Potential interaction of experimental knee pain and laterally wedged insoles for knee off-loading during walking

A Review of the Relationships Between Knee Pain and Movement Neuromechanics

CONTEXT

Knee injury and disease are common, debilitating, and expensive. Pain is a chief symptom of knee injury and disease and likely contributes to arthrogenic muscle inhibition. Joint pain alters isolated motor function, muscular strength, and movement biomechanics. Because knee pain influences biomechanics, it likely also influences long-term knee joint health.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is 2-fold: (1) review effects of knee pain on lower-extremity muscular activation and corresponding biomechanics and (2) consider potential implications of neuromechanical alterations associated with knee pain for long-term knee joint health. Experimental knee pain is emphasized because it has been used to mimic clinical knee pain and clarify independent effects of knee pain. Three common sources of clinical knee pain are also discussed: patellofemoral pain, anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction, and knee osteoarthritis.

DATA SOURCES

The PubMed, Web of Science, and SPORTDiscus databases were searched for articles relating to the purpose of this article.

CONCLUSION

Researchers have consistently reported that knee pain alters neuromuscular activation, often in the form of inhibition that likely occurs via voluntary and involuntary neural pathways. The effects of knee pain on quadriceps activation have been studied extensively. Knee pain decreases voluntary and involuntary quadriceps activation and strength and alters the biomechanics of various movement tasks. If allowed to persist, these neuromechanical alterations might change the response of articular cartilage to joint loads during movement and detrimentally affect long-term knee joint health. Physical rehabilitation professionals should consider neuromechanical effects of knee pain when treating knee injury and disease. Resolution of joint pain can likely help to restore normal movement neuromechanics and potentially improve long-term knee joint health and should be a top priority.

An evaluation of the use of a lateral wedged insole and a valgus knee brace in combination in subjects with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis (OA)

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect (6 weeks) of the use of a knee brace and a lateral wedge insole, both in isolation and combined, on the knee adduction moment (KAM), pain levels, kinematics (velocity, stride length, cadence), knee ROM, function, and satisfaction in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA).Methods: Twenty-one patients with medial compartment knee OA were participated in this study. A relatively light three-point valgus knee brace (VB) and full length custom-made lateral wedge insole with arch support were prepared for each subject. Patients divided into three groups at random.Results: The use of a custom fit valgus brace with lateral edge insole concurrently can reduce a greater peak KAM than use in isolation (30%). In addition, the use of both interventions can improve walking velocity, cadence, and reduce levels of pain in patients with medial compartment OA.Conclusion: All parameters except stride length and KAM in comparison with first day of wearing interventions improved significantly in the combined, concurrent usage group. The use of a lateral wedge insole and a valgus knee brace in combination can improve the kinetic and kinematic parameters in patients with medial compartment knee OA.

Can foot orthoses impose different gait features based on geometrical design in healthy subjects? A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Foot orthoses (FOs) are popular treatment to alleviate several abnormalities of lower extremity. FO designs might alter lower extremity biomechanics differently, but the association is not yet known. This review aimed to evaluate how different FO designs, namely FO with medial posting, lateral posting, arch support, or arch & heel support, change lower limb kinematics and kinetics during walking.

LITERATURE SURVEY

Electronic database search were conducted from inception to March 2019, and 25 papers passed the inclusion criteria. Two independent reviewers checked the quality using a modified Downs and Black checklist (73.7±5.5%) and a biomechanical quality checklist (71.4±17.1%). Effect sizes for differences between with- and without- FO walking were calculated, and meta-analysis was performed whenever at least two studies reported the same variable.

RESULTS

Medial posting reduced peak ankle eversion moment. Lateral posting brought about higher peak ankle dorsiflexion and peak ankle eversion for kinematics, as well as higher peak ankle abduction moment, lower peak knee adduction moment, and higher peak mediolateral ground reaction force (GRF) for kinetics. FOs with either arch support or arch & heel support tended to decrease vertical ground reaction force, but it was not significant.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this review reveal that medial or lateral posting work efficiently to change foot and knee kinematics and kinetics. However, the impact force is just slightly decreased by arch-supported and heel supported FOs. Due to the small number of available studies, and heterogeneity in meta-analysis findings, further research with more standardized biomechanical approach are required.

Effects of lateral wedge insole application on medial compartment knee osteoarthritis severity evaluated by ultrasound

BACKGROUND

It is known that a lateral wedge insole (LWI) decreases medial loading stress in the knee. Medial meniscus pathology, such as a degenerative tear or a root tear, leading to malfunction and medial meniscus extrusion (MME), is a critical condition that leads to severe osteoarthritis (OA). However, the effect of LWI on MME is still unknown. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of LWI use on MME in knee OA using ultrasonography.

METHODS

Thirty-one knees from 18 patients with knee OA diagnosed radiographically were allocated to the OA group (mean age, 73.6years; sex M:F, 2:16). Twenty-two knees from 11 volunteers without knee OA were also enrolled as an age-matched control group. MME was evaluated using ultrasonography with the patients in three positions: supine, standing without LWI, and standing with LWI.

RESULTS

In both groups, the mean values of the MME increased significantly when patients were in the standing position compared to the supine position. In the OA group, MME significantly decreased with LWI use. There was no significant difference in MME between use and non-use of an LWI in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

The LWI could significantly decrease MME in patients with knee OA.