Variability of the helical axis during active cervical movements in people with chronic neck pain

Effect of non-specific neck pain on the path of the instantaneous axis of rotation of the neck during its flexion-extension movement

Non-specific neck pain is a common musculoskeletal disorder with a high prevalence and involves impaired joint movement pattern. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the trajectory of the instantaneous axis of rotation(IAR) in flexion-extension movements of the neck between people with and without nonspecific neck pain, using functional data analysis techniques. Furthermore, possible relationships between neck kinematics and perceived pain and disability were explored. Seventy-three volunteers participated in this cross-sectional study. They were allocated in a non-specific pain group (PG, n = 28) and a control group (CG, n = 45). A cyclic flexion-extension movement was assessed by a video photogrammetry system and numerical and functional variables were computed to analyze IAR trajectory during movement. Moreover, to explore possible relationships of these variables with pain and neck disability, a visual analogue scale (VAS) and the neck disability index (NDI) were used. The instantaneous axis of rotation trajectory during the flexion-extension cyclic movement described a path like Greek letter rho both in the CG and the PG, but this trajectory was shorter and displaced upward in the PG, compared to the CG. A reduction of the displacement range and a rise in the vertical position of the IAR were related to VAS and NDI scores. Non-specific neck pain is associated with a higher location of the instantaneous axis of rotation and a decrease in length of the path traveled during the flexion-extension movement. This study contributes to a better description of neck movement in people with non-specific neck pain, which would help to plan an individualized treatment.

A randomized controlled trial on the effects of "Global Postural Re-education" versus neck specific exercise on pain, disability, postural control, and neuromuscular features in women with chronic non-specific neck pain

BACKGROUND

Neck pain is associated with decreased health-related quality of life, decreased work productivity, and increased visits to health care providers.

AIM

The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of "Global Postural Re-education" (GPR) versus a neck specific exercise (SE) program on neck pain, disability, cervical range of movement, postural stability, and activity of the superficial cervical flexor muscles.

DESIGN

A parallel-group and single-blinded clinical trial.

SETTING

Community interventions.

POPULATION

Fifty women with non-specific chronic neck pain (NSCNP).

METHODS

Participants were randomly assigned to one of the two intervention groups (GPR [N.=25] or SE [N.=25]). Both interventions consisted of eight sessions of ~40 minutes duration, performed twice a week, for four weeks. Outcomes included neck pain intensity and disability, cervical range of motion (CROM), postural sway, and activity of the superficial neck flexor muscles during a cranio-cervical flexion test (CCFT). All outcomes were assessed twice before the intervention and immediately following eight treatment sessions over four weeks.

RESULTS

Both interventions were equally effective in reducing neck pain (P<0.001, ŋp²=0.770) and disability (P<0.001, ŋp²=0.306), improving neck mobility (P<0.001, 0.385≤ŋp²≤0.623, for all measurements) and decreasing the activity of the superficial cervical flexor muscles (P>0.001). Neither intervention altered postural sway.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results revealed that GPR and SE induced significant positive results in all measures apart from postural stability but with no difference between the interventions.

CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT

"Global Postural Re-education" (GPR) and neck SE interventions are equally effective in reducing neck pain and disability, and improving neck mobility in women with NSCNP. Overall, this study indicates that GPR and SE interventions can be used to effectively manage patients with NSCNP.

Influencing factors of pressure pain hypersensitivity of the upper trapezius in food service workers with nonspecific neck/shoulder myofascial pain: A cross-sectional study

It is unclear which factors contribute to the developing pressure pain hypersensitivity of the upper trapezius, a type of neurophysiological hyperexcitability. The present study investigated the relationship between physical and psychological factors and pressure pain hypersensitivity of the upper trapezius for each sex. In total, 154 individuals with neck/shoulder myofascial pain participated, among 372 food service workers. Participants completed a questionnaire (Beck Depression Inventory, and Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion scale) and were photographed to measure posture. Pressure pain sensitivity, 2 range of motions (cervical lateral bending and rotation), and 4 muscle strengths (serratus anterior, lower trapezius [LT], biceps, and glenohumeral external rotator) were measured by a pressure algometer, iPhone application, and handheld dynamometer, respectively. For each sex, forward multivariate logistic regression was used to test our a priori hypothesis among selected variables that a combination of psychosocial and physical factors contributed to the risk for pressure pain hypersensitivity. In multivariate analyses, LT strength (odds ratio = 0.94, 95% confidence interval = 0.91-0.97, P = .001) was the only significant influencing factor for pressure pain hypersensitivity in men. Dominant painful ipsilateral cervical rotation range of motion (odds ratio = 0.96, 95% confidence interval = 0.92-0.99, P = .037) was the only influencing factor for pressure pain hypersensitivity in women. LT strength and dominant painful ipsilateral cervical rotation range of motion could serve as guidelines for preventing and managing pressure pain hypersensitivity of the upper trapezius in food service workers with nonspecific neck/shoulder myofascial pain.

A network analysis reveals the interaction between fear and physical features in people with neck pain

Although neck pain is known to be a complex and multifactorial condition characterised by the interplay between physical and psychological domains, a comprehensive investigation examining the interactions across multiple features is still lacking. In this study, we aimed to unravel the structure of associations between physical measures of neuromuscular function and fear of movement in people with a history of neck pain. One hundred participants (mean age 33.3 ± 9.4) were assessed for this cross-sectional study, and the neuromuscular and kinematic features investigated were the range of motion, velocity of neck movement, smoothness of neck movement, neck proprioception (measured as the joint reposition error), and neck flexion and extension strength. The Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia was used to assess fear of movement. A network analysis was conducted to estimate the associations across features, as well as the role of each feature in the network. The estimated network revealed that fear of movement and neuromuscular/kinematic features were conditionally dependent. Higher fear of movement was associated with a lower range of motion, velocity, smoothness of neck movement, neck muscle strength, and proprioception (partial correlations between − 0.05 and − 0.12). Strong interactions were also found between kinematics features, with partial correlations of 0.39 and 0.58 between the range of motion and velocity, and between velocity and smoothness, respectively. The velocity of neck movement was the most important feature in the network since it showed the highest strength value. Using a novel approach to analysis, this study revealed that fear of movement can be associated with a spectrum of neuromuscular/kinematic adaptations in people with a history of neck pain.

A machine learning approach for the identification of kinematic biomarkers of chronic neck pain during single- and dual-task gait

BACKGROUND

Changes in gait characteristics have been reported in people with chronic neck pain (CNP).

RESEARCH QUESTION

Can we classify people with and without CNP by training machine learning models with Inertial Measurement Units (IMU)-based gait kinematic data?

METHODS

Eighteen asymptomatic individuals and 21 participants with CNP were recruited for the study and performed two gait trajectories, (1) linear walking with their head straight (single-task) and (2) linear walking with continuous head-rotation (dual-task). Kinematic data were recorded from three IMU sensors attached to the forehead, upper thoracic spine (T1), and lower thoracic spine (T12). Temporal and spectral features were extracted to generate the dataset for both single- and dual-task gait. To evaluate the most significant features and simultaneously reduce the dataset size, the Neighbourhood Component Analysis (NCA) method was utilized. Three supervised models were applied, including K-Nearest Neighbour, Support Vector Machine, and Linear Discriminant Analysis to test the performance of the most important temporal and spectral features.

RESULTS

The performance of all classifiers increased after the implementation of NCA. The best performance was achieved by NCA-Support Vector Machine with an accuracy of 86.85%, specificity of 83.30%, and sensitivity of 92.85% during the dual-task gait using only nine features.

SIGNIFICANCE

The results present a data-driven approach and machine learning-based methods to identify test conditions and features from high-dimensional data obtained during gait for the classification of people with and without CNP.

Assessment of Neuromuscular and Psychological Function in People with Recurrent Neck Pain during a Period of Remission: Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Analyses

The aim of this study was to examine for the presence of differences in neuromuscular and psychological function in individuals with recurrent neck pain (RNP) or chronic neck pain (CNP) following a whiplash trauma compared to healthy controls. A secondary aim was to examine whether neuromuscular characteristics together with psychological features in people with RNP were predictive of future painful episodes. Multiple features were assessed including neck disability, kinesiophobia, quality of life, cervical kinematics, proprioception, activity of superficial neck flexor muscles, maximum neck flexion and extension strength, and perceived exertion during submaximal contractions. Overall, those with RNP (n = 22) and CNP (n = 8) presented with higher neck disability, greater kinesiophobia, lower quality of life, slower and irregular neck movements, and less neck strength compared to controls (n = 15). Prediction analysis in the RNP group revealed that a higher number of previous pain episodes within the last 12 months along with lower neck flexion strength were predictors of higher neck disability at a 6-month follow-up. This preliminary study shows that participants with RNP presented with some degree of altered neuromuscular features and poorer psychological function with respect to healthy controls and these features were similar to those with CNP. Neck flexor weakness was predictive of future neck disability.

Head kinematics in patients with neck pain compared to asymptomatic controls: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Neck pain is one of the most common musculoskeletal disorders encountered by healthcare providers. A precise assessment of functional deficits, including sensorimotor control impairment, is regarded necessary for tailored exercise programmes. Sensorimotor control can be measured by kinematic characteristics, such as velocity, acceleration, smoothness, and temporal measures, or by assessing movement accuracy. This systematic review aims to identify movement tasks and distinct outcome variables used to measure kinematics and movement accuracy in patients with neck pain and present their results in comparison to asymptomatic controls.

METHODS

Electronic searches were conducted in MEDLINE, PEDro, Cochrane Library and CINAHL databases from inception to August 2020. Risk of bias of included studies was assessed. Movement tasks and specific outcome parameters used were collated. The level of evidence for potential group differences in each outcome variable between patients with neck pain and controls was evaluated.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven studies examining head kinematics and movement accuracy during head-aiming, functional and unconstrained movement tasks of the head were included. Average Risk of Bias of included studies was moderate. In total, 23 different outcome variables were assessed. A strong level of evidence for an increased movement time and for an increased number of errors during head aiming tasks was found. Moderate evidence was found in traumatic neck pain for a decreased mean velocity, peak acceleration, and reaction time, and for point deviation and time on target during head aiming tasks. Moderate evidence was found for decreased acceleration during unconstrained movements, too. Results on the remaining movement task and outcome variables showed only limited, very limited or even conflicting level of evidence for patients with neck pain to differ from controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Sensorimotor control in NP in the way of kinematic and movement accuracy characteristics of head motion was examined in head aiming, functional or unconstrained movement tasks. The results from this review indicate that for some characteristics that describe sensorimotor control, patients with NP differ from healthy controls.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020139083.

Normative cervical spine kinematics of a circumduction task

Neck pain is a prevalent condition and clinical examination techniques are limited and unable to assess out-of-plane motion. Recent works investigating cervical kinematics during neck circumduction (NC), a dynamic 3D task, has shown the ability to discern those with and without neck pain. The purposes of this study were to establish 1) confidence and prediction intervals of head-to-torso kinematics during NC in a healthy cohort, 2) a baseline summative metric to quantify the duration and magnitude of deviations outside the prediction interval, and 3) the reliability of NC. Thirty-nine participants (25.6 ± 6.3 years, 19F/20M) without neck pain completed left and right NC. A two-way smoothing spline analysis of variance was utilized to determine the mean-fitted values and 90% confidence and prediction intervals for NC. A standardized effect size was calculated and aggregated across all axes (Delta RMSD aggregate), as a summative metric of motion quality. Confidence and prediction intervals were comparable for left and right NC and demonstrated excellent reliability. The average sum of the Delta RMSD aggregate was 2.76 ± 0.55 for left NC and 2.74 ± 0.63 for right NC. The results of this study demonstrate the feasibility of utilizing normative intervals of a NC task to assess head-to-torso kinematics.

Analysis and evaluation of the systems used for the assessment of the cervical spine function: a systematic review

Neck injuries and pathologies are widespread and cause disability. Clinicians use different tools to measure the cervical spine' mobility to diagnose different disorders. There are many reliable assessment methods for this purpose, but their benefits have not been deeply investigated and compared, as well as their measurement results. This review aims to summarise the advantages, accuracy, and reliability, of measurement tools and devices used in studies or trails related to the neck and cervical spine evaluation, to evidence the use of inertial sensors and compare them, to highlight the best assessment systems and their characteristics. A literature review has been performed in a range of five years, to obtain information about cervical spine evaluation. Studies that met the established inclusion criteria were selected and classified according their pathology studied, objectives and methodologies followed when evaluating the cervical spine functionality. Studies were described chronologically highlighting the tools employed, where the motion capture systems and cervical range of motion devices stood out as the most used and reliable methods. Cervical spine assessment studies employing systems with inertial sensors as an accurate method, is not evidenced in the sample. However, they are widely tested and different studies validate these systems for their clinical area use, obtaining high reliability and repeatability. Thereby, this review argues that inertial sensors have proven to be a portable, and easy to use tool for the evaluation of neck and its related pathologies, with a great accuracy level.

Quaternions as a solution to determining the angular kinematics of human movement

The three-dimensional description of rigid body kinematics is a key step in many studies in biomechanics. There are several options for describing rigid body orientation including Cardan angles, Euler angles, and quaternions; the utility of quaternions will be reviewed and elaborated. The orientation of a rigid body or a joint between rigid bodies can be described by a quaternion which consists of four variables compared with Cardan or Euler angles (which require three variables). A quaternion, q = (q ₀, q ₁, q ₂, q ₃), can be considered a rotation (Ω = 2 cos^-1(q ₀)), about an axis defined by a unit direction vector q 1 / sin Ω 2 q 2 / sin Ω 2 q 3 / sin Ω 2 . The quaternion, compared with Cardan and Euler angles, does not suffer from singularities or Codman's paradox. Three-dimensional angular kinematics are defined on the surface of a unit hypersphere which means numerical procedures for orientation averaging and interpolation must take account of the shape of this surface rather than assuming that Euclidean geometry based procedures are appropriate. Numerical simulations demonstrate the utility of quaternions for averaging three-dimensional orientations. In addition the use of quaternions for the interpolation of three-dimensional orientations, and for determining three-dimensional orientation derivatives is reviewed. The unambiguous nature of defining rigid body orientation in three-dimensions using a quaternion, and its simple averaging and interpolation gives it great utility for the kinematic analysis of human movement.

Dispersion of knee helical axes during walking in young and elderly healthy subjects

Knee joint rotation center displacement can be estimated in vivo through the analysis of helical axis (HAs) dispersion. HAs can be analyzed during walking, providing information on joint stability. The study aim was to describe knee HAs dispersion during walking in dominant and non-dominant legs of young and elderly healthy subjects. Twenty young (YG: age 23.3 ± 2.4 years) and twenty elderly (EG: age 69.3 ± 4.6 years) healthy subjects were asked to walk on a treadmill at a self-selected speed with reflective markers placed bilaterally on thighs and shanks to detect HAs dispersion and knee kinematics with an optoelectronic system. HAs dispersion was described during the following four phases of gait cycle: (1) flexion from 95% of the previous gait cycle to 10% of the subsequent gait cycle, (2) extension from 10% to 40%, (3) flexion from 40% to 75% and (4) extension from 75% to 95% of the gait cycle. Mean Distance (MD) and Mean Angle (MA) were used as HAs dispersion indexes during each gait phase. Participants showed greater MD and MA in sagittal and frontal planes during the first and second phases. EG revealed higher MD (p = 0.001) and MA (p < 0.001) during the first phase and higher MA (p = 0.001) during the fourth phase in both dominant and non-dominant legs on the sagittal plane. HAs dispersion could be related to the amount of forces acting on knee (first two phases) and knee degeneration (elderly). These results may be used as reference data in further studies on HAs dispersion in presence of knee pathologies or after knee surgery or rehabilitation.

Eccentric exercise and delayed onset muscle soreness reduce the variability of active cervical movements

People with acute neck pain commonly present with restricted neck movement. However, it is unknown whether the presence of acute pain affects the quality of neck movement, specifically neck movement variability. We examined the effects of acute neck muscle soreness induced via eccentric exercise in healthy volunteers, on the variability of neck movement by examining changes in parameters of the helical axis during active neck movements. An experimental, single-arm repeated measures study recruited 32 healthy participants, male and female, aged between 18 and 55 years. Repetitive active neck movements (flexion-extension, bilateral lateral flexion and bilateral rotation) were performed at different speeds, either at full range of motion (RoM) or restricted to 45° RoM at baseline, pre-exercise (T0), immediately following eccentric neck exercise (T1), 24 h (T2) and 48 h post-exercise (T3). The mean distance (MD) and mean angle (MA) parameters of the helical axis were extracted to quantify movement variability. MD, measured during movements performed at full RoM, reduced significantly at T2 compared to T0 (P = 0.001) regardless of direction or speed of movement. MA was significantly lower at T2 and T3 compared to T1 (P = 0.029 and P = 0.033, respectively). When RoM was restricted to 45°, significantly lower MD values were observed at T3 compared to T1 (P = 0.034), and significantly lower MA values were measured at T3 compared to T0, T1 and T2 (all P < 0.0001). This study uniquely demonstrates that neck movement variability is reduced immediately after, 24 h and 48 h after eccentric exercise, indicating that acute neck muscle soreness modifies the quality of neck movement.

Paths of the cervical instantaneous axis of rotation during active movements-patterns and reliability

The instantaneous helical axis (IHA) is a characteristic of neck movement that is very sensitive to changes in coordination and that has potential in the assessment of functional alterations. For its application in the clinical setting, normative patterns must be available, and its reliability must be established. The purpose of this work is to describe the continuous paths of the IHA during cyclic movements of flexion-extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), and axial rotation (AR) and to quantify their reliability. Fifteen healthy volunteers participated in the study; two repetitions were made on the same day (by different operators) and over an 8-day interval (by the same operator) to evaluate the inter-operator and inter-session reliability, respectively. The paths described by the IHA suggest a sequential movement of the vertebrae in the FE movement, with a large vertical displacement (mean, 10 cm). The IHA displacement in LB and AR movements are smaller. The paths described by the IHAs have a very high reliability for FE movement, although it is somewhat lower for LB and RA movements. The standard error of measurement (SEM) is less than 0.5 cm. These results show that the paths of the IHA are reliable enough to evaluate changes in the coordination of intervertebral movement. Graphical abstract A video photogrammetry system is used to record the cyclic movements of the neck, from which the continuous trajectories of the associated instantaneous helical axis (IHA) are calculated. We have analyzed the movements of flexion-extension (FE), lateral flexion (LB), and axial rotation (AR) for a sample of 15 healthy subjects. The measurements have been repeated with two different operators (in the same session) and in two separate sessions (same operator). IHA displacement patterns have been obtained in each movement, and the reliability of the measurement of such IHA trajectories has been estimated.

Variability of neck and trunk movement during single- and dual-task gait in people with chronic neck pain

BACKGROUND

Previous findings reported that people with chronic neck pain walk with reduced range trunk rotation, especially when walking in more challenging conditions. Quantification of the quality of neck and trunk movement during gait could provide further insight into biomechanical changes that occur in people with neck pain. This study uniquely compared the variability of trunk and neck rotation during single-task and dual-task gait in people with chronic neck pain and asymptomatic individuals.

METHODS

An observational case-control study was conducted on 20 asymptomatic individuals and 24 people with chronic neck pain of idiopathic or traumatic origin. Participants performed rectilinear walking whilst keeping the head in a neutral position (single-task) and whilst rotating the head at a natural speed (dual-task). Trunk and head rotation angles were averaged across gait cycles for the task trials. The data were normalised in time, and the average variability of angular distribution along the normalised cycle was extracted. The Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia was used to assess fear of movement.

FINDINGS

During single-task gait, there were no group differences for the variability of trunk (p = 0.862) or neck (p = 0.427) rotation. For dual-task gait, there was no difference between groups for the variability of neck rotation (p = 0.636), however, the participants with neck pain displayed reduced variability of trunk rotation (p = 0.021). The neck pain group also walked at a significantly slower speed during dual-task gait (p = 0.043) compared to asymptomatic individuals and the speed of their gait was associated with the extent of fear of movement.

INTERPRETATION

The strategy observed in participants with chronic neck pain likely reflects adaptive behaviour when faced with more challenging conditions for postural control.

Classifying neck pain status using scalar and functional biomechanical variables - development of a method using functional data boosting

BACKGROUND

Individuals with neck pain have different movement and muscular activation (collectively termed as biomechanical variables) patterns compared to healthy individuals. Incorporating biomechanical variables as covariates into prognostic models is challenging due to the high dimensionality of the data.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the classification performance of neck pain status of a statistical model which uses both scalar and functional biomechanical covariates?

METHODS

Motion capture with electromyography assessment on the sternocleidomastoid, splenius cervicis, erector spinae, was performed on 21 healthy and 26 individuals with neck pain during walking over three gait conditions (rectilinear, curvilinear clockwise (CW) and counterclockwise (CCW)). After removing highly collinear variables, 94 covariates across the three conditions were used to classify neck pain status using functional data boosting (FDboost).

RESULTS

Two functional covariates trunk lateral flexion angle during CCW gait, and trunk flexion angle during CW gait; and a scalar covariate, hip jerk index during CCW gait were selected. The model achieved an estimated AUC of 80.8 %. For hip jerk index, an increase in hip jerk index by one unit increased the log odds of being in the neck pain group by 0.37. A 1° increase in trunk lateral flexion angle throughout gait alone reduced the probability of being in the neck pain group from 0.5 to 0.15. A 1° increase in trunk flexion angle throughout gait alone increased the probability of being in the neck pain group from 0.5 to 0.9.

SIGNIFICANCE

Interpreting the physiological significance of the extracted covariates, with other biomechanical variables, suggests that individuals with neck pain performed curvilinear walking using a stiffer strategy, compared to controls; and this increased the risk of being in the neck pain group. FDboost can produce clinically interpretable models with complex high dimensional data and could be used in future prognostic modelling studies in neck pain research.

Are neuromuscular adaptations present in people with recurrent spinal pain during a period of remission? A protocol for a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The course of spinal pain (neck or low back pain) is often described as episodic and intermittent, with more than one-third of people continuing to experience episodic symptoms 1 year after first onset. Although ongoing neuromuscular adaptations could contribute to recurrent episodes of pain, no systematic review has synthesised evidence of ongoing neuromuscular changes in people with recurrent spinal pain during a period of symptom remission.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This protocol is developed and reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-P, the Update of the Cochrane Back and Neck Group guidelines and the Methodological Expectations of Cochrane Intervention Reviews. PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, ZETOC, Google Scholar, grey literature sources and key journals will be searched up to September 2019. Observational studies investigating neuromuscular changes in people with recurrent spinal pain during a period of remission will be included. Neuromuscular function will be considered under five outcome domains of muscle activity, spine kinematics, muscle properties, sensorimotor control and neuromuscular performance. Two independent reviewers will search, screen studies, extract data and assess risk of bias (Newcastle-Ottawa Scale). Data will be synthesised per outcome domain. Where clinical and methodological homogeneity across studies exists, a random-effects meta-analysis will be conducted. Otherwise, results will be synthesised narratively. The overall quality of evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Findings of this review may aid the identification of factors that could contribute to spinal pain recurrence and aid the development of interventions for secondary prevention aimed at the restoration of optimal neuromuscular function. The results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at conferences. No ethical approval was required.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42019141527.

Local and Widespread Pressure Pain Hyperalgesia Is Not Side Specific in Females with Unilateral Neck Pain that Can Be Reproduced during Passive Neck Rotation

Current evidence for widespread hyperalgesia in non-specific neck pain (NSNP) is unclear. It is currently recommended to group NSNP patients according to pain-provoking movements. The aim of this study was to investigate local and widespread pain sensitivity in females with unilateral NSNP that is reproducible during passive neck rotation compared with matched controls, and to compare the side specific effect of pain location on pressure pain sensitivity among females with unilateral NSNP. Thirty-six females with unilateral NSNP evoked during passive ipsilateral (n = 20) or contralateral (n = 16) rotation toward the painful side were compared with 20 controls. Participants reported their pain intensity at rest and during passive neck rotation and completed the Neck Disability Index. Pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) were assessed bilaterally over the anterior scalene; the sternocleidomastoid; the levator scapulae; lateral to the spinous process of C6; the median, ulnar, and radial nerves; and the tibialis anterior. The ANOVA revealed lower PPTs in females with unilateral NSNP compared with the controls (all at p < 0.001), but no differences were found between the sides, nor was there any Group × side interaction. Among females with NSNP, those with higher pain intensity during ipsilateral rotation toward the painful side showed lower PPTs over the anterior scalene, median nerve, ulnar nerve, and tibialis anterior (all, p < 0.05) than females with higher pain intensity during contralateral rotation toward the painful side. These findings demonstrated bilateral local and widespread pressure pain hyperalgesia in females with unilateral NSNP that was reproducible during passive neck rotation compared with controls. There was no side specific effect of pain location on PPTs among females with unilateral NSNP.