1
|
Campbell RA, Wood A, Michael PD, Shin D, Pramod N, Haywood SC, Eltemamy M, Weight C, Haber GP, Lee B, Myles J, McKenney J, Nguyen J, Williamson SR, Przybycin C, Alaghehbandan R, Almassi N. Impact of pathologic re-review on grade, clinical stage, and risk stratification for patients with nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:372.e21-372.e27. [PMID: 38880703 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.05.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Revised: 05/07/2024] [Accepted: 05/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Pathologic re-review of transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) specimen is a common practice at our tertiary care center, but its impact on disease risk stratification remains unknown. We sought to determine how pathologic re-review of specimen initially read at an outside institution changed grade, clinical T (cT) stage, and AUA non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) risk stratification. METHODS AND MATERIALS The laboratory information system was searched for patients who underwent TURBT from 2021 to 2022, yielding 561 records. 173 patients met inclusion criteria: 113 with RESULTS For CONCLUSIONS Re-review of TURBT pathology by a dedicated GU pathologist led to change in AUA NMIBC risk stratification in over one-fifth of patients, with potential for changing management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrew Wood
- Glickman Urologic and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Patrick D Michael
- Glickman Urologic and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - David Shin
- Glickman Urologic and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Nikhil Pramod
- Glickman Urologic and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Samuel C Haywood
- Glickman Urologic and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Mohamed Eltemamy
- Glickman Urologic and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | | | | | - Byron Lee
- Glickman Urologic and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Jonathan Myles
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Robert J. Tomsich Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Jesse McKenney
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Robert J. Tomsich Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Jane Nguyen
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Robert J. Tomsich Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Sean R Williamson
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Robert J. Tomsich Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Christopher Przybycin
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Robert J. Tomsich Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | | | - Nima Almassi
- Glickman Urologic and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Downes MR, Hartmann A, Shen S, Tsuzuki T, van Rhijn BWG, Bubendorf L, van der Kwast TH, Cheng L. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Current Issues in Bladder Cancer. Working Group 1: Comparison of Bladder Cancer Grading System Performance. Am J Surg Pathol 2024; 48:e1-e10. [PMID: 37246824 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000002059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
Grade is a key prognostic factor in determining progression in nonmuscle invasive papillary urothelial carcinomas. The 2 most common grading methods in use worldwide are the World Health Organization (WHO) 2004 and 1973 schemes. The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) organized the 2022 consensus conference in Basel, Switzerland on current issues in bladder cancer and tasked working group 1 to make recommendations for future iterations of bladder cancer grading. For this purpose, the ISUP developed in collaboration with the European Association of Urology a 10-question survey for their memberships to understand the current use of grading schemes by pathologists and urologists and to ascertain the areas of potential improvements. An additional survey was circulated to the ISUP membership for their opinion on interobserver variability in grading, reporting of urine cytology, and challenges encountered in grade assignment. Comprehensive literature reviews were performed on bladder cancer grading prognosis and interobserver variability along with The Paris System for urine cytology. There are notable differences in practice patterns between North American and European pathologists in terms of used grading scheme and diagnosis of papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential. Areas of common ground include difficulty in grade assignment, a desire to improve grading criteria, and a move towards subclassifying high-grade urothelial carcinomas. The surveys and in-person voting demonstrated a strong preference to refine current grading into a 3-tier scheme with the division of WHO 2004 high grade into clinically relevant categories. More variable opinions were voiced regarding the use of papillary urothelial carcinoma with low malignant potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle R Downes
- Precision Diagnostics & Therapeutics Program, Department of Anatomic Pathology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nurnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Steven Shen
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Toyonori Tsuzuki
- Department of Surgical Pathology, Aichi Medical University Hospital, Nagakute, Aichi Prefecture, Japan
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lukas Bubendorf
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Theodorus H van der Kwast
- Laboratory Medicine Program, Department of Anatomic Pathology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Liang Cheng
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Brown University Warren Alpert Medical School, Lifespan Academic Medical Center, and the Legorreta Cancer Center at Brown University, Providence, RI
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Beijert IJ, Cheng L, Liedberg F, Plass K, Williamson SR, Gontero P, Ribal MJ, Babjuk M, Black PC, Kamat AM, Algaba F, Berman DM, Hartmann A, Masson-Lecomte A, Rouprêt M, Lopez-Beltran A, Samaratunga H, Shariat SF, Mostafid AH, Varma M, Shen S, Burger M, Tsuzuki T, Palou J, Compérat EM, Sylvester RJ, van der Kwast TH, van Rhijn BW, Downes MR. International Opinions on Grading of Urothelial Carcinoma: A Survey Among European Association of Urology and International Society of Urological Pathology Members. EUR UROL SUPPL 2023; 52:154-165. [PMID: 37284047 PMCID: PMC10240524 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Grade of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is an important prognostic factor for progression. Currently, two World Health Organization (WHO) classification systems (WHO1973, categories: grade 1-3, and WHO2004 categories: papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential [PUNLMP], low-grade [LG], high-grade [HG] carcinoma) are used. Objective To ask the European Association of Urology (EAU) and International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) members regarding their current practice and preferences of grading systems. Design setting and participants A web-based, anonymous questionnaire with ten questions on grading of NMIBC was created. The members of EAU and ISUP were invited to complete an online survey by the end of 2021. Thirteen experts had previously answered the same questions. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis The submitted answers from 214 ISUP members, 191 EAU members, and 13 experts were analyzed. Results and limitations Currently, 53% use only the WHO2004 system and 40% use both systems. According to most respondents, PUNLMP is a rare diagnosis with management similar to Ta-LG carcinoma. The majority (72%) would consider reverting back to WHO1973 if grading criteria were more detailed. Separate reporting of WHO1973-G3 within WHO2004-HG would influence clinical decisions for Ta and/or T1 tumors according the majority (55%). Most respondents preferred a two-tier (41%) or a three-tier (41%) grading system. The current WHO2004 grading system is supported by a minority (20%), whereas nearly half (48%) supported a hybrid three- or four-tier grading system composed of both WHO1973 and WHO2004. The survey results of the experts were comparable with ISUP and EAU respondents. Conclusions Both the WHO1973 and the WHO2004 grading system are still widely used. Even though opinions on the future of bladder cancer grading were strongly divided, there was limited support for WHO1973 and WHO2004 in their current formats, while the hybrid (three-tier) grading system with LG, HG-G2, and HG-G3 as categories could be considered the most promising alternative. Patient summary Grading of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is a matter of ongoing debate and lacks international consensus. We surveyed urologists and pathologists of European Association of Urology and International Society of Urological Pathology on their preferences regarding NMIBC grading to generate a multidisciplinary dialogue. Both the "old" World Health Organization (WHO) 1973 and the "new" WHO2004 grading schemes are still used widely. However, continuation of both the WHO1973 and the WHO2004 system showed limited support, while a hybrid grading system composed of both the WHO1973 and the WHO2004 classification system may be considered a promising alternative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene J. Beijert
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Liang Cheng
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Brown University Warren Alpert Medical School, Lifespan Academic Medical Center and Legorreta Cancer Center at Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Fredrik Liedberg
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Karin Plass
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- European Association of Urology, Guidelines Office Board, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | | | - Paolo Gontero
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Maria J. Ribal
- European Association of Urology, Guidelines Office Board, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marko Babjuk
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Peter C. Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Ashish M. Kamat
- Department of Urology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ferran Algaba
- Department of Pathology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David M. Berman
- Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Alexandra Masson-Lecomte
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Université de Paris, APHP, Saint Louis Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, GRC n°5, ONCOTYPE-URO, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Antonio Lopez-Beltran
- Department of Morphological Sciences, University of Cordoba Medical School, Cordoba, Spain
- Anatomic Pathology, Champalimaud Clinical Center, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Hemamali Samaratunga
- Department of Pathology, Aquesta Uropathology and University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Shahrokh F. Shariat
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - A. Hugh Mostafid
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Murali Varma
- Department of Cellular Pathology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - Steven Shen
- Department of Pathology Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital and Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Maximilian Burger
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Toyonori Tsuzuki
- Department of Surgical Pathology, Aichi Medical University Hospital, Nagakute, Japan
| | - Joan Palou
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eva M. Compérat
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Richard J. Sylvester
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Theo H. van der Kwast
- Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Bas W.G. van Rhijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Michelle R. Downes
- Division of Anatomic Pathology, Precision Diagnostics and Therapeutics Program, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Downes MR, Lajkosz K, Kuk C, Gao B, Kulkarni GS, van der Kwast TH. The impact of grading scheme on non-muscle invasive bladder cancer progression: potential utility of hybrid grading schemes. Pathology 2022; 54:425-433. [PMID: 35074179 DOI: 10.1016/j.pathol.2021.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Revised: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) grade is a major determinant of progression risk. The most widely utilised grading systems are the World Health Organization (WHO) 1973 and 2004 schemes. Recent publications suggest the utility of combining both into a four-tier or a hybrid three-tier system, subdividing WHO 2004 high grade into two separate categories while maintaining low grade as a single group. We identified two retrospective cohorts of bladder resections/biopsies of papillary urothelial NMIBC with long term clinical follow-up. The sentinel specimen was assessed for WHO 2004 and 1973 grade, along with pathological stage and carcinoma in situ. Each case was additionally stratified into a hybrid three-tier system (low grade; high grade, grades 2 and 3) and a four-tier system (low grade, grades 1 and 2; high grade, grades 2 and 3). Uni- and multivariable analysis for progression and event free survival (PFS/EFS) were calculated along with the time dependent area under the curve (AUC) for each grading scheme. There were 609 cases (Cohort A, n=343; Cohort B, n=266), including 449 (74%) pTa, 156 pT1 (26%) and four pTx with 338 (56%) low grade (177, grade 1; 161, grade 2) and 271 (44%) high grade (137, grade 2; 134, grade 3). A total of 108 patients progressed (17.7%): 97 high grade, (grade 3, n=59; grade 2, n=38). Multivariable analyses of PFS with the hybrid 3- and 4-tier systems showed higher Harrell's concordance indices (0.851 and 0.853, respectively) than WHO 1973 (0.844) and WHO 2004 (0.846). In both cohorts AUC values were higher (0.77-0.85) for the two hybrid grading systems compared to WHO 1973 or WHO 2004 (0.72-0.82). Similar results were seen on analysis of EFS. The data support the use of a hybrid three-tier or four-tier grading system to improve stratification of NMIBC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle R Downes
- Division of Anatomic Pathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Katherine Lajkosz
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Cynthia Kuk
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Bruce Gao
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Girish S Kulkarni
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Theodorus H van der Kwast
- Department of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jackson CL, Chen L, Hardy CS, Ren KY, Visram K, Bratti VF, Johnstone J, Sjödahl G, Siemens DR, Gooding RJ, Berman DM. Diagnostic and prognostic implications of a three-antibody molecular subtyping algorithm for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY CLINICAL RESEARCH 2021; 8:143-154. [PMID: 34697907 PMCID: PMC8822375 DOI: 10.1002/cjp2.245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2021] [Revised: 08/25/2021] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Intrinsic molecular subtypes may explain marked variation between bladder cancer patients in prognosis and response to therapy. Complex testing algorithms and little attention to more prevalent, early‐stage (non‐muscle invasive) bladder cancers (NMIBCs) have hindered implementation of subtyping in clinical practice. Here, using a three‐antibody immunohistochemistry (IHC) algorithm, we identify the diagnostic and prognostic associations of well‐validated proteomic features of basal and luminal subtypes in NMIBC. By IHC, we divided 481 NMIBCs into basal (GATA3−/KRT5+) and luminal (GATA3+/KRT5 variable) subtypes. We further divided the luminal subtype into URO (p16 low), URO‐KRT5+ (KRT5+), and genomically unstable (GU) (p16 high) subtypes. Expression thresholds were confirmed using unsupervised hierarchical clustering. Subtypes were correlated with pathology and outcomes. All NMIBC cases clustered into the basal/squamous (basal) or one of the three luminal (URO, URO‐KRT5+, and GU) subtypes. Although uncommon in this NMIBC cohort, basal tumors (3%, n = 16) had dramatically higher grade (100%, n = 16, odds ratio [OR] = 13, relative risk = 3.25) and stage, and rapid progression to muscle invasion (median progression‐free survival = 35.4 months, p = 0.0001). URO, the most common subtype (46%, n = 220), showed rapid recurrence (median recurrence‐free survival [RFS] = 11.5 months, p = 0.039) compared to its GU counterpart (29%, n = 137, median RFS = 16.9 months), even in patients who received intravesical immunotherapy (p = 0.049). URO‐KRT5+ tumors (22%, n = 108) were typically low grade (66%, n = 71, OR = 3.7) and recurred slowly (median RFS = 38.7 months). Therefore, a simple immunohistochemical algorithm can identify clinically relevant molecular subtypes of NMIBC. In routine clinical practice, this three‐antibody algorithm may help clarify diagnostic dilemmas and optimize surveillance and treatment strategies for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chelsea L Jackson
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.,Division of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Lina Chen
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Céline Sc Hardy
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.,Division of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Kevin Ym Ren
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Kash Visram
- Department of Urology, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Vanessa F Bratti
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.,Division of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Jeannette Johnstone
- Department of Urology, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Gottfrid Sjödahl
- Division of Urologic Research, Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - David Robert Siemens
- Department of Urology, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Robert J Gooding
- Division of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - David M Berman
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.,Division of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Taber A, Park Y, Lelo A, Prip F, Xiao J, Berry DL, Chaldekas K, Jensen JB, Philips G, Kim JS, Harris BT, Dyrskjøt L, Waldman T. STAG2 as a prognostic biomarker in low-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Urol Oncol 2021; 39:438.e1-438.e9. [PMID: 33712344 PMCID: PMC8286298 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2020] [Revised: 01/20/2021] [Accepted: 02/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Improvements to bladder cancer risk stratification guidelines are needed to better tailor post-operative surveillance and adjuvant therapy to individual patients. We previously identified STAG2 as a commonly mutated tumor suppressor gene in bladder cancer and an independent predictor of progression in NMIBC. Here we test the value of combining STAG2 immunostaining with other risk stratification biomarkers in NMIBC, and as an individual biomarker in MIBC. MATERIALS AND METHODS STAG2 immunohistochemistry was performed on a progressor-enriched cohort of tumors from 297 patients with NMIBC, and on tumors from 406 patients with MIBC from Aarhus University Hospital in Denmark. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the log rank test, and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS STAG2-negative low-grade NMIBC tumors were 2.5 times less likely to progress to muscle invasion than STAG2-positive low-grade NMIBC tumors (Log-rank test, P = 0.008). In a composite group of patients with AUA intermediate and high-risk NMIBC tumors, STAG2-negative tumors were less likely to progress (Log-rank test, P = 0.02). In contrast to NMIBC, we show that STAG2 is not useful as a prognostic biomarker in MIBC. CONCLUSIONS STAG2 immunostaining can be used to subdivide low-grade NMIBC tumors into two groups with substantially different risks of disease progression. Furthermore, STAG2 immunostaining may be useful to enhance NMIBC risk stratification guidelines, though larger cohorts are needed to solidify this conclusion in individual risk groups. STAG2 is not useful as a biomarker in MIBC. Further study of the use of STAG2 immunostaining as a biomarker for predicting the clinical behavior in NMIBC is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann Taber
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Youngrok Park
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC; Tumor Biology Training Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC
| | - Alana Lelo
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC; Tumor Biology Training Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC
| | - Frederik Prip
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jerry Xiao
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC; Tumor Biology Training Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC
| | - Deborah L Berry
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC
| | - Krysta Chaldekas
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC
| | - Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Urology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - George Philips
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC
| | - Jung-Sik Kim
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC
| | - Brent T Harris
- Departments of Pathology and Neurology , Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC
| | - Lars Dyrskjøt
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
| | - Todd Waldman
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Amin MB, Comperat E, Epstein JI, True LD, Hansel D, Paner GP, Al-Ahmadie H, Baydar D, Bivalacqua T, Brimo F, Cheng L, Cheville J, Dalbagni G, Falzarano S, Gordetsky J, Guo CC, Gupta S, Hes O, Iyer G, Kaushal S, Kunju L, Magi-Galluzzi C, Matoso A, Netto G, Osunkoya AO, Pan CC, Pivovarcikova K, Raspollini MR, Reis H, Rosenberg J, Roupret M, Shah RB, Shariat S, Trpkov K, Weyerer V, Zhou M, McKenney J, Reuter VE. The Genitourinary Pathology Society Update on Classification and Grading of Flat and Papillary Urothelial Neoplasia With New Reporting Recommendations and Approach to Lesions With Mixed and Early Patterns of Neoplasia. Adv Anat Pathol 2021; 28:179-195. [PMID: 34128483 DOI: 10.1097/pap.0000000000000308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) undertook a critical review of the recent advances in bladder neoplasia with a focus on issues relevant to the practicing surgical pathologist for the understanding and effective reporting of bladder cancer, emphasizing particularly on the newly accumulated evidence post-2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification. The work is presented in 2 manuscripts. Here, in the first, we revisit the nomenclature and classification system used for grading flat and papillary urothelial lesions centering on clinical relevance, and on dilemmas related to application in routine reporting. As patients of noninvasive bladder cancer frequently undergo cystoscopy and biopsy in their typically prolonged clinical course and for surveillance of disease, we discuss morphologies presented in these scenarios which may not have readily applicable diagnostic terms in the WHO classification. The topic of inverted patterns in urothelial neoplasia, particularly when prominent or exclusive, and beyond inverted papilloma has not been addressed formally in the WHO classification. Herein we provide a through review and suggest guidelines for when and how to report such lesions. In promulgating these GUPS recommendations, we aim to provide clarity on the clinical application of these not so uncommon diagnostically challenging situations encountered in routine practice, while also importantly advocating consistent terminology which would inform future work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahul B Amin
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science, Memphis
- Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Eva Comperat
- Department of Pathology, Vienna General Hospital
- Medical University Department of Pathology, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne University
| | - Jonathan I Epstein
- Departments of Pathology
- Urology
- Oncology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Lawrence D True
- Department of Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Donna Hansel
- Department of Pathology, Oregon Health Science University, OR
| | | | - Hikmat Al-Ahmadie
- Departments of Pathology
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Dilek Baydar
- Department of Pathology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | | | - Liang Cheng
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | | | | | | | - Jennifer Gordetsky
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Charles C Guo
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Sounak Gupta
- Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Ondra Hes
- Department of Pathology, Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Plzen, Plzen, Czech Republic
| | | | - Seema Kaushal
- Department of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, Delhi, India
| | - Lakshmi Kunju
- Department of Pathology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | - Andres Matoso
- Departments of Pathology
- Urology
- Oncology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - George Netto
- Department of Pathology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Adeboye O Osunkoya
- Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
- Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Chin Chen Pan
- Department of Pathology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Kristina Pivovarcikova
- Department of Pathology, Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Plzen, Plzen, Czech Republic
| | - Maria R Raspollini
- Department of Histopathology and Molecular Diagnostics, University Hospital Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Henning Reis
- Institute of Pathology, University Medicine Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen
| | | | - Morgan Roupret
- GRC 5 Predictive ONCO-URO, AP-HP, Urology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Rajal B Shah
- Departments of Pathology
- Urology, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Shahrokh Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Kiril Trpkov
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Veronika Weyerer
- Department of Pathology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Ming Zhou
- Department of Pathology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Jesse McKenney
- Robert J Tomsich Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
|
9
|
Jones TD, Cheng L. Histologic Grading of Bladder Tumors: Using Both the 1973 and 2004/2016 World Health Organization Systems in Combination Provides Valuable Information for Establishing Prognostic Risk Groups. Eur Urol 2021; 79:489-491. [PMID: 33478775 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2020] [Accepted: 01/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy D Jones
- Department of Pathology, Norton Healthcare/CPA Lab, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Liang Cheng
- Department of Pathology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
van Rhijn BWG, Hentschel AE, Bründl J, Compérat EM, Hernández V, Čapoun O, Bruins HM, Cohen D, Rouprêt M, Shariat SF, Mostafid AH, Zigeuner R, Dominguez-Escrig JL, Burger M, Soukup V, Gontero P, Palou J, van der Kwast TH, Babjuk M, Sylvester RJ. Prognostic Value of the WHO1973 and WHO2004/2016 Classification Systems for Grade in Primary Ta/T1 Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: A Multicenter European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel Study. Eur Urol Oncol 2021; 4:182-191. [PMID: 33423944 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2020.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2020] [Revised: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the current European Association of Urology (EAU) non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) guideline, two classification systems for grade are advocated: WHO1973 and WHO2004/2016. OBJECTIVE To compare the prognostic value of these WHO systems. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Individual patient data for 5145 primary Ta/T1 NMIBC patients from 17 centers were collected between 1990 and 2019. The median follow-up was 3.9 yr. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Univariate and multivariable analyses of WHO1973 and WHO2004/2016 stratified by center were performed for time to recurrence, progression (primary endpoint), cystectomy, and duration of survival, taking into account age, concomitant carcinoma in situ, gender, multiplicity, tumor size, initial treatment, and tumor stage. Harrell's concordance (C-index) was used for prognostic accuracy of classification systems. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The median age was 68 yr; 3292 (64%) patients had Ta tumors. Neither classification system was prognostic for recurrence. For a four-tier combination of both WHO systems, progression at 5-yr follow-up was 1.4% in low-grade (LG)/G1, 3.8% in LG/G2, 7.7% in high grade (HG)/G2, and 18.8% in HG/G3 (log-rank, p < 0.001). In multivariable analyses with WHO1973 and WHO2004/2016 as independent variables, WHO1973 was a significant prognosticator of progression (p < 0.001), whereas WHO2004/2016 was not anymore (p = 0.067). C-indices for WHO1973, WHO2004, and the WHO systems combined for progression were 0.71, 0.67, and 0.73, respectively. Prognostic analyses for cystectomy and survival showed results similar to those for progression. CONCLUSIONS In this large prognostic factor study, both classification systems were prognostic for progression but not for recurrence. For progression, the prognostic value of WHO1973 was higher than that of WHO 2004/2016. The four-tier combination (LG/G1, LG/G2, HG/G2, and HG/G3) of both WHO systems proved to be superior, as it divides G2 patients into two subgroups (LG and HG) with different prognoses. Hence, the current EAU-NMIBC guideline recommendation to use both WHO classification systems remains correct. PATIENT SUMMARY At present, two classification systems are used in parallel to grade non-muscle-invasive bladder tumors. Our data on a large number of patients showed that the older classification system (WHO1973) performed better in terms of assessing progression than the more recent (WHO2004/2016) one. Nevertheless, we conclude that the current guideline recommendation for the use of both classification systems remains correct, since this has the advantage of dividing the large group of WHO1973 G2 patients into two subgroups (low and high grade) with different prognoses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bas W G van Rhijn
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; Surgical Oncology (Urology), University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Anouk E Hentschel
- Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes Bründl
- Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Eva M Compérat
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Pathology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Virginia Hernández
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Otakar Čapoun
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - H Maxim Bruins
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel Cohen
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Urology, Royal Free London - NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Urology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, GRC n°5, ONCOTYPE-URO, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic; Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - A Hugh Mostafid
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Richard Zigeuner
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Jose L Dominguez-Escrig
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Urology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (I.V.O.), Valencia, Spain
| | - Maximilian Burger
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Viktor Soukup
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Paolo Gontero
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Joan Palou
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Theo H van der Kwast
- Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Marko Babjuk
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic; Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Richard J Sylvester
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Jones TD, Cheng L. Reappraisal of the papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential (PUNLMP). Histopathology 2020; 77:525-535. [PMID: 32562556 DOI: 10.1111/his.14192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Although the papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential (PUNLMP) diagnostic category was retained in the updated 2016 World Health Organisation (WHO) classification of tumours of the urinary system, there still exists a great deal of controversy regarding the biological behaviour of these tumours. We review PUNLMP tumours and histological grading with an emphasis on the histomorphological, genetic and clinical similarities between PUNLMP and low-grade non-invasive papillary urothelial carcinoma. A literature search using PubMed was performed. All relevant literature concerning PUNLMP and the grading of urothelial tumours was reviewed. PUNLMPs cannot be reliably distinguished from low-grade non-invasive papillary urothelial carcinomas based on the histomorphological criteria outlined in the WHO 2004/2016 classification system. PUNLMPs and low-grade non-invasive papillary urothelial carcinomas are not only morphologically similar, but also share similar molecular genetic alterations and a similar risk of recurrence and progression. In addition, there are no consensus recommendations for a different method of treatment and follow-up for these two tumour types. Attempting to distinguish PUNLMP from low-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma adds an unnecessary level of complexity to the grading and classification of urothelial tumours. We feel that PUNLMP terminology should be abandoned and that all such tumours should be classified as low-grade carcinomas until more objective determinants of clinical outcome can be established.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy D Jones
- Department of Pathology, Norton Healthcare/CPA Laboratory, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Liang Cheng
- Department of Pathology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.,Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hentschel AE, van Rhijn BW, Bründl J, Compérat EM, Plass K, Rodríguez O, Henríquez JDS, Hernández V, de la Peña E, Alemany I, Turturica D, Pisano F, Soria F, Čapoun O, Bauerová L, Pešl M, Bruins HM, Runneboom W, Herdegen S, Breyer J, Brisuda A, Scavarda-Lamberti A, Calatrava A, Rubio-Briones J, Seles M, Mannweiler S, Bosschieter J, Kusuma VR, Ashabere D, Huebner N, Cotte J, Mertens LS, Cohen D, Lunelli L, Cussenot O, Sheikh SE, Volanis D, Coté JF, Rouprêt M, Haitel A, Shariat SF, Mostafid AH, Nieuwenhuijzen JA, Zigeuner R, Dominguez-Escrig JL, Hacek J, Zlotta AR, Burger M, Evert M, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA, van der Heijden AG, Kiemeney LA, Soukup V, Molinaro L, Gontero P, Llorente C, Algaba F, Palou J, N'Dow J, Babjuk M, van der Kwast TH, Sylvester RJ. Papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential (PUN-LMP): Still a meaningful histo-pathological grade category for Ta, noninvasive bladder tumors in 2019? Urol Oncol 2020; 38:440-448. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2019] [Revised: 09/23/2019] [Accepted: 10/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
13
|
Jansen I, Lucas M, Bosschieter J, de Boer OJ, Meijer SL, van Leeuwen TG, Marquering HA, Nieuwenhuijzen JA, de Bruin DM, Savci-Heijink CD. Automated Detection and Grading of Non-Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Cell Carcinoma of the Bladder. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY 2020; 190:1483-1490. [PMID: 32283104 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2020.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2019] [Revised: 01/24/2020] [Accepted: 03/05/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Accurate grading of non-muscle-invasive urothelial cell carcinoma is of major importance; however, high interobserver variability exists. A fully automated detection and grading network based on deep learning is proposed to enhance reproducibility. A total of 328 transurethral resection specimens from 232 patients were included, and a consensus reading by three specialized pathologists was used. The slides were digitized, and the urothelium was annotated by expert observers. The U-Net-based segmentation network was trained to automatically detect urothelium. This detection was used as input for the classification network. The classification network aimed to grade the tumors according to the World Health Organization grading system adopted in 2004. The automated grading was compared with the consensus and individual grading. The segmentation network resulted in an accurate detection of urothelium. The automated grading shows moderate agreement (κ = 0.48 ± 0.14 SEM) with the consensus reading. The agreement among pathologists ranges between fair (κ = 0.35 ± 0.13 SEM and κ = 0.38 ± 0.11 SEM) and moderate (κ = 0.52 ± 0.13 SEM). The automated classification correctly graded 76% of the low-grade cancers and 71% of the high-grade cancers according to the consensus reading. These results indicate that deep learning can be used for the fully automated detection and grading of urothelial cell carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilaria Jansen
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Marit Lucas
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Judith Bosschieter
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Onno J de Boer
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sybren L Meijer
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ton G van Leeuwen
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Henk A Marquering
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jakko A Nieuwenhuijzen
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Daniel M de Bruin
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C Dilara Savci-Heijink
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Simultaneously Quantifying Both Young's Modulus and Specific Membrane Capacitance of Bladder Cancer Cells with Different Metastatic Potential. MICROMACHINES 2020; 11:mi11030249. [PMID: 32120859 PMCID: PMC7143764 DOI: 10.3390/mi11030249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2020] [Revised: 02/23/2020] [Accepted: 02/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Both Young's modulus and specific membrane capacitance (SMC) are two important physical parameters for characterizing cell status. In this paper, we utilized a thin-neck-micropipette aspiration system to simultaneously quantify Young's modulus and SMC value of six types of cell lines in different progression grades, which include four grades from the lowest metastatic potential G1 to the highest potential G4. We investigated how these two physical properties possess heterogeneities in bladder cancer cells with different grades and what roles they might play in grading bladder cancer. The characterization results of these cells of different cancer grades is linearly correlated with the cancer grades, showing that the Young's modulus is negatively linearly correlated with bladder cancer grades, while SMC shows a positive linear correlation. Furthermore, the combination of these two physical properties on a scatter diagram clearly shows the cell groups with different cancer grades, which means that this combination could be a potential tumor grading marker to identify cancer cells with different metastatic potential.
Collapse
|
15
|
A noninvasive urine-based methylation biomarker panel to detect bladder cancer and discriminate cancer grade. Urol Oncol 2020; 38:603.e1-603.e7. [PMID: 32081560 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2019] [Revised: 01/10/2020] [Accepted: 01/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Highly sensitive and specific urinary biomarkers for the early detection of bladder cancer (BC) to improve the performance of urinary cytology are needed. OBJECTIVE To investigate the usefulness of methylation markers in voided urine to identify BC presence and grade. DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND PARTICIPANTS Using genome-wide methylation strategies in Toronto, Canada and Liège, Belgium, we have identified differentially methylated genes (TWIST1, RUNX3, GATA4, NID2, and FOXE1) in low-grade vs. high-grade BC tissue and urine. We accrued urine samples from 313 patients using a 2:1 ratio in a case-control setting from Toronto, Canada, Halifax, Canada, and Zurich, Switzerland. We studied the usefulness of these 5 methylated genes to identify BC and discriminate cancer grade in voided urine specimens. Urinary cell sediment DNA was evaluated using qPCR-based MethyLight assay. Multivariable logistic regression prediction models were created. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS We included 211 BC patients (180 nonmuscle invasive) and 102 controls. In univariate analyses, all methylated genes significantly predicted BC vs. no BC, and high grade vs. low grade (all P < 0.05). In multivariable analysis, NID2, TWIST1, and age were independent predictors of BC (all P < 0.05). Sensitivity of NID2 and TWIST1 to predict BC and BC grade was 76.2% and 77.6%, respectively, whereas specificity was 83.3% and 61.1%, respectively. Multivariable models predicting BC overall and discriminating between high-grade and low-grade BC reached area under the receiver operating characteristics curves of 0.89 and 0.78, respectively. CONCLUSIONS This multi-centric study in a real life scenario (different countries, techniques, and pathologists) supports the promise of epigenetic urinary markers in noninvasively detecting BC. With sensitivities and specificities in the range of 80%, the overall performance characteristics of this panel of methylated genes probably does not allow such signature to significantly alter clinical care at this stage but is worth further studying for instance in BC surveillance or screening in high-risk populations.
Collapse
|
16
|
Krajewski W, Rodríguez-Faba O, Breda A, Pisano F, Poletajew S, Tukiendorf A, Algaba F, Zdrojowy R, Kołodziej A, Palou J. The 1973 WHO and 2004 WHO grading systems are not equal in prediction of survival among stage T1 bladder cancer patients. Actas Urol Esp 2019; 43:467-473. [PMID: 31272800 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2019.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2019] [Revised: 03/04/2019] [Accepted: 03/19/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to analyse prognostic impact of tumour histological grade on survival differences between primary G2 and G3 WHO1973 stage T1 tumours which were graded as HG according to WHO2004 grading system. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data from 481 patients with primary T1HG bladder cancer who were treated between 1986 and 2016 in 2university centres were retrospectively reviewed. Log-rank test and Cox regression analysis was performed to compare the groups. RESULTS 95 (19,8%) tumours were classified as G2 and 386 (80,2%) were G3. Median follow-up was 68 months. The recurrence was observed in 228 (47,5%), and progression in 109 patients (22,7%). Radical cystectomy was performed in 114 pts (23,7%) and there were 64 (13,3%) cancer specific deaths. Recurrence-free rates at 5-years follow-up for G2, G3 and all patients were 68,7%, 51,2% and 56,3% and progression-free rates were 89,3%, 73,2% and 78,1% respectively. For total observation period patients with G3 tumours presented also worse recurrence-free, and progression-free survival levels than patients with G2 tumours. In multivariate analysis, after adjustment for clinical features, the risk of recurrence and progression for G3 tumours was 1,65 and 2,42 fold higher than for G2 tumours. CONCLUSIONS It was shown that G3 T1 tumours are characterized by worse recurrence free and progression free survivals when compared to G2 cancers.
Collapse
|
17
|
Bosschieter J, Hentschel AE, Savci-Heijink CD, van der Voorn JP, Rozendaal RL, Vis AN, Zwartkruis EC, Lissenberg-Witte BI, van Moorselaar RJA, Nieuwenhuijzen JA. Objectifying grade in Ta-T1 urothelial carcinomas of the bladder using proliferative and quantitative markers: A multicentre study in 310 bladder tumors. Urol Oncol 2019; 37:530.e1-530.e8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2018] [Revised: 03/02/2019] [Accepted: 03/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
18
|
March-Villalba JA, Ramos-Soler D, Soriano-Sarrió P, Hervás-Marín D, Martínez-García L, Martínez-Jabaloyas JM. Immunohistochemical expression of Ki-67, Cyclin D1, p16INK4a, and Survivin as a predictive tool for recurrence and progression-free survival in papillary urothelial bladder cancer pTa / pT1 G2 (WHO 1973). Urol Oncol 2019; 37:158-165. [PMID: 30446453 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2018] [Revised: 08/11/2018] [Accepted: 10/01/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - José María Martínez-Jabaloyas
- Department of Urology, University Clinic Hospital of Valencia. Surgery Department, Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|