Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results From a Large Single-Institution Series

Evaluation of American Urological Association Renal Cell Carcinoma Risk Groups for Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To develop and compare various models for risk stratification in chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chrRCC). Models have been developed to predict progression-free (PFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) following surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Notably, chromophobe RCC (chrRCC) is not included in American Urological Association (AUA) risk stratification, as nuclear grading is not recommended.

METHODS

We queried our institutional registry to identify patients managed surgically for unilateral, sporadic, M0, chrRCC from 1970-2012. AUA risk groups were defined using reported criteria, excluding grade, and were compared to the Mayo system incorporating nodal involvement, perinephric/renal sinus fat invasion, and sarcomatoid differentiation. PFS and CSS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Predictive ability was summarized using c-indexes from Cox proportional hazard regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 257 patients were identified. Thirty-nine patients experienced disease progression at a median 30 months (IQR 5.0-84) and 25 died from chrRCC at a median 34 months (IQR 15-79) following surgery. PFS and CSS rates at 10 years after surgery were 84% and 90%, respectively. C-indexes for modified AUA and Mayo risk groups were similar at 0.76 and 0.75, respectively, for PFS, and 0.77 and 0.76, respectively for CSS.

CONCLUSION

The modified AUA and Mayo risk stratification systems have similarly robust c-indexes for PFS and CSS in chrRCC. These models can be used to counsel patients based on pathologic features, inform clinicians on appropriate follow-up pathways, and identify patients at risk of disease progression for enrollment in adjuvant systemic therapy trials.

Grading Challenges and Prognostic Insights in Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study of 72 Patients

Chromophobe RCC (ChRCC) carries the best prognosis among all RCC subtypes, yet it lacks a proper grading system. Various systems have been suggested in the past, causing much controversy, and Avulova et al. recently proposed a promising four-tier grading system that takes into consideration tumor necrosis. Dysregulation of the mammalian target of the rapamycin (mTOR) pathway plays a key role in ChRCC pathogenesis, highlighting its molecular complexity. The present retrospective study aimed to evaluate the prognostic factors associated with a more aggressive ChRCC phenotype. Materials and Methods: Seventy-two patients diagnosed with ChRCC between 2004 and 2017 were included in our study. Pathology reports and tissue blocks were reviewed, and immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed in order to assess the expressions of CYLD (tumor-suppressor gene) and mTOR, among other markers. Univariate analysis was performed, and OS was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: In our study, 74% of patients were male, with a mean age of 60 years, and the mean tumor size was 63 mm (±44). The majority (54%) were followed for more than 10 years at intervals ranging between 44 and 222 months. The risk of death was significantly higher for patients that were classified as Grade 4 in the Avulova system (HR: 5.83; 95% CI, 1.37-24.7; p: = 0.017). As far as the IHC is concerned, mTOR expression was associated with an HR of 8.57 (95% CI, 1.91-38.5; p = 0.005), and CYLD expression was associated with an HR of 17.3 (95% CI, 1.57-192; p = 0.02). Conclusions: In our study, the Avulova grading system seems to be positively correlated with OS in patients diagnosed with ChRCC. Furthermore, an elevated mTOR expression also shows a negative correlation with OS, whereas an elevated CYLD expression does not seem to exert a protective role. However, because only a small proportion (4.2%) of our patients died due to ChRCC, despite the long follow-up period, the results must be interpreted with caution. Further research is needed to validate our findings.

Current Status and Challenges in Rare Genitourinary Cancer Research and Future Directions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In contemporary urological practice, managing rare genitourinary (GU) malignancies presents significant challenges, necessitating a comprehensive understanding of their unique characteristics and tailored treatment approaches.

RECENT FINDINGS

Rare GU malignancies, whether per se, variants of common histologies, or common tumors in uncommon locations, often lack widely available clinical guidelines. Consequently, treatment decisions are frequently based on empirical evidence, risking suboptimal outcomes. However, recent advances in molecular profiling, targeted therapies, and immunotherapy offer promising avenues for improving management strategies and patient outcomes. This review provides a comprehensive overview of some rare GU malignancies encountered in clinical practice, including their distinct pathological features, current management approaches, and ongoing research directions. Understanding the complexities of these rare tumors and implementing multidisciplinary treatment strategies are essential for optimizing patient care and improving survival outcomes.

Combined Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma and Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Case Report

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a diverse array of cancers arising from renal tubular epithelial cells. RCC presenting with distinct morphological subtypes, such as the simultaneous presence of chromophobe RCC (chRCC) and clear cell RCC (ccRCC) lesions within the same kidney, is rare. We present the case of a 79-year-old female with a history of breast cancer who presented to our facility with right flank pain. Further investigations using CT of the abdomen and pelvis revealed a Bosniak type 4 cyst with a mural nodule in the right kidney. Furthermore, another well-defined, solid lesion measuring 2.8 × 2.6 cm was observed in the same area. The patient underwent a right radical nephrectomy. The macroscopic examination of the kidney revealed the presence of three cysts, with the largest measuring up to 7.5 cm. Moreover, a distinctly demarcated, golden-yellow, solid mass was discerned in the superior pole of the kidney. The mass showed a heterogeneous cut surface with solid and cystic components, measuring 2.8 × 2.6 × 2.0 cm. A less extensive but well-defined, uniform tan mass was also identified within the wall of the largest cyst, which measured 1.2 × 1.0 × 0.7 cm. At this point, the diagnosis of ccRCC and chRCC was established.

A case-report of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma with renal subcapsular hematoma

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (CHRCC) is a rare subtype of renal cancer, accompanied by subcapsular renal hematoma (SRH) without a history of traumatic or hemorrhagic disease, which is clinically rare. The reason for CHRCC with SRH may be caused by tumor rupture or vascular rupture. In the early stage, it is often asymptomatic and can be easily overlooked and misdiagnosed, leading to delayed treatment and serious consequences.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 39-year-old female patient was admitted to the emergency department due to sudden dull pain and discomfort in the lower back. Subsequent ultrasound, CT, and MRI imaging examinations revealed the presence of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma with a volume of 4.5 × 3.5 × 3 cm in the middle and lower pole of the right kidney. In addition, a subcapsular hematoma with an area of approximately 6 × 11 cm was also found. The patient underwent laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

Due to its atypical syptmoms and signs, it is often overlooked or misdiagnosed. CHRCC has unique histological features, which distinguish it from other subtypes of renal cell carcinoma. Imaging studies such as CT scan and MRI are helpful in diagnosing and identifying associated complications. In this case, the presence of the perirenal hematoma is a notable finding, which may be caused by tumor-induced vascular disruption.

CONCLUSION

This report underscores the importance of recognizing and managing complications associated with CHRCC. Early diagnosis and appropriate surgical treatment are crucial for favorable outcomes in these cases.

Molecular underpinnings of dedifferentiation and aggressiveness in chromophobe renal cell carcinoma

Sarcomatoid dedifferentiation is common to multiple renal cell carcinoma (RCC) subtypes, including chromophobe RCC (ChRCC), and is associated with increased aggressiveness, resistance to targeted therapies, and heightened sensitivity to immunotherapy. To study ChRCC dedifferentiation, we performed multiregion integrated paired pathological and genomic analyses. Interestingly, ChRCC dedifferentiates not only into sarcomatoid but also into anaplastic and glandular subtypes, which are similarly associated with increased aggressiveness and metastases. Dedifferentiated ChRCC shows loss of epithelial markers, convergent gene expression, and whole genome duplication from a hypodiploid state characteristic of classic ChRCC. We identified an intermediate state with atypia and increased mitosis but preserved epithelial markers. Our data suggest that dedifferentiation is initiated by hemizygous mutation of TP53, which can be observed in differentiated areas, as well as mutation of PTEN. Notably, these mutations become homozygous with duplication of preexisting monosomes (i.e., chromosomes 17 and 10), which characterizes the transition to dedifferentiated ChRCC. Serving as potential biomarkers, dedifferentiated areas become accentuated by mTORC1 activation (phospho-S6) and p53 stabilization. Notably, dedifferentiated ChRCC share gene enrichment and pathway activation features with other sarcomatoid RCC, suggesting convergent evolutionary trajectories. This study expands our understanding of aggressive ChRCC, provides insight into molecular mechanisms of tumor progression, and informs pathologic classification and diagnostics.

VDRA downregulate β-catenin/Smad3 and DNA damage and repair associated with improved prognosis in ccRCC patients

The clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) spotlighted the poorest survival, while chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC) was associated with the best survival. Earlier studies corroborated vitamin D receptor (VDR) was a promising molecular for improving the prognosis of RCC. In contrast to VDRA, the one of VDR isoforms, VDRB1 (VDR isoform B1) has an N-terminal extension of 50 amino acids and is less ligand-dependent. However, the functional differences between VDRA and VDRB1, and their roles in the prognosis of ccRCC and chRCC, have not been investigated. In the present study, we uncovered that the transcripts related to vitamin D pathway and cellular calcium signaling were effectively decreased in the context of ccRCC, yet failed to exert a comparable effect within chRCC. Specially, minimally levels of VDRA wherein kidneys of patients suffering from ccRCC predict shorter survival time. In addition, the protein expressions for β-catenin/Smad3 pathway and DNA damage and repair pathways were obviously impeded in VDRA-overexpressed ccRCC cells, yet this inhibitory effect was conspicuously absent in enable VDRB1 cells. Our results provide a new idea to improve the prognosis of ccRCC via VDRA upregulation.

External validation of a four-tiered grading system for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma

This study aimed to validate the prognostic value of a four-tiered grading system recently proposed by Avulova et al. and to explore the prognostic ability of another four-tiered classification grading system in which there is a separate Grade 3 for tumor necrosis. Grading of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC) by the Fuhrman system is not feasible because of the inherent nuclear atypia in ChRCC. We collected relevant data of 263 patients with ChRCC who had undergone surgery in our hospital from 2008 to 2020. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the survival rate and Cox proportional hazard regression models to assess associations with cancer-specific survival and distant metastasis-free survival by hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Ten patients died from ChRCC, and 12 developed metastases. The 5 year CSS rates were 95.9%. Grades 2 (HR = 10.9; CI 1.11-106.4; P = 0.04), 3 (HR = 33.6, CI 3.32-339.1; P = 0.003), and 4 (HR = 417.4, CI 35.0-4976.2; P < 0.001) in a four-tiered grading system were significantly associated with CSS in a multivariate setting. However, the difference in CSS between Grades 2 and 3 was not significant (HR = 2.14, 95% CI 0.43-10.63; P = 0.35). The HRs of the associations between an exploratory grading system that includes a separate Grade 3 for tumor necrosis and CSS were as follows: Grade 2, 10.2 (CI 1.06-97.9, P = 0.045); Grade 3, 11.4 (CI 1.18-109.6, P = 0.04); and Grade 4, 267.9 (CI 27.6-2603.3, P < 0.001). Similarly, Grades 2 and 3 did not differ significantly. The four-tiered grading system studied is useful for predicting death from ChRCC and metastasis. However, Grade 3 did not more accurately predict risk of death and metastasis than did Grade 2. This was also true for the novel exploratory grading system that classifies tumors with necrosis into a separate Grade 3.

Tumor-to-Tumor Metastasis of Lung Cancer to Kidney Cancer: A Review of the Literature and Our Experience

Tumor-to-tumor metastasis (TTM) is a rare phenomenon documented in patients with multiple primary cancers. This condition is defined as a metastasis between two true primary tumors. The most frequently reported recipient tumor is renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and the lung carcinomas are the most common metastatic tumor donors. Therefore, this paper attempts to address the current gap in knowledge about this rare phenomenon. The first part of this review outlines the recently proposed models and mechanisms involved in the TTM process. The second part then summarizes and analyzes previous case reports in the literature. We also present our experience with the case of lung cancer that metastasized into RCC. Given the sporadic incidence of TTM, no specific management guidelines exist. Therefore, considering TTM in patients with multiple primary tumors is important as it could potentially modify the oncological management offered.

Sintilimab combined with axitinib in the treatment of advanced chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: a case report

Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC) is a rare pathological type of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Related systematic studies involving large numbers of patients are lacking, and more importantly, there is currently no international consensus on post-line treatment guidelines for ChRCC. The rapid development of systemic treatment with molecular targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors has brought effective approaches for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), while progress in the treatment of ChRCC is still limited. In this case report, the patient was initially diagnosed at the early stage; 4 years post-surgery, she developed lung metastases and the disease progressed once again after being treated with sunitinib monotherapy for 3 years. However, after combining the immunotherapy sintilimab with the targeted therapy axitinib as second-line treatment, imageological examination showed lesions in the lungs that gradually decreased, and the bone metastases remained stable. To date, the patient has been continuously treated for over 2 years and is still undergoing regular treatment and follow-up. This case is the first to report the long-term survival of metastatic disease by using this treatment regimen and to propose a potential therapeutic option for patients with metastatic ChRCC. Since only one case was observed in this report, further study is needed.

Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma with Sarcomatoid Differentiation: Clinicopathologic Correlation and Molecular Findings

Introduction: Sarcomatoid differentiation has been reported in approximately 8% of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and is associated with a worse prognosis. We aim to describe the clinicopathologic and molecular findings of chromophobe RCC with sarcomatoid differentiation. Methods: Surgical pathology database was searched to identify chromophobe RCC with sarcomatoid differentiation from January 2015 to December 2021. Results: Five patients were diagnosed with chromophobe RCC with sarcomatoid differentiation. The median age at the time of diagnosis was 57 years (range 51-61 years). Three patients died after median follow-up of 12.1 months (range 1.6-18.2 months). The median tumor size was 10.7 cm (range 5.6-13.6 cm). The median percentage of sarcomatoid component was 60% (range 10-90%), and the median percentage of necrosis was 30% (range 10-50%). One tumor demonstrated osteoid formation. PAX8, keratin 7, KIT (CD117), and Hale colloidal iron were positive in the epithelial component, whereas the sarcomatoid component was positive for vimentin, CD10, and high Ki67 proliferative index. Molecular testing was performed in three specimens: all were TP53 mutated and microsatellite stable. One aggressive tumor had RB1 frameshift mutation and copy number gains for TERT and CUL4A. Conclusion: Chromophobe RCC with sarcomatoid differentiation is a rare entity with aggressive behavior. Percentage of sarcomatoid component, necrosis, and the occurrence of metastasis is associated with worse prognosis. Molecular profiling reveals frequent TP53 mutation. While TERT promoter mutation has no prognostic implication, FLCN inactivation may be associated with a less aggressive course. The clinical significance of RB1 loss is unclear.

Locoregional Therapies in Immunologically "Cold" Tumors: Opportunities and Clinical Trial Design Considerations

Immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer management, but many tumors, particularly immunologically "cold" tumors, remain resistant to the therapy. The combination of conventional systemic immunotherapies and locoregional interventional radiology approaches is being explored to transform these cold tumors into immunologically active "hot" ones. The present article uses the example of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC), a renal cell carcinoma subtype resistant to current systemic immunotherapies, to address practical and conceptual challenges that have prevented the activation of clinical trials specifically designed for this malignancy to date. The practical framework discussed herein can help overcome logistic and funding limitations and facilitate the development of biology-informed clinical trials tailored to specific rare diseases such as ChRCC.

Renal Cell Carcinoma of Variant Histology: Biology and Therapies

The term variant histology renal cell carcinomas (vhRCCs), also known as non-clear cell RCCs, refers to a diverse group of malignancies with distinct biologic and therapeutic considerations. The management of vhRCC subtypes is often based on extrapolating results from the more common clear cell RCC studies or basket trials that are not specific to each histology. The unique management of each vhRCC subtype necessitates accurate pathologic diagnosis and dedicated research efforts. Herein, we discuss tailored recommendations for each vhRCC histology informed by ongoing research and clinical experience.

Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma

Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC) is the second most common variant histology (non-clear cell) RCC. ChRCC is distinct from clear cell RCC (ccRCC) in terms of genetics, genomics, metabolism, cell of origin, and response to targeted and immune therapies. The pathogenesis of ChRCC remains unclear, but current data suggest two potential mechanisms: mTORC1 hyperactivation through PTEN pathway mutations and mitochondrial dysfunction leading to oxidative stress. There are no specific approved treatments for ChRCC, although some responses to tyrosine kinase and mTOR inhibitors have been observed. Response to immunotherapy is generally limited. Targetable pathways involving innate lymphoid cells/IL-15 and cysteine homeostasis/ferroptosis have recently been identified.

Navigating the Current Landscape of Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Review of the Literature

Non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) is an entity comprised of a heterogeneous constellation of RCC subtypes. Genomic profiling has broadened our understanding of molecular pathogenic mechanisms unique to individual nccRCC subtypes. To date, clinical trials evaluating the use of immunotherapies and targeted therapies have predominantly been conducted in patients with clear cell histology. A comprehensive review of the literature has been undertaken in order to describe molecular pathogenic mechanisms pertaining to each nccRCC subtype, and concisely summarise findings from therapeutic trials conducted in the nccRCC space.

Predicting Oncologic Outcomes in Small Renal Tumors

BACKGROUND

Most patients diagnosed with renal cancer today present with small renal masses (SRMs). Although these patients have a low risk of dying from their disease and many are followed with active surveillance protocols, a small subset of renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) behave aggressively. Knowledge regarding features of aggressive behavior would enable better adoption of active surveillance strategies among these patients.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to improve prognostic models to predict metastasis-free survival after nephrectomy through focused analyses of clinicopathologic characteristics of SRMs associated with adverse outcomes.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

We identified consecutive patients with surgically resected SRMs (≤4 cm) at the University of Texas Southwestern Kidney Cancer Program between 1998 and 2020. In addition, we evaluated the ability of SRMs to form tumors when implanted in mice, an indicator of tumor aggressiveness.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

We examined the clinicopathologic factors associated with metastasis including prospectively performed BAP1 immunohistochemistry at our Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments laboratory. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression was used to predict metastasis-free survival.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

A total of 3900 evaluable nephrectomies (from 3674 ethnically diverse patients) were identified, of which 1984 (51%) were SRMs including 1720 RCC. Of these patients with RCC (SRMRCC), 1576 did not have synchronous or metachronous larger RCCs and among these, 37 (2%) developed metastases. SRMRCC that metastasized were significantly enriched for aggressive morphologic phenotypes and engrafted in mice at comparable rates as larger metastatic tumors. BAP1 loss remained significantly associated with metastasis-free survival after accounting for TNM (tumor-node-metastasis) stage and SSIGN (stage, size, grade, and necrosis) score in multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified clinicopathologic features that influence metastasis-free survival for patients with SRMRCC. If validated independently, these data should assist with patient prognosis and help with active surveillance strategies.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We report the identification of features of aggressiveness in small renal tumors that influence the likelihood of metastases after surgery.

The Critical Gene Screening to Prevent Chromophobe Cell Renal Carcinoma Metastasis through TCGA and WGCNA

Common chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC) has a good prognosis when cured by surgery. However, clinical practice shows that a small number of patients with chRCC will produce metastasis, and the prognosis after metastasis is poor. In this regard, we try to find potential biological targets to prevent CRCC metastasis. In this experiment, we analyzed the clinical traits and gene expression data of chRCC samples which were provided by the TCGA database by the WGCNA method. On this basis, we selected MEtan, a module with a significant positive correlation with the M phase of chRCC, for subsequent analysis. The MEtan module genes in the biological process of chRCC were mainly related to steroid metabolic process, cholesterol metabolic process and STEM cell differentiation. KEGG analysis showed that these genes were mainly enriched in cancer-related signaling pathways, such as Neuroactive Ligand−receptor interaction, cAMP signaling pathway, and Wnt signaling pathway. Subsequently, we mapped the PPI interaction network and screened the key gene beta-arrestin 2 (ARRB2). Expression analysis showed that there was a significantly increased expression of ARRB2 in chRCC patients in comparison to the normal group. Expression survival analysis indicated that ARRB2 was inversely associated with overall survival. We firmly believe that the key genes identified in this study would be able to provide new clues and research basis for the treatment of chRCC.

The significance of sarcomatoid and rhabdoid dedifferentiation in renal cell carcinoma

Dedifferentiation in renal cell carcinoma (RCC), either sarcomatoid or rhabdoid, is an infrequent event that may occur heterogeneously in the setting of any RCC histology and is associated with poor outcomes. Sarcomatoid dedifferentiation is associated with inferior survival with angiogenesis targeted therapy and infrequent responses to cytotoxic chemotherapy. However, immune checkpoint therapy has significantly improved outcomes for patients with sarcomatoid dedifferentiation. Biologically, sarcomatoid dedifferentiation has increased programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and an inflamed tumor microenvironment, in addition to other distinct molecular alterations. Less is known about rhabdoid dedifferentiation from either a clinical, biological, or therapeutic perspective. In this focused review, we will discuss the prognostic implications, outcomes with systemic therapy, and underlying biology in RCC with either sarcomatoid or rhabdoid dedifferentiation present.

Nomograms for predicting overall and cancer-specific survival of patients with chromophobe renal cell carcinoma after nephrectomy: a retrospective SEER-based study

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to construct and validate nomograms to predict overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) for patients with chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC) after nephrectomy.

DESIGN

This study is a retrospective cohort study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

There were 2810 patients with chRCC from Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 included in the study who were randomly divided into a training cohort (n=1970) and a validation cohort (n=840). Another single-centre external validation cohort containing 124 patients from our hospital was also involved in our study.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

OS and CSS.

RESULTS

Nomograms for OS and CSS include four and five variables, respectively, from the result of least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression analyses. Nomograms reveal the accurate discrimination by the area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and C-indexes, with a C-index value of 0.777 (95% CI 0.728 to 0.826), 0.810 (95% CI 0.747 to 0.873) and 0.863 (95% CI 0.773 to 0.953) for the training cohort, the internal validation cohort and the external validation cohort in the nomogram for OS; and a C-index value of 0.884 (95% CI 0.829 to 0.939), 0.868 (95% CI 0.772 to 0.964) and 0.862 (95% CI 0.760 to 0.964) for the training cohort, the internal validation cohort and the external validation cohort in the nomogram for CSS. It was also proven that there was a high degree of conformance between the predicted and observation results by calibration plots. In addition, the comparison of ROC curves and C-indexes between nomograms and seventh tumour, node and metastasis stage demonstrated that nomograms were better in accuracy and efficacy ability.

CONCLUSIONS

We successfully constructed two accurate and effective nomograms to predict OS and CSS for patients with chRCC after nephrectomy, which can help clinical doctors choose individual treatment strategies for chRCC patients.

Two case reports of immune checkpoint therapy on chromophobe renal cell carcinoma with sarcomatoid differentiation

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most predominant type of kidney cancer in adults and comprises several histological subtypes. Among them, the chromophobe RCC (ChRCC) with sarcomatoid differentiation is a rare subtype, and its therapeutic strategy remains unclear. Hence, to provide more information on effective therapeutic strategies against ChRCC, we report two cases of ChRCC with sarcomatoid differentiation treated with nivolumab monotherapy or ipilimumab-nivolumab combination therapy. One patient was treated with nivolumab monotherapy after the failure of sunitinib, while the other was treated with ipilimumab-nivolumab combination therapy as a first-line option. The therapeutic strategies adopted in both cases were effective, but the patients experienced immune-related adverse events such as interstitial nephritis and colitis. Thus, our report indicates that immune checkpoint therapy is effective for ChRCCs with sarcomatoid differentiation.

Clinicopathologic and Immunohistochemical Characterization of Sarcomatoid Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma: An Analysis of 22 Cases

Sarcomatoid differentiation in chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC) is a rare finding and a significant predictor of worse outcomes. When the sarcomatoid component overgrows the conventional component or is the only component on a biopsy, the differential diagnoses encompass a variety of entities. Therefore, we reviewed 22 sarcomatoid ChRCCs and characterized the immunophenotype. Given that renal carcinomas with sarcomatoid features may benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapy we also assessed the programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) (28-8) expression. DOG1, CD117, cytokeratin 7, and PAX8 were negative in 100%, 88%, 63%, and 44% of the sarcomatoid components, respectively. GATA3 was expressed in 31% of the conventional components and in 50% of the sarcomatoid components. One conventional and 3 sarcomatoid components expressed PD-L1. Sarcomatoid ChRCCs have a high propensity for metastases and cancer progression. Distant metastatic disease was seen in 73% of the cases and median survival in this cohort was <1 year. The sarcomatoid portion had increased expression of PD-L1 and frequent loss of expression of multiple immunohistochemical markers associated with ChRCC. Half of the sarcomatoid ChRCC exhibited GATA3 expression, 3 of which did not express PAX8.

Development and Validation of a Competitive Risk Model in Elderly Patients With Chromophobe Cell Renal Carcinoma: A Population-Based Study

Background

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common renal malignancy in adults, and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC) is the third most common subtype of RCC. We aimed to construct a competitive risk model to predict cancer-specific survival (CSS) in elderly patients with chRCC.

Methods

The clinicopathological information of the patients was downloaded from the SEER database, and the patients were randomly divided into the training and validation cohorts. Patients' risk factors for cancer-specific death (CSM) were analyzed using proportional subdistribution hazard (SH). We constructed a competitive risk model to predict the CSS of elderly chRCC patients. Consistency index (C-index), the area under receiver operating curve (AUC), and a calibration curve were used to validate the model's accuracy. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to test the clinical value of the model.

Results

A total of 3,522 elderly patients with chRCC were included in the analysis. Patients were randomly assigned to either the training cohort (N = 2,474) or the validation cohort (N = 1,048). SH analysis found that age, race, T, N, and M stage, tumor size, and surgery were risk factors for CSM. We constructed a competitive risk model to predict patients' CSS. In the training set, the model predicted patients' 1-, 3-, and 5-year CSS with C-indices of 82.2, 80.8, and 78.2, respectively. The model predicted patient 1-, 3-, and 5-year CSS in the validation cohort with C-indices of 84.7, 83.4, and 76.9, respectively. The calibration curve showed that the model's predicted value is almost consistent with the observed value, which indicated that the model has good accuracy. The AUC of the training set and validation queue also suggested that the model has good discrimination. The clinical utility of the DCA model in predicting patients' CSS is higher than that of traditional TNM staging.

Conclusions

We constructed a competitive risk model to predict CSS in elderly patients with chRCC. The model has good accuracy and reliability, which can help doctors and patients to make clinical decisions and follow-up strategies.

Differential Immunohistochemical and Molecular Profiling of Conventional and Aggressive Components of Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma: Pitfalls for Diagnosis

Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC) is a relatively rare subtype of RCC with a characteristic histologic appearance. Most ChRCC are slow growing, but sarcomatoid differentiation and metastases can occur, indicative of aggressive behavior and poor prognosis. Herein, we characterize ten ChRCC with aggressive components, defined as sarcomatoid change and/or metastasis. Immunohistochemistry and next-generation sequencing was performed on available formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue, with differential profiling of conventional and aggressive components. All ten cases showed a conventional component of renal tumor morphologically consistent with ChRCC: three had sarcomatoid change, four had metastases, and three had both sarcomatoid change and metastases. In the primary conventional components, a typical ChRCC IHC pattern (CK7+, CD117+ and CAIX-) was observed in 8/10 cases; 2 cases had rare CK7 staining. In the aggressive components, CD117 and/or CK7 was lost in 7/10 cases; 3 cases showed loss of both. Two of 10 cases showed significant CAIX staining in the aggressive component. All 7 cases that had molecular profiling performed showed characteristic chromosomal losses reported for ChRCC, though two cases showed additional complex copy number alterations in the aggressive component only. Recurrent TP53 mutations (TP53m) were also seen; however surprisingly, the conventional and aggressive components had no shared TP53m: a TP53m was private to aggressive components in 2 cases; to the conventional component in 1 case; and in 4 cases, components demonstrated different TP53m. Of the 21 pathogenic alterations identified in 7 tumors, only a PTEN splicing alteration was shared between both components in one case. In conclusion, ChRCC can have IHC staining patterns and molecular profile that differ between conventional and aggressive components. Interpretation of stains on metastases or small biopsies to determine histologic subtype can be misleading. The lack of shared pathogenic mutations between the two components supports a model in which aggressive ChRCC can have convergent subclones with different TP53m.

Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma with Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a heterogeneous group of neoplasms derived from the renal tubular epithelial cells. Chromophobe RCC (chRCC) is the third most common subtype of RCC, accounting for 5% of cases. chRCC may be detected as an incidental finding or less commonly may manifest with clinical symptoms. The mainstay of therapy for chRCC is surgical resection. chRCC has a better prognosis compared with the more common clear cell RCC. At gross pathologic analysis, chRCC is a solid well-defined mass with lobulated borders. Histologic findings vary by subtype but include large pale polygonal cells with abundant transparent cytoplasm, crinkled "raisinoid" nuclei with perinuclear halos, and prominent cell membranes. Pathologic analysis reveals only moderate vascularity. The most common imaging pattern is a predominantly solid renal mass with circumscribed margins and enhancement less than that of the renal cortex. The authors discuss chRCC with emphasis on correlative pathologic findings and illustrate the multimodality imaging appearances of chRCC by using cases from the Radiologic Pathology Archives of the American Institute for Radiologic Pathology. ^©RSNA, 2021.

Sarcomatoid features and lymph node-positive disease in chromophobe renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

The presence of sarcomatoid features and/or lymph node-positive disease may be associated with a worse prognosis in chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC). We sought to better characterize patients' long-term outcomes with these features compared with those without these features.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified 300 patients treated for sporadic, unilateral, nonmetastatic ChRCC between 1993 and 2019. Clinical and pathologic features were summarized, and cancer-specific survival (CSS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier plots. Cox regression analysis was performed to determine factors associated with recurrence. Patients with sarcomatoid features and/or nodal disease were grouped as high-risk in a secondary analysis.

RESULTS

The median age was 60 years, 43.7% were female, 29.3% had pT3/T4 disease, 3.3% had sarcomatoid features, and 4% had pathologic N1 disease. Sixteen patients were categorized as high-risk based on the presence of sarcomatoid features (n = 4), pathologic N1 disease (n = 6), or both (n = 6). There were 22 recurrences; the recurrence rate in the low-risk group was 4.9% and 50% in the high-risk group. 10-year RFS was 91.4% in the low-risk group and 34.4% in the high-risk group (P < 0.001). 10-year CSS was 96.4% in the low-risk group and 54.3% in the high-risk group (P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, sarcomatoid features (HR 5.5, CI 1.5-20.2, P = 0.01) and pN1 disease (HR 16.5, CI 5.3-51.4, P < 0.0001) were independently associated with RFS.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of sarcomatoid features and/or lymph node-positive disease portends a poor prognosis in ChRCC. Further studies evaluating the impact of novel therapeutic agents in these patients are warranted.

Kidney re-transplantation after living donor graft nephrectomy due to de novo chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: A case report

BACKGROUND

There are few reported cases of allograft nephrectomy due to malignancy followed by successful renal re-transplantation two years later. In this paper, we report a patient who underwent kidney re-transplantation after living donor graft nephrectomy due to de novo chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC) involving the allograft kidney.

CASE SUMMARY

A 34-year-old man underwent living kidney transplantation at the age of 22 years for end-stage renal disease. Maintenance immunosuppression consisted of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and prednisone. Six years post-transplantation, at another hospital, ultrasonography revealed a small mass involving the upper pole of the graft. The patient declined further examination and treatment at this point. Seven years and three months post-transplantation, the patient experienced decreasing appetite, weight loss, gross hematuria, fatigue, and oliguria. Laboratory tests showed anemia (hemoglobin level was 53 g/L). Contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed a large heterogeneous cystic-solid mass involving the upper pole of the renal allograft. Graft nephrectomy was performed and immunosuppressants were withdrawn. Histological and immunohistochemical features of the tumor were consistent with ChRCC. One year after allograft nephrectomy, low doses of tacrolimus and MMF were administered for preventing allosensitization. Two years after allograft nephrectomy, the patient underwent kidney re-transplantation. Graft function remained stable with no ChRCC recurrence in more than 2-years of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

De novo ChRCC in kidney graft generally has a good prognosis after graft nephrectomy and withdrawal of immunosuppression. Kidney re-transplantation could be a viable treatment. A 2-year malignancy-free period may be sufficient time before re-transplantation.

The Molecular Characteristics of Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: What's the Story Morning Glory?

Non-clear cell renal cell carcinomas are a miscellaneous group of tumors that include different histological subtypes, each one characterized by peculiarity in terms of genetic alteration, clinical behavior, prognosis, and treatment response. Because of their low incidence and poor enrollment in clinical trials, alongside their heterogeneity, additional efforts are required to better unveil the pathogenetic mechanisms and, consequently, to improve the treatment algorithm. Nowadays, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, mTOR and MET inhibitors, and even cisplatin-based chemotherapy and immunotherapy are potential weapons that are still under evaluation in this setting. Various biomarkers have been evaluated for detecting progression and monitoring renal cell carcinoma, but more studies are necessary to improve this field. In this review, we provide an overview on the molecular characteristics of this group of tumors and the recently published trials, giving an insight into what might become the future therapeutic standard in this complex world of non-clear cell kidney cancers.

Pattern, timing and predictors of recurrence after surgical resection of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

Currently there are no specific guidelines for the post-operative follow-up of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC). We aimed to evaluate the pattern, location and timing of recurrence after surgery for non-metastatic chRCC and establish predictors of recurrence and cancer-specific death.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of consecutive surgically treated non-metastatic chRCC cases from the Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust (UK, 2015-2019) and the international collaborative database RECUR (15 institutes, 2006-2011). Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted. The association between variables of interest and outcomes were analysed using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models with shared frailty for data source.

RESULTS

295 patients were identified. Median follow-up was 58 months. The five and ten-year recurrence-free survival rates were 94.3% and 89.2%. Seventeen patients (5.7%) developed recurrent disease, 13 (76.5%) with distant metastases. 54% of metastatic disease diagnoses involved a single organ, most commonly the bone. Early recurrence (< 24 months) was observed in 8 cases, all staged ≥ pT2b. 30 deaths occurred, of which 11 were attributed to chRCC. Sarcomatoid differentiation was rare (n = 4) but associated with recurrence and cancer-specific death on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, UICC/AJCC T-stage ≥ pT2b, presence of coagulative necrosis, and positive surgical margins were predictors of recurrence and cancer-specific death.

CONCLUSION

Recurrence and death after surgically resected chRCC are rare. For completely excised lesions ≤ pT2a without coagulative necrosis or sarcomatoid features, prognosis is excellent. These patients should be reassured and follow-up intensity curtailed.

Systemic Therapies for the Management of Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: What Works, What Doesn't, and What the Future Holds

Non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) is a broad term that refers to a diverse group of tumors, each with its own distinct biologic and therapeutic profile. The management of nccRCCs is often based on extrapolating data from clinical trials in the more common clear cell renal cell carcinoma, but our emerging prospective and retrospective clinical experience in nccRCC allows us to make more precise recommendations tailored to each histology. The systemic therapy options for metastatic nccRCC include targeted therapies such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and, for specific rare subtypes, cytotoxic chemotherapy. Each nccRCC histology may respond differently to these regimens, which makes accurate pathologic diagnosis imperative. In the present review, we discuss the available clinical and biological data that can help guide systemic therapy recommendations for specific nccRCC subtypes.

Comprehensive review of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma

Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC) is the third most common type of RCC with distinct biology compared to other kidney cancer subtypes. The heterogeneity between the RCC subtypes is associated with noticeable differences in tumor aggressiveness and risk for the development of metastatic disease. ChRCC is characterized by chromosomal aneuploidy, TP53, PTEN, and mitochondrial gene mutations. Though the therapeutic landscape of clear cell RCC (ccRCC) has significantly evolved over the past decade, limited progress has been seen in chRCC due to its infrequent incidence. In fact, the therapeutic approach for chRCC is often extrapolated from ccRCC treatments or studies that combine several forms of nccRCC subtypes. In the new era of genetic profiling of tumors and targeted therapeutics, this review describes the epidemiology, pathology, molecular characteristics, and current management with ongoing clinical trials for chRCC.

Broad spectrum mutational analysis of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma using next-generation sequencing

BACKGROUND

Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC) is a rare subtype of non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Due to its rarity, its molecular characterization as well as therapeutic targets are still not fully understood.

METHODS

We performed a next-generation sequencing analysis using the platform Ion PGM System on 20 retrospectively collected ChRCC cases with the aim of identify molecular biomarkers with potential prognostic value or that could have therapeutic implications.

RESULTS

We identified mutation onTP53, SMARCB1, RB1 and JAK3. The most frequently altered gene was TP53 (6/20, 30 % of cases). SMARCB1 mutation was found in 3 (15 %) patients and in all cases the mutational variant was p.T72 K, with known pathogenenic meaning. One (5%) patient presented a pathogenetic mutation of RB1. JAK3 was mutated in 1 (5%) patient and this mutation resulted to have uncertain pathogenetic significance.

CONCLUSION

ChRCC is a rare disease still not fully molecularly characterized. Next-generation sequencing analysis could be useful to identify potential mutation with prognostic value or that could be potential therapeutic targets.

Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: current and controversial issues

It has been 35 years since Professor Thoenes and his colleagues discovered chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Since then, our knowledge about this tumour entity has changed and novel tumour entities have been discovered. The aim of this review is to discuss recent molecular findings and open questions in diagnosing chromophobe-like/oncocytic neoplasms. The broader differential diagnosis of chromophobe-like and oncocytoma-like neoplasms includes SDH-deficient renal cell carcinoma, fumarate hydratase (FH) deficient RCC, epitheloid angiomyolipoma ('oncocytoma like'), MiT family translocation RCC and the emerging entity of eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma. After separation of these tumours from chromophobe RCC, it becomes evident that chromophobe RCC are low malignant tumours with a 5-6% risk of metastasis. Recent next generation sequencing (NGS) and DNA methylation profiling studies have confirmed Thoenes' theory of a distal tubule derived origin of chromophobe RCC and renal oncocytomas. Comprehensive genomic analyses of chromophobe RCC have demonstrated a low somatic mutation rate and identified TP53 and PTEN as the most frequently mutated genes, whereas 'unclassified' RCC with oncocytic or chromophobe-like features can show somatic inactivating mutations of TSC2 or activating mutations of MTOR as the primary molecular alterations. For the future, it would be desirable to create a category of 'oncocytic/chromophobe RCC, NOS' with the potential of further molecular studies for identification of TSC1/2 mutations in these rare tumours.

Sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma: biology, natural history and management

Sarcomatoid dedifferentiation is an uncommon feature that can occur in most histological subtypes of renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) and carries a decidedly poor prognosis. Historically, conventional treatments for sarcomatoid RCCs (sRCCs) have shown little efficacy, and median survival is commonly 6–13 months. Despite being first described in 1968, the mechanisms driving sarcomatoid dedifferentiation remain poorly understood, and information and treatment options available to physicians and patients are limited. When diagnosed at an early stage, surgical intervention remains the treatment of choice. However, preoperative identification through routine imaging or biopsy is unreliable and most patients present with advanced disease and systemic symptoms. For these patients, the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy is disputed. The expansion of immunotherapies approved for RCCs has generated a search for biomarkers that might be indicative of treatment response in sRCCs, although a proven effective systemic agent remains elusive. PDL1 expression is increased in sarcomatoid dedifferentiated renal tumours, which suggests that patients with sRCCs could benefit from PD1 and/or PDL1 immune checkpoint blockade therapy. Treatment outcomes for sarcomatoid tumours have remained relatively consistent compared with other RCCs, but further investigation of the tumour–immune cell microenvironment might yield insights into further therapeutic possibilities.

In this Review, Blum et al. summarize the current knowledge on sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma, a diagnosis characterized by the presence of sarcomatoid dedifferentiation and a poor prognosis. They discuss the origin, presentation, molecular biology and treatment of this disease.

Sarcomatoid dedifferentiation is not considered to be a unique histological subtype of renal cell carcinomas (RCCs); rather, it can be present within any subtype of RCCs.

Sarcomatoid dedifferentiation appears in ~4% of all RCCs, but is present in ~20% of all metastatic RCCs. According to WHO guidelines, any RCC with sarcomatoid dedifferentiation is a WHO–International Society of Urological Pathology grade 4 lesion.

Sarcomatoid dedifferentiation is often heterogeneously present within RCCs, making routine imaging and biopsy unreliable for preoperative detection. Surgical resection for localized disease is the standard of care, with subsequent close monitoring of patients following surgery.

In patients with metastatic disease, conventional therapies such as surgery and systemic agents have been ineffective and overall 5-year survival remains at 23.5–33%.

Previous genomic analyses have failed to identify definitive mutational drivers of disease. However, sarcomatoid RCCs (sRCCs) have been shown to have higher PD1 and PDL1 expression than other subtypes of RCCs. Newer combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapies could yield improved responses and outcomes.

Studies investigating sRCCs are limited by patient numbers owing to the low incidence of sRCCs and their advanced stage at presentation. Multi-institutional efforts to establish a consensus on treatment recommendations based on highly powered data are essential.

Predicting common solid renal tumors using machine learning models of classification of radiologist-assessed magnetic resonance characteristics

PURPOSE

Solid renal masses (SRM) are difficult to differentiate based on standard MR features. The purpose of this study was to assess MR imaging features of SRM to evaluate performance of ensemble methods of classifying SRM subtypes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MR images of SRM (n = 330) were retrospectively evaluated for standard and multiparametric (mp) features. Models of MR features for predicting malignant and benign lesions as well as subtyping SRM were developed using a training dataset and performance was evaluated in a test data-set using recursive partitioning (RP), gradient booting machine (GBM), and random forest (RF) methods.

RESULTS

In the test dataset, GBM and RF models demonstrated an accuracy of 86% (95% CI 75% to 93%) for predicting benign versus malignant SRM compared to 83% (95% CI 71% to 91%) for the RP model. RF had the greatest accuracy in predicting SRM subtypes, 81.2% (95% CI 69.5% to 89.9%) compared with GBM 73.4% (95% CI 60.9% to 83.7%) or RP 70.3% (95% CI 57.6% to 81.1%). Marginal homogeneity was reduced by the RF model compared with the RP model (P < 0.001), but not the GBM model (P = 0.135). All models had high sensitivity and specificity for clear cell and papillary renal cell carcinomas (RCC), but performed less well in differentiating chromophobe RCC, oncocytomas, and fat-poor angiomyolipomas.

CONCLUSION

Ensemble methods for prediction of SRM from radiologist-assessed image characteristics have high accuracy for distinguishing benign and malignant lesions. SRM subtype classification is limited by the ability to categorize chromophobe RCCs, oncocytomas, and fat-poor angiomyolipomas.

Genetic Alterations in Renal Cancers: Identification of The Mechanisms Underlying Cancer Initiation and Progression and of Therapeutic Targets

Renal cell cancer (RCC) involves three most recurrent sporadic types: clear-cell RCC (70-75%, CCRCC), papillary RCCC (10-15%, PRCC), and chromophobe RCC (5%, CHRCC). Hereditary cases account for about 5% of all cases of RCC and are caused by germline pathogenic variants. Herein, we review how a better understanding of the molecular biology of RCCs has driven the inception of new diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Genomic research has identified relevant genetic alterations associated with each RCC subtype. Molecular studies have clearly shown that CCRCC is universally initiated by Von Hippel Lindau (VHL) gene dysregulation, followed by different types of additional genetic events involving epigenetic regulatory genes, dictating disease progression, aggressiveness, and differential response to treatments. The understanding of the molecular mechanisms that underlie the development and progression of RCC has considerably expanded treatment options; genomic data might guide treatment options by enabling patients to be matched with therapeutics that specifically target the genetic alterations present in their tumors. These new targeted treatments have led to a moderate improvement of the survival of metastatic RCC patients. Ongoing studies based on the combination of immunotherapeutic agents (immune check inhibitors) with VEGF inhibitors are expected to further improve the survival of these patients.

Multi-institutional re-evaluation of prognostic factors in chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: proposal of a novel two-tiered grading scheme

A histological grading system of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC) is highly desirable to identify approximately 5-10% of tumors at risk for progression. Validation studies failed to demonstrate a correlation between the four-tiered WHO/ISUP grade and outcome. Previous proposals with three-tiered chromophobe grading systems could not be validated. In this study, the presence of sarcomatoid differentiation, necrosis, and mitosis was analyzed in a Swiss cohort (n = 42), an Italian cohort (n = 103), a German cohort (n = 54), a Japanese cohort (n = 119), and The Cancer Genome Atlas cohort (n = 64). All 3 histological parameters were significantly associated with shorter time to tumor progression and overall survival in univariate analysis. Interobserver variability for identification of these parameters was measured by Krippendorff's alpha coefficient and showed high concordance for the identification of sarcomatoid differentiation and tumor necrosis, but only low to medium concordance for the identification of mitosis. Therefore, we tested a two-tiered tumor grading system (low versus high grade) based only on the presence of sarcomatoid differentiation and/or necrosis finding in the combined cohorts (n = 382). pT stage, patient's age (> 65 vs ≤ 65), lymph node and/or distant metastasis, and the two-tiered grading system (low versus high grade) were significantly associated with overall survival and were independent prognostic parameters in multivariate analysis (Cox proportional hazard). This multi-institutional evaluation of prognostic parameters suggests tumor necrosis and sarcomatoid differentiation as reproducible components of a two-tiered chromophobe tumor grading system.