Transmissibility and waveform purity of whole-body vibrations in older adults

A new method to determine stretch reflex latency

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

Motion artifact signals (MASs) created by the relative movement of intramuscular wire electrodes are an indicator of the mechanical stimulus arrival time to the muscle belly. This study proposes a method that uses wire electrodes as an intramuscular mechanosensor to determine the stretch reflex (SR) latency without lag time.

METHODS

Gastrocnemius SR was induced by tendon tap, heel tap, and forefoot tap. The MASs recorded by intramuscular wire electrodes were extracted from background electromyographic activity using the spike-triggered averaging technique. Simultaneous recordings were obtained from multiple sites to validate the MAS technique.

RESULTS

Using intramuscular wire electrodes, the MASs were successfully determined and extracted for all stimulus sites. In the records from the rectus femoris, MASs were also successfully extracted; thus, the reflex latency could be calculated.

DISCUSSION

Wire electrodes can be used as an intramuscular mechanosensor to determine the mechanical stimulus arrival time to the muscle belly.

Biodynamic Responses to Whole-Body Vibration Training: A Systematic Review

In recent years, whole-body vibration (WBV) training has received an increasing interest in the sports and medical fields. However, there has been inconsistency among several studies regarding the effect of WBV training on the human body, which is partly due to the lack of the existence of guidelines for using WBV training machines. To understand the effect of WBV training on the human body and build the needed regulations, it is essential first to understand the biodynamic responses to vibration which represent how vibration is transmitted to and through the human body. The purpose of this study is to systematically review previous studies that measured biodynamic responses when using WBV training machines to highlight inconsistencies in their results and provide possible reasons for them. An extensive literature search was performed on the SCOPUS database to obtain relevant studies. One hundred and fifty-six potentially relevant studies were obtained but after further screening, 23 papers from 2007 to 2020 met inclusion criteria and were included in the study. The papers were analysed with respect to acceleration, transmissibility, interface force, and apparent mass during different vibration settings, body posture, age, and sex. Results and conflicts among studies were highlighted and possible explanations for the inconsistency were provided.

Transmission of whole body vibration - Comparison of three vibration platforms in healthy subjects

The potential of whole body vibration (WBV) to maintain or enhance musculoskeletal strength during ageing is of increasing interest, with both low and high magnitude WBV having been shown to maintain or increase bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine and femoral neck. The aim of this study was to determine how a range of side alternating and vertical WBV platforms deliver vibration stimuli up through the human body. Motion capture data were collected for 6 healthy adult participants whilst standing on the Galileo 900, Powerplate Pro 5 and Juvent 100 WBV platforms. The side alternating Galileo 900 WBV platform delivered WBV at 5-30 Hz and amplitudes of 0-5 mm. The Powerplate Pro 5 vertical WBV platform delivered WBV at 25 and 30 Hz and amplitude settings of 'Low' and 'High'. The Juvent 1000 vertical WBV platform delivered a stimulus at a frequency between 32 and 37 Hz and amplitude 10 fold lower than either the Galileo or Powerplate, resulting in accelerations of 0.3 g. Motion capture data were recorded using an 8 camera Vicon Nexus system with 21 reflective markers placed at anatomical landmarks between the toe and the forehead. Vibration was expressed as vertical RMS accelerations along the z-axis which were calculated as the square root of the mean of the squared acceleration values in g. The Juvent 1000 did not deliver detectable vertical RMS accelerations above the knees. In contrast, the Powerplate Pro 5 and Galileo 900 delivered vertical RMS accelerations sufficiently to reach the femoral neck and lumbar spine. The maximum vertical RMS accelerations at the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) were 1.00 g ±0.30 and 0.85 g ±0.49 for the Powerplate and Galileo respectively. For similar accelerations at the ASIS, the Galileo achieved greater accelerations within the lower limbs, whilst the Powerplate recorded higher accelerations in the thoracic spine at T10. The Powerplate Pro 5 and Galileo 900 deliver vertical RMS accelerations sufficiently to reach the femoral neck and lumbar spine, whereas the Juvent 1000 did not deliver detectable vertical RMS accelerations above the knee. The side alternating Galileo 900 showed greater attenuation of the input accelerations than the vertical vibrations of the Powerplate Pro 5. The platforms differ markedly in the transmission of vibration with strong influences of frequency and amplitude. Researchers need to take account of the differences in transmission between platforms when designing and comparing trials of whole body vibration.

Transmission of Acceleration From a Synchronous Vibration Exercise Platform to the Head During Dynamic Squats

Many research studies have evaluated the effects of whole-body vibration exercise on muscular strength, standing balance, and bone density, but relatively few reports have evaluated safety issues for vibration exercises. Knee flexion reduces acceleration transmission to the head during static exercise. However, few studies have evaluated dynamic exercises. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the transmission of acceleration to the head during dynamic squats. Twelve participants performed dynamic squats (0°-40° of knee flexion) on a synchronous vertical whole-body vibration platform. Platform frequencies from 20 to 50 Hz were tested at a peak-to-peak nominal displacement setting of 1 mm. Transmissibilities from the platform to head varied depending on platform frequency and knee flexion angle. We observed amplification during 20 and 25 Hz platform vibration when knee flexion was <20°. Vibration from exercise platforms can be amplified as it is transmitted through the body to the head during dynamic squats. Similarly, this vibration energy contributes to observed injuries such as retinal detachment. It is recommended that knee flexion angles of at least 20° and vibration frequencies above 30 Hz are used when performing dynamic squat exercises with whole-body vibration.