- Department of Nephro-Urology, Nagoya City University, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan,
| | - Keitaro Iida
- Department of Nephro-Urology, Nagoya City University, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan,
| | - Toshiki Etani
- Department of Nephro-Urology, Nagoya City University, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan,
| | - Takashi Nagai
- Department of Urology, Anjo Kosei Hospital, Anjo, Japan
| | - Yutaro Tanaka
- Department of Nephro-Urology, Nagoya City University, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan,
| | - Yosuke Sugiyama
- Department of Pharmacy, Nagoya City University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Ryosuke Ando
- Department of Nephro-Urology, Nagoya City University, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan,
| | - Shuzo Hamamoto
- Department of Nephro-Urology, Nagoya City University, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan,
| | - Rika Banno
- Department of Urology, Konan Kosei Hospital, Konan, Japan
| | - Daisuke Nagata
- Department of Urology, Konan Kosei Hospital, Konan, Japan
| | - Noriyasu Kawai
- Department of Nephro-Urology, Nagoya City University, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan,
| | - Takahiro Yasui
- Department of Nephro-Urology, Nagoya City University, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan,
| |
Collapse
|