Heart-type fatty acid binding protein in elective cardioversion of atrial fibrillation

The Role of Biochemical Cardiac Markers in Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common type of cardiac arrhythmia. Proteins are a component of cardiac biomarkers containing cell structures that are released into the circulation when a myocardial injury occurs. They are essential in the diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment of patients who have chest pain, are thought to have acute coronary syndrome, or are experiencing acute heart failure exacerbations. There are numerous biochemical cardiac markers, but this article summarizes the basic role of major biochemical cardiac markers, including cardiac natriuretic peptides, cardiac troponins, C-reactive protein (CRP), creatine kinase-MB, heart-type fatty acid-binding protein, ischemia-modified albumin, lipoprotein (a), osteopontin (OPN), and soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2), in AF. Atrial natriuretic peptide may serve as an indicator of atrial integrity, which may help to select appropriate treatment approaches for AF. Higher levels of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and brain natriuretic peptide are predictive of incidental AF. Increased troponin T release may indicate better clinical results following AF ablation. Similarly, CRP increases the risk of the AF-increasing calcium (Ca) influx in atrial myocytes, but not because of atrial fibrosis. Patients with postoperative AF have lower FABP3 gene expression in the atrium. Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) may play a causative role in the onset of AF and impact various cardiac tissues. Clinical trials for Lp(a)-lowering drugs should assess their impact on preventing AF. Also, OPN was highly expressed in the circulation of AF patients and further increased with the progression of AF. sST2 was a reliable predictor of new-onset AF and can improve the accuracy of the AF risk model. There is a greater chance that these cardiac biomarkers might be employed to enhance clinical risk stratification in AF.

Heart-type fatty acid-binding protein in cardiovascular disease: A systemic review

Fatty acid-binding proteins, whose clinical applications have been studied, are a family of proteins that reflect tissue injury. Heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (H-FABP) is a marker of ongoing myocardial damage and useful for early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). In the past decade, compared to other cardiac enzymes, H-FABP has shown more promise as an early detection marker for AMI. However, the role of H-FABP is being re-examined due to recent refinement in the search for newer biomarkers, and greater understanding of the role of high-sensitivity troponin. We discuss the current role of H-FABP as an early marker for AMI in the era of high sensitive troponin. H-FABP is highlighted as a prognostic marker for a broad spectrum of fatal diseases, viz., AMI, heart failure, arrhythmia, and pulmonary embolism that could be associated with poor clinical outcomes. Because the cut-off value of what constitutes an abnormal H-FABP potentially differs for each cardiovascular event and depends on the clinical setting, an optimal cut-off value has not been clearly established. Of note, several factors such as age, gender, and cardiovascular risk factors, which affect H-FABP levels need to be considered in this context. In this review, we discuss the clinical applications of H-FABP as a prognostic marker in various clinical settings.

Heart type fatty acid binding protein in relation to pharmacologic scintigraphy in coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (H-FABP) is a marker of myocardial necrosis, but whether it increases during myocardial ischemia is not known. This study investigated whether serum levels of H-FABP change during adenosine stress testing and nuclear imaging in patients with stable coronary artery disease.

METHODS

Thirty stable patients with established coronary artery disease on their medications were studied. Sampling was performed before the stress test, at the end of adenosine infusion, as well as 1, 2 and 3 h after the completion of the infusion.

RESULTS

No difference in H-FABP serum levels were found at the five pre-specified time points in the overall group (p=0.99); furthermore, there was no significant difference regardless of the test result--positive (p=1) or negative (p=0.98).

CONCLUSIONS

It is concluded that H-FABP does not change significantly during pharmacologic stress testing in patients with known coronary artery disease and there is no difference whether there is inducible ischemia or not.