1
|
Grivas P, Pouessel D, Park CH, Barthelemy P, Bupathi M, Petrylak DP, Agarwal N, Gupta S, Fléchon A, Ramamurthy C, Davis NB, Recio-Boiles A, Sternberg CN, Bhatia A, Pichardo C, Sierecki M, Tonelli J, Zhou H, Tagawa ST, Loriot Y. Sacituzumab Govitecan in Combination With Pembrolizumab for Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Cancer That Progressed After Platinum-Based Chemotherapy: TROPHY-U-01 Cohort 3. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:1415-1425. [PMID: 38261969 PMCID: PMC11095901 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.02835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Pembrolizumab is standard therapy for patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) who progress after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy; however, only approximately 21% of patients respond. Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is a trophoblast cell surface antigen-2-directed antibody-drug conjugate with US Food and Drug Administration-accelerated approval to treat patients with locally advanced or mUC who previously received platinum-based chemotherapy and a checkpoint inhibitor (CPI). Here, we report the primary analysis of TROPHY-U-01 cohort 3. METHODS TROPHY-U-01 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03547973) is a multicohort, open-label phase II study. Patients were CPI-naïve and had mUC progression after platinum-based chemotherapy in the metastatic setting or ≤12 months in the (neo)adjuvant setting. Patients received 10 mg/kg of SG once on days 1 and 8 and 200 mg of pembrolizumab once on day 1 of 21-day cycles. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) per central review. Secondary end points included clinical benefit rate (CBR), duration of response (DOR) and progression-free survival (PFS) per central review, and safety. RESULTS Cohort 3 included 41 patients (median age 67 years; 83% male; 78% visceral metastases [29% liver]). With a median follow-up of 14.8 months, the ORR was 41% (95% CI, 26.3 to 57.9; 20% complete response rate), CBR was 46% (95% CI, 30.7 to 62.6), median DOR was 11.1 months (95% CI, 4.8 to not estimable [NE]), and median PFS was 5.3 months (95% CI, 3.4 to 10.2). The median overall survival was 12.7 months (range, 10.7-NE). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 61% of patients; most common were neutropenia (37%), leukopenia (20%), and diarrhea (20%). CONCLUSION SG plus pembrolizumab demonstrated a high response rate with an overall manageable toxicity profile in patients with mUC who progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy. No new safety signals were detected. These data support further evaluation of SG plus CPI in mUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petros Grivas
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Damien Pouessel
- Department of Medical Oncology & Clinical Research Unit, Institut Claudius Regaud/Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse (IUCT-Oncopôle), Toulouse, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Chethan Ramamurthy
- University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Scott T. Tagawa
- Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
| | - Yohann Loriot
- Institut de Cancérologie Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sheng X, Wang L, He Z, Shi Y, Luo H, Han W, Yao X, Shi B, Liu J, Hu C, Liu Z, Guo H, Yu G, Ji Z, Ying J, Ling Y, Yu S, Hu Y, Guo J, Fang J, Zhou A, Guo J. Efficacy and Safety of Disitamab Vedotin in Patients With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Combined Analysis of Two Phase II Clinical Trials. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:1391-1402. [PMID: 37988648 PMCID: PMC11095880 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.02912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2022] [Revised: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/23/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of disitamab vedotin (DV, RC48-ADC), a novel humanized anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) antibody conjugated with monomethyl auristatin E, in patients with HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) refractory to standard or regular therapies. PATIENTS AND METHODS The data analyzed and reported are from two phase II, open-label, multicenter, single-arm studies (RC48-C005 and RC48-C009) in patients with HER2-positive (immunohistochemistry 3+ or 2+) locally advanced or metastatic UC who have progressed on at least one previous line of systemic chemotherapy. Patients received DV treatment (2 mg/kg IV infusion, once every 2 weeks). The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) assessed by a blinded independent review committee (BIRC). Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety were also assessed. RESULTS One hundred and seven patients were enrolled in total. The overall confirmed ORR by BIRC was 50.5% (95% CI, 40.6 to 60.3). Consistent results were observed in prespecified subgroups including patients with liver metastasis and patients previously treated with anti-PD-1/L1 therapies. By the cutoff date of May 10, 2022, the median duration of response was 7.3 months (95% CI, 5.7 to 10.8). The median PFS and OS were 5.9 months (95% CI, 4.3 to 7.2) and 14.2 months (95% CI, 9.7 to 18.8), respectively. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were peripheral sensory neuropathy (68.2%), leukopenia (50.5%), AST increased (42.1%), and neutropenia (42.1%). Fifty-eight (54.2%) patients experienced grade ≥3 TRAEs, including peripheral sensory neuropathy (18.7%) and neutropenia (12.1%). CONCLUSION DV demonstrated a promising efficacy with a manageable safety profile in patients with HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic UC who had progressed on at least one line of systemic chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinan Sheng
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Lin Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zhisong He
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, National Urological Cancer Center of China, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Yanxia Shi
- Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hong Luo
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital and Chongqing Cancer Institute and Chongqing Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Weiqing Han
- Department of Urology, Hunan Cancer Hospital/The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Xin Yao
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Benkang Shi
- Department of Urology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Jiyan Liu
- Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Changlu Hu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Anhui Provincial Cancer Hospital, Hefei, China
| | - Ziling Liu
- Department of Cancer Centre, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Hongqian Guo
- Department of Urology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Guohua Yu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Weifang People's Hospital, Weifang, China
| | - Zhigang Ji
- Department of Urology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jianming Ying
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer /Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yun Ling
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer /Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Shiying Yu
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yi Hu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jianming Guo
- Department of Urology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jianmin Fang
- RemeGen, Ltd, Yantai, China
- School of Life Science and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Aiping Zhou
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jun Guo
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bakaloudi DR, Talukder R, Lin GI, Makrakis D, Diamantopoulos LN, Tripathi N, Agarwal N, Zakopoulou R, Bamias A, Brown JR, Pinato DJ, Korolewicz J, Jindal T, Koshkin VS, Murgić J, Miletić M, Frobe A, Johnson J, Zakharia Y, Drakaki A, Rodriguez-Vida A, Rey-Cárdenas M, Castellano D, Buznego LA, Duran I, Carballeira CC, Barrera RM, Marmorejo D, McKay RR, Stewart T, Gupta S, Ruplin AT, Yu EY, Khaki AR, Grivas P. Response and Outcomes of Maintenance Avelumab After Platinum-Based Chemotherapy (PBC) in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma (aUC): "Real World" Experience. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2023; 21:584-593. [PMID: 37414620 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Revised: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) followed by avelumab switch maintenance in nonprogressors is standard first line (1L) treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC). We describe clinical features and outcomes in a "real-world' cohort treated with avelumab maintenance for aUC. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study of patients (pts) who received 1L switch maintenance avelumab after no progression on PBC for aUC. We calculated progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from initiation of maintenance avelumab. We also described OS and PFS for specific subsets using Cox regression and observed response rate (ORR). RESULTS A total of 108 pts with aUC from 14 sites treated with maintenance avelumab were included. There was a median of 6 weeks1-30 from end of PBC to avelumab initiation; median follow-up time from avelumab initiation was 8.8 months (1-42.7). Median [m]PFS was 9.6 months (95%CI 7.5-12.1) and estimated 1-year OS was 72.5%. CR/PR (vs. SD) to 1L PBC (HR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.13-0.87) and ECOG PS 0 (vs. ≥1), (HR = 0.15, 95% CI 0.05-0.47) were associated with longer OS. The presence of liver metastases was associated with shorter PFS (HR = 2.32, 95% CI 1.17-4.59). ORR with avelumab maintenance was 28.7% (complete response 17.6%, partial response 11.1%), 29.6% stable disease, 26.9% progressive disease as best response (14.8% best response unknown). CONCLUSIONS Results seem relatively consistent with findings from JAVELIN Bladder100 trial and recent "real world" studies. Prior response to platinum-based chemotherapy, ECOG PS 0, and absence of liver metastases were favorable prognostic factors. Limitations include the retrospective design, lack of randomization and central scan review, and possible selection/confounding biases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rafee Talukder
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Dimitrios Makrakis
- Department of Medicine, Jacobi Medical Center-Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
| | | | - Nishita Tripathi
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Neeraj Agarwal
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Roubini Zakopoulou
- 2nd Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, ATTIKON University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Aristotelis Bamias
- 2nd Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, ATTIKON University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Jason R Brown
- Division of Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Clevelant, OH
| | - David J Pinato
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, UK; Division of Oncology, Department of Translational Medicine (DIMET), University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - James Korolewicz
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, UK
| | - Tanya Jindal
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Helen Diller Family Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Vadim S Koshkin
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Helen Diller Family Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Jure Murgić
- Department of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, School of Dental Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Marija Miletić
- Department of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, School of Dental Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Ana Frobe
- Department of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry, University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Jeffrey Johnson
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| | - Yousef Zakharia
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| | - Alexandra Drakaki
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Alejo Rodriguez-Vida
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital del Mar, IMM Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Daniel Castellano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Lucia Alonso Buznego
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Marqués of Valdecilla, IDIVAL Santander, Cantabria, Spain
| | - Ignacio Duran
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Marqués of Valdecilla, IDIVAL Santander, Cantabria, Spain
| | - Clara Castro Carballeira
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Marqués of Valdecilla, IDIVAL Santander, Cantabria, Spain
| | - Rafael Morales Barrera
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d' Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Marmorejo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d' Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rana R McKay
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Tyler Stewart
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Shilpa Gupta
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Taussig cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
| | | | - Evan Y Yu
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Ali R Khaki
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
| | - Petros Grivas
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhang Z, Pan Q, Lu M, Zhao B. Intermediate endpoints as surrogates for outcomes in cancer immunotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of phase 3 trials. EClinicalMedicine 2023; 63:102156. [PMID: 37600482 PMCID: PMC10432823 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2023] [Revised: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Cancer immunotherapy shows unique efficacy kinetics that differs from conventional treatment. These characteristics may lead to the prolongation of trial duration, hence reliable surrogate endpoints are urgently needed. We aimed to systematically evaluate the study-level performance of commonly reported intermediate clinical endpoints for surrogacy in cancer immunotherapy. Methods We searched the Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane databases, between database inception and October 18, 2022, for phase 3 randomised trials investigating the efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumours. An updated search was done on July, 15, 2023. No language restrictions were used. Eligible trials had to set overall survival (OS) as the primary or co-primary endpoint and report at least one intermediate clinical endpoint including objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and 1-year overall survival. Other key inclusion and exclusion criteria included: (1) adult patients (>18 years old) with advanced solid tumour; (2) no immunotherapy conducted in the control arms; (3) follow-up is long enough to achieve OS; (4) data should be public available. A two-stage meta-analytic approach was conducted to evaluate the magnitude of the association between these intermediate endpoints and OS. A surrogate was identified if the coefficient of determination (R2) was 0.7 or greater. Leave-one-out cross-validation and pre-defined subgroup analysis were conducted to examine the heterogeneity. Potential publication bias was evaluated using the Egger's and Begg's tests. This trial was registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42022381648. Findings 52,342 patients with 15 types of tumours from 77 phase 3 studies were included. ORR (R2 = 0.11; 95% CI, 0.00-0.24), DCR (R2 = 0.01; 95% CI, 0.00-0.01), and PFS (R2 = 0.40; 95% CI, 0.23-0.56) showed weak associations with OS. However, a strong correlation was observed between 1-year survival and clinical outcome (R2 = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.64-0.83). These associations remained relatively consistent across pre-defined subgroups stratified based on tumour types, masking methods, line of treatments, drug targets, treatment strategies, and follow-up durations. No significant heterogeneities or publication bias were identified. Interpretation 1-year milestone survival was the only identified surrogacy endpoint for outcomes in cancer immunotherapy. Ongoing investigations and development of new endpoints and incorporation of biomarkers are needed to identify potential surrogate markers that can be more robust than 1-year survival. This work may provide important references in assisting the design and interpretation of future clinical trials, and constitute complementary information in drafting clinical practice guidelines. Funding None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhishan Zhang
- Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
| | - Qunxiong Pan
- Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
| | - Mingdong Lu
- The Second Affiliated Hospital & Yuying Children's Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Bin Zhao
- Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Makrakis D, Bakaloudi DR, Talukder R, Lin GI, Diamantopoulos LN, Jindal T, Vather-Wu N, Zakharia Y, Tripathi N, Agarwal N, Dawsey S, Gupta S, Lu E, Drakaki A, Liu S, Zakopoulou R, Bamias A, Fulgenzi CM, Cortellini A, Pinato D, Barata P, Grivas P, Khaki AR, Koshkin VS. Treatment Rechallenge With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2023; 21:286-294. [PMID: 36481176 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Revised: 10/30/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine patient and disease characteristics, toxicity, and clinical outcomes for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) who are rechallenged with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this retrospective cohort, we included patients treated with ICI for aUC after having prior ICI treatment. Endpoints included the evaluation of radiographic response and disease control rates with first and second ICI courses, outcomes based on whether there was a change in ICI class (anti-PD-1 vs. anti-PD-L1), and assessment of the reasons for ICI discontinuation. RESULTS We identified 25 patients with aUC from 9 institutions who received 2 separate ICI courses. ORR with first ICI and second ICI were 39% and 13%, respectively. Most patients discontinued first ICI due to progression (n = 19) or treatment-related toxicity (n = 4). Thirteen patients received non-ICI treatment between the first and second ICI, and 12 patients changed ICI class (anti-PD-1 vs. anti-PD-L1) at rechallenge. Among 10 patients who changed ICI class, 8 (80%) had progressive disease as best response with second ICI, while among 12 patients re-treated with the same ICI class, only 3 (25%) had progressive disease as best response at the time of rechallenge. With second ICI, most patients discontinued treatment due to progression (n = 18) or patient preference (n = 2). CONCLUSIONS A proportion of patients with aUC rechallenged with ICI-based regimens may achieve disease control, supporting clinical trials in that setting, especially with ICI-based combinations. Future studies are needed to validate our results and should also focus on identifying biomarkers predictive of benefit with ICI rechallenge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios Makrakis
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Rafee Talukder
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | | | | | - Tanya Jindal
- Helen Diller Family Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Yousef Zakharia
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| | - Nishita Tripathi
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Neeraj Agarwal
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Scott Dawsey
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | - Shilpa Gupta
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | - Eric Lu
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Alexandra Drakaki
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Sandy Liu
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Roubini Zakopoulou
- 2nd Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, ATTIKON University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Aristotelis Bamias
- 2nd Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, ATTIKON University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Claudia-Maria Fulgenzi
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London; Department of Medical Oncology, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Italy
| | - Alessio Cortellini
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London; Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - David Pinato
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London; Division of Oncology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Pedro Barata
- Tulane Medical School, New Orleans, LA; University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH
| | - Petros Grivas
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Ali Raza Khaki
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Vadim S Koshkin
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Helen Diller Family Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bamias A, Merseburger A, Loriot Y, James N, Choy E, Castellano D, Lopez-Rios F, Calabrò F, Kramer M, de Velasco G, Zakopoulou R, Tzannis K, Sternberg CN. New prognostic model in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma treated with second-line immune checkpoint inhibitors. J Immunother Cancer 2023; 11:jitc-2022-005977. [PMID: 36627145 PMCID: PMC9835946 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2022-005977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bellmunt Risk Score, based on Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS), hemoglobin levels and presence of liver metastases, is the most established prognostic algorithm for patients with advanced urothelial cancer (aUC) progressing after platinum-based chemotherapy. Nevertheless, existing algorithms may not be sufficient following the introduction of immunotherapy. Our aim was to develop an improved prognostic model in patients receiving second-line atezolizumab for aUC. METHODS Patients with aUC progressing after cisplatin/carboplatin-based chemotherapy and enrolled in the prospective, single-arm, phase IIIb SAUL study were included in this analysis. Patients were treated with 3-weekly atezolizumab 1200 mg intravenously. The development and internal validation of a prognostic model for overall survival (OS) was performed using Cox regression analyses, bootstrapping methods and calibration. RESULTS In 936 patients, ECOG PS, alkaline phosphatase, hemoglobin, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, liver metastases, bone metastases and time from last chemotherapy were identified as independent prognostic factors. In a 4-tier model, median OS for patients with 0-1, 2, 3-4 and 5-7 risk factors was 18.6, 10.4, 4.8 and 2.1 months, respectively. Compared with Bellmunt Risk Score, this model provided enhanced prognostic separation, with a c-index of 0.725 vs 0.685 and increment in c-statistic of 0.04 (p<0.001). Inclusion of PD-L1 expression did not improve the model. CONCLUSIONS We developed and internally validated a prognostic model for patients with aUC receiving postplatinum immunotherapy. This model represents an improvement over the Bellmunt algorithm and could aid selection of patients with aUC for second-line immunotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02928406.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aristotelis Bamias
- Second Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Chaidari, Greece
| | | | | | | | | | | | - F Lopez-Rios
- Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
| | - Fabio Calabrò
- GU Oncology Unit, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, Roma, Italy
| | - Mario Kramer
- University Clinic Schleswig-Holstein-Lubeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | | | | | - Kimon Tzannis
- National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Cora N Sternberg
- Hematology and Oncology Englander Institute for Precision Medicine Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|