The effect of functional knee brace design and hinge misalignment on lower limb joint mechanics

An interaction model for predicting brace migration and validation through walking experiment

Brace migration undermines therapeutic efficacy, which is traditionally evaluated through walking experiments. This study developed an interaction model that considered the instantaneous center of rotation (ICR) misalignment to predict migration. The model was validated by walking experiment. Results show a strong positive correlation for four-linkage (FL) (r = 0.952, p < 0.01, root mean squared error (RMSE) = 0.53 mm) and spur gear (SG) (r = 0.898, p < 0.01, RMSE = 1.35 mm) mechanisms. The FL exhibits lower migration than SG (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the interaction model accurately predicts migration, emphasizing the influence of mechanism on migration.

Ergonomic dual four-bar linkage knee exoskeleton for stair ascent assistance

Introduction: Robotic exoskeletons are emerging technologies that have demonstrated their effectiveness in assisting with Activities of Daily Living. However, kinematic disparities between human and robotic joints can result in misalignment between humans and exoskeletons, leading to discomfort and potential user injuries. Methods: In this paper, we present an ergonomic knee exoskeleton based on a dual four-bar linkage mechanism powered by hydraulic artificial muscles for stair ascent assistance. The device comprises two asymmetric four-bar linkage mechanisms on the medial and lateral sides to accommodate the internal rotation of the knee and address the kinematic discrepancies between these sides. A genetic algorithm was employed to optimize the parameters of the four-bar linkage mechanism to minimize misalignment between human and exoskeleton knee joints. The proposed device was evaluated through two experiments. The first experiment measured the reduction in undesired load due to misalignment, while the second experiment evaluated the device's effectiveness in assisting stair ascent in a healthy subject. Results: The experimental results indicate that the proposed device has a significantly reduced undesired load compared to the traditional revolute joint, decreasing from 14.15 N and 18.32 N to 1.88 N and 1.07 N on the medial and lateral sides, respectively. Moreover, a substantial reduction in muscle activities during stair ascent was observed, with a 55.94% reduction in surface electromyography signal. Discussion: The reduced undesired load of the proposed dual four-bar linkage mechanism highlights the importance of the adopted asymmetrical design for reduced misalignment and increased comfort. Moreover, the proposed device was effective at reducing the effort required during stair ascent.

Assessing effects of exoskeleton misalignment on knee joint load during swing using an instrumented leg simulator

Background

Exoskeletons are working in parallel to the human body and can support human movement by exerting forces through cuffs or straps. They are prone to misalignments caused by simplified joint mechanics and incorrect fit or positioning. Those misalignments are a common safety concern as they can cause undesired interaction forces. However, the exact mechanisms and effects of misalignments on the joint load are not yet known. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate the influence of different directions and magnitudes of exoskeleton misalignment on the internal knee joint forces and torques of an artificial leg.

Methods

An instrumented leg simulator was used to quantify the changes in knee joint load during the swing phase caused by misalignments of a passive knee brace being manually flexed. This was achieved by an experimenter pulling on a rope attached to the distal end of the knee brace to create a flexion torque. The extension was not actuated but achieved through the weight of the instrumented leg simulator. The investigated types of misalignments are a rotation of the brace around the vertical axis and a translation in anteroposterior as well as proximal/distal direction.

Results

The amount of misalignment had a significant effect on several directions of knee joint load in the instrumented leg simulator. In general, load on the knee joint increased with increasing misalignment. Specifically, stronger rotational misalignment led to higher forces in mediolateral direction in the knee joint as well as higher ab-/adduction, flexion and internal/external rotation torques. Stronger anteroposterior translational misalignment led to higher mediolateral knee forces as well as higher abduction and flexion/extension torques. Stronger proximal/distal translational misalignment led to higher posterior and tension/compression forces.

Conclusions

Misalignments of a lower leg exoskeleton can increase internal knee forces and torques during swing to a multiple of those experienced in a well-aligned situation. Despite only taking swing into account, this is supporting the need for carefully considering hazards associated with not only translational but also rotational misalignments during wearable robot development and use. Also, this warrants investigation of misalignment effects in stance, as a target of many exoskeleton applications.

The Effects of Knee Orthosis with Two Degrees of Freedom Joint Design on Gait and Sit-to-Stand Task in Patients with Medial Knee Osteoarthritis

Objectives

Knee bracing as a conservative treatment option for patients with medial knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is of great interest to health practitioners and patients alike. Optimal orthotic knee joint structure is essential to achieve biomechanical and clinical effectiveness. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the effects of a knee orthosis with a new two-degrees-of-freedom (DOF) joint design on selected gait parameters and in a sit-to-stand task in patients with mild-to-moderate medial KOA.

Methods

This study was conducted both at the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinic in Shahid Modarres Academic Hospital and the Biomechanical Laboratory of Rehabilitation Faculty of Iran University of medical Sciences in Tehran, Iran from September 2015 to October 2017. The gait performance of 16 patients was assessed without an orthosis, using a common one-DOF (DOF) knee orthosis and using the same knee orthosis with a two-DOF orthotic joint design. The interactive shearing force between limb and brace in the shell area during a sit-to-stand test was also identified. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to analyse the data.

Results

Compared with walking with no orthosis, both orthosis conditions reduced the external knee adduction moment significantly (P ≤0.05). A significant increase between the one-DOF and two-DOF conditions in terms of walking speed (P = 0.041 and P = 0.009, respectively) and stride length (P = 0.028 and P = 0.038, respectively) was observed. In a sit-to-stand test, wearing the orthosis significantly decreased knee transverse plane range of motion (P ≤0.05). There was a 41.31 ± 8.34 Newtons reduction in knee flexion constraint force.

Conclusion

The two-DOF knee orthosis was more comfortable compared to the one-DOF knee orthosis during deep knee flexion. Otherwise, the one-DOF- and two-DOF-braces performed similarly.

Effect of Different Knee Braces in ACL-Deficient Patients

Knee braces are often used during rehabilitation after ACL injury. There are two main concepts, rigid and soft braces, but studies comparing the two show conflicting results. Most studies used movement tasks with low translational or rotational loads and did not provide joint kinematics. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of two different knee braces (rigid vs. soft) on knee joint kinematics in ACL-deficient patients compared to an unbraced control condition using two tasks (walking and 180° cutting) provoking knee movements in the frontal and transverse planes. 17 subjects with ACL-deficient knees participated in this study. 3D knee joint kinematics were recorded. To provoke frontal plane knee joint motion a laterally tilting plate was applied during a walking task. Both braces reduced the maximum valgus angle compared to the unbraced condition, stabilizing the knee joint against excessive valgus motion. Yet, no differences in peak abduction angle between the two braces were found. However, a significant extension deficit was observed with the rigid brace. Moreover, both braces increased transverse plane RoM and peak internal rotation angle, with the effects being significantly larger with the rigid brace. These effects have been associated with decreased knee stability and unphysiological cartilage loading. Therefore, the soft brace seems to be able to limit peak abduction with a lesser impact on physiological gait compared to the rigid brace. The cutting task was selected to provoke transverse plane knee movement and large external knee rotation was expected. However, none of the braces was able to reduce peak external knee rotation. Again, an increase in transverse plane RoM was observed with both braces. Based on these results, no brace outmatched the other in the second task. This study was the first attempt to clarify the effect of brace design for the stabilization of the knee joint during movements with frontal and transverse plane loading. However, to provide physicians and patients with a comprehensive guideline for brace usage, future studies will have to extent these findings to other daily or sportive movement tasks.

Study of human-machine physical interface for wearable mobility assist devices

A decrease in mobility, related to illness, trauma or ageing, negatively affects the quality of life of the rapidly growing elderly population. A promising solution to maintain this standard of living is powered wearable mobility assist devices. Although they have achieved technological breakthroughs in the last decade, their overall success is still hindered by their induced physical discomfort, which limits their effective and prolonged usage. The aim of this study is to achieve a comprehensive characterization of human-machine physical interface to further advance the performance of wearable mobility assist devices, specifically for the knee joint. This led the research group to design, fabricate, and instrument a low-cost modular knee orthosis testing apparatus with extension moment assist that allows multiple physical interface adjustment parameters. This device was conceived with the objective to conduct human testing while introducing design variables and operating parameters to evaluate device's performance. Using a force mapping apparatus and a motion capture system, the kinetic and the kinematic behaviour of the developed orthosis' physical interfaces were acquired. The results demonstrated varied impact on performance when introducing key design variables namely interface position, interface geometry, interface compliancy, interface hard-shell position, interface degree of freedom, and knee extension moment. This study provides an in-depth understanding of distinct user-device interface mechanisms and permitted an evaluation of optimum orthosis parameters to help further advance the state of wearable mobility assist devices.

The effect of knee brace misalignment on the anterior cruciate ligament: An experimental study

BACKGROUND

Protective knee braces are used for rehabilitation or prevention. Due to poor patient compliance or slippage, the brace might be misaligned with the knee axis.

OBJECTIVES

Does a misaligned knee brace stress the anterior cruciate ligament?

STUDY DESIGN

It is an experimental study.

METHODS

A strain sensor was implanted on the anterior cruciate ligament in eight limbs. The limbs were mounted in a knee simulator, muscle forces were applied and a cyclic motion from 10° to 60° flexion was performed under three conditions: unbraced, braced and with a misaligned brace.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The outcome measures were anterior cruciate ligament strain and three-dimensional kinematics of the knee joint.

RESULTS

The correctly aligned brace significantly reduced the anterior cruciate ligament strain at 10° compared to the unbraced condition from 0% to -1.54% (standard deviation = 1.4). The misaligned brace neutralised the effect of bracing to -0.06% (standard deviation = 1.1) anterior cruciate ligament strain. At 60° flexion angle, bracing had no statistically significant effect on the anterior cruciate ligament strain compared to the unbraced knee: -2.58% (standard deviation = 0.8) versus -1.64% (standard deviation = 1.0). The anterior cruciate ligament in the misaligned braced knee at 60° flexion with a strain of -1.1% (standard deviation = 0.9) was significantly more stressed than in the correctly aligned condition. An effect of bracing on knee kinematics was not detected.

CONCLUSION

A correctly aligned knee brace reduced anterior cruciate ligament strain. By contrast, a misaligned brace tended to increase the anterior cruciate ligament strain compared to the unbraced knee.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The correct alignment of the brace was identified as a key factor decisively influencing the effectiveness of bracing.

Confirmation bias affects user perception of knee braces

Technological advances in orthopedic devices such as prostheses and orthoses are intended to improve function but may also result in increased complexity and expense. Consequently, accurate determination of effectiveness is important. When devices with advanced technology are used, it is possible that confirmation bias - the tendency for a user to actually experience what he or she expects to experience - will influence outcomes. This study assessed confirmation bias in 18 healthy young adults walking in knee braces. Participants wore two identical braces, but one was cosmetically modified and participants were told that it was a prototype computerized brace that could dynamically alter its stiffness. Before using the braces, the majority of users indicated a preference for the "computerized" brace. Actual walking showed no differences between the two braces. Following walking, users maintained preference for the "computerized" brace, indicating the presence of confirmation bias. These results underscore the importance of blinding when self-reported outcomes are used and the need to consider a placebo effect when comparing orthopedic devices.

A biomechanical perspective on physical therapy management of knee osteoarthritis

SYNOPSIS

Altered knee joint biomechanics and excessive joint loading have long been considered as important contributors to the development and progression of knee osteoarthritis. Therefore, a better understanding of how various treatment options influence the loading environment of the knee joint could have practical implications for devising more effective physical therapy management strategies. The aim of this clinical commentary was to review the pertinent biomechanical evidence supporting the use of treatment options intended to provide protection against excessive joint loading while offering symptomatic relief and functional improvements for better long-term management of patients with knee osteoarthritis. The biomechanical and clinical evidence regarding the effectiveness of knee joint offloading strategies, including contralateral cane use, laterally wedged shoe insoles, variable-stiffness shoes, valgus knee bracing, and gait-modification strategies, within the context of effective disease management is discussed. In addition, the potential role of therapeutic exercise and neuromuscular training to improve the mechanical environment of the knee joint is considered. Management strategies for treatment of joint instability and patellofemoral compartment disease are also mentioned. Based on the evidence presented as part of this clinical commentary, it is argued that special considerations for the role of knee joint biomechanics and excessive joint loading are necessary in designing effective short- and long-term management strategies for treatment of patients with knee osteoarthritis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapy, level 5.

The effects of a prophylactic knee brace and two neoprene knee sleeves on the performance of healthy athletes: a crossover randomized controlled trial

Knee injury is one of the major problems in sports medicine, and the use of prophylactic knee braces is an attempt to reduce the occurrence and/or severity of injuries to the knee joint ligament(s) without inhibiting knee mobility. The aim of the present study was to examine the effect of one recently designed prophylactic knee brace and two neoprene knee sleeves upon performance of healthy athletes. Thirty-one healthy male athletes (age = 21.2 ± 1.5) volunteered as participants to examine the effect of prophylactic knee brace/sleeves on performance using isokinetic and functional tests. All subjects were tested in four conditions in a random order: 1. nonbraced (control) 2. using a neoprene knee sleeve 3. using a knee sleeve with four bilateral metal supports and 4. using a prophylactic knee brace. The study design was a crossover, randomized, controlled trial. Subjects completed single leg vertical jump, cross-over hop, and the isokinetic knee flexion and extension (at 60, 180, 300°/sec). Data were collected from the above tests and analyzed for jump height, cross-over hop distance, peak torque to body weight ratio and average power, respectively. Comparisons of these variables in the four testing conditions revealed no statistically significant difference (p>0.05). The selected prophylactic brace/sleeves did not significantly inhibit athletic performance which might verify that their structure and design have caused no complication in the normal function of the knee joint. Moreover, it could be speculated that, if the brace or the sleeves had any limiting effect, our young healthy athletic subjects were well able to generate a mean peak torque large enough to overcome this possible restriction. Further studies are suggested to investigate the long term effect of these prophylactic knee brace and sleeves as well as their possible effect on the adjacent joints to the knee.