Comparison of cell stabilizing blood collection tubes for circulating plasma tumor DNA

Implementation of a Pilot Study to Analyze Circulating Tumor DNA in Early-Stage Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Liquid biopsies based on plasma circulating tumour deoxyribonucleic acid (ctDNA) have shown promise in monitoring lung cancer evolution. The expression of ctDNA across time, its relationship with clinicopathological parameters and its association with lung cancer progression through imaging allow us to weigh how useful ctDNA could be in monitoring surgically resectable lung cancer. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of ctDNA analysis implementation in early-stage lung cancer.

METHODS

A cohort of 47 patients was sequentially recruited. Only 34 patients with early-stage lung cancer were included. All patients had a tissue specimen and five blood samples drawn: at the preoperative stage, from the pulmonary vein, at surgical discharge, at the first follow-up and at the last follow-up. All blood samples were evaluated for ctDNA expression.

RESULTS

On average, the maximum yield of ctDNA was obtained in liquid biopsies at the surgical discharge of patients when compared with PO, PV, and F1 (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001 respectively). No statistically significant differences were found when comparing the last follow-up to surgical discharge ctDNA expression (p = 0.851). The correlation between ctDNA concentration according to five-time points and the four clinicopathological characteristics showed that patients younger than 70 years had a statistically significant reduction of the concentration of ctDNA at the preoperative and surgical discharge time point [β = -16 734 (-27 707; - 5760); p = 0.003; β = -21 785 (-38 447; -5123); p = 0.010], as opposed to an increase of the concentration of ctDNA at the pulmonary vein and last follow-up time points [β = 8369 (0.359; 16 378); p = 0.041; β = 34 402 (12 549; 56 254); p = 0.002] all with a confidence level of 95%. In the cases where actionable mutations were identified in tissue biopsies, the expected mutation was found in five out of six patients plasma samples at the pre-operatory time point and in two out of six patients plasma samples at the pulmonary vein time point. Two out of six patients with actionable mutations had disease progression.

CONCLUSION

The results of this pilot study suggest that the maximum yield of ctDNA is obtained at the surgical discharge of the patients and that the pre-operatory timepoint is the one offering the highest sensitivity for the detection of actionable mutations in ctDNA in early-stage lung cancer.

The changing face of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) profiling: Factors that shape the landscape of methodologies, technologies, and commercialization

Liquid biopsies, in particular the profiling of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), have long held promise as transformative tools in cancer precision medicine. Despite a prolonged incubation phase, ctDNA profiling has recently experienced a strong wave of development and innovation, indicating its imminent integration into the cancer management toolbox. Various advancements in mutation-based ctDNA analysis methodologies and technologies have greatly improved sensitivity and specificity of ctDNA assays, such as optimized preanalytics, size-based pre-enrichment strategies, targeted sequencing, enhanced library preparation methods, sequencing error suppression, integrated bioinformatics and machine learning. Moreover, research breakthroughs have expanded the scope of ctDNA analysis beyond hotspot mutational profiling of plasma-derived apoptotic, mono-nucleosomal ctDNA fragments. This broader perspective considers alternative genetic features of cancer, genome-wide characterization, classical and newly discovered epigenetic modifications, structural variations, diverse cellular and mechanistic ctDNA origins, and alternative biospecimen types. These developments have maximized the utility of ctDNA, facilitating landmark research, clinical trials, and the commercialization of ctDNA assays, technologies, and products. Consequently, ctDNA tests are increasingly recognized as an important part of patient guidance and are being implemented in clinical practice. Although reimbursement for ctDNA tests by healthcare providers still lags behind, it is gaining greater acceptance. In this work, we provide a comprehensive exploration of the extensive landscape of ctDNA profiling methodologies, considering the multitude of factors that influence its development and evolution. By illuminating the broader aspects of ctDNA profiling, the aim is to provide multiple entry points for understanding and navigating the vast and rapidly evolving landscape of ctDNA methodologies, applications, and technologies.

Exploring the Role of Circulating Cell-Free RNA in the Development of Colorectal Cancer

Circulating tumor RNA (ctRNA) has recently emerged as a novel and attractive liquid biomarker. CtRNA is capable of providing important information about the expression of a variety of target genes noninvasively, without the need for biopsies, through the use of circulating RNA sequencing. The overexpression of cancer-specific transcripts increases the tumor-derived RNA signal, which overcomes limitations due to low quantities of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). The purpose of this work is to present an up-to-date review of current knowledge regarding ctRNAs and their status as biomarkers to address the diagnosis, prognosis, prediction, and drug resistance of colorectal cancer. The final section of the article discusses the practical aspects involved in analyzing plasma ctRNA, including storage and isolation, detection technologies, and their limitations in clinical applications.

Pre-Analytical Evaluation of Streck Cell-Free DNA Blood Collection Tubes for Liquid Profiling in Oncology

Excellent pre-analytical stability is an essential precondition for reliable molecular profiling of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in oncological diagnostics. Therefore, in vitro degradation of ctDNA and the additional release of contaminating genomic DNA from lysed blood cells must be prevented. Streck Cell-Free DNA blood collection tubes (cfDNA BCTs) have proposed advantages over standard K2EDTA tubes, but mainly have been tested in healthy individuals. Blood was collected from cancer patients (n = 53) suffering from colorectal (n = 21), pancreatic (n = 11), and non-small-cell lung cancer (n = 21) using cfDNA BCT tubes and K2EDTA tubes that were processed immediately or after 3 days (BCTs) or 6 hours (K2EDTA) at room temperature. The cfDNA isolated from these samples was characterized in terms of yield using LINE-1 qPCR; the level of gDNA contamination; and the mutation status of KRAS, NRAS, and EGFR genes using BEAMing ddPCR. CfDNA yield and gDNA levels were comparable in both tube types and were not affected by prolonged storage of blood samples for at least 3 days in cfDNA BCTs or 6 hours in K2EDTA tubes. In addition, biospecimens collected in K2EDTA tubes and cfDNA BCTs stored for up to 3 days demonstrated highly comparable levels of mutational load across all respective cancer patient cohorts and a wide range of concentrations. Our data support the applicability of clinical oncology specimens collected and stored in cfDNA BCTs for up to 3 days for reliable cfDNA and mutation analyses.

Performance of ImproGene Cell-Free DNA Tubes for Stabilization and Analysis of cfDNA in Blood Samples

BACKGROUND

With the development of liquid biopsy technology, the demand for noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is increasing rapidly. The aim of the study is to evaluate the effects of different blood collection tubes on plasma cfDNA and NIPT quality control.

METHODS

We investigated hemolysis, cfDNA concentration, and fragment distribution within blood samples stored in EDTA, ImproGene, and Streck tubes. The effects of ImproGene and Streck tubes on NIPT quality control were evaluated.

RESULTS

The ImproGene tubes prevented the time-dependent increase of cfDNA concentration and preserved the cfDNA fragment size distribution. For NIPT quality control, there is no significant difference in cfDNA, library concentration, and fetal fraction between ImproGene and Streck tubes samples. GC content of the samples in ImproGene tubes was closer to the human genome.

CONCLUSION

The ImproGene cfDNA tube has excellent performance and is an effective choice for storing blood samples for NIPT testing or other cfDNA analysis.

Circulating tumor DNA: current challenges for clinical utility

Cancer cells shed naked DNA molecules into the circulation. This circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has become the predominant analyte for liquid biopsies to understand the mutational landscape of cancer. Coupled with next-generation sequencing, ctDNA can serve as an alternative substrate to tumor tissues for mutation detection and companion diagnostic purposes. In fact, recent advances in precision medicine have rapidly enabled the use of ctDNA to guide treatment decisions for predicting response and resistance to targeted therapies and immunotherapies. An advantage of using ctDNA over conventional tissue biopsies is the relatively noninvasive approach of obtaining peripheral blood, allowing for simple repeated and serial assessments. Most current clinical practice using ctDNA has endeavored to identify druggable and resistance mutations for guiding systemic therapy decisions, albeit mostly in metastatic disease. However, newer research is evaluating potential for ctDNA as a marker of minimal residual disease in the curative setting and as a useful screening tool to detect cancer in the general population. Here we review the history of ctDNA and liquid biopsies, technologies to detect ctDNA, and some of the current challenges and limitations in using ctDNA as a marker of minimal residual disease and as a general blood-based cancer screening tool. We also discuss the need to develop rigorous clinical studies to prove the clinical utility of ctDNA for future applications in oncology.

The effect of hemolysis on quality control metrics for noninvasive prenatal testing

Background

Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is the testing of blood samples from pregnant women to screen for fetal risk of chromosomal disorders. Even though in vitro hemolysis of blood specimens is common in clinical laboratories, its influence on NIPT has not been well investigated.

Methods

Peripheral blood samples were collected from 205 pregnant women and categorized according to the concentration of free hemoglobin in the plasma. After performing NIPT using massively parallel sequencing, the quality control metrics were analyzed and compared with samples that did not undergo hemolysis or samples redrawn from the same women.

Results

The specimens were divided into four groups based on the concentration of free hemoglobin: Group I (0–1 g/L, n = 53), Group II (1–2 g/L, n = 97), Group III (2–4 g/L, n = 30), and Group IV (> 4 g/L, n = 25). There was no significant difference in the quality control metrics of clinical samples with slight or moderate hemolysis (Group II and III). However, samples with severe hemolysis (Group IV) showed a significantly increased rate of duplicated reads (duplication rate) and fetal fraction, as well as decreased library concentration compared with samples without hemolysis. Moreover, the increase in fetal fraction caused by hemolysis was confirmed by redrawing blood samples in Group IV.

Conclusion

For NIPT using massively parallel sequencing, samples with slight or moderate hemolysis (≤ 4 g/L) are acceptable. However, careful consideration should be taken regarding the use of severely hemolyzed samples (> 4 g/L), since they might increase the risk of test failure.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12920-022-01280-2.

Liquid biopsy in lung cancer management

Liquid biopsy is a promising tool for a better cancer management and currently opens perspectives for several clinical applications, such as detection of mutations when the analysis from tissue is not available, monitoring tumor mutational burden and prediction of targeted therapy response. These characteristics validate liquid biopsy analysis as a strong cancer biomarkers source with high potential for improving cancer patient's evolution. Compared to classical biopsy, liquid biopsy is a minimal invasive procedure, and it allows the real-time monitoring of treatment response. Considering that lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer-associated death worldwide and that only 15-19% of the lung cancer patients survive five years after diagnosis, there is an important interest in improving its management. Like in other types of solid cancers, lung cancer could benefit from liquid biopsy through a simple peripheral blood sample as tumor-related biomarkers, such as circulating tumor cells (CTCs), cell-free nucleic acids (cfNA) [cell-free ribonucleic acid (cfRNA) and cell-free deoxyribonucleic acid (cfDNA)], exosomes and tumor-educated platelets (TEPs) may shed into circulation because of necrosis or in an active manner. More, the detection and analysis of these biomarkers could lead to a better understanding of oncological diseases like lung cancer. The better the tumor profile is established; the better management is possible. However, this approach has currently some limitations, such as low cfNA concentration or low count of CTCs that might be overcome by improving the actual methods and technologies.

Liquid biopsy from research to clinical practice: focus on non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

In the current era of personalized medicine, liquid biopsy has acquired a relevant importance in patient management of advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). As a matter of fact, liquid biopsy may supplant the problem of inadequate tissue for molecular testing. The term 'liquid biopsy' refers to a number of different biological fluids, but is most clearly associated with plasma-related platforms. It must be taken into account that pre-analytical processing and the selection of the appropriate technology according to the clinical context may condition the results obtained. In addition, novel clinical applications beyond the evaluation of the molecular status of predictive biomarkers are currently under investigation.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the available evidence on pre-analytical issues and different clinical applications of liquid biopsies in NSCLC patients.

EXPERT OPINION

Liquid biopsy should be considered not only as a valid alternative but as complementary to tissue-based molecular approaches. Careful attention should be paid to the optimization and standardization of all phases of liquid biopsy samples management in order to determine a significant improvement in either sensitivity or specificity, while significant reducing the number of 'false negative' or 'false positive' molecular results.

The breast is yet to come: current and future utility of circulating tumour DNA in breast cancer

Advances in genomic strategies and the development of targeted therapies have enabled precision medicine to revolutionise the field of oncology. Precision medicine uses patient-specific genetic and molecular information, traditionally obtained from tumour biopsy samples, to classify tumours and treat them accordingly. However, biopsy samples often fail to provide complete tumour profiling, and the technique is expensive and, of course, relatively invasive. Advances in genomic techniques have led to improvements in the isolation and detection of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA), a component of a peripheral blood draw/liquid biopsy. Liquid biopsy offers a minimally invasive method to gather genetic information that is representative of a global snapshot of both primary and metastatic sites and can thereby provide invaluable information for potential targeted therapies and methods for tumour surveillance. However, a lack of prospective clinical trials showing direct patient benefit has limited the implementation of liquid biopsies in standard clinical applications. Here, we review the potential of ctDNA obtained by liquid biopsy to revolutionise personalised medicine and discuss current applications of ctDNA both at the benchtop and bedside.

Optimization of Sources of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Variability for Downstream Molecular Analysis

Circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) is used increasingly as a cancer biomarker for prognostication, as a correlate for tumor volume, or as input for downstream molecular analysis. Determining optimal blood processing and ccfDNA quantification are crucial for ccfDNA to serve as an accurate biomarker as it moves into the clinical realm. Whole blood was collected from 50 subjects, processed to plasma, and used immediately or frozen at -80°C. Plasma ccfDNA was extracted and concentration was assessed by real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), fluorimetry, and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). For the 24 plasma samples from metastatic pancreatic cancer patients, the variant allele fractions (VAF) of KRAS G12/13 pathogenic variants in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) were measured by ddPCR. Using a high-speed (16,000 × g) or slower-speed (4100 × g) second centrifugation step showed no difference in ccfDNA yield or ctDNA VAF. A two- versus three-spin centrifugation protocol also showed no difference in ccfDNA yield or ctDNA VAF. A higher yield was observed from fresh versus frozen plasma by qPCR and fluorimetry, whereas a higher yield was observed for frozen versus fresh plasma by ddPCR, however, no difference was observed in ctDNA VAF. Overall, our findings suggest factors to consider when implementing a ccfDNA extraction and quantification workflow in a research or clinical setting.

Assessment of Circulating Nucleic Acids in Cancer: From Current Status to Future Perspectives and Potential Clinical Applications

Current approaches for cancer detection and characterization are based on radiological procedures coupled with tissue biopsies, despite relevant limitations in terms of overall accuracy and feasibility, including relevant patients' discomfort. Liquid biopsies enable the minimally invasive collection and analysis of circulating biomarkers released from cancer cells and stroma, representing therefore a promising candidate for the substitution or integration in the current standard of care. Despite the potential, the current clinical applications of liquid biopsies are limited to a few specific purposes. The lack of standardized procedures for the pre-analytical management of body fluids samples and the detection of circulating biomarkers is one of the main factors impacting the effective advancement in the applicability of liquid biopsies to clinical practice. The aim of this work, besides depicting current methods for samples collection, storage, quality check and biomarker extraction, is to review the current techniques aimed at analyzing one of the main circulating biomarkers assessed through liquid biopsy, namely cell-free nucleic acids, with particular regard to circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). ctDNA current and potential applications are reviewed as well.

Optimization of Preanalytical Variables for cfDNA Processing and Detection of ctDNA in Archival Plasma Samples

DNA released from cells into the peripheral blood is known as cell-free DNA (cfDNA), representing a promising noninvasive source of biomarkers that could be utilized to manage Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL), among other diseases. The procedure for purification and handling of cfDNA is not yet standardized, and various preanalytical variables may affect the yield and analysis of cfDNA, including the purification kits, blood collection tubes, and centrifugation regime. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the impact of these preanalytical variables on the yield of cfDNA by comparing three different purification kits DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen), QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit (Qiagen), and Quick-cfDNA Serum & Plasma Kit (Zymo Research). Two blood collection tubes (BCTs), EDTA-K2 and Cell-Free DNA (Streck), stored at four different time points before plasma was separated and cfDNA purified, were compared, and for EDTA tubes, two centrifugation regimes at 2000 × g and 3000 × g were tested. Additionally, we have tested the utility of long-term archival blood samples from DLBCL patients to detect circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). We observed a higher cfDNA yield using the QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit (Qiagen) purification kit, as well as a higher cfDNA yield when blood samples were collected in EDTA BCTs, with a centrifuge regime at 2000 × g. Moreover, ctDNA detection was feasible from archival plasma samples with a median storage time of nine years.

Next-Generation Sequencing with Liquid Biopsies from Treatment-Naïve Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma Patients

Recently, the liquid biopsy (LB), a non-invasive and easy to repeat approach, has started to compete with the tissue biopsy (TB) for detection of targets for administration of therapeutic strategies for patients with advanced stages of lung cancer at tumor progression. A LB at diagnosis of late stage non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) is also being performed. It may be asked if a LB can be complementary (according to the clinical presentation or systematics) or even an alternative to a TB for treatment-naïve advanced NSCLC patients. Nucleic acid analysis with a TB by next-generation sequencing (NGS) is gradually replacing targeted sequencing methods for assessment of genomic alterations in lung cancer patients with tumor progression, but also at baseline. However, LB is still not often used in daily practice for NGS. This review addresses different aspects relating to the use of LB for NGS at diagnosis in advanced NSCLC, including its advantages and limitations.

Liquid biopsy in NSCLC: a new challenge in radiation therapy

Lung cancer is the most common cancer and the leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. To date, tissue biopsy has been the gold standard for the diagnosis and the identification of specific molecular mutations, to guide choice of therapy. However, this procedure has several limitations. Liquid biopsy could represent a solution to the intrinsic limits of traditional biopsy. It can detect cancer markers such as circulating tumor DNA or RNA (ctDNA, ctRNA), and circulating tumor cells, in plasma, serum or other biological fluids. This procedure is minimally invasive, reproducible and can be used repeatedly. The main clinical applications of liquid biopsy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients are the early diagnosis, stratification of the risk of relapse, identification of mutations to guide application of targeted therapy and the evaluation of the minimum residual disease. In this review, the current role of liquid biopsy and associated markers in the management of NSCLC patients was analyzed, with emphasis on ctDNA and CTCs, and radiotherapy.

Next generation sequencing for liquid biopsy based testing in non-small cell lung cancer in 2021

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) representing its most commonly diagnosed sub-type. Despite the significant improvements in lung cancer biomarkers knowledge, accompanied by substantial technological advances in molecular tumor profiling, a considerable fraction (up to 30 %) of advanced NSCLC patient presents with major testing challenges or tissue unavailability for molecular analysis. In this context, liquid biopsy is on the rise, currently gaining considerable interest within the molecular pathology and oncology community. Molecular profiling of liquid biopsy specimens using next generation molecular biology methodologies is a rapidly evolving field with promising applications not exclusively limited to advanced stages but also more recently expanding to early stages cancer patients. Here, we offer an overview of some of the most consolidated and emerging applications of next generation sequencing technologies for liquid biopsy testing in NSCLC.

Ultrasensitive circulating tumor DNA analysis enables precision medicine: experimental workflow considerations

Introduction: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has become a relevant biomarker in cancer management, allowing tumor assessment through analysis of minimally invasive liquid biopsies. Applications include screening, diagnostics, monitoring of treatment efficacy and detection of minimal residual disease as well as relapse. The potential of ctDNA analysis is significant, but several biological and technical challenges need to be addressed before widespread clinical implementation.Areas covered: Several clinical applications where ctDNA analysis may be beneficial require detection of individual DNA molecules. Consequently, to acquire accurate and informative data the entire workflow from sampling to final data interpretation needs to be optimized. In this review, we discuss the biological and technical challenges of ctDNA analysis and how preanalytical and analytical approaches affect different cancer applications.Expert opinion: While numerous studies have demonstrated the potential of using ctDNA in cancer applications, yet few reports about true clinical utility exist. Despite encouraging data, the sensitivity of ctDNA analyses, i.e. the probability to detect presence of cancer in liquid biopsies, is still an issue. Analysis of multiple mutations in combination with simultaneous assessment of other analytes is one solution. Improved standardization and guidelines will also facilitate the introduction of ctDNA analysis into clinical routine.

Specialized Blood Collection Tubes for Liquid Biopsy: Improving the Pre-analytical Conditions

INTRODUCTION

The potential of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis as a liquid biopsy has led to the development of several specialized measuring tools. Interest in the (pre-)analytical conditions of the liquid biopsy workflow has increased over the past few years.

METHODS

In this study, we performed a systematic review of the cfDNA stabilizing efficacy in standard EDTA and specialized blood collection tubes (BCTs), namely CellSave, Norgen, PAXgene, Roche, and Streck tubes, and compared the efficacy of the latter three BCTs in a situation resembling the clinical setting. Blood samples were collected from ten KRAS-mutated metastatic cancer patients and stored for 72 h. During this time, samples were shaken and kept at either 6 °C or at room temperature for 24 h to mimic transport.

RESULTS

We demonstrated that while cfDNA levels in EDTA tubes are only stable for a couple of (≤ 6) hours, they could be sustained for at least 48-72 h in all three specialized BCTs, irrespective of temperature. This timespan enables a fast turnaround time, which is one of the advantages of liquid biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

The choice between these specialized BCTs is less vital when they are processed correctly within a few days.

Noninvasive Monitoring of Mantle Cell Lymphoma by Immunoglobulin Gene Next-Generation Sequencing in a Phase 2 Study of Sequential Chemoradioimmunotherapy Followed by Autologous Stem-Cell Rescue

Limited information exists in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) on the performance of next-generation sequencing–based assay of immunoglobulin gene rearrangements for minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment. Posttreatment peripheral blood samples were collected from 16 MCL patients and analyzed with the Adaptive Biotechnologies MRD assay, which identified early molecular relapse. We observed more sensitivity in the cellular versus acellular compartment.

Implementing ctDNA Analysis in the Clinic: Challenges and Opportunities in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Tumor genomic profiling has a dramatic impact on the selection of targeted treatment and for the identification of resistance mechanisms at the time of progression. Solid tissue biopsies are sometimes challenging, and liquid biopsies are used as a non-invasive alternative when tissue is limiting. The clinical relevance of tumor genotyping through analysis of ctDNA is now widely recognized at all steps of the clinical evaluation process in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. ctDNA analysis through liquid biopsy has recently gained increasing attention as well in the management of early and locally advanced, not oncogene-addicted, NSCLC. Its potential applications in early disease detection and the response evaluation to radical treatments are promising. The aim of this review is to summarize the landscape of liquid biopsies in clinical practice and also to provide an overview of the potential perspectives of development focusing on early detection and screening, the assessment of minimal residual disease, and its potential role in predicting response to immunotherapy. In addition to available studies demonstrating the clinical relevance of liquid biopsies, there is a need for standardization and well-designed clinical trials to demonstrate its clinical utility.

Circulating Tumor DNA in Cancer Management: A Value Proposition

BACKGROUND

Analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) allows the noninvasive molecular profiling of tumor, and such analysis has gained popularity for the detection of mutations with therapeutic implications. A value-based assessment would be useful for an objective evaluation of the benefits of ctDNA testing.

CONTENT

The value proposition approach was used to evaluate the benefits of implementing ctDNA testing to inform treatment decisions of targeted therapy. The ctDNA testing was shown to complement tumor biopsy testing for the detection of mutations that are predictive of treatment response. It might be particularly useful for tracking resistance mechanisms among patients who experience disease progression despite treatment.

SUMMARY

Patients, clinicians, and laboratory medicine specialists would benefit from the implementation of appropriate ctDNA testing in routine clinical care.

Two Reliable Methodical Approaches for Non-Invasive RHD Genotyping of a Fetus from Maternal Plasma

Noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping is an important tool for predicting RhD incompatibility between a pregnant woman and a fetus. This study aimed to assess a methodological approach other than the commonly used one for noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping on a representative set of RhD-negative pregnant women. The methodology must be accurate, reliable, and broadly available for implementation into routine clinical practice. A total of 337 RhD-negative pregnant women from the Czech Republic region were tested in this study. The fetal RHD genotype was assessed using two methods: real-time PCR and endpoint quantitative fluorescent (QF) PCR. We used exon-7-specific primers from the RHD gene, along with internal controls. Plasma samples were analyzed and measured in four/two parallel reactions to determine the accuracy of the RHD genotyping. The RHD genotype was verified using DNA analysis from a newborn buccal swab. Both methods showed an excellent ability to predict the RHD genotype. Real-time PCR achieved its greatest accuracy of 98.6% (97.1% sensitivity and 100% specificity (95% CI)) if all four PCRs were positive/negative. The QF PCR method also achieved its greatest accuracy of 99.4% (100% sensitivity and 98.6% specificity (95% CI)) if all the measurements were positive/negative. Both real-time PCR and QF PCR were reliable methods for precisely assessing the fetal RHD allele from the plasma of RhD-negative pregnant women.

Assessment of Pre-Analytical Sample Handling Conditions for Comprehensive Liquid Biopsy Analysis

Liquid biopsies as a minimally invasive approach have the potential to revolutionize molecular diagnostics. Yet, although protocols for sample handling and the isolation of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) are numerous, comprehensive guidelines for diagnostics and research considering all aspects of real-life multicenter clinical studies are currently not available. These include limitations in sample volume, transport, and blood collection tubes. We tested the impact of commonly used (EDTA and heparin) and specialized blood collection tubes and storage conditions on the yield and purity of cell-free DNA for the application in down-stream analysis. Moreover, we evaluated the feasibility of a combined workflow for ctDNA and tumor cell genomic testing and parallel flow cytometric analysis of leukocytes. For genomic analyses, EDTA tubes showed good results if stored for a maximum of 4 hours at room temperature or for up to 24 hours when stored at 4°C. Spike-in experiments revealed that EDTA tubes in combination with density gradient centrifugation allowed the parallel isolation of ctDNA, leukocytes, and low amounts of tumor cells (0.1%) and their immunophenotyping by flow cytometry and down-stream genomic analysis by whole genome sequencing. In conclusion, adhering to time and temperature limits allows the use of routine EDTA blood samples for liquid biopsy analyses. We further provide a workflow enabling the parallel analysis of cell-free and cellular features for disease monitoring and for clonal evolution studies.

Pre-analytical issues in liquid biopsy – where do we stand?

It is well documented that in the chain from sample to the result in a clinical laboratory, the pre-analytical phase is the weakest and most vulnerable link. This also holds for the use and analysis of extracellular nucleic acids. In this short review, we will summarize and critically evaluate the most important steps of the pre-analytical phase, i.e. the choice of the best control population for the patients to be analyzed, the actual blood draw, the choice of tubes for blood drawing, the impact of delayed processing of blood samples, the best method for getting rid of cells and debris, the choice of matrix, i.e. plasma vs. serum vs. other body fluids, and the impact of long-term storage of cell-free liquids on the outcome. Even if the analysis of cell-free nucleic acids has already become a routine application in the area of non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) and in the care of cancer patients (search for resistance mutations in the EGFR gene), there are still many unresolved issues of the pre-analytical phase which need to be urgently tackled.

The Translational Potential of Electrochemical DNA-Based Liquid Biopsy

Latest technological advancement has tremendously expanded the knowledge on the composition of body fluids and the cancer-associated changes, which has fueled the replacement of invasive biopsies with liquid biopsies by using appropriate specific receptors. DNA emerges as a versatile analytical reagent in electrochemical devices for hybridization-based or aptamer-based recognition of all kind of biomarkers. In this mini review, we briefly introduce the current affordable targets (tumor-derived nucleic acids, circulating tumor cells and exosomes) in body fluids, and then we provide an overview of selected electrochemical methods already applied in clinical samples by dividing them into three large categories according to sample type: red (blood), yellow (urine), and white (saliva and sweat) diagnostics. This review focuses on the hurdles of the complex matrices rather than a comprehensive and detailed revision of the format schemes of DNA-based electrochemical sensing. This diverse perspective compiles some challenges that are often forgotten and critically underlines real sample analysis or clinical validation assays. Finally, the needs and trends to reach the market are briefly outlined.

Harmonizing Cell-Free DNA Collection and Processing Practices through Evidence-Based Guidance

Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is rapidly transitioning from discovery research to an important tool in clinical decision making. However, the lack of harmonization of preanalytic practices across institutions may compromise the reproducibility of cfDNA-derived data and hamper advancements in cfDNA testing in the clinic. Differences in cellular genomic contamination, cfDNA yield, integrity, and fragment length have been attributed to different collection tube types and anticoagulants, processing delays and temperatures, tube agitation, centrifugation protocols and speeds, plasma storage duration and temperature, the number of freeze-thaw events, and cfDNA extraction and quantification methods, all of which can also ultimately impact subsequent downstream analysis. Thus, there is a pressing need for widely applicable standards tailored for cfDNA analysis that include all preanalytic steps from blood draw to analysis. The NCI's Biorepositories and Biospecimen Research Branch has developed cfDNA-specific guidelines that are based upon published evidence and have been vetted by a panel of internationally recognized experts in the field. The guidelines include optimal procedures as well as acceptable alternatives to facilitate the generation of evidence-based protocols by individual laboratories and institutions. The aim of the document, which is entitled "Biospecimen Evidence-based Best Practices for Cell-free DNA: Biospecimen Collection and Processing," is to improve the accuracy of cfDNA analysis in both basic research and the clinic by improving and harmonizing practices across institutions.

Cell-free DNA donor fraction analysis in pediatric and adult heart transplant patients by multiplexed allele-specific quantitative PCR: Validation of a rapid and highly sensitive clinical test for stratification of rejection probability

Lifelong noninvasive rejection monitoring in heart transplant patients is a critical clinical need historically poorly met in adults and unavailable for children and infants. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) donor-specific fraction (DF), a direct marker of selective donor organ injury, is a promising analytical target. Methodological differences in sample processing and DF determination profoundly affect quality and sensitivity of cfDNA analyses, requiring specialized optimization for low cfDNA levels typical of transplant patients. Using next-generation sequencing, we previously correlated elevated DF with acute cellular and antibody-mediated rejection (ACR and AMR) in pediatric and adult heart transplant patients. However, next-generation sequencing is limited by cost, TAT, and sensitivity, leading us to clinically validate a rapid, highly sensitive, quantitative genotyping test, myTAI_HEART^®, addressing these limitations. To assure pre-analytical quality and consider interrelated cfDNA measures, plasma preparation was optimized and total cfDNA (TCF) concentration, DNA fragmentation, and DF quantification were validated in parallel for integration into myTAI_HEART reporting. Analytical validations employed individual and reconstructed mixtures of human blood-derived genomic DNA (gDNA), cfDNA, and gDNA sheared to apoptotic length. Precision, linearity, and limits of blank/detection/quantification were established for TCF concentration, DNA fragmentation ratio, and DF determinations. For DF, multiplexed high-fidelity amplification followed by quantitative genotyping of 94 SNP targets was applied to 1168 samples to evaluate donor options in staged simulations, demonstrating DF call equivalency with/without donor genotype. Clinical validation studies using 158 matched endomyocardial biopsy-plasma pairs from 76 pediatric and adult heart transplant recipients selected a DF cutoff (0.32%) producing 100% NPV for ≥2R ACR. This supports the assay’s conservative intended use of stratifying low versus increased probability of ≥2R ACR. myTAI_HEART is clinically validated for heart transplant recipients ≥2 months old and ≥8 days post-transplant, expanding opportunity for noninvasive transplant rejection assessment to infants and children and to all recipients >1 week post-transplant.

Circulating DNA, a Potentially Sensitive and Specific Diagnostic Tool for Future Medicine

Liquid biopsy has the great potential of detecting early diseases before deterioration and is valued for screening abnormalities at early stage. In oncology, circulating DNA derived from shed cancer cells reflects the tissue of origin, so it could be used to locate tissue sites during early screening. However, the heterogenous parameters of different types limit the clinical application, making it inaccessible to encompass all the cancer types. Instead, for reproducible scenario as pregnancy, fetal cell-free DNA has been well utilized for screening aneuploidies. Noninvasive and convenient as is, it would be of great value in the next decades far more than early diagnosis. This review recapitulates the discovery and development of tumor and fetal cell-free DNA. The common factors are also present that could be taken into consideration when collecting, transporting, and preserving samples. Meanwhile, several protocols used for purifying cell-free DNA, either classic ones or through commercial kits, are compared carefully. In addition, the development of technologies for analyzing cell-free DNA have been summarized and discussed in detail, especially some up-to-date approaches. At the end, the potential prospect of circulating DNA is bravely depicted. In summary, although there would be a lot of efforts before it’s prevalent, cell-free DNA remains a promising tool in point-of-care diagnostic medicine.

Investigation of Preanalytical Variables Impacting Pathogen Cell-Free DNA in Blood and Urine

Pathogen cell-free DNA (pcfDNA) in blood and urine is an attractive biomarker; however, the impact of preanalytical factors is not well understood. Blood and urine samples from healthy donors spiked with cfDNA from Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Salmonella enterica, Aspergillus fumigatus, and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and samples from tuberculosis patients were used to evaluate the impact of blood collection tube, urine preservative, processing delay, processing method, freezing and thawing, and sample volume on pcfDNA. The PCR cycle threshold (C_T ) was used to measure amplifiable cfDNA. In spiked samples, the median C_T values for M. tuberculosis, S. enterica, and EBV cfDNA were significantly lower in blood collected in K₂EDTA tubes than those in Streck and PAXgene blood collection tubes, and they were was significantly lower in urine preserved with EDTA (EDTA-urine) than in urine preserved with Streck reagent (Streck-urine). Blood and urine samples from TB patients preserved with K₂EDTA and Tris-EDTA, respectively, showed significantly lower median M. tuberculosis C_T values than with the Streck blood collection tube and Streck urine preservative. Processing delay increased the median pathogen C_T values for Streck and PAXgene but not K₂EDTA blood samples and for urine preserved with Streck reagent but not EDTA. Double-spin compared with single-spin plasma separation increased the median pathogen C_T regardless of blood collection tube. No differences were observed between whole urine and supernatant and between fresh and thawed plasma and urine after 24 weeks at -80°C. Larger plasma and urine volumes in contrived and patient samples showed a significantly lower median M. tuberculosis C_T These findings suggest that large-volume single-spin K₂EDTA-plasma and EDTA-whole urine with up to a 24-h processing delay may optimize pcfDNA detection.

The pre-analytical phase of the liquid biopsy

The term 'liquid biopsy', introduced in 2013 in reference to the analysis of circulating tumour cells (CTCs) in cancer patients, was extended to cell-free nucleic acids (cfNAs) circulating in blood and other body fluids. CTCs and cfNAs are now considered diagnostic and prognostic markers, used as surrogate materials for the molecular characterisation of solid tumours, in particular for research on tumour-specific or actionable somatic mutations. Molecular characterisation of cfNAs and CTCs (especially at the single cell level) is technically challenging, requiring highly sensitive and specific methods and/or multi-step processes. The analysis of the liquid biopsy relies on a plethora of methods whose standardisation cannot be accomplished without disclosing criticisms related to the pre-analytical phase. Thus, pre-analytical factors potentially influencing downstream cellular and molecular analyses must be considered in order to translate the liquid biopsy approach into clinical practice. The present review summarises the most recent reports in this field, discussing the main pre-analytical aspects related to CTCs, cfNAs and exosomes in blood samples for liquid biopsy analysis. A short discussion on non-blood liquid biopsy samples is also included.

Preanalytics and Precision Pathology: Pathology Practices to Ensure Molecular Integrity of Cancer Patient Biospecimens for Precision Medicine

Biospecimens acquired during routine medical practice are the primary sources of molecular information about patients and their diseases that underlies precision medicine and translational research. In cancer care, molecular analysis of biospecimens is especially common because it often determines treatment choices and may be used to monitor therapy in real time. However, patient specimens are collected, handled, and processed according to routine clinical procedures during which they are subjected to factors that may alter their molecular quality and composition. Such artefactual alteration may skew data from molecular analyses, render analysis data uninterpretable, or even preclude analysis altogether if the integrity of a specimen is severely compromised. As a result, patient care and safety may be affected, and medical research dependent on patient samples may be compromised. Despite these issues, there is currently no requirement to control or record preanalytical variables in clinical practice with the single exception of breast cancer tissue handled according to the guideline jointly developed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists (CAP) and enforced through the CAP Laboratory Accreditation Program. Recognizing the importance of molecular data derived from patient specimens, the CAP Personalized Healthcare Committee established the Preanalytics for Precision Medicine Project Team to develop a basic set of evidence-based recommendations for key preanalytics for tissue and blood specimens. If used for biospecimens from patients, these preanalytical recommendations would ensure the fitness of those specimens for molecular analysis and help to assure the quality and reliability of the analysis data.

Comparison of Roche Cell-Free DNA collection Tubes ® to Streck Cell-Free DNA BCT ® s for sample stability using healthy volunteers

Objectives

To compare the Roche Cell-Free DNA Collection Tubes^® against the Streck Cell-Free DNA BCT^®s for sample stability using Cell Free DNA (cfDNA) from healthy volunteers (n = 20).

Design & methods

Whole blood was drawn into five Roche and five Streck tubes per volunteer, stored at room temperature and processed at five different time points (Days 0, 4, 7, 10 and 14). One volunteer had blood drawn into ×10 K₃EDTA tubes to observe the effect of no preservation buffer on White Blood Cell (WBC) lysis. DNA was extracted from the plasma and the concentration (ng/μL) measured using the Qubit Fluorometer^® at each time point. The eluted DNA was further analysed by capillary electrophoresis to determine the proportion of cfDNA and gDNA contamination in the samples over the 14 days.

Results

There was no difference in individual (p = 0.097) and median paired (p = 0.26) DNA concentration across the five time points between the two tubes. However, a difference was observed for samples in the Roche tubes for pair days 0-7 (p = 0.01), 0 to 10 (p = 0.046) and 0 to 14 (p = 0.0016) in contrast to the Streck tubes after adjustment for multiple testing.

Conclusion

The findings of this study indicate that the Roche Cell-Free DNA Collection Tubes^® are a suitable alternative for sample collection and storage at room temperature, albeit for a duration of less than 7 days.

Quantitative Methylation-Specific PCR: A Simple Method for Studying Epigenetic Modifications of Cell-Free DNA

Aberrant DNA methylation of cell-free circulating DNA (cfDNA) has recently gained attention for its use as biomarker in cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and prediction of therapeutic response. Quantification of cfDNA methylation levels requires methods with high sensitivity and specificity due to low amounts of cfDNA available in plasma, high degradation of cfDNA, and/or contamination with genomic DNA. To date, several approaches for measuring cfDNA methylation have been established, including quantitative methylation-specific PCR (qMSP), which represents a simple, fast, and cost-effective technique that can be easily implemented into clinical practice. In this chapter, we provide a detailed protocol for SYBR Green qMSP analysis which is currently used in our laboratory for cfDNA methylation detection. Useful information regarding successful qMSP primers design are also provided.

Molecular testing strategies in non-small cell lung cancer: optimizing the diagnostic journey

Molecular testing identifies patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who may benefit from targeted therapy or immunotherapy (i.e., immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment for patients with high tumor mutational burden (TMB), microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair-deficient tumors). Current guidelines state that molecular testing should be conducted at the time of initial diagnosis and tumor progression on targeted therapy. In real-world clinical practice in the United States (US), molecular testing is often not conducted or happens late in the diagnostic journey, resulting in delayed or inappropriate treatment. Herein, we review the rationale for molecular testing in advanced NSCLC, along with best-practice guidelines based on published recommendations and our own clinical experience, including a case study. We propose three strategies to optimize molecular testing in newly diagnosed patients with advanced NSCLC: (I) pulmonologists, interventional radiologists, or thoracic surgeons order molecular tests as soon as advanced NSCLC with an adenocarcinoma component is suspected; (II) liquid biopsies conducted early in the diagnostic pathway; and (III) pathologist-directed reflex testing, as conducted in other areas of oncology. To help facilitate these strategies, we outline our recommendations for optimal sample collection techniques and stewardship. In summary, we believe that implementation of these individual strategies will allow clinicians to effectively leverage available treatment options for advanced NSCLC, reducing the time to optimal treatment and improving patient outcomes.

Targeted next-generation sequencing of endometrial cancer and matched circulating tumor DNA: identification of plasma-based, tumor-associated mutations in early stage patients

There is currently no blood-based marker in routine use for endometrial cancer patients. Such a marker could potentially be used for early detection, but it could also help to track tumor recurrence following hysterectomy. This is important, as extra-vaginal recurrence of endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma is usually incurable. This proof-of-principle study was designed to determine if tumor-associated mutations could be detected in cell-free DNA from the peripheral blood of early and late stage endometrial endometrioid carcinoma patients. Approximately 90% of endometrioid carcinomas have at least one mutation in the genes CTNNB1, KRAS, PTEN, or PIK3CA. Using a custom panel targeting 30 hotspot amplicons in these four genes, next-generation sequencing was performed on cell-free DNA extracted from plasma obtained from a peripheral blood draw at the time of hysterectomy and the matching tumor DNA from 48 patients with endometrioid endometrial carcinomas. At least one mutation in the tumor was detected in 45/48 (94%) of patients. Fifteen of 45 patients (33%) had a mutation in the plasma that matched a mutation in the tumor. These same mutations were not detected in the matched negative control buffy coat. Presence of a plasma mutation was significantly associated with advanced stage at hysterectomy, deep myometrial invasion, lymphatic/vascular invasion, and primary tumor size. Detecting a plasma-based mutation was independent of the amount of cell-free DNA isolated from the plasma. Overall, 18% of early stage patients had a mutation detected in the plasma. These results demonstrate that mutations in genes relevant to endometrial cancer can be identified in the peripheral blood of patients at the time of surgery. Future studies can help to determine the post-operative time course of mutation clearance from the peripheral blood and if mutation re-emergence is predictive of recurrence.

Evaluation of Storage Tubes for Combined Analysis of Circulating Nucleic Acids in Liquid Biopsies

In the last decade, circulating nucleic acids such as microRNAs (miRNAs) and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) have become increasingly important in serving as potential novel biomarkers for a variety of human diseases. If cell-free nucleic acids are to become routinely used in diagnostics, the difference in plasma miRNA and cfDNA levels between healthy and diseased subjects must exceed pre-analytical and analytical variability. Until now, few studies have addressed the time limitations of pre-processing or explored the potential use of long-term blood storage tubes, which might need to be implemented in real-life diagnostics. In this study, we analyzed the stability of four breast cancer-associated miRNAs and two cancer-associated genes under various storage conditions, to test their limitations for potential application in clinical diagnostics. In two consecutive experiments, we tested the limits of conventional EDTA tubes, as well as long-term storage blood collection tubes (BCTs) from four different manufacturers. We found that circulating miRNAs are relatively stable when stored in EDTA monovettes for up to 12 h before processing. When stored in BCTs, circulating miRNAs and cfDNA are stable for up to 7 days, depending on the manufacturer. Norgen tubes were superior for cfDNA yield, while Streck tubes performed the worst in our study with hemolysis induction. In conclusion, plasma prepared from whole blood is suitable for the quantification of both cf-miRNAs and cfDNA simultaneously.

Liquid Biopsy and Lung Cancer

The identification of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients potentially responsive to targeted therapies relies on a number of relevant biomarkers, including EGFR, ALK, ROS-1, and PD-L1. Biomarker identification is most commonly based on surgical sample collection. However, when tissues are difficult to reach or when multiple analyses are necessary to monitor tumor progression and treatment response, liquid biopsy is a valid noninvasive alternative. This analysis, which is preferentially performed on circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) extracted from plasma samples, has the major advantage of reducing the inherent risks and discomfort of tissue biopsy. However, a major disadvantage is that it yields only a low number of ctDNA targets. Thus, to avoid false-positive and false-negative results, it is important to adopt and validate technologies with high sensitivity and specificity in the pre-analytical phase of sampling. This review succinctly addresses the principal methodologies for analyzing plasma-derived ctDNA in NSCLC patients.

Circulating tumour DNA as a cancer biomarker

Measurement of genetically altered DNA shed from tumours into the circulation can potentially provide a new generation of blood-based cancer biomarkers. Compared with tissue DNA biomarkers which require surgery or biopsy, samples for circulating tumour DNA assays can be obtained with minimal inconvenience and at lower cost. Furthermore, in contrast to tissue, the use of circulating tumour DNA allows serial monitoring, faster delivery of results and potentially provides an integrative representation of genetic alterations across all tumour sites within a patient. In contrast to existing protein-based cancer biomarkers, all of which can be produced by benign disease, circulating tumour DNA biomarkers would be expected to be more specific for malignancy. Furthermore, unlike the available blood cancer biomarkers, circulating tumour DNA can be used to predict response to specific therapies, identify mechanisms of therapy resistance and detect potentially actionable mutations. One of the first circulating tumour DNA assays recommended for clinical use involves EGFR mutation testing for predicting response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, especially when tumour tissue is unavailable. In order to accelerate the introduction of circulating tumour DNA assays into routine clinical use, laboratory medicine staff will have to undergo training in the use of polymerase chain reaction and DNA sequencing. Furthermore, existing circulating tumour DNA assays will need to be simplified, standardized, shown to have clinical utility, be made available at reasonable costs and be reimbursable.

Factors that influence quality and yield of circulating-free DNA: A systematic review of the methodology literature

BACKGROUND

Circulating-free DNA (cfDNA) is under investigation as a liquid biopsy of cancer for early detection, monitoring disease progression and therapeutic response. This systematic review of the primary cfDNA literature aims to identify and evaluate factors that influence recovery of cfDNA, and to outline evidence-based recommendations for standardization of methods.

METHODS

A search of the Ovid and Cochrane databases was undertaken in May 2018 to obtain relevant literature on cfDNA isolation and quantification. Retrieved titles and abstracts were reviewed by two authors. The factors evaluated include choice of specimen type (plasma or serum); time-to-processing of whole blood; blood specimen tube; centrifugation protocol (speed, time, temperature and number of spins); and methods of cfDNA isolation and quantification.

FINDINGS

Of 4,172 articles identified through the database search, 52 proceeded to full-text review and 37 met the criteria for inclusion. A quantitative analysis was not possible, due to significant heterogeneity in methodological approaches between studies. Therefore, included data was tabulated and a textual qualitative synthesis approach was taken.

INTERPRETATION

This is the first systematic review of methodological factors that influence recovery and quantification of cfDNA, enabling recommendations to be made that will support standardization of methodological approaches towards development of blood-based cancer tests.

Liquid Biopsy for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): A Statement Paper from the IASLC

The isolation and analysis of circulating cell-free tumor DNA in plasma is a powerful tool with considerable potential to improve clinical outcomes across multiple cancer types, including NSCLC. Assays of this nature that use blood as opposed to tumor samples are frequently referred to as liquid biopsies. An increasing number of innovative platforms have been recently developed that improve not only the fidelity of the molecular analysis but also the number of tests performed on a single specimen. Circulating tumor DNA assays for detection of both EGFR sensitizing and resistance mutations have already entered clinical practice and many other molecular tests - such as detection of resistance mutations for Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) receptor tyrosine kinase rearrangements - are likely to do so in the near future. Due to an abundance of new evidence, an appraisal was warranted to review strengths and weaknesses, to describe what is already in clinical practice and what has yet to be implemented, and to highlight areas in need of further investigation. A multidisciplinary panel of experts in the field of thoracic oncology with interest and expertise in liquid biopsy and molecular pathology was convened by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer to evaluate current available evidence with the aim of producing a set of recommendations for the use of liquid biopsy for molecular analysis in guiding the clinical management of advanced NSCLC patients as well as identifying unmet needs. In summary, the panel concluded that liquid biopsy approaches have significant potential to improve patient care, and immediate implementation in the clinic is justified in a number of therapeutic settings relevant to NSCLC.

Evaluation of pre-analytical factors affecting plasma DNA analysis

Pre-analytical factors can significantly affect circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis. However, there are few robust methods to rapidly assess sample quality and the impact of pre-analytical processing. To address this gap and to evaluate effects of DNA extraction methods and blood collection tubes on cfDNA yield and fragment size, we developed a multiplexed droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay with 5 short and 4 long amplicons targeting single copy genomic loci. Using this assay, we compared 7 cfDNA extraction kits and found cfDNA yield and fragment size vary significantly. We also compared 3 blood collection protocols using plasma samples from 23 healthy volunteers (EDTA tubes processed within 1 hour and Cell-free DNA Blood Collection Tubes processed within 24 and 72 hours) and found no significant differences in cfDNA yield, fragment size and background noise between these protocols. In 219 clinical samples, cfDNA fragments were shorter in plasma samples processed immediately after venipuncture compared to archived samples, suggesting contribution of background DNA by lysed peripheral blood cells. In summary, we have described a multiplexed ddPCR assay to assess quality of cfDNA samples prior to downstream molecular analyses and we have evaluated potential sources of pre-analytical variation in cfDNA studies.

High Interspecimen Variability in Nucleic Acid Extraction Efficiency Necessitates the Use of Spike-In Control for Accurate qPCR-based Measurement of Plasma Cell-Free DNA Levels

Objective

To assess the interspecimen variability associated with plasma DNA extraction in order to provide insight regarding the necessity to use an exogenous spike-in control when measuring cell-free DNA (cfDNA) levels using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR).

Methods

Plasma specimens were obtained from 8 healthy individuals, 20 patients with cardiovascular disease risk factors, and 54 patients diagnosed with acute stroke. Specimens were spiked with an exogenous oligonucleotide fragment, and total DNA was extracted via automated solid phase anion exchange. We determined recovery of the exogenous fragment via qPCR and used this information to calculate DNA extraction efficiency.

Results

Plasma DNA extraction efficiencies varied dramatically between specimens, ranging from 22.9% to 88.1%, with a coefficient of variance of 28.9%. No significant differences in DNA extraction efficiencies were observed between patient populations.

Conclusions

We strongly recommend the use of an exogenous spike-in control to account for variance in plasma DNA extraction efficiency when assessing cell free DNA (cfDNA) levels by qPCR in future biomarker investigations.

Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis in Patients With Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists Joint Review

PURPOSE.—

Clinical use of analytical tests to assess genomic variants in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is increasing. This joint review from the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the College of American Pathologists summarizes current information about clinical ctDNA assays and provides a framework for future research.

METHODS.—

An Expert Panel conducted a literature review on the use of ctDNA assays for solid tumors, including preanalytical variables, analytical validity, interpretation and reporting, and clinical validity and utility.

RESULTS.—

The literature search identified 1338 references. Of those, 390, plus 31 references supplied by the Expert Panel, were selected for full-text review. There were 77 articles selected for inclusion.

CONCLUSIONS.—

The evidence indicates that testing for ctDNA is optimally performed on plasma collected in cell stabilization or EDTA tubes, with EDTA tubes processed within 6 hours of collection. Some ctDNA assays have demonstrated clinical validity and utility with certain types of advanced cancer; however, there is insufficient evidence of clinical validity and utility for the majority of ctDNA assays in advanced cancer. Evidence shows discordance between the results of ctDNA assays and genotyping tumor specimens, and supports tumor tissue genotyping to confirm undetected results from ctDNA tests. There is no evidence of clinical utility and little evidence of clinical validity of ctDNA assays in early-stage cancer, treatment monitoring, or residual disease detection. There is no evidence of clinical validity or clinical utility to suggest that ctDNA assays are useful for cancer screening, outside of a clinical trial. Given the rapid pace of research, reevaluation of the literature will shortly be required, along with the development of tools and guidance for clinical practice.

Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis in Patients With Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists Joint Review

Purpose Clinical use of analytical tests to assess genomic variants in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is increasing. This joint review from ASCO and the College of American Pathologists summarizes current information about clinical ctDNA assays and provides a framework for future research. Methods An Expert Panel conducted a literature review on the use of ctDNA assays for solid tumors, including pre-analytical variables, analytical validity, interpretation and reporting, and clinical validity and utility. Results The literature search identified 1,338 references. Of those, 390, plus 31 references supplied by the Expert Panel, were selected for full-text review. There were 77 articles selected for inclusion. Conclusion The evidence indicates that testing for ctDNA is optimally performed on plasma collected in cell stabilization or EDTA tubes, with EDTA tubes processed within 6 hours of collection. Some ctDNA assays have demonstrated clinical validity and utility with certain types of advanced cancer; however, there is insufficient evidence of clinical validity and utility for the majority of ctDNA assays in advanced cancer. Evidence shows discordance between the results of ctDNA assays and genotyping tumor specimens and supports tumor tissue genotyping to confirm undetected results from ctDNA tests. There is no evidence of clinical utility and little evidence of clinical validity of ctDNA assays in early-stage cancer, treatment monitoring, or residual disease detection. There is no evidence of clinical validity and clinical utility to suggest that ctDNA assays are useful for cancer screening, outside of a clinical trial. Given the rapid pace of research, re-evaluation of the literature will shortly be required, along with the development of tools and guidance for clinical practice.

Application and optimization of minimally invasive cell-free DNA techniques in oncogenomics

The conventional method of measuring biomarkers in malignant tissue samples has already given subversive growth in cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy selection. However, the regression and heterogeneity associated with tumor tissue biopsy have urged for the development of an alternative approach. Considering the limitations, cell-free DNA has emerged as a surrogate alternative, facilitating preoperative chemoradiotherapy (p < 0.0001) treatment response in rectal cancer and detection of biomarker in lung cancer. This potential of cell-free DNA in several other cancers has yet to be explored based on clinical relevance by optimizing the preanalytical factors. This review has highlighted the crucial parameters from blood collection to cell-free DNA analysis that has a significant impact on the accuracy and reliability of clinical data. The quantity of cell-free DNA is also a limiting factor. Therefore, a proper preanalytical factor for blood collection, its stability, centrifugation speed, and plasma storage condition are to be optimized for developing cancer-specific biomarkers useful for clinical purpose. Liquid biopsy-based origin of cell-free DNA has revolutionized the area of cancer research. Lack of preanalytical and analytical procedures may be considered for identification of novel biomarkers through next-generation sequencing of tumor-originated cell-free DNA in contradiction to tissue biopsy for cancer-specific biomarkers.