Valproic acid derivatives signal for apoptosis and repair in vitro

Biomarkers of Drug-Induced Liver Toxicity

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a comprehensive phenomenon. The injury to the liver may occur as an unexpected and undesired reaction to a therapeutic dose of a drug (idiosyncratic reaction) or as an expected therapeutic effect of the direct (intrinsic) toxicity of a drug taken in a large enough dose to cause liver injury. The direct toxicity (type A) reactions represent an extension of the drug's therapeutic effect; they occur relatively frequently and are typically dose-related and frequency-of-exposure-related. By contrast, idiosyncratic reactions, or type B reactions, are unpredictable, occurring only in susceptible individuals, and are unrelated to the dose or frequency of exposure. DILI encompasses both acute and/or chronic hepatic lesions. The liver injury may be the only clinical manifestation of the adverse drug effect. Otherwise, it may be accompanied by injury to other organs, or by systemic manifestations. The liver injury may be observed in 1-8 days from taking the drug. DILI cases may result in the disapproval of a new drug or in the removal of a useful drug from the market by regulatory agencies. The purpose of this review is to provide guidance to facilitate the detection and assessment of hepatotoxicity induced by therapeutics that received market authorization. This review supports the safe and effective use of drugs by patients and guides laboratory medicine professional in determining the possible drug-induced liver damage.

Antiepileptic Drugs and Liver Disease

Acute, symptomatic seizures or epilepsy may complicate the course of hepatic disease. Choosing the most appropriate antiepileptic drug in this setting represents a difficult challenge, as most medications are metabolized by the liver. This article focuses on the acute and chronic treatment of seizures in patients with advanced liver disease and reviews the hepatotoxic potential of specific antiepileptic drugs. Newer antiepileptic drugs without, or with minimal, hepatic metabolism, such as levetiracetam, lacosamide, topiramate, gabapentin, and pregabalin should be used as first-line therapy. Medications undergoing extensive hepatic metabolism, such as valproic acid, phenytoin, and felbamate should be used as drugs of last resort. In special circumstances, as in patients affected by acute intermittent porphyria, exposure to most antiepileptic drugs could precipitate attacks. In this clinical scenario, bromides, levetiracetam, gabapentin, and vigabatrin constitute safe choices. For the treatment of status epilepticus, levetiracetam and lacosamide, available in intravenous preparations, are good second-line therapies after benzodiazepines fail to control seizures. Hepatotoxicity is also a rare and unexpected side effect of some antiepileptic drugs. Drugs such as valproic acid, phenytoin, and felbamate, have a well-recognized association with liver toxicity. Other antiepileptic drugs, including phenobarbital, benzodiazepines, ethosuximide, and the newer generations of antiepileptic drugs, have only rarely been linked to hepatotoxicity. Thus physicians should be mindful of the pharmacokinetic profile and the hepatotoxic potential of the different antiepileptic drugs available to treat patients affected by liver disease.

Toxicity of Antiepileptic Drugs to Mitochondria

Some of the side and beneficial effects of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are mediated via the influence on mitochondria. This is of particular importance in patients requiring AED treatment for mitochondrial epilepsy. AED treatment in patients with mitochondrial disorders should rely on the known influences of AEDs on these organelles. AEDs may influence various mitochondrial functions or structures in a beneficial or detrimental way. There are AEDs in which the toxic effect outweighs the beneficial effect, such as valproic acid (VPA), carbamazepine (CBZ), phenytoin (PHT), or phenobarbital (PB). There are, however, also AEDs in which the beneficial effect on mitochondria outweighs the mitochondrion-toxic effect, such as gabapentin (GBT), lamotrigine (LTG), levetiracetam (LEV), or zonisamide (ZNS). In the majority of the AEDs, however, information about their influence of mitochondria is lacking. In clinical practice mitochondrial epilepsy should be initially treated with AEDs with low mitochondrion-toxic potential. Only in cases of ineffectivity or severe mitochondrial epilepsy, mitochondrion-toxic AEDs should be given. This applies for AEDs given orally or intravenously.

Common biological mechanisms between bipolar disorder and type 2 diabetes: Focus on inflammation

INTRODUCTION

Bipolar disorder (BD) patients present a 3-5 fold greater risk of developing type 2 diabetes (T2D) compared to general population. The underlying mechanisms for the increased prevalence of T2D in BD population are poorly understood.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this review is to critically review evidence suggesting that inflammation may have an important role in the development of both BD and T2D.

RESULTS

The literature covered in this review suggests that inflammatory dysregulation take place among many BD patients. Such dysregulated and low grade chronic inflammatory process may also increase the prevalence of T2D in BD population. Current evidence supports the hypothesis of dysregulated inflammatory processes as a critical upstream event in BD as well as in T2D.

CONCLUSIONS

Inflammation may be a factor for the development of T2D in BD population. The identification of inflammatory markers common to these two medical conditions will enable researchers and clinicians to better understand the etiology of BD and develop treatments that simultaneously target all aspects of this multi-system condition.