Diagnostic performance of a rapid, novel, whole blood, point of care high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay for myocardial infarction

Protocol for Improving Care by FAster risk-STratification through use of high sensitivity point-of-care troponin in patients presenting with possible acute coronary syndrome in the EmeRgency department (ICare-FASTER): a stepped-wedge cluster randomised quality improvement initiative

INTRODUCTION

Clinical assessment in emergency departments (EDs) for possible acute myocardial infarction (AMI) requires at least one cardiac troponin (cTn) blood test. The turn-around time from blood draw to posting results in the clinical portal for central laboratory analysers is ~1-2 hours. New generation, high-sensitivity, point-of-care cardiac troponin I (POC-cTnI) assays use whole blood on a bedside (or near bedside) analyser that provides a rapid (8 min) result. This may expedite clinical decision-making and reduce length of stay. Our purpose is to determine if utilisation of a POC-cTnI testing reduces ED length of stay. We also aim to establish an optimised implementation process for the amended clinical pathway.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This quality improvement initiative has a pragmatic multihospital stepped-wedge cross-sectional cluster randomised design. Consecutive patients presenting to the ED with symptoms suggestive of possible AMI and having a cTn test will be included. Clusters (comprising one or two hospitals each) will change from their usual-care pathway to an amended pathway using POC-cTnI-the 'intervention'. The dates of change will be randomised. Changes occur at 1 month intervals, with a minimum 2 month 'run-in' period. The intervention pathway will use a POC-cTnI measurement as an alternate to the laboratory-based cTn measurement. Clinical decision-making steps and logic will otherwise remain unchanged. The POC-cTnI is the Siemens (Erlangen Germany) Atellica VTLi high-sensitivity cTnI assay. The primary outcome is ED length of stay. The safety outcome is cardiac death or AMI within 30 days for patients discharged directly from the ED.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval has been granted by the New Zealand Southern Health and Disability Ethics Committee, reference 21/STH/9. Results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. Lay and academic presentations will be made. Māori-specific results will be disseminated to Māori stakeholders.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ACTRN12619001189112.

Troponin testing in routine primary care: observations from a dynamic cohort study in the Amsterdam metropolitan area

OBJECTIVES

Troponin testing is indicated in the diagnostic work-up of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and incorporated in risk stratification pathways. This study aims to gain insights on the use, outcomes, and diagnostic accuracy of troponin testing in routine primary care; a setting that is understudied.

METHODS

Routine data were used from the academic primary care network in the Amsterdam metropolitan area (968,433 patient records). The study population included adult patients who underwent high-sensitivity troponin I or T (hs-TnI/T) testing between 2011 and 2021. The primary outcome was the reported diagnosis and the secondary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy measured by death or ACS at 30 days.

RESULTS

3,184 patients underwent hs-troponin testing, either with hsTNT (n=2,333) or hsTNI (n=851). Median patients' age was 55 (44-65) years, and 62.3 % were female. Predominant symptoms were chest pain and dyspnea (56.7 %). Additional diagnostic laboratory tests were commonly performed (CRP: 47.7 %, natriuretic peptides: 25.6 %, d-dimer: 21.5 %). Most common diagnoses were musculoskeletal symptoms (21.6 %) and coronary heart disease (7.1 %; 1.1 % ACS). Troponin testing showed sensitivity and specificity of 77.8 % (60.9-89.9) and 94.3 % (93.5-95.1), respectively. Negative and positive predictive values were 99.7 (99.5-99.9) and 13.5 (11.1-16.4), and positive and negative likelihood ratios were 13.7 (10.9-17.1) and 0.24 (0.13-0.43).

CONCLUSIONS

GPs occasionally use troponin testing in very low-risk patients, often as part of a multi-marker rule-out strategy. The diagnostic characteristics of troponin tests, while promising, warrant prospective validation and implementation to facilitate appropriate use.

Diagnostic performance of a point of care high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay and single measurement evaluation to rule out and rule in acute coronary syndrome

OBJECTIVES

About 10 million individuals in USA presented annually in the emergency department (ED) with chest pain or with signs and symptoms of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The advent of point of care (POC) devices, able to measure high sensitivity troponin, are a very interesting tool in the ED setting for its rapid turnaround time (<10 min).

METHODS

The present study evaluates the diagnostic performance of the Atellica VTLi (Siemens) in real life setting using the clinical data derived from integrated diagnoses of emergency room staff and cardiologist and in comparison with standard laboratory hs-cTnT assay (Cobas 8000, Elecsys, Roche). 966 patients admitted to the emergency department of "G. Mazzini Hospital" in Teramo, Italy, from July 27, 2022, through June 09, 2023, were enrolled.

RESULTS

The diagnostic performance of POC hs-cTnI was evaluated. An appropriate POC hs-cTnI threshold values <4 ng/L supplied a sensitivity and an NPV of 100 % (95 % CI: 99.5-100) in order to achieve rapid rule out for MI through a single measurement at patient presentation in the ED. Furthermore, a derivation POC hs-cTnI concentration >54 ng/L provided a specificity of 97.2 % (95 % CI: 95.9-98.1) and a PPV of 43.5 % (95 % CI: 40.3-46.7) for ruling in MI.

CONCLUSIONS

This platform showed comparable diagnostic performance for myocardial infarction to the central laboratory. Our data suggest the possible use of the Atellica VTLi hs-cTnI POC assay either in emergency department of urban medical centre, either in rural hospital for triage and patient management.

Analytical assays and bootstrap resampling method to validate performance of the Roche Elecsys STAT highly sensitive troponin T assay and its application for the 'rule-out' part of ESC guidelines for NTSTEMI

BACKGROUND

The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines recommend a dynamic (0-1h) cardiac troponin (cTn) determination for non-ST elevation myocardial infarction diagnosis. For patients with low cTn levels, a discharge from emergency can be considered. Nevertheless, cTn cutoffs for discharge are lower than the limits of quantification proposed by laboratory reagent suppliers.

AIM

Validate cTn assay on the Elecsys STAT kit.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Precision, trueness, repeatability and within-laboratory variability were calculated from internal quality control and plasma pooled at 5.78 and 10.73 ng/L. Accuracy was calculated from external quality control. Uncertainty of measurement was calculated from (i) the uncertainty of the standard and control values and (ii) by precision from pooled plasma. Distribution of precision results from pooled plasma has been evaluated by bootstrap simulations. Dilution linearity tests with patient plasma were performed to evaluate the method for values near 5 ng/L.

RESULTS

Precision and trueness ranged from 1.35 to 4.45% and from 0.14 to -3.74%, respectively. Accuracy results ranged from 101.40 to 104.90%. Within laboratory variability was 2.91%. Uncertainty ranged from 3.66% to 19.90% for higher (2188) to lower values (5.78 ng/L). Bootstrap simulations allowed utilization of precision data from pooled plasma to evaluate cTn assay. The method was linear from 4.48 to 39.80 ng/L. A linear regression model best described the data.

CONCLUSION

Elecsys STAT method provides accurate cTn results, including patients with cTn results categorizing them as 'rule-out' in the ESC guidelines.

Measurement of Cardiac-Specific Biomarkers in the Emergency Department: New Insight in Risk Evaluation

The aim of this article review is to analyze some models and clinical issues related to the implementation of accelerated diagnostic protocols based on specific cardiac biomarkers in patients admitted to the emergency department (ED) with symptoms compatible with acute cardiac disorders. Four specific clinical issues will be discussed in detail: (a) pathophysiological and clinical interpretations of circulating hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT levels; (b) the clinical relevance and estimation of the biological variation of biomarkers in patients admitted to the ED with acute and severe diseases; (c) the role and advantages of the point-of-care testing (POCT) methods for cardiac-specific biomarkers in pre-hospital and hospital clinical practice; and (d) the clinical role of specific cardiac biomarkers in patients with acute heart failure (AHF). In order to balance the risk between a hasty discharge versus the potential harms caused by a cardiac assessment in patients admitted to the ED with suspected acute cardiovascular disease, the measurement of specific cardiac biomarkers is essential for the early identification of the presence of myocardial dysfunction and/or injury and to significantly reduce the length and costs of hospitalization. Moreover, specific cardiac biomarkers (especially hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT) are useful predictors of mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients admitted to the ED with suspected acute cardiovascular disease. To guide the implementation of the most rapid algorithms for the diagnosis of Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI) into routine clinical practice, clinical scientific societies and laboratory medicine societies should promote collaborative studies specifically designed for the evaluation of the analytical performance and, especially, the cost/benefit ratio resulting from the use of these clinical protocols and POCT methods in the ED clinical practice.

Management of patients suspected for non-ST elevation-acute coronary syndrome in the prehospital phase

The management of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome, especially in prehospital settings, is challenging. This Special Report focuses on studies in emergency medical services concerning chest pain patients' triage and risk stratification. In addition, it emphasizes advancements in point-of-care cardiac troponin testing. These developments are compared with in-hospital guidelines, proposing an initial framework for a new acute care pathway. This pathway integrates a risk stratification tool with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin testing, aiming to deliver optimal care and collaboration within the acute care chain. It has the potential to contribute to a significant reduction in hospital referrals, reduce observation time and overcrowding at emergency departments and hospital admissions.

Consequences of different cut-off values for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin for risk stratification of patients suspected for NSTE-ACS with a modified HEART score

Aim: This study aims to enhance prehospital risk assessment for suspected non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) patients using the HEART-score. By incorporating novel point-of-care high-sensitivity cardiac troponin devices, a modified HEART-score was developed and compared with the conventional approach. Patients & methods: Troponin points within the modified HEART-score are based on values below the limit of quantitation (LoQ), between the LoQ and 99th percentile and above the 99th percentile of the used device. A total HEART-score of three or lower is considered low-risk for major adverse cardiac events. Results & conclusion: The number of low-risk patients decreased based on the modified HEART-score. The sensitivity and negative predictive value increased which suggests increasing safety in ruling out patients with suspected NSTE-ACS.

Performance of a prehospital HEART score in patients with possible myocardial infarction: a prospective evaluation

INTRODUCTION

The History, Electrocardiogram (ECG), Age, Risk Factors and Troponin (HEART) score is commonly used to risk stratify patients with possible myocardial infarction as low risk or high risk in the Emergency Department (ED). Whether the HEART score can be used by paramedics to guide care were high-sensitivity cardiac troponin testing available in a prehospital setting is uncertain.

METHODS

In a prespecified secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study where paramedics enrolled patients with suspected myocardial infarction, a paramedic Heart, ECG, Age, Risk Factors (HEAR) score was recorded contemporaneously, and a prehospital blood sample was obtained for subsequent cardiac troponin testing. HEART and modified HEART scores were derived using laboratory contemporary and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assays. HEART and modified HEART scores of ≤3 and ≥7 were applied to define low-risk and high-risk patients, and performance was evaluated for an outcome of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) at 30 days.

RESULTS

Between November 2014 and April 2018, 1054 patients were recruited, of whom 960 (mean 64 (SD 15) years, 42% women) were eligible for analysis and 255 (26%) experienced a MACE at 30 days. A HEART score of ≤3 identified 279 (29%) as low risk with a negative predictive value of 93.5% (95% CI 90.0% to 95.9%) for the contemporary assay and 91.4% (95% CI 87.5% to 94.2%) for the high-sensitivity assay. A modified HEART score of ≤3 using the limit of detection of the high-sensitivity assay identified 194 (20%) patients as low risk with a negative predictive value of 95.9% (95% CI 92.1% to 97.9%). A HEART score of ≥7 using either assay gave a lower positive predictive value than using the upper reference limit of either cardiac troponin assay alone.

CONCLUSIONS

A HEART score derived by paramedics in the prehospital setting, even when modified to harness the precision of a high-sensitivity assay, does not allow safe rule-out of myocardial infarction or enhanced rule-in compared with cardiac troponin testing alone.

Analytical performance comparing siemens whole blood point of care Atellica VTLi to the central laboratory plasma Atellica IM high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assays

INTRODUCTION

This study examined the analytical performance of a whole blood (WB) point of care (POC) hs-cTnI assay compared to a plasma central laboratory hs-cTnI assay in patients presenting with ischemic symptoms to a US emergency department.

METHODS

Fresh WB specimens collected at 0 and 2 h from 1089 consecutive patients (2152 total from 1076 matched specimens) were analyzed for hs-cTnI using WB on POC Siemens Atellica VTLi assay and plasma on central laboratory Siemens Atellica IM assay. Concordances were determined based on concentrations ranging from < limit of detection (LoD), LoD to overall and sex specific 99th percentiles from both the IFCC manufacturer package inserts and Universal Sample Bank (USB) data, and > 99th percentiles. Method comparisons were calculated using Passing Bablok regression and Bland Altmann plots, and linear regression determined by Pearson correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

Baseline concentration comparisons showed: POC VTLi < LoD 4-5 %, ≥ LoD 95 %; Atellica IM < LoD 5-7 %, and ≥ LoD 94-95 %. From the 2152 paired 0 and 2-hour samples, based on 99th percentiles, overall concordance was 91-92 % (kappa 0.72-0.77) and discordance 8 %. Passing Bablok regression analysis using 1924 specimens between LoD to 500 ng/L showed: slopes 0.469-0.490; y-intercepts 1.753-2.028; r values 0.631-0.817. Pearson correlation coefficient showed moderate to strong correlation strength, even with up to 53 % cTnI concentrations variance (Passing Bablok slopes) vs 27.0-40.1 % (Bland-Altmann plots).

CONCLUSIONS

Up to 95 % of measured samples were > LoD for both the POC (Atellica VTLi) and central laboratory (Atellica IM) hs-cTnI assays. Moderate to strong concordance and correlation were observed between assays, despite up to 53 % variances in cTnI concentration.