Clinicopathologic Features and Survival Outcomes for Primary Renal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Atypical carcinoid of the primary kidney with retroperitoneal metastasis 15 years later: A case report and literature review

Primary renal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are extremely rare among renal malignancies. According to pathological manifestations, carcinoid can be divided into four types: typical carcinoid, atypical carcinoid, large cell and small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. Primary or secondary retroperitoneal carcinoid is even rarer than renal carcinoid. This article reports a patient with renal carcinoid complicated with retroperitoneal metastasis, who developed retroperitoneal metastasis 15 years after radical nephrectomy. Through the analysis of this case and the combination of the existing published literature, it is aimed to provide valuable references for clinicians in treating patients with renal carcinoid or with metastasis.

Hepatic cytoreduction for lung and renal neuroendocrine tumor metastases

BACKGROUND

Patients with hepatic metastases from lung and renal neuroendocrine tumors are rare. Outcome data on treatment of hepatic metastases for these types of tumors are lacking. We report the outcomes of hepatic cytoreduction operations for these tumors.

METHODS

Records of patients undergoing hepatic cytoreduction operations of at least 70 ​% of the hepatic tumors for well differentiated lung and renal neuroendocrine tumors were reviewed. Data collected included primary tumor type, number and size of metastases resected, tumor grade, percentage of hepatic cytoreduction, presence of extra-hepatic disease, and status at last follow up.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients were identified. Ninety percent had extrahepatic metastases. Median-time to liver progression was 66 months. The five-year survival rate was 65 ​%. Liver failure was the predominant cause of death. No prognostic factors for survival could be identified among the variables collected.

CONCLUSION

Hepatic cytoreduction operations for lung and renal neuroendocrine tumors do not yield as good of survival rates as observed with small bowel and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, but are considerably better than those obtained with complete resection of colorectal metastases.

Primary neuroendocrine neoplasms of the kidney: a case report and literature review

Primary kidney neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare renal malignancies. However, detecting and monitoring neuroendocrine neoplasms remains challenging because of their nonspecific nature. We herein present a case involving a 53-year-old woman who experienced episodes of intermittent abdominal pain, dizziness, and nausea for a period of 5 days. Computed tomography urography revealed a small (approximately 19- × 16-mm) nodular shadow in the left kidney. The nodular shadow exhibited slightly lower density than the surrounding tissue as well as enhancement, with a portion protruding into the renal sinus region. Histological and immunohistochemical analyses of the biopsy specimen from the mass indicated a well-differentiated NET. After analysis of this case, we performed a literature review and herein discuss various techniques for imaging and pathological diagnosis of renal NETs. Additionally, we provide insights into the treatment options and prognosis for affected patients. By combining this case study with the existing published literature, we aim to offer a valuable reference for clinicians treatment patients diagnosed with renal NETs.

Urinary Neuroendocrine Neoplasms Treated in the "Modern Era": A Multicenter Retrospective Review

BACKGROUND

Primary urinary neuroendocrine neoplasms (U-NENs) are extremely rare thus optimal treatment is unknown. Grading and treatment are typically extrapolated from other primary sites. Since 2010, the clinical landscape for NENs has changed substantially. We performed a retrospective review of U-NENs to assess treatment patterns and oncologic outcomes of patients treated in the recent era of NEN therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A multicenter retrospective review of patients diagnosed after 2005 and alive after 2010. Time to treatment failure (TTF) was used to evaluate progression and toxicity for systemic therapy. Tumors were categorized as having either well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (WDNET) or poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (PDNEC) histology.

RESULTS

A total of 134 patients from 6 centers were included in our analysis, including 94 (70%) bladder, 32 (24%) kidney, 2 (1.5%) urethra and 4 other urinary primaries (3.0%). Poorly-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma was more common in bladder (92%) than non-bladder tumors (8%). Median Ki-67 available in bladder primary was 90% (n = 24), kidney 10% (n = 23), ureter 95% (n = 1), urethra 54% (n = 2), and others 90% (n = 3). Patients received a median of 2 therapies (range 0-10). Median time to death was not reached in locoregional WDNETs versus 8.2 years (95% CI, 3.5-noncalculable) in metastatic WDNETs (predominantly renal primary). Median time to death was 3.6 years (95% CI, 2.2-9.2) in locoregional PDNECs versus 1 year (95% CI, 0.8-1.3) in metastatic PDNECs (predominantly bladder primary).

CONCLUSION

This is the most extensive series examining treatment patterns in patients with U-NENs in the recent era of NEN therapy. The apparent inferior survival for bladder NENs is likely due to the preponderance of PDNECs in this group. As predicted, treatments for U-NENs mirrored that of other more common NENs. In our retrospective cohort, we observed that patients with WD-UNETs treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) and everolimus suggested potential activity for disease control in WD-UNETs. Prospective studies are needed to assess the activity of new oncology drugs in UNENs.

Primary renal neuroendocrine neoplasms: A systematic literature review, report of four local cases, and original survival analysis of 63 patients from a national registry 2012-2018

Primary renal neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) are rare. We aimed to conduct a systematic review, present local cases, and analyse data from the England's National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service (NCRAS) to provide comprehensive evidence on clinical experience, incidence, and survival to better characterize these tumours. First, a systematic review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method; second, a synthesis of local cases; and, finally, a retrospective population-based cohort analysis of renal NEN recorded between 2012 and 2018 on NCRAS were performed. Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to calculate overall survival and Cox proportional hazard regression to identify prognostic factors. Systematic review identified 48 articles and the evidence was summarized and presented. We reported data from four local cases presenting with abdominal and back pain but without carcinoid syndrome. In population-based analysis, we identified 63 cases of renal NEN between 2012 and 2018 from the registry. Age-standardized incidence was 0.09-0.32 per million with a median age of 64 years (interquartile range = 48-72 years). Survival was worse in males and those aged 64 years and over. Five-year survival for renal neuroendocrine tumours (NET) was 69.8% (95% confidence interval = 66.6-72.7) and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) was 38.4% (95% confidence interval = 34.6-42.0). No independent predictive factor was identified in the multivariable analyses. We have given a systematic review of evidence, published local experience, and reported incidence and survival of renal NEN in England for the first time. We have provided clinicians with evidence on diagnosis and proposed a treatment algorithm of theses rare tumours. The incidence and median age of presentation in England is similar to other published series. Renal NET has better survival than renal NEC as expected. A uniform classification system would reduce inconsistencies in reporting and standardize treatment decisions for this neoplasia.

Impact of treatment modalities on prognosis of patients with metastatic renal collecting duct carcinoma

Although patients with renal collecting duct carcinoma (CDC) benefit from surgery, the value of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CNx) for the prognosis of patients with metastatic CDC remains unclear. Hence, in this study, we used data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry to investigate the prognostic factors and the impact of CNx on the outcomes in patients with metastatic CDC. Data of 521 patients, diagnosed with CDC between 2000 and 2018, were retrieved from the SEER database. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests were used to compare the survival differences between the CNx group and non-surgical group. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors associated with overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) for patients with metastatic CDC. Moreover, multivariate Cox regression analysis guided by directed acyclic graphs (DAG) was used to unfold the impact of CNx and chemotherapy on OS and CSS. 86 patients were identified to have metastatic CDC. The median OS and CSS time were 5 and 6 months, respectively. The OS rates at 1-, 2- and 5-years were 24.4%, 15.1% and 2.3%, respectively. Whereas, the CSS rates at 1-, 2- and 5-years were 27.0%, 17.9% and 2.8%, respectively. Old patients and those receiving CNx or chemotherapy exhibited better survival outcomes. The multivariate regression model identified non-surgical treatment as the only independent prognostic factor for both, OS and CSS. However, DAG-guided multivariate Cox regression model showed that both, CNx and chemotherapy, were associated with both, OS and CSS. Patients with metastatic CDC exhibited worse clinical outcomes. However, CNx improved the prognosis of patients with metastatic CDC. Additionally, surgical resection of visible lesions and suitable chemotherapy were identified as alternative treatment strategies.

Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Female Genitourinary Tract: A Comprehensive Overview

Simple Summary

Primary neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a rare, heterogeneous group of tumors that include well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors, poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma, and paraganglioma. NENs in the urinary tract are observed in <0.05% of individuals, in whom the bladder is the most common site. In this review, we described the epidemiology, pathogenesis, imaging, staging, and management of the genitourinary NENs.

Abstract

Primary neuroendocrine neoplasms are a rare heterogeneous group of tumors that include well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors, poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma, and paraganglioma. An extensive literature search was used to compile the data regarding epidemiology, pathogenesis, imaging features, and management of the urinary system NENs. We also included the updated staging of the NENs at various locations of the urinary system.

Clinicopathological Characteristics and Survival Outcomes of Primary Renal Leiomyosarcoma

Background: Primary renal leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is an exceedingly rare entity with a poor prognosis. We summarized the clinicopathological characteristics, treatment choice, and survival outcomes of LMS from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

Methods: Renal LMS and kidney renal clear cell carcinoma (KIRC) data from 1998 to 2016 were collected from the SEER database. The continuous variables were analyzed using t-tests, while the categorical variables were analyzed using Pearson's chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests. Propensity score matching (PSM) was also performed. The cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) curves were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analyses and compared by log-rank tests. The risk factors for CSS and OS were estimated using univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models.

Results: A total of 140 patients with renal LMS and 75,401 patients with KIRC were enrolled. These groups differed significantly in sex, race, tumor size, grade, SEER stage, surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. Renal LMS exhibited poorer CSS and OS compared with KIRC before and after PSM. For renal LMS, the univariate Cox proportional hazard regression model indicated that larger tumor size, higher tumor grade, higher SEER stage, and chemotherapy were risk factors for CSS and OS, while surgery appeared to be a protective factor. However, only tumor grade, SEER stage, and receiving surgery remained independent prognostic factors in the multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression model. In addition, subgroup analyses indicated that surgery remained a protective factor for advanced renal LMS. However, there was no survival benefit for patients receiving chemotherapy.

Conclusions: Primary renal LMS is an exceedingly rare entity with distinct clinicopathological features and a poor prognosis. A higher tumor grade and late stage may indicate a poor prognosis. Complete tumor resection remains to be the first treatment choice, while chemotherapy may be a palliative treatment for patients with advanced disease.