The relationship between frontal plane trunk control during landing and lower extremity muscle strength in young athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Athletes Continue to Show Functional Performance Deficits at Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To systematically review the existing literature on the functional performance of athletes at the time of return-to-sport (RTS) clearance after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

METHODS

A systematic literature search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases was performed. The inclusion criteria were original research reports with study populations of athletes who had undergone ACLR and had undergone objective functional testing immediately after clearance to RTS. Functional testing was stratified by hop tests, strength tests, kinetic assessment, and kinematic assessment, and data were extracted from each study using a standardized template.

RESULTS

Of the 937 unique studies identified, 46 met the inclusion criteria. The average time between ACLR and functional testing was 7.9 months among the included studies. In 10 of 17 studies, patients were found to have an average quadriceps strength limb symmetry index of less than 90%. However, only 2 of 12 studies found the average hop test limb symmetry index to be less than 90%. Kinematics included reduced knee flexion angle and increased trunk flexion on landing in ACLR patients compared with matched controls. On evaluation of kinetics, ACLR patients showed reduced peak vertical ground reaction force, lower peak knee extension and knee flexion moments, and altered energy absorption contribution compared with matched controls.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review suggests that athletes show functional deficits at the time of RTS at an average of 7.9 months after ACLR. Traditional functional tests, such as strength and hop tests, are not able to accurately identify patients who continue to show deficits. The most common biomechanical deficits that persist after RTS clearance include diminished peak knee extension moment, decreased knee flexion angle, increased trunk flexion angle, reduced vertical ground reaction force, and increased hamstring central activation ratio during various functional gait and landing tasks.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, systematic review of Level I to III studies.

No sign of weakness: a systematic review and meta-analysis of hip and calf muscle strength after anterior cruciate ligament injury

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to determine hip and lower-leg muscle strength in people after ACL injury compared with an uninjured control group (between people) and the uninjured contralateral limb (between limbs).

DESIGN

Systematic review with meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL and SportDiscus to 28 February 2023.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Primary ACL injury with mean age 18-40 years at time of injury. Studies had to measure hip and/or lower-leg muscle strength quantitatively (eg, dynamometer) and report muscle strength for the ACL-injured limb compared with: (i) an uninjured control group and/or (ii) the uninjured contralateral limb. Risk of bias was assessed according to Cochrane Collaboration domains.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies were included (n=23 measured strength ≤12 months post-ACL reconstruction). Most examined hip abduction (16 studies), hip extension (12 studies) and hip external rotation (7 studies) strength. We found no meaningful difference in muscle strength between people or between limbs for hip abduction, extension, internal rotation, flexion or ankle plantarflexion, dorsiflexion (estimates ranged from -9% to +9% of comparator). The only non-zero differences identified were in hip adduction (24% stronger on ACL limb (95% CI 8% to 42%)) and hip external rotation strength (12% deficit on ACL limb (95% CI 6% to 18%)) compared with uninjured controls at follow-ups >12 months, however both results stemmed from only two studies. Certainty of evidence was very low for all outcomes and comparisons, and drawn primarily from the first year post-ACL reconstruction.

CONCLUSION

Our results do not show widespread or substantial muscle weakness of the hip and lower-leg muscles after ACL injury, contrasting deficits of 10%-20% commonly reported for knee extensors and flexors. As it is unclear if deficits in hip and lower-leg muscle strength resolve with appropriate rehabilitation or no postinjury or postoperative weakness occurs, individualised assessment should guide training of hip and lower-leg strength following ACL injury.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020216793.

Surface electromyography characteristics of patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury in different rehabilitation phases

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a common treatment for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. However, after ACLR, a significant proportion of patients do not return to pre-injury levels. Research on muscle function during movement has important implications in rehabilitation.

Methods: Sixty patients with unilateral ACL injury were recruited for this study and assigned into three groups: group A, individuals with an ACL injury before 6 months; group B, individuals with ACLR from 6 months to 1 year; and group C, individuals with ACLR 1 year later. Surface electromyography (SEMG) signals were collected from the bilateral rectus femoris (RF), vastus medialis (VM), vastus lateralis (VL), biceps femoris (BF), and semitendinosus (ST). The tasks performed during the experiment included straight leg raising (SLR) training at 30°, SLR training at 60°, ankle dorsiflexion, walking, and fast walking.

Results: In the maximum muscle strength test, the affected side of the BF in group A (199.4 ± 177.12) was significantly larger than in group B (53.91 ± 36.61, p = 0.02) and group C (75.08 ± 59.7, p = 0.023). In the walking test, the contralateral side of the RF in group B (347.53 ± 518.88) was significantly greater than that in group C (139.28 ± 173.78, p = 0.029). In the SLR training (60°) test, the contralateral side of the RF in group C (165.37 ± 183.06) was significantly larger than that in group A (115.09 ± 62.47, p = 0.023) and smaller than that in group B (226.21 ± 237.17, p = 0.046); In the ankle dorsiflexion training test, the contralateral side of the RF in group B (80.37 ± 87.9) was significantly larger than that in group C (45.61 ± 37.93, p = 0.046).

Conclusion: This study showed the EMG characteristics of patients with ACL injury helped to determine which muscle requires more training and which exercise model would be best suited for intervention.

Asymmetries in Two-Dimensional Trunk and Knee Kinematics During a Single-Leg Drop Landing Post Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

The purpose of this study was to compare interlimb asymmetries in trunk and knee kinematics during a single-leg drop landing between athletes 9 months post anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (post-ACLR) and healthy athletes using two-dimensional analysis. Thirty-three recreational athletes (12 post-ACLR and 21 healthy) participated in the study. Participants post-ACLR showed significantly higher limb symmetry indices in peak trunk flexion (144.0%, SE drop landing kinematics: 22.7%) when compared to healthy participants (100.6%, SE: 10.5%; z = 2.17, p = .03) and lower limb symmetry indices in peak knee flexion (85.3%, SE: 3.6%) when compared to healthy participants (98.0%, SE: 3.3%; z = −2.43, p = .01). Two-dimensional analyses of a single-leg drop landing is a clinically applicable tool that can identify interlimb asymmetries in peak trunk flexion and peak knee flexion kinematics in athletes greater than 9 months post-ACLR when compared to healthy athletes.

Trunk Biomechanics in Individuals with Knee Disorders: A Systematic Review with Evidence Gap Map and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The trunk is the foundation for transfer and dissipation of forces throughout the lower extremity kinetic chain. Individuals with knee disorders may employ trunk biomechanical adaptations to accommodate forces at the knee or compensate for muscle weakness. This systematic review aimed to synthesize the literature comparing trunk biomechanics between individuals with knee disorders and injury-free controls.

METHODS

Five databases were searched from inception to January 2022. Observational studies comparing trunk kinematics or kinetics during weight-bearing tasks (e.g., stair negotiation, walking, running, landings) between individuals with knee disorders and controls were included. Meta-analyses for each knee disorder were performed. Outcome-level certainty was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE), and evidence gap maps were created.

RESULTS

A total of 81 studies investigating trunk biomechanics across six different knee disorders were included (i.e., knee osteoarthritis [OA], total knee arthroplasty [TKA], patellofemoral pain [PFP], patellar tendinopathy [PT], anterior cruciate ligament deficiency [ACLD], and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction [ACLR]). Individuals with knee OA presented greater trunk flexion during squatting (SMD 0.88, 95% CI 0.58-1.18) and stepping tasks (SMD 0.56, 95% CI 0.13-.99); ipsilateral and contralateral trunk lean during walking (SMD 1.36; 95% CI 0.60-2.11) and sit-to-stand (SMD 1.49; 95% CI 0.90-2.08), respectively. Greater trunk flexion during landing tasks in individuals with PFP (SMD 0.56; 95% CI 0.01-1.12) or ACLR (SMD 0.48; 95% CI 0.21-.75) and greater ipsilateral trunk lean during single-leg squat in individuals with PFP (SMD 1.01; 95% CI 0.33-1.70) were also identified. No alterations in trunk kinematics of individuals with TKA were identified. Evidence gap maps outlined the lack of investigations for individuals with PT or ACLD, as well as for trunk kinetics across knee disorders.

CONCLUSION

Individuals with knee OA, PFP, or ACLR present with altered trunk kinematics in the sagittal and frontal planes. The findings of this review support the assessment of trunk biomechanics in these individuals in order to identify possible targets for rehabilitation and avoidance strategies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019129257.

Limited evidence for return to sport testing after ACL reconstruction in children and adolescents under 16 years: a scoping review

Specific return to sport criteria for children and adolescents after anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction are unknown. The aim of this scoping review is to provide an overview of current tests regarding return to sport for children and adolescents. This scoping review was performed according to the PRISMA statement. A systematic search was performed on PubMed and EMBASE. The inclusion criteria were diagnostic and prognostic studies evaluating tests regarding return to sport after ACL injury and reconstruction in children/adolescents (age < 18 years). Twenty-six studies were included, of which 22 studies evaluated tests in the age category of 16 to 18 years. All studies evaluated tests after ACL reconstruction, no studies have been conducted in non-operative patients. Strength tests, movement quality and patient reported outcomes measures (PROMs) are investigated most frequently. Clearance for return to sport should be based on a test battery including strength tests, movement quality during sport-specific tasks and (paediatric) patient reported outcome measures. There are no recommendations on which specific tests regarding quantity and quality of movement should be used. Future research should aim at at developing and validating a test battery including movement quality and neuromotor control in a sport-specific context for both younger children and adolescents after both operative and non-operative treatment.

Factors associated with dynamic knee valgus angle during single-leg forward landing in patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Background

A few studies have reported on how to predict increased dynamic knee valgus angle (KVA), a risk factor for second anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury after ACL reconstruction. This study aimed to identify the factors with the potential to predict the KVA during single-leg hop landing.

Methods

Using three-dimensional motion analysis systems, knee motion during a single-leg hop landing task was measured in 22 patients who had undergone ACL reconstruction at 8–10 months postoperatively. The KVA at initial contact (IC) and maximum KVA during the 40-ms period after IC were calculated using the point cluster technique; correlations between the KVA and other factors were assessed. We performed multiple regression analysis to determine whether KVA could be predicted by these parameters.

Results

The KVA was significantly negatively correlated with the static femorotibial angle (FTA; P < 0.01) and patient height (P < 0.01). It was positively correlated with the body mass index (P < 0.05). Multiple regression analysis showed that a small FTA could predict the KVA at IC (β: 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.24-(-0.42); P < 0.01). The maximum KVA during the 40-ms period after IC was associated with the FTA (β: 0.46, 95% CI: 2.22-(-0.26); P = 0.02) and height (β: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.59-(-0.02); P = 0.04).

Conclusion

At 8–10 months after ACL reconstruction, the KVA was significantly correlated with the FTA, with reduced FTA being associated with an increased dynamic KVA during single-leg hop landing. The measurement of anatomical parameters may aid in predicting the second ACL injury risk after reconstruction.

Gait deviations and muscle strength deficits in subjects with patellar instability

BACKGROUND

Abnormal tracking of the patella is a hallmark sign of patellar instability (PI). Gait deviations and strength deficits may exacerbate abnormal tracking. The identification of modifiable gait deviations and strength deficits can aid in developing more effective management strategies for individuals with PI. The purpose of this study was to identify modifiable gait and strength deficits in subjects with PI.

METHODS

32 subjects (16 PI, 16 controls, 3 males/13 females in each group, 21.1 years old, 23.5 BMI), performed an instrumented gait analysis while walking at 1.5 m per second. Subjects' peak hip adduction angles, external rotation angles, hip abduction moments, knee flexion angles, knee adduction angles, and knee extensor moments were measured during walking. Hip abduction, hip external rotation, and knee extension strength were assessed with a handheld dynamometer.

RESULTS

Individuals with PI displayed significantly lower peak knee adduction angles (1.8 ± 2.8° PI, 5.5 ± 4.5° control, p < .01) and peak hip abduction moments (0.2 ± 0.1 Nm/kg*m PI, 0.4 ± 0.1 Nm/kg*m control, p < .01). Subjects with PI were weaker in knee extension strength (14.5 ± 4.1 kg/m PI, 23.8 ± 7.2 kg/m control, p < .01), hip abduction strength (12.1 ± 2.0 kg/m PI, 17.8 ± 4.0 kg/m control, p < .01), and hip external rotation strength (5.5 ± 1.9 kg/m PI, 7.1 ± 1.3 kg/m control, p = .01).

CONCLUSION

Subjects with patellar instability have smaller joint moments and a more valgus knee position while walking. Coupled with deficits in muscle strength, this likely contributes to subjective reports of chronic patellar instability.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.