Inferior extended fixation utilizing porous titanium augments improves primary anti-rotational stability of the acetabular component

Medial wall reconstruction using metal disc augments in revision total hip arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Medial acetabular bone defects are frequently encountered in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA), but few studies have focused on their reconstruction. This study aimed to report the radiographic and clinical results after medial acetabular wall reconstruction using metal disc augments in revision THA.

METHODS

Forty consecutive revision THA cases using metal disc augments for medial acetabular wall reconstruction were identified. Post-operative cup orientation, the centre of rotation (COR), stability of acetabular components and peri-augments osseointegration were measured. The pre-operative and post-operative Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) were compared.

RESULTS

The mean post-operative inclination and anteversion were 41.88 ± 6.70° and 16.73 ± 5.35°, respectively. The median vertical and lateral distance between the reconstructed CORs and the anatomic CORs were -3.45 mm (interquartile range [IQR]: -11.30 mm, -0.02 mm) and 3.18 mm (IQR: -0.03 mm, 6.99 mm). Thirty-eight cases completed the minimum two year clinical follow-up, whereas 31 had a minimum two year radiographic follow-up. Acetabular components were radiographically stable with bone ingrowth in 30 cases (30/31, 96.8%) while one case was classified as radiographic failure. Osseointegration around disc augments was observed in 25 of 31 cases (80.6%). The median HHS improved from 33.50 (IQR: 27.50-40.25) pre-operatively to 90.00 (IQR: 86.50-96.25) (p < 0.001), whereas the median WOMAC significantly improved from 38.02 (IQR: 29.17-46.09) to 85.94 (IQR: 79.43-93.75) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In revision THA with severe medial acetabular bone defect, disc augments could provide favorable cup position and stability, peri-augments osseointegration, with satisfactory clinical scores.

Ischial screw fixation can prevent cup migration in 3D-printed custom acetabular components for complex hip reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

Custom acetabular components have become an established method of treating massive acetabular bone defects in hip arthroplasty. Complication rates, however, remain high and migration of the cup is still reported. Ischial screw fixation (IF) has been demonstrated to improve mechanical stability for non-custom, revision arthroplasty cup fixation. We hypothesize that ischial fixation through the flange of a custom acetabular component aids in anti-rotational stability and prevention of cup migration.

METHODS

Electronic patient records were used to identify a consecutive series of 49 custom implants in 46 patients from 2016 to 2022 in a unit specializing in complex joint reconstruction. IF was defined as a minimum of one screw inserted into the ischium passing through a hole in a flange on the custom cup. The mean follow-up time was 30 months. IF was used in 36 cups. There was no IF in 13 cups. No difference was found between groups in age (68.9 vs. 66.3, P = 0.48), BMI (32.3 vs. 28.2, P = 0.11) or number of consecutively implanted cups (3.2 vs. 3.6, P = 0.43). Aseptic loosening with massive bone loss was the primary indication for revision. There existed no difference in Paprosky grade between the groups (P = 0.1). 14.2% of hips underwent revision and 22.4% had at least one dislocation event.

RESULTS

No ischial fixation was associated with a higher risk of cup migration (6/13 vs. 2/36, X² = 11.5, P = 0.0007). Cup migration was associated with an increased risk for all cause revision (4/8 vs. 3/38, X² = 9.96, P = 0.0016, but not with dislocation (3/8 vs. 8/41, X² = 1.2, P = 0.26).

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that failure to achieve adequate ischial fixation, with screws passing through the flange of the custom component into the ischium, increases the risk of cup migration, which, in turn, is a risk factor for revision.

Extended Fixation for Paprosky Type III Acetabular Defects in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Minimum Follow-Up of 2 Years

OBJECTIVE

Revision of total hip arthroplasty for patients with severe acetabular bone defects is challenging. This study aims to report the minimum 2 years outcome of the iliac extended fixation technique in patients with Paprosky type III acetabular defects.

METHODS

Fifty-seven revision total hip arthroplasty patients were retrospectively reviewed who underwent reconstruction with the concept of iliac extended fixation from 2014 to 2017 in our hospital. We proposed a new concept of "iliac extended fixation" in revision total hip arthroplasty as fixation extending superiorly 2 cm beyond the original acetabular rim with porous metal augments, which was further classified into intracavitary and extracavitary fixation. Patients were assessed using the Harris Hip Score and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Score. Radiographs and patient-reported satisfaction were assessed.

RESULTS

At an average follow-up of 63 months (range 25-88 months), the postoperative Harris Hip Score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index scores were significantly improved at the last follow-up (p < 0.001). The center of rotation was significantly improved (p < 0.05). Fifty-three (93.0%) patients were satisfied with the outcome. The extracavitary iliac extended fixation group had higher rate of osteointegration in zone 1A (the superior lateral zone) than the intracavitary iliac extended fixation group (82.3% vs 55.0%, p = 0.015), and significantly more horizontal screws fixation (5.1 ± 24.7° vs 42.3 ± 36.8°, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Intracavitary and extracavitary iliac extended fixation with porous metal augments and cementless cups are effective in reconstructing severe superior acetabular bone defects. The difference in screw direction might reflect the different biomechanics of augment fixation.

RSA Measurements of Implant Instability in a Paprosky III Pelvic Defect with Discontinuity: A Case Report

CASE

We report a case of acetabular reconstruction for a large defect with pelvic discontinuity that underwent 4 revisions for dislocations over a 3-year period. This allowed assessment of implant stability both on imaging, using measurements on plain radiographs and radiostereometric analysis (RSA) against both ilium and ischium, and direct assessment during each surgery. Only implant stability measured with RSA correlated with intraoperative revision findings.

CONCLUSION

This case underlines the role of RSA in assessing early acetabular implant stability in pelvic discontinuity and the importance of assessing the stability of the implant against both ilium and ischium.

Extended Ischiopubic Fixation Using Porous Metal Augments in Cementless Acetabular Reconstruction during Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

Objectives

The aims of this study were to introduce the definition, indication, and surgical technique of extended ischiopubic fixation (EIF) and to investigate the early clinical, radiographic results and complications of hips revised with EIF.

Methods

Patients who underwent revision THA utilizing the technique of EIF which was defined as securing the porous metal augment >5 mm deep into the ischium and/or pubic ramus to gain adequate mechanical support and fresh host bone for bony ingrowth in a single institution from February 2015 to February 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 30 hips (28 patients) were eligible for the study and were enrolled. Four patients were lost to follow‐up postoperatively. The data of the remaining 24 patients (26 hips) were analyzed. The patients' clinical results were assessed using of the Harris Hip Score and any complications including postoperative periprosthetic joint infection, intraoperative fracture, postoperative periprosthetic fracture, dislocation, nerve palsy, hematoma or wound complication were documented. The radiographic results were assessed with the construct stability, the position of the center of rotation, and cup orientation.

Results

The median age of these 25 patients was 62.00 (interquartile: 54.25–68.25) years, with a median body mass index (BMI) of 22.60 kg/m² (interquartile: 21.49–25.12 kg/m²). A total of 12 (48%) patients were female. At a median duration of follow‐up of 49.16 months, 20 (80%) patients rated their satisfaction level as “very satisfied,” five (20%) were “satisfied.” The median HHS improved from 36.00 (interquartile range: 31.25–49.75) preoperatively to 81.00 (interquartile range: 74.75–88.25) at the most recent follow‐up (p < 0.001). No complications such as periprosthetic joint infection, intraoperative fracture, periprosthetic fracture, dislocation, nerve palsy, hematoma, or wound complication were identified. All constructs were considered to have obtained stable fixation. The median vertical and horizontal distance between the latest postoperative centers of rotation to the anatomic center of rotation improved from 13.62 and 8.68 mm preoperatively to 4.42 and 4.19 mm at final follow‐up (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Early follow‐up of patients reconstructed with porous metal augments using the EIF technique demonstrated satisfactory clinical results with no particular complications, stable fixation, and restoration of the center of rotation.

The Diagnosis and Treatment of Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: An International Consensus Symposium

Despite growing evidence supporting the evaluation, classification, and treatment of acetabular bone loss in revision hip replacement, advancements have not been systematically incorporated into a single document, and therefore, a comprehensive review of the treatment of severe acetabular bone loss is needed. The Stavros Niarchos Foundation Complex Joint Reconstruction Center at Hospital for Special Surgery held an Acetabular Bone Loss Symposium on June 21, 2019, to answer the following questions: What are the trends, emerging technologies, and areas of future research related to the evaluation and management of acetabular bone loss in revision hip replacement? What constitutes the optimal workup and management strategies for acetabular bone loss? The 36 international experts convened were divided into groups, each assigned to discuss 1 of 4 topics: (1) preoperative planning and postoperative assessment; (2) implant selection, management of osteolysis, and management of massive bone loss; (3) the treatment challenges of pelvic discontinuity, periprosthetic joint infection, instability, and poor bone biology; and (4) the principles of reconstruction and classification of acetabular bone loss. Each group came to consensus, when possible, based on an extensive literature review. This document provides an overview of these 4 areas, the consensus each group arrived at, and directions for future research.

Reconstruction of severe acetabular bone defects with porous metal augment in total hip arthroplasty: A finite element analysis study

This study aims to evaluate the reconstructive stability for Paprosky III acetabular defects after total hip arthroplasty using three different reconstruction strategies with trabecular metal (TM) augments. The acetabular bone defects examined were located in the ilium, the sciatic ramus and the pubic ramus. Different scenarios of acetabular reconstructions were simulated, including the non-reconstruction model (NRM), the complete reconstruction model (CRM), the two-point reconstruction model (TRM) and the superior edge reconstruction model (SRM). A primary hip replacement model (HRM) was also investigated to compare the initial stability with different reconstruction models. The gait cycle was incorporated in the model to investigate the dynamic variation within the contact mechanics parameters. By comparing the SRM and the TRM, the acetabular cup translation was more pronounced when the superior defect on the acetabulum remained unfixed. Comparison of the acetabular cup displacement and the interface micromotion of both HRM and CRM demonstrated that the prosthetic implant provided good support for the reconstructed acetabulum. With the use of a press-fit cup, the cup displacement was reduced remarkably, while its Von-Mises stress increased significantly. The results show that the CRM was the best reconstruction option. In terms of acetabular defects, future improvements should focus on the reconstructive stability in stress concentration areas, to ensure no significant stress-shielding or other factors contributing to loosening of the prosthesis.