On the path to evidence-based reporting of serum protein electrophoresis patterns in the absence of a discernible monoclonal protein - A critical review of literature and practice suggestions

Evaluation of a Capillary Electrophoresis System for the Separation of Proteins

BACKGROUND

Serum protein electrophoresis is one of the core investigations for screening for monoclonal proteins. Among the available capillary systems, the Helena V8 system has been evaluated in a limited number of studies.

METHODS

In total, 310 sera samples were assessed on the Helena V8 system and compared with the Sebia Capillarys instrument. Abnormalities suggestive of monoclonal proteins were confirmed by immunofixation. Imprecision studies and reference intervals were determined.

RESULTS

The imprecision of the Helena V8 was inferior or equal to 5.8%. The mean bias of Helena V8 vs Sebia Capillarys was about -0.9 g/L for albumin; -0.2 g/L foralpha-1; 1.1 g/L for alpha-2; -0.2 g/L for beta; 0.3 g/L for gamma; -0.5 g/L for monoclonal protein in beta; and 0.3 g/L for monoclonal protein in gamma. Among the 56 samples with monoclonal proteins confirmed by immunofixation, all were seen on both methods, with only 1 discordant result at a cutoff of 5.0 g/L. Reference intervals were statistically different between the 2 analyzers, except for the beta fraction.

CONCLUSIONS

Our evaluation confirms the good analytical performance of the Helena V8 analyzer as a suitable alternative to the Sebia Capillarys instrument.

Diagnostic performance of routine electrophoresis and immunofixation for the detection of immunoglobulin paraproteins (M-Proteins) in dogs with multiple myeloma and related disorders: Part 2-Toward improved diagnostic performance

BACKGROUND

The diagnostic performance of routine electrophoresis (agarose gel electrophoresis [AGE] and capillary zone electrophoresis [CZE]) and species-specific immunofixation (IF) for the detection of immunoglobulin paraproteins (M-proteins) and diagnosis of secretory myeloma-related disorders (sMRD) can be improved. Available canine IF targets were IgG-FC, IgA, IgM, light chain (LC), IgG4, and free LC (fLC) antibodies.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to review specific features associated with the presence of M-proteins in canine serum samples and the common features causing inaccurate reporting of M-proteins to improve the diagnostic performance of routine electrophoresis and IF for the detection of M-proteins.

METHODS

Features found in AGE, CZE, routine IF, IgG4 IF, and fLC IF of 100 canine serum samples from Part 1 of this study were evaluated by simple and multivariate logistic regression to identify factors associated with the presence of M-proteins. Cases falsely called negative or positive for M-proteins were reviewed to identify the common features that could be used to increase the diagnostic performance of SPE and IF for M-protein detection.

RESULTS

The presence of hypogammaglobulinemia or any peak taller than albumin was associated with an M-protein. Total protein concentrations, globulin concentrations, or peaks wider than albumin were not associated with an M-protein. Free LC sMRD cases were not diagnosed by SPE and routine IF. Cases with infectious and inflammatory etiologies had a restricted polyclonal gammopathy with multiple γ-globulin restrictions resulting in some false-positive results. SPE combined with all available IF results and the specific features identified in this study had an estimated sensitivity of 95.1% and specificity of 81.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

The identified criteria of this study increase the diagnostic performance of the electrophoretic evaluation for M-proteins.

Diagnostic performance of routine electrophoresis and immunofixation for the detection of immunoglobulin paraproteins (M-Proteins) in dogs with multiple myeloma and related disorders: Part 1 - Current performance

BACKGROUND

Routine electrophoresis [agarose gel electrophoresis (AGE) and capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE)] and species-specific immunofixation (IF) can be used alone or in combination to detect immunoglobulin paraprotein (M-protein) and diagnose secretory myeloma-related disorders (sMRD).

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the performance of AGE, CZE, CZE plus IF (CZE-IF), and AGE plus IF (AGE-IF) for detecting canine serum M-proteins.

METHODS

One hundred canine cases that had AGE, CZE, and routine IF performed on serum, and where B-cell lineage neoplasia (such as B-cell lymphoma and plasma cell tumors) had been diagnosed or excluded, were evaluated. Routine IF protocols targeted IgG-FC, IgA, and IgM heavy chains and light chains. IgG4 IF and free light chain IF were also performed. B-cell lineage neoplasms with an M-protein detected, using any available method, were classified as sMRD. Datasets from AGE, CZE, IF, CZE-IF, and AGE-IF (electrophoretograms, gel images, and fraction concentrations) were composed and reviewed. The sensitivity, specificity, and Youden's index for M-protein detection were determined for each dataset.

RESULTS

The combination of AGE-IF or CZE-IF was more sensitive (82.9%) than CZE alone (72.0%) or AGE alone (64.6%) and more specific (66.1%, 48.3%, 51.7%, respectively). Immunofixation could be used alone to detect M-proteins (sensitivity 82.9%, specificity 61.9%), but there were technical challenges that complicated the performance and evaluation of the test. Myeloma with free light chains only was found in 5/41 cases of sMRD.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding routine IF to routine electrophoresis increases the ability to accurately identify M-proteins; however, there is still room for further diagnostic performance improvements.

Validation and method comparison of the use of densitometry to quantify monoclonal proteins in canine sera

BACKGROUND

Densitometric quantitation using serum protein electrophoresis (SPE) is used to monitor monoclonal proteins (M-proteins) in human patients but has not been validated in the dog. Serum globulin concentrations, species-specific radial immunodiffusion (RID), and ELISAs are currently used in veterinary medicine.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to compare four methods that quantify M-proteins using densitometry and biuret protein (dM-protein) measurements. We also validated the best performing method and compared it with the RID and ELISA methods for measuring canine serum M-protein.

METHOD

Serum from six normal dogs and 83 serum samples from 46 dogs with confirmed monoclonal gammopathies were used. A spike and recovery experiment with purified monoclonal IgG and IgM, inter-run and intra-run variability, linearity under dilution, and lower limit of detection were performed. Results of commercial canine RID and ELISA kits for total class-specific immunoglobulin were compared with dM-proteins.

RESULTS

The corrected perpendicular drop gating method had <20% error for IgG/γ-globulin and IgM/β-globulin M-protein quantifications. Linearity (r > .99), intra-run CV (1.1%-2.3%), and inter-run CVs (2.0%-3.5%) were acceptable. Correlation between the RID and densitometry results ranged from r = .25 to r = .88, depending on the class. The RID result was greater than that of the biuret total protein in 26/63 (41%) IgA cases. A panel of IgG, IgA, and IgM RIDs failed to correctly identify an IgM paraproteinemia in 6/6 (100%) cases. Densitometry was not comparable with any other tested method.

CONCLUSION

Densitometric quantitation is a valid technique for measuring M-proteins in the β- and γ-globulin regions. Immunotyping via RID using the tested kit does not appear to detect IgM. Densitometry is recommended for measuring M-proteins in canine patients.

Hypoxia and Inflammation as a Consequence of β-Fibril Accumulation: A Perspective View for New Potential Therapeutic Targets

Amyloidoses are heterogeneous diseases that result from the deposition of toxic insoluble β-sheet fibrillar protein aggregates in different tissues. The cascade of molecular events leading to amyloidoses and to the related clinical manifestations is not completely understood. Nevertheless, it is known that tissue damage associated to this disease involves alteration of tissue architecture, interaction with cell surface receptors, inflammation elicited by the amyloid protein deposition, oxidative stress, and apoptosis. However, another important aspect to consider is that systemic protein massive deposition not only subverts tissue architecture but also determines a progressive cellular hypertrophy and dilation of the extracellular space enlarging the volume of the organ. Such an alteration increases the distance between cells and vessels with a drop in pO₂ that, in turn, causes both necrotic cell death and activation of the hypoxia transcription factor HIF-1α. Herewith, we propose the hypothesis that both cell death and hypoxia represent two important events for the pathogenesis of damage and progression of amyloidoses. In fact, molecules released by necrotic cells activate inflammatory cells from one side while binding to HIF-1α-dependent membrane receptors expressed on hypoxic parenchymal cells on the other side. This latter event generates a signaling cascade triggering NFκB activation and chronic inflammation. Finally, we also suggest that this scenario, once proved and detailed, might suggest important targets for new therapeutic interventions.

Protein characterization using electrophoresis and immunofixation; a case-based review of dogs and cats

Protein electrophoresis and immunotyping can be a useful adjunct to the standard biochemical techniques for characterizing serum and urine proteins. This paper reviews currently available and commonly used methods for diagnostic protein electrophoresis, including both agarose gel and capillary zone electrophoretic techniques and total protein assessments. Immunofixation and immunosubtraction methods for identification of immunoglobulin location and class are also presented. Practical application of quality assurance and quality control strategies in compliance with American Society of Veterinary Clinical Pathology (ASVCP) best practices are discussed. Commonly encountered serum and urine electrophoretic diagnostic patterns, including electrophoretically normal, acute-phase protein responses, polyclonal gammopathies, restricted polyclonal/oligoclonal gammopathies, paraproteinemias (monoclonal or biclonal gammopathies), and Bence-Jones proteinurias are also reviewed using relevant case material. Cases in which immunofixation electrophoresis are particularly useful are highlighted, and methodologies to more accurately quantify serum monoclonal proteins (M-proteins), monitoring tests commonly used in human medicine, are discussed.

Laboratory assessment of multiple myeloma

Laboratory testing plays an essential role in the diagnosis and management of patients with multiple myeloma. A variety of chemistry and molecular assays are routinely used to monitor patient progress, response to treatment and relapse. Here, we have reviewed current literature and core guidelines on the details of laboratory testing in myeloma-related investigations. This includes the use and value of protein electrophoresis, serum free light chain and cytogenetic testing. Furthermore, we discuss other traditional chemistry assays essential to myeloma investigation, and potential interferences that may arise due to the disease nature of myeloma, that is, the presence of a monoclonal immunoglobulin. Finally, we discuss the importance of communication in protein electrophoresis results, where laboratorians are required to relate clinically relevant myeloma-relevant information to the ordering physician on the background of a complex pattern of serum or urine proteins. Laboratory testing in myeloma-related investigation relies on several traditional chemistry assays. However, we anticipate new tests and technologies to become available in the future with improved analytical sensitivity, as well as improved clinical sensitivity in identifying patients who are at high risk of progression to multiple myeloma.

Microfluidic techniques for tumor cell detection

Cancer metastasis is the main cause of cancer-related death. Early detection of tumor cell in peripheral blood is of great significant to early diagnosis and effective treatment of cancer. Over the past two decades, microfluidic technologies have been demonstrated to have great potential for isolating and detecting tumor cell from blood. The present paper reviews microfluidic techniques for tumor cell detection based on various physical principles. The specific methods are categorized into active and passive methods depending on whether extra force field is applied. Working principles of the two methods are explained in detail, including microfluidics combined with optical tweezer, electric field, magnetic field, acoustophoresis, and without extra fields for tumor cell detection. Typical experiments and the results are reviewed. Based on these, research characteristics of the two methods are analyzed.