1
|
Song B, Kim JK, Lee H, Lee S, Hong SK, Byun SS, Oh JJ. Evaluation of histological variants of upper tract urothelial carcinoma as prognostic factor after radical nephroureterectomy. World J Urol 2024; 42:225. [PMID: 38592495 PMCID: PMC11003889 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04878-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the impact of variant histology on patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) survival outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 519 patients underwent radical nephroureterectomy without neoadjuvant therapy for UTUC at a single institution between May 2003 and December 2019. Multivariate Cox regression analysis evaluated the impact of variant histology on progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Among 84 patients (16.2%) with variant histology, the most frequent variant type was squamous cell differentiation (64.3%), followed by glandular differentiation (25.0%) and sarcomatoid variant (2.4%). They showed pathologically advanced T stage (for ≥ T3, 59.5% vs 33.3%, p < 0.001), higher tumor grade (96.4% vs 85.7%, p = 0.025), and higher rates of lymph node metastasis (17.9% vs 7.8%, p = 0.015), angiolymphatic invasion (41.7% vs 25.7%, p = 0.003), tumor necrosis (57.1% vs 29.0%, p < 0.001) and positive surgical margin (13.1% vs 5.7%, p = 0.015). On multivariate Cox regression analyses, variant histology was significantly associated with worse PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.23; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.55-3.21; p < 0.001), CSS (HR 2.67; 95% CI 1.35-5.30; p = 0.005) and OS (HR 2.22; 95% CI 1.27-3.88; p = 0.005). In subgroup analysis, no significant survival gains of adjuvant chemotherapy occurred in patients with variant histology. CONCLUSIONS Variant histology was associated with adverse pathologic features and poor survival outcomes. Our results suggest that patients with variant histology may require a close follow-up schedule and novel adjuvant therapy other than chemotherapy postoperatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Byeongdo Song
- Department of Urology, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Guri, Kyunggi-Do, South Korea, 11923
| | - Jung Kwon Kim
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 300, Gumi-Dong, Bundang-Gu, Seongnam, Kyunggi-Do, South Korea, 13605
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hakmin Lee
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 300, Gumi-Dong, Bundang-Gu, Seongnam, Kyunggi-Do, South Korea, 13605
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sangchul Lee
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 300, Gumi-Dong, Bundang-Gu, Seongnam, Kyunggi-Do, South Korea, 13605
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sung Kyu Hong
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 300, Gumi-Dong, Bundang-Gu, Seongnam, Kyunggi-Do, South Korea, 13605
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Seok-Soo Byun
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 300, Gumi-Dong, Bundang-Gu, Seongnam, Kyunggi-Do, South Korea, 13605
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jong Jin Oh
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 300, Gumi-Dong, Bundang-Gu, Seongnam, Kyunggi-Do, South Korea, 13605.
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yu TY, Wang HJ, Sung MT, Chuang YC, Chen YT, Cheng YT, Kang CH, Liu HY, Chang YL, Luo HL. Variant histology is associated with more non-urothelial tract recurrence but less intravesical recurrence for upper tract urothelial carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy. Int J Urol 2024; 31:410-418. [PMID: 38169055 DOI: 10.1111/iju.15376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the prognostic impact of variant histology (VH) on oncological outcomes in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) who had undergone radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 1239 patients with clinically localized UTUC who underwent RNU at a single institution between January 2005 and June 2020 were included. The VH was reviewed by a uro-pathologist at our institution. The Cox regression model was used to perform multivariate analysis, including VH and other established prognostic factors for post-RNU oncological outcomes (intravesical recurrence [IVR], non-urothelial recurrence, and cancer-specific death). RESULTS Of the 1239 patients with UTUC, 384 patients (31%) were found to have VH. Advanced tumor stage, lymph node metastasis, high tumor grade, lymphovascular invasion, open surgery, and renal pelvis had a significantly larger proportion of UTUC with VH compared to pure UTUC (all p < 0.05). VH was an independent prognostic factor associated with less IVR identified by multivariate analysis, more non-urothelial recurrence, and more cancer-specific mortality. CONCLUSION Patients with VH account for 31% with UTUC treated with RNU in this cohort. VH was an independent prognostic factor associated with more non-urothelial recurrence and cancer-specific mortality but less IVR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsung Yu Yu
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University and College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Hung Jen Wang
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University and College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Min Tse Sung
- Department of Pathology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yao Chi Chuang
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University and College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Center for Shockwave Medicine and Tissue Engineering, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yen Ta Chen
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University and College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yuan Tso Cheng
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University and College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chih Hsiung Kang
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University and College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Hui Ying Liu
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University and College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yin Lun Chang
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University and College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Hao Lun Luo
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University and College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Center for Shockwave Medicine and Tissue Engineering, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Douglawi A, Ghoreifi A, Carbonara U, Yip W, Uzzo RG, Margulis V, Ferro M, Cobelli OD, Wu Z, Simone G, Mastroianni R, Rha KH, Eun DD, Reese AC, Porter JR, Derweesh I, Mehrazin R, Rosiello G, Tellini R, Jamil M, Kenigsberg A, Farrow JM, Schrock WP, Cacciamani G, Srivastava A, Bhattu AS, Mottrie A, Gonzalgo ML, Sundaram CP, Abdollah F, Minervini A, Autorino R, Djaladat H. Impact of Variant Histology on Oncological Outcomes in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Results From the ROBUUST Collaborative Group. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2023; 21:563-568. [PMID: 37301663 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Revised: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Oncologic implications of variant histology (VH) have been extensively studied in bladder cancer; however, further investigation is needed in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Our study aims to evaluate the impact of VH on oncological outcomes in UTUC patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who underwent a robotic or laparoscopic RNU for UTUC using the ROBUUST database, a multi-institutional collaborative including 17 centers worldwide. Logistic regression was used to assess the effect of VH on urothelial recurrence (bladder, contralateral upper tract), metastasis, and survival following RNU. RESULTS A total of 687 patients were included in this study. Median (IQR) age was 71 (64-78) years and 470 (68%) had organ confined disease. VH was present in 70 (10.2%) patients. In a median follow-up of 16 months, the incidence of urothelial recurrence, metastasis, and mortality was 26.8%, 15.3%, and 11.8%, respectively. VH was associated with increased risk of metastasis (HR 4.3, P <.0001) and death (HR 2.0, P =.046). In multivariable analysis, VH was noted to be an independent risk factor for metastasis (HR 1.8, P =.03) but not for urothelial recurrence (HR 0.99, P =.97) or death (HR 1.4, P =.2). CONCLUSION Variant histology can be found in 10% of patients with UTUC and is an independent risk factor for metastasis following RNU. Overall survival rates and the risk of urothelial recurrence in the bladder or contralateral kidney are not affected by the presence of VH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoin Douglawi
- Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Alireza Ghoreifi
- Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Umberto Carbonara
- Division of Urology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Wesley Yip
- Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Robert G Uzzo
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Matteo Ferro
- Department of Urology, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia (IEO), Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio De Cobelli
- Department of Urology, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia (IEO), Milan, Italy
| | - Zhenjie Wu
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Hospital, Naval Medical University Shanghai, China
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- Istituto Regina Elena (IRE), Department of Urology, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Koon H Rha
- Department of Urology, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Daniel D Eun
- Department of Urology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Adam C Reese
- Department of Urology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Ithaar Derweesh
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Reza Mehrazin
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Department of Urology, New York, NY
| | - Giuseppe Rosiello
- Onze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis (OLV), Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | - Riccardo Tellini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Marcus Jamil
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI
| | - Alexander Kenigsberg
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Jason M Farrow
- Department of Urology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN
| | | | | | | | - Amit S Bhattu
- Department of Urology, University of Miami, Miami, FL
| | - Alexandre Mottrie
- Onze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis (OLV), Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | | | | | - Firas Abdollah
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Hooman Djaladat
- Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Franco A, Ditonno F, Feng C, Manfredi C, Sturgis MR, Farooqi M, Del Giudice F, Coogan C, Ferro M, Zhang C, Wu Z, Yang B, Wang L, Autorino R. Minimally Invasive Radical Nephroureterectomy: 5-Year Update of Techniques and Outcomes. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4585. [PMID: 37760553 PMCID: PMC10527300 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Revised: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The gold standard treatment for non-metastatic upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) is represented by radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). The choice of surgical technique in performing UTUC surgery continues to depend on several factors, including the location and extent of the tumor, the patient's overall health, and very importantly, the surgeon's skill, experience, and preference. Although open and laparoscopic approaches are well-established treatments, evidence regarding robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomy (RANU) is growing. Aim of our study was to perform a critical review on the evidence of the last 5 years regarding surgical techniques and outcomes of minimally invasive RNU, mostly focusing on RANU. Reported oncological and function outcomes suggest that minimally invasive RNU is safe and effective, showing similar survival rates compared to the open approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Franco
- Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, USA; (A.F.); (F.D.); (C.F.); (C.M.); (M.R.S.); (M.F.); (C.C.)
- Department of Urology, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, 00189 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Ditonno
- Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, USA; (A.F.); (F.D.); (C.F.); (C.M.); (M.R.S.); (M.F.); (C.C.)
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, University of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy
| | - Carol Feng
- Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, USA; (A.F.); (F.D.); (C.F.); (C.M.); (M.R.S.); (M.F.); (C.C.)
| | - Celeste Manfredi
- Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, USA; (A.F.); (F.D.); (C.F.); (C.M.); (M.R.S.); (M.F.); (C.C.)
- Urology Unit, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Morgan R. Sturgis
- Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, USA; (A.F.); (F.D.); (C.F.); (C.M.); (M.R.S.); (M.F.); (C.C.)
| | - Mustafa Farooqi
- Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, USA; (A.F.); (F.D.); (C.F.); (C.M.); (M.R.S.); (M.F.); (C.C.)
| | - Francesco Del Giudice
- Department of Maternal Infant and Urologic Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy;
| | - Christopher Coogan
- Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, USA; (A.F.); (F.D.); (C.F.); (C.M.); (M.R.S.); (M.F.); (C.C.)
| | - Matteo Ferro
- Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Chao Zhang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; (C.Z.); (Z.W.); (B.Y.); (L.W.)
| | - Zhenjie Wu
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; (C.Z.); (Z.W.); (B.Y.); (L.W.)
| | - Bo Yang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; (C.Z.); (Z.W.); (B.Y.); (L.W.)
| | - Linhui Wang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; (C.Z.); (Z.W.); (B.Y.); (L.W.)
| | - Riccardo Autorino
- Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, USA; (A.F.); (F.D.); (C.F.); (C.M.); (M.R.S.); (M.F.); (C.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang J, Zuo X, Zhang Y, Wang W, Zhou D, Liu W, Han G, Wu C, Tian D. The impact of histological variants in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with radical nephroureterectomy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023:10.1007/s00432-023-04763-6. [PMID: 37072553 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-04763-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Accepted: 04/08/2023] [Indexed: 04/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the impact of histological variants (HV) in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and analyze the potential association between HV and postoperative bladder recurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS The medical records of UTUC patients treated with RNU at our center from January 2012 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were grouped according to the types of HV. Clinicopathological features and prognostic factors were compared among groups. RESULTS A total of 629 patients were included in the study: 458 (73%) patients had pure urothelial carcinoma (PUC) and 171 (27%) patients had UTUC with HV. Squamous differentiation was the most common type (124 cases, 19%), followed by glandular differentiation (29 cases, 5.0%). Patients with HV had a higher proportion of T3 and T4 pathologic stages (P < 0.001) as well as high-grade disease (P = 0.002). In the univariate analysis, squamous differentiation and glandular differentiation were significantly associated with worse cancer-specific survival (CSS) (HR 2.22, 95% CI 1.62-3.04, P < 0.001; HR 1.90, 95% CI 1.13-3.20, P = 0.016). However, the multivariate analysis showed that this association became non-significant. We found that HV were associated with recurrent muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) after RNU and all patients had T2 and T3 initial tumor stages (P = 0.008, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION We found that UTUC patients with HV were associated with biologically aggressive disease and recurrent MIBC after RNU. The detection of bladder recurrence following surgery needs to be given more attention in advanced UTUC patients with HV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian Wang
- Department of Urology, Tianjin Institute of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, PingJiang Road 23, HeXi District, Tianjin, 300211, China
| | - Xiepeng Zuo
- Department of Urology, Tianjin Institute of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, PingJiang Road 23, HeXi District, Tianjin, 300211, China
| | - Yu Zhang
- Department of Urology, Tianjin Institute of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, PingJiang Road 23, HeXi District, Tianjin, 300211, China
- Department of Urology, The Eco-City Hospital of Tianjin Fifth Central Hospital, Tianjin, 300211, China
| | - Weiwei Wang
- Department of Urology, Tianjin Institute of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, PingJiang Road 23, HeXi District, Tianjin, 300211, China
| | - Diansheng Zhou
- Department of Urology, Tianjin Institute of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, PingJiang Road 23, HeXi District, Tianjin, 300211, China
| | - Wenbo Liu
- Department of Urology, Tianjin Institute of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, PingJiang Road 23, HeXi District, Tianjin, 300211, China
| | - Guoqiang Han
- Department of Urology, Tianjin Institute of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, PingJiang Road 23, HeXi District, Tianjin, 300211, China
| | - Changli Wu
- Department of Urology, Tianjin Institute of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, PingJiang Road 23, HeXi District, Tianjin, 300211, China.
| | - Dawei Tian
- Department of Urology, Tianjin Institute of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, PingJiang Road 23, HeXi District, Tianjin, 300211, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Song E, Suek T, Davaro F, Hamilton Z. Variant histology in upper tract carcinomas: Analysis of the National Cancer Database. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:206.e1-206.e9. [PMID: 36822992 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.01.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Revised: 01/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Upper urinary tract malignancies are relatively uncommon, with the majority representing urothelial carcinoma (UC). Variant histology (VH) is rare but has been increasingly shown to confer worse prognoses, and standardized approaches to treatment for upper tract cancers with VH have not been established. Our study aimed to analyze outcomes amongst various treatment modalities for upper tract malignancies based on VH subtype. Additionally, we stratified mortality outcomes associated with the upper tract tumors based on their primary location in the renal pelvis (RP) versus ureter. METHODS The National Cancer Database was queried for patients who were diagnosed with upper tract malignancy of the RP or ureter from 2005 to 2016. Populations were grouped based on tumor location (RP vs. ureter) and substratified based on tumor histology (UC vs. VH). Cox regression (CR) was used for multivariable survival analysis. RESULTS A total of 63,826 patients with upper tract malignancies met inclusion criteria: 36,692 (57.5%) cases involving the RP and 27,134 (42.5%) cases involving the ureter. VH was noted in 2.5% of all tumors with the squamous cell variant being the most common subtype (62.5%). VH presented with higher stage, increased mortality, and higher proportion of metastatic disease relative to UC. Patients with VH were less likely to undergo surgical intervention and more likely to receive radiation or adjuvant chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with tumor downstaging for VH. On multivariable CR, receiving definitive surgical excision improved survival for patients with any VH, and chemotherapy improved survival for patients with renal VH. On subanalysis of CR by VH subtype, survival benefits for surgery were significant for adenocarcinoma, neuroendocrine, and squamous in a renal location and adenocarcinoma, neuroendocrine, sarcoma, and squamous in a ureteral location. Additionally, benefits of chemotherapy were significant for adenocarcinoma in a renal location and neuroendocrine in a ureteral location. CONCLUSION Patients with upper tract VH are more likely to present at advanced stages and experience higher mortality rates when compared to pure UC. Generally, survival benefits are seen with either surgical excision or chemotherapy for renal VH and with surgical excision for ureteral VH, but mortality rates for these treatment modalities differ amongst specific subtypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Song
- Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Timothy Suek
- Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Facundo Davaro
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Zachary Hamilton
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sharma G, Yadav AK, Pareek T, Kaundal P, Tyagi S, Devana SK, Singh SK. Impact of pathological factors on survival in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Braz J Urol 2022; 48:406-455. [PMID: 34003609 PMCID: PMC9060157 DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2020.1032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is an ongoing need to identify various pathological factors that can predict various survival parameters in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). With this review, we aim to scrutinize the impact of several pathological factors on recurrence free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with UTUC. MATERIALS AND METHODS Systematic electronic literature search of various databases was conducted for this review. Studies providing multivariate hazard ratios (HR) for various pathological factors such as tumor margin, necrosis, stage, grade, location, architecture, lymph node status, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), carcinoma in situ (CIS), multifocality and variant histology as predictor of survival parameters were included and pooled analysis of HR was performed. RESULTS In this review, 63 studies with 35.714 patients were included. For RFS, all except tumor location (HR 0.94, p=0.60) and necrosis (HR 1.00, p=0.98) were associated with worst survival. All the pathological variables except tumor location (HR 0.95, p=0.66) were associated with worst CSS. For OS, only presence of CIS (HR 1.03, p=0.73) and tumor location (HR 1.05, p=0.74) were not predictor of survival. CONCLUSIONS We noted tumor grade, stage, presence of LVI, lymph node metastasis, hydronephrosis, variant histology, sessile architecture, margin positivity and multifocality were associated with poor RFS, CSS and OS. Presence of CIS was associated with poor RFS and CSS but not OS. Tumor necrosis was associated with worst CSS and OS but not RFS. Tumor location was not a predictor of any of the survival parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gopal Sharma
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and ResearchDepartment of UrologyChandigarhIndiaDepartment of Urology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Anuj Kumar Yadav
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and ResearchDepartment of UrologyChandigarhIndiaDepartment of Urology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Tarun Pareek
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and ResearchDepartment of UrologyChandigarhIndiaDepartment of Urology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Pawan Kaundal
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and ResearchDepartment of UrologyChandigarhIndiaDepartment of Urology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Shantanu Tyagi
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and ResearchDepartment of UrologyChandigarhIndiaDepartment of Urology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Sudheer Kumar Devana
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and ResearchDepartment of UrologyChandigarhIndiaDepartment of Urology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Shrawan Kumar Singh
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and ResearchDepartment of UrologyChandigarhIndiaDepartment of Urology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lo CW, Li WM, Ke HL, Chang YH, Wu HC, Chen IHA, Lin JT, Huang CY, Chen CH, Tseng JS, Lin WR, Jiang YH, Lee YK, Tsai CY, Chung SD, Hsueh TY, Chiu AW, Jou YC, Cheong IS, Chen YT, Chen JS, Chiang BJ, Yu CC, Lin WY, Wu CC, Chen CS, Weng HY, Tsai YC. Impact of Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Variant Histology of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Analysis. Front Oncol 2022; 12:843715. [PMID: 35530335 PMCID: PMC9072967 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.843715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The advantage of adjuvant chemotherapy for upper urinary tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) has been reported, whereas its impact on upper tract cancer with variant histology remains unclear. We aimed to answer the abovementioned question with our real-world data. Design, Setting, and Participants Patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) and were confirmed to have variant UTUC were retrospectively evaluated for eligibility of analysis. In the Taiwan UTUC Collaboration database, we identified 245 patients with variant UTUC among 3,109 patients with UTUC who underwent RNU after excluding patients with missing clinicopathological information. Intervention Those patients with variant UTUC were grouped based on their history of receiving adjuvant chemotherapy or not. Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis Propensity score matching was used to reduce the treatment assignment bias. Multivariable Cox regression model was used for the analysis of overall, cancer-specific, and disease-free survival. Results and Limitations For the patients with variant UTUC who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy compared with those without chemotherapy, survival benefit was identified in overall survival in univariate analysis (hazard ratio (HR), 0.527; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.285–0.973; p = 0.041). In addition, in multivariate analysis, patients with adjuvant chemotherapy demonstrated significant survival benefits in cancer-specific survival (OS; HR, 0.454; CI, 0.208–0.988; p = 0.047), and disease-free survival (DFS; HR, 0.324; 95% CI, 0.155–0.677; (p = 0.003). The main limitations of the current study were its retrospective design and limited case number. Conclusions Adjuvant chemotherapy following RNU significantly improved cancer-related survivals in patients with UTUC with variant histology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chi-Wen Lo
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzuchi Hospital, The Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Ming Li
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Ministry of Health and Welfare Pingtung Hospital, Pingtung, Taiwan
- Cohort Research Center, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Hung-Lung Ke
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Ministry of Health and Welfare Pingtung Hospital, Pingtung, Taiwan
- Cohort Research Center, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Huei Chang
- Department of Urology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, China Medical University Beigang Hospital, Yunlin, Taiwan
| | - Hsi-Chin Wu
- Department of Urology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, China Medical University Beigang Hospital, Yunlin, Taiwan
| | - I-Hsuan Alan Chen
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Tai Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Yuan Huang
- Department of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, and National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chung-Hsin Chen
- Department of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, and National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Shu Tseng
- Department of Urology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Medicine, Mackay Medical College, Taipei, Taiwan
- Institute of Biomedical Informatics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wun-Rong Lin
- Department of Urology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Medicine, Mackay Medical College, Taipei, Taiwan
- Institute of Biomedical Informatics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yuan-Hong Jiang
- Department of Urology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation and Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Khun Lee
- Department of Urology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation and Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Chung-You Tsai
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Healthcare Information and Management, Ming Chuan University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Shiu-Dong Chung
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Nursing, College of Healthcare and Management, Asia Eastern University of Science and Technology, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- General Education Center, Eastern University of Science and Technology, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Thomas Y. Hsueh
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei City Hospital Renai Branch, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Allen W. Chiu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei City Hospital Renai Branch, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yeong-Chin Jou
- Department of Urology, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chiayi Christian Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
- Department of Health and Nutrition Biotechnology, Asian University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Ian-Seng Cheong
- Department of Urology, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chiayi Christian Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
- Department of Health and Nutrition Biotechnology, Asian University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Yung-Tai Chen
- Department of Urology, Taiwan Adventist Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jih-Sheng Chen
- Department of Urology, Taiwan Adventist Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Bing-Juin Chiang
- College of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Cardinal Tien Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Life Science, College of Science, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Chin Yu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzuchi Hospital, The Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Wei Yu Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chia-Yi, Taiwan
- Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Chia-Yi, Taiwan
- Department of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Chang Wu
- Department of Urology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Taipei Medical University Research Center of Urology and Kidney (TMU-RCUK), Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chuan-Shu Chen
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung City, Taiwan
- Department of Senior Citizen Service Management, National Taichung University of Science and Technology, Taichung City, Taiwan
| | - Han-Yu Weng
- Department of Urology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Yao-Chou Tsai
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzuchi Hospital, The Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
- *Correspondence: Yao-Chou Tsai,
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Low Hemoglobin-to-Red Cell Distribution Width Ratio Is Associated with Disease Progression and Poor Prognosis in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Biomedicines 2021; 9:biomedicines9060672. [PMID: 34208273 PMCID: PMC8230812 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines9060672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Revised: 06/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The importance of blood cell markers in patients with malignant tumors has been studied, but there are few studies on the prognostic value of hemoglobin-to-red cell distribution width ratio (HRR) in cancer. This is the first study to investigate the effect of preoperative HRR on patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Our retrospective cohort study included 730 UTUC patients who underwent nephroureterectomy from 2000 to 2019. Clinicopathological parameters were compared according to HRR levels, and the relationship between blood cell markers (HRR, white blood cell [WBC] count, platelet count) and prognosis was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model. We found that patients with HRR ≤ 1.05 tended to have worse renal function, higher pathological stages, and more high-grade tumors. In univariate analysis, HRR ≤ 1.05, WBC > 8.65 × 103 cells/μL and platelets >309 × 103 cells/μL were associated with poor progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that HRR ≤ 1.05 and WBC > 8.65 × 103 cells/μL were independent prognostic factors for predicting deterioration of PFS, CSS, and OS. In conclusion, HRR and WBC are easy to obtain in clinical practice and are useful indicators to provide prognostic information before surgery for UTUC.
Collapse
|
10
|
Sfakianos JP, Gul Z, Shariat SF, Matin SF, Daneshmand S, Plimack E, Lerner S, Roupret M, Pal S. Genetic Differences Between Bladder and Upper Urinary Tract Carcinoma: Implications for Therapy. Eur Urol Oncol 2020; 4:170-179. [PMID: 33386276 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2020.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Revised: 11/25/2020] [Accepted: 12/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Bladder urothelial carcinoma (BUC) and upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) have genetic differences, which may influence therapy. OBJECTIVE The aim of the current review was to summarize the current genetic understanding of upper tract and BUC. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science online databases were searched systematically up to February 2020, using the following keywords: urothelial carcinomas, upper urinary tract, renal pelvis, ureter, bladder cancer, and genetics. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS UTUC and BUC share mutations in similar genes, such as FGFR3, TP53, and HRAS, and epigenetic genes, such as KDM6A and KMT2A-C, but at varying frequencies. Furthermore, subtyping of UTUC and BUC has identified similar expression subtypes, but UTUC is more often luminal with more T-cell depletion. Clonal studies indicate that BUC after UTUC is also likely luminal, while UTUC after BUC is often basal. CONCLUSIONS UTUC and BUC share many genomic alterations, but at different frequencies, which recapitulate with their metachronous recurrences. These differences likely contribute to the behavior of these two cancers and imply that they and their metachronous recurrences should be treated as two related yet distinct entities. PATIENT SUMMARY Urothelial carcinoma of the bladder has distinct genomic features, which are different from distinct genomic features of urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis and/or ureter. These features can be used for tailored treatment options specific to tumors of different locations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John P Sfakianos
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Zeynep Gul
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Surena F Matin
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Siamak Daneshmand
- Institute of Urology and USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Seth Lerner
- Scott Department of Urology, Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Morgan Roupret
- Urology Department, GRC n°5, Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Sumanta Pal
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mori K, Janisch F, Mostafaei H, Lysenko I, Kimura S, Egawa S, Shariat SF. Prognostic value of preoperative blood-based biomarkers in upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with nephroureterectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Oncol 2020; 38:315-333. [PMID: 32088103 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2019] [Revised: 01/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the prognostic value of preoperative blood-based biomarkers in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with nephroureterectomy. METHODS PUBMED, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases were searched in June 2019 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis statement. Studies were deemed eligible if they compared cancer-specific survival in UTUC patients with and without pretreatment laboratory abnormalities. Formal meta-analyses were performed for this outcome. RESULTS The review identified 54 studies with 23,118 patients, of these, 52 studies with 22,513 patients were eligible for the meta-analysis. Several preoperative blood-based biomarkers were significantly associated with cancer-specific survival as follows: neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (pooled hazard ratio [HR]: 1.66, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.34-2.06), C-reactive protein (pooled HR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.07-1.29), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (pooled HR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.30-2.17), white blood cell (pooled HR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.02-2.46), De Ritis ratio (pooled HR: 2.40, 95% CI: 1.92-2.99), fibrinogen (pooled HR: 2.23, 95% CI: 1.86-2.68), albumin-globulin ratio (pooled HR: 3.00, 95% CI: 1.87-4.84), hemoglobin (pooled HR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.22-1.87), and estimate glomerular filtration rate (pooled HR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.19-1.94). The Cochrane's Q test and I2 test revealed significant heterogeneity for neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, C-reactive protein, white blood cell, hemoglobin, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (P = 0.022; I2 = 50.7%, P = 0.000; I2 = 80.4%, P = 0.000; I2 = 88.3%, P = 0.010; I2 = 62.0%, P = 0.000; I2 = 83.9%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Several pretreatment laboratory abnormalities in patients with UTUC were associated with increased risks of cancer-specific mortality. Therefore, blood-based biomarkers may have the potential to serve as prognostic factors to assist patients and physicians in selecting appropriate treatment strategies for UTUC. However, considering the study limitations including heterogeneity and retrospective nature of the primary data, the conclusions should be interpreted with caution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Florian Janisch
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Ivan Lysenko
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Shoji Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shin Egawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tully KH, Krimphove MD MJ, Huynh MJ, Marchese M, Kibel AS, Noldus J, Kluth LA, McGregor B, Chang SL, Trinh QD, Mossanen M. Differences in survival and impact of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with variant histology of tumors of the renal pelvis. World J Urol 2019; 38:2227-2236. [DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-03003-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2019] [Accepted: 10/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
|